Appropriations bill FY2005, Transportation, Treasury, and Independent Agencies

Action history

1. 2004-09-15POSTPONED VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the Oxley amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Oxley demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.
2. 2004-09-14DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Oxley amendment and any amendment thereto.
3. 2004-09-14Mr. Hefley raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Hefley stated that language on page 56 line 6, through line 20, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
4. 2004-09-14Mr. Petri raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Petri stated that Section 177 constitutes legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
5. 2004-09-14Mr. Petri raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Petri stated that Section 174 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
6. 2004-09-14DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Istook amendment under the five-minute rule.
7. 2004-09-14Mr. Hefley raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Hefley stated language on page 47 line 20, through page 48 line 3, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
8. 2004-09-14Mr. Hefley raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Hefley stated that language beginning on page 44 line 15, through page 47 line 19, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
9. 2004-09-14Mr. Petri raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Petri stated that language on page 43 line 17 through page 44 line 14 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
10. 2004-09-14Mr. Hefley raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Hefley stated that language on page 43 line 1, through line 16 constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
11. 2004-09-14Mr. Hefley raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Hefley stated that language on page 42 line 22, through line 26 constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
12. 2004-09-14Mr. Hefley raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Hefley stated that language beginning on page 42 line 16, through line 21 constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
13. 2004-09-14Mr. Hefley raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Hefley stated that language beginning on page 40 line 13, through page 42 line 15, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
14. 2004-09-14Mr. Petri raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Petri stated that Section 162 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
15. 2004-09-14Mr. Blumenauer raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Blumenauer stated that Section 161 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
16. 2004-09-14Mr. Tancredo raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Tancredo stated that language on page 33 line 20, through page 37 line 20, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
17. 2004-09-14Mr. Tancredo raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Tancredo stated that language on page 33 line 6, through line 10 constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
18. 2004-09-14Mr. Blumenauer raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Blumenauer stated that language on page 32 line 11, through page 33 line 5 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The point of order was extended to the entire paragraph. The Chair sustained the point of order.
19. 2004-09-14Mr. Tancredo raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Tancredo stated that language on page 32 line 7, through line 10 constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
20. 2004-09-14Mr. Tancredo raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Tancredo stated that language on page 32 line 2, through line 6, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
21. 2004-09-14Mr. Petri raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Petri stated that language beginning on page 31 line 6, through line 19, constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. Mr. Istook insisted the point of order be extended to include the entire paragraph. The Chair sustained the point of order.
22. 2004-09-14Mr. Young (FL) raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Young of Florida stated that language on page 29 line 15, through page 30 line 20, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
23. 2004-09-14Mr. Young (FL) raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Young of Florida stated that language on page 29 line 1, through page 29 line 14, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
24. 2004-09-14Mr. Young (FL) raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Young of Florida stated that language on page 28 line 11, through page 28 line 22, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.
25. 2004-09-14Mr. Young (FL) raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Young of Florida stated language on page 27 line 19, through page 28 line 10, constituted appropriations without authorization. The Chair sustained the point of order.