Appropriations bill FY2007, Military Construction

Action history

1. 2006-12-06Senate insists on its amendments, asks for a conference, appoints conferees Hutchison; Burns; Craig; DeWine; Brownback; Allard; McConnell; Cochran; Stevens; Feinstein; Inouye; Johnson; Landrieu; Byrd; Murray; Leahy; Harkin.
2. 2006-12-06Message on Senate action sent to the House.
3. 2006-11-14Considered by Senate.
4. 2006-11-14Passed Senate with an amendment and an amendment to the Title by Voice Vote.
5. 2006-11-13The committee substitute agreed to by Unanimous Consent.
6. 2006-11-13Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
7. 2006-07-20Committee on Appropriations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
8. 2006-07-20Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Hutchison with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 109-286.
9. 2006-07-20Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 525.
10. 2006-07-18Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans' Affairs and Related Agencies. Approved for full committee consideration with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
11. 2006-05-22Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
12. 2006-05-19The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 5385.
13. 2006-05-19Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
14. 2006-05-19On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 395 - 0 (Roll no. 176).
15. 2006-05-19The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
16. 2006-05-19The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 5385.
17. 2006-05-19UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of an amendment which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
18. 2006-05-19DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment under the five-minute rule.
19. 2006-05-19DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tiahrt amendment under the five-minute rule.
20. 2006-05-19Mr. Hensarling raised a point of order against the content of the measure. The proviso beginning on page 60, line 15 and ending on page 60, line 20 violates the Budget Act. Subsequently, Mr. Walsh insisted that the point of order lie against the entire paragraph which provides additional funds for Military Construction, Army Reserve. The Chair sustained the point of order.
21. 2006-05-19Mr. Hensarling raised a point of order against the content of the measure. The proviso beginning on page 60, line 6 and ending on page 60, line 11 violates the Budget Act. Subsequently, Mr. Walsh insisted that the point of order lie against the entire paragraph which provides additional funding for Military Construction, National Guard. The Chair sustained the point of order.
22. 2006-05-19Mr. Hensarling raised a point of order against the content of the measure. The proviso beginning on page 59, line 22 and ending on page 60, line 2, violates the Budget Act. Subsequently, Mr. Walsh insisted that the point of order lie against the entire paragraph which provides additional funds for Military Construction, Defense-Wide. The Chair sustained the point of order.
23. 2006-05-19Mr. Hensarling raised a point of order against the content of the measure. The proviso beginning on page 59, line 13, and ending on page 59, line 18 violates the Budget Act. Subsequently, Mr. Walsh insisted that the point of order lie against the entire paragraph which provides additional funds for Military Construction, Air Force. The Chair sustained the point of order.
24. 2006-05-19Mr. Hensarling raised a point of order against the content of the measure. The proviso beginning on page 59, line 4 and ending on page 59, line 9 violates the Budget Act. Subsequently, Mr. Walsh insisted that the point of order lie against the entire paragraph which provides additional funds for Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps. The Chair sustained the point of order.
25. 2006-05-19Mr. Hensarling raised a point of order against the content of the measure. The proviso beginning on page 58, line 20, and ending on page 58 line 25 violates the Budget Act. Subsequently, Mr. Walsh insisted that the point of order lie against the entire paragraph which provides additional funds for Military Construction, Army. The Chair sustained the point of order.