Appropriations bill FY2005, Interior

Action history

1. 2004-06-21Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
2. 2004-06-17Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 334 - 86 (Roll no. 264).
3. 2004-06-17Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
4. 2004-06-17On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 334 - 86 (Roll no. 264).
5. 2004-06-17The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
6. 2004-06-17The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
7. 2004-06-17The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4568.
8. 2004-06-17UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
9. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule.
10. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceededw with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule.
11. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Weiner amendment under the five-minute rule.
12. 2004-06-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Holt amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Holt demanded a recorded vote. Pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
13. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Holt amendment under the five-minute rule.
14. 2004-06-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Sanders amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Sanders demanded a recorded vote. Pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
15. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Sanders amendment under the five-minute rule.
16. 2004-06-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hinchey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hinchey demanded a recorded vote and made a point of no quorum. Pursuant to the rule, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
17. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hinchey amendment under the five-minute rule.
18. 2004-06-17The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
19. 2004-06-17Considered as unfinished business.
20. 2004-06-17Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4568 as unfinished business.
21. 2004-06-17UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
22. 2004-06-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 674, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
23. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Flake amendment under the five-minute rule.
24. 2004-06-17DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hensarling amendment under the five-minute rule.
25. 2004-06-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Udall (NM) amendment the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Udall (NM) demanded a recorded vote and made a point of no quorum. Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 674, the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment and the point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.