Appropriations bill FY2005, Homeland Security

Action history

1. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Velazquez amendment under the five-minute rule.
2. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sherman amendment under the five-minute rule.
3. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the King (IA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
4. 2004-06-18POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Markey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Shays demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
5. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Markey amendment under the five minute rule
6. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Obey amendment under the five minute rule.
7. 2004-06-18POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Sabo amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Sabo demanded a recorded vote and made a point of no quorum. Pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
8. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sabo amendment under the five minute rule.
9. 2004-06-18POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS At the conclusion of debate on the Maloney amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Maloney demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
10. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Maloney amendment under the five minute rule.
11. 2004-06-18POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Tancredo amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Tancredo demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
12. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tancredo amendment under the five minute rule.
13. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Ryun (KS) amendment under the five minute rule.
14. 2004-06-18POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Roybal- Allard amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Roybal-Allard demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in thelegislative day.
15. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Roybal-Allard amendment under the five minute rule.
16. 2004-06-18POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Delauro amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Delauro demanded a recorded vote and made a point of no quorum. Pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
17. 2004-06-18TIME LIMITATION - Mr. Latham asked unanimous consent that debate on the DeLauro amendment and any amendment thereto be limited to forty minutes equally divided and controlled. Agreed to without objection.
18. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the DeLauro amendment under the five-minute rule.
19. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Millender-McDonald amendment under the five-minute rule.
20. 2004-06-18Mr. Davis, Tom raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Sec. 526b which seeks to change exisiting law and constitutes legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
21. 2004-06-18Mr. Davis, Tom raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Sec. 512 subsection b and c, sec. 514, and sec. 525 on the grounds that it seeks to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
22. 2004-06-18Mr. Mica raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Sec. 524 page 47, line 6 beginning with "and the" through line 13. Seeks to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
23. 2004-06-18POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson-Lee demanded a recorded vote. Pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
24. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule.
25. 2004-06-18DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sabo amendment under the five-minute rule.