H.J.Res. 10 · 109th Congress
Flag Desecration resolution
- Stage
- Passed a chamber
- Sponsor
- Duke Cunningham
- Introduced
- 2005-01-25
- Latest action
- 2005-06-22 · Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Action history
- 2005-06-22Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2005-06-22On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 286 - 130 (Roll no. 296).
- 2005-06-22On motion table the appeal of the ruling of the Chair Agreed to by recorded vote: 222 - 190 (Roll no. 295).
- 2005-06-22Mr. Sensenbrenner moved table the appeal of the ruling of the Chair.
- 2005-06-22Mr. Taylor (MS) appealed the ruling of the chair. The question was then put on sustaining the ruling of the chair.
- 2005-06-22Point of order sustained against the motion to recommit with instructions.
- 2005-06-22Mr. Sensenbrenner raised a point of order against the motion to recommit with instructions. Mr. Sensenbrenner stated that the instructions contained in the motion to recommit seek to add an amendment which is not germane. Sustained by the Chair.
- 2005-06-22Mr. Taylor (MS) moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
- 2005-06-22On motion to table appeal of the ruling of the Chair Agreed to by recorded vote: 222 - 194 (Roll no. 294).
- 2005-06-22Mr. Sensenbrenner moved to table appeal of the ruling of the Chair.
- 2005-06-22By voice vote, the Chair announced that the noes had prevailed on the motion to appeal the ruling of the chair.
- 2005-06-22Mr. Taylor (MS) appealed the ruling of the chair. The question was then put on sustaining the ruling of the chair.
- 2005-06-22Point of order sustained against the motion to recommit with instructions.
- 2005-06-22Mr. Sensenbrenner raised a point of order against the motion to recommit with instructions. Mr. Sensenbrenner stated that the instructions contained in the motion to recommit with instructions were not germane to the joint resolution. Sustained by the Chair.
- 2005-06-22Mr. Taylor (MS) moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
- 2005-06-22DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 330, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on the Watt amendment in the nature of a substitute.
- 2005-06-22DEBATE - The House proceeded with two hours of debate on H.J. Res. 10.
- 2005-06-22Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 10 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. During consideration of H.J. Res. 10 pursuant to H. Res. 330, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.
- 2005-06-22Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 330.
- 2005-06-21Rule H. Res. 330 passed House.
- 2005-06-20Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 330 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 10 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order. During consideration of H.J. Res. 10 pursuant to H. Res. 330, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.
- 2005-06-14Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 109-131.
- 2005-06-14Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 76.
- 2005-05-25Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
- 2005-05-25Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 17 - 9.