Energy and Water Appropriations, FY 2004 bill

Action history

1. 2003-09-16See also S. 1424.
2. 2003-09-16Measure amended in Senate by unanimous consent after passage.
3. 2003-09-16Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Domenici; Cochran; McConnell; Bennett; Burns; Craig; Bond; Stevens; Reid; Byrd; Hollings; Murray; Dorgan; Feinstein; Inouye.
4. 2003-09-15Considered by Senate.
5. 2003-09-15Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 1424.
6. 2003-09-11Measure laid before Senate.
7. 2003-07-21Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 218.
8. 2003-07-18Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
9. 2003-07-18On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 377 - 26 (Roll no. 395).
10. 2003-07-18On motion to recommit Failed by recorded vote: 99 - 310 (Roll no. 394).
11. 2003-07-18The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered without objection.
12. 2003-07-18Mr. Hoyer moved to recommit to Appropriations.
13. 2003-07-18The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
14. 2003-07-18The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
15. 2003-07-18The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2754.
16. 2003-07-18UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of the amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
17. 2003-07-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Markey amendment under the five-minute rule.
18. 2003-07-18POINT OF ORDER RESERVED - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Inslee amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order against the amendment.
19. 2003-07-18POINT OF ORDER RESERVED - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Manzullo amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order against the amendment.
20. 2003-07-18POINT OF ORDER RESERVED - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kucinich amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order against the amendment.
21. 2003-07-18POSTPONED VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the Hefley amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hefley demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of the adoption of the amendment until a later time.
22. 2003-07-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hefley amendment under the five-minute rule.
23. 2003-07-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Wilson (NM) amendment under the five-minute rule.
24. 2003-07-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia amendment under the five-minute rule.
25. 2003-07-18Mr. Shimkus raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Shimkus stated that section 310 sought to change existing law and constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.