H.R. 2765 · 108th Congress
District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2004
- Stage
- Passed a chamber
- Sponsor
- Rodney Frelinghuysen
- Introduced
- 2003-07-17
- Latest action
- 2004-01-22 · See also H. R. 2673.
Action history
- 2004-01-22See also H. R. 2673.
- 2003-11-19Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- 2003-11-18Considered by Senate.
- 2003-11-18Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- 2003-11-18Senate insists on its amendment, asks for a conference, appoints conferees DeWine; Hutchison; Brownback; Stevens; Landrieu; Durbin; Inouye.
- 2003-11-11Returned to the Calendar. when the motion to proceed to H.R. 2861 was agreed to. Calendar No. 278.
- 2003-09-30Considered by Senate.
- 2003-09-29Considered by Senate.
- 2003-09-26Considered by Senate.
- 2003-09-25Considered by Senate.
- 2003-09-24Measure laid before Senate.
- 2003-09-10Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2003-09-10On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 206 (Roll no. 491).
- 2003-09-10ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT - The House proceeded with a roll call vote on the question of adoption of the Tom Davis of Virginia amendment which had been previously adopted during consideration of the bill in the Committee of the Whole.
- 2003-09-10The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 2003-09-10The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2765.
- 2003-09-10The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
- 2003-09-10Considered as unfinished business.
- 2003-09-10Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 278.
- 2003-09-05Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2765 as unfinished business.
- 2003-09-05DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Manzullo amendment under the five-minute rule.
- 2003-09-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hefley amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hefley demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2003-09-05DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hefley amendment under the five-minute rule.
- 2003-09-05POSTPONED PROCEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Tom Davis (VA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Norton demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2003-09-05DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tom Davis (VA) amendment under the five-minute rule.