Agriculture FY2004 Appropriations bill

Action history

1. 2003-07-14The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
2. 2003-07-14The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2673.
3. 2003-07-14The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
4. 2003-07-14Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2673 as unfinished business.
5. 2003-07-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kaptur amendment.
6. 2003-07-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kaptur amendment.
7. 2003-07-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kaptur amendment.
8. 2003-07-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Commitee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kaptur amendment.
9. 2003-07-14The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
10. 2003-07-14Considered as unfinished business.
11. 2003-07-14ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Bonilla asked unanimous consent that it be in order at any time for the Speaker, as though pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 18, to declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of H.R. 2673, and that no further amendments shall be in order except an amendment by Ms. Kaptur regarding biofuels; an amendment by Ms. Kaptur regarding APHIS; an amendment by Ms. Kaptur regarding credit cards; an amendment by Ms. Kaptur regarding the Agriculture Department website; and an amendment by Mr. Brown of Ohio regarding food safety. Agreed to without objection.
12. 2003-07-14Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2673 as unfinished business.
13. 2003-07-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Ackerman amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Ackerman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
14. 2003-07-14DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 30 minutes of debate on the Ackerman amendment, and all amendments thereto, equally divided and controlled.
15. 2003-07-14DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Bonilla amendment under the five-minute rule.
16. 2003-07-14DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Holt amendment under the five-minute rule.
17. 2003-07-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hefley amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hefley demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
18. 2003-07-14DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hefley amendment.
19. 2003-07-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Rehberg amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Rehberg demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
20. 2003-07-14DEBATE LIMITATION - By unanimous consent, all debate on the Rehberg amendment was limited to 50 minutes, equally divided and controlled.
21. 2003-07-14DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Rehberg amendment under the five-minute rule.
22. 2003-07-14debate - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Davis (AL) amendment under the five-minute rule.
23. 2003-07-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Blumenauer amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Blumenauer demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
24. 2003-07-14DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Blumenauer amendment under the five-minute rule.
25. 2003-07-14DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Ballance amendment under the five-minute rule.