Foreign Operations Appropriations, FY 2004 bill

Action history

1. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole continued with debate on the Weiner amendment under the five-minute rule.
2. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Weiner amendment under the five-minute rule.
3. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Otter amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
4. 2003-07-24POSTPONED ROLL CALL VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the Hefley amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hefley demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
5. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hefley amendment udner the five-minute rule.
6. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sanders amendment under the five-minute rule.
7. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kolbe amendment under the five-minute rule.
8. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
9. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Ryun (KS) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
10. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
11. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment under the five-minute rule.
12. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Biggert amendment under the five-minute rule.
13. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Nadler amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
14. 2003-07-24Mr. Putnam raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Putnam stated that section 575 sought to change existing law and as such, constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
15. 2003-07-24Mr. Putnam raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Putnam stated that section 572 sought to change existing law and as such, constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
16. 2003-07-24Mr. Putnam raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Putnam stated that section 568 (a) (3) constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
17. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Weiner amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
18. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hefley amendment under the five-minute rule.
19. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Schiff amendment under the five-minute rule.
20. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kaptur amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
21. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kolbe amendment under the five-minute rule.
22. 2003-07-24POSTPONED ROLL CALL VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the McGovern amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
23. 2003-07-24DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the McGovern amendment under the five-minute rule.
24. 2003-07-24POSTPONED ROLL CALL VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the Kilpatrick amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
25. 2003-07-24The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.