S.Con.Res. 95 · 108th Congress

Budget resolution FY2005

Stage
Passed Congress
Introduced
2004-03-05
Latest action
2004-05-20 · Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 213 (Roll no. 198).

Action history

  1. 2004-05-20Conference report agreed to in House: On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 213 (Roll no. 198).
  2. 2004-05-20Motions to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  3. 2004-05-20On agreeing to the conference report Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 213 (Roll no. 198).
  4. 2004-05-20The previous question was ordered without objection.
  5. 2004-05-20Conference papers: Senate report and manager's statement and message on House action held at the desk in Senate.
  6. 2004-05-19DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the conference report to accompany S. Con. Res. 95.
  7. 2004-05-19Mr. Nussle brought up conference report H. Rept. 108-498 for consideration under the provisions of H. Res. 649.
  8. 2004-05-19Rule H. Res. 649 passed House.
  9. 2004-05-19Conferees agreed to file conference report.
  10. 2004-05-19Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 649 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to S. Con. Res. 95 with 1 hour of general debate. Upon adoption in the House of the conference report to accompany Senate Concurrrent Resolution 95, and until a concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2005 has been adopted by the Congress the provisions of the conference report and its joint explanatory statement shall have force and effect in the House and for purposes for title III of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the conference report shall be considered adopted by the Congress. Nothing in this section may be construed to engage rule XXVII.
  11. 2004-05-19Conference report H. Rept. 108-498 filed.
  12. 2004-05-19POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Stenholm motion to instruct conferees, the Chair put the question on adoption of the motion and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Nussle objected to the voice vote based upon the absence of a quorum and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the motion until a later time. The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.
  13. 2004-05-18DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Stenholm motion to instruct conferees on S. Con. Res. 95. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the managers on the part of the House to, within the scope of the conference, reject provisions that provide for an increase in the statutory debt limit.
  14. 2004-05-18Mr. Stenholm moved that the House instruct conferees.
  15. 2004-05-18NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER MOTION TO INSTRUCT - Mr. Price of North Carolina notified the House of his intent to offer a motion to instruct conferees on S. Con. Res. 95.
  16. 2004-05-17NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER MOTION TO INSTRUCT - Mr. Stenholm notified the House of his intent to offer a motion to instruct conferees on S. Con. Res. 95.
  17. 2004-05-13Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  18. 2004-05-13On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 207 - 211 (Roll no. 171).
  19. 2004-05-12DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Pomeroy motion to instruct conferees on S. Con. Res. 95.
  20. 2004-05-12Mr. Pomeroy moved that the House instruct conferees.
  21. 2004-05-11NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER MOTION TO INSTRUCT - Mr. Pomeroy notified the House of his intention to offer a motion to instruct conferees on S. Con. Res. 95.
  22. 2004-05-05Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  23. 2004-05-05On motion that the House instruct conferees Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 208 - 215 (Roll no. 145).
  24. 2004-05-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Moore motion to instruct conferees, the Chair put the question on adoption of the motion and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Moore demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed the ordered vote until later in the legislative day.
  25. 2004-05-05The previous question was ordered without objection.