Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006

Action history

1. 2006-03-16DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Doggett amendment under the five-minute rule.
2. 2006-03-16DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kirk amendment under the five-minute rule.
3. 2006-03-16DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Salazar amendment under the five-minute rule pending reservation of a point of order.
4. 2006-03-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Capuano demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.
5. 2006-03-16DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Capuano amendment under the five-minute rule.
6. 2006-03-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Lowey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.
7. 2006-03-16DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Burton amendment under the five-minute rule.
8. 2006-03-16DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Garrett (NJ) amendment under the five-minute rule pending reservation of a point of order.
9. 2006-03-16DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 725, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Shays amendment under the five-minute rule.
10. 2006-03-15DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Engel amendment under the five-minute rule pending reservation of a point of order.
11. 2006-03-15DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Souder amendment under the five-minute rule.
12. 2006-03-15DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Millender-McDonald amendment under the five-minute rule.
13. 2006-03-15The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
14. 2006-03-15Considered as unfinished business.
15. 2006-03-15Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4939 as unfinished business.
16. 2006-03-15On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
17. 2006-03-15Mr. Lewis (CA) moved that the Committee rise.
18. 2006-03-15UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of the Gilchrest amendment which was debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
19. 2006-03-15DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Sabo amendment.
20. 2006-03-15POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Lewis (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.
21. 2006-03-15DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Gilchrest amendment.
22. 2006-03-15GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole resumed general debate on H.R. 4939.
23. 2006-03-15The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
24. 2006-03-15Considered as unfinished business.
25. 2006-03-15ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Lewis (CA) asked unanimous consent that, during further consideration of H.R. 4939 in the Committee of the Whole pursuant to House Resolution 725, an amendment by Mr. Gilchrest regarding section 3011 and an amendment by Mr. Sabo regarding the Defense Production Act may be offered at any point in the reading, shall be considered as read, shall not be subject to amendment except that the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations each may offer one pro forma amendment for the purpose of debate and shall not be subject to a demand for the division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. Each amendment shall be debatable for 20 minutes, equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent.