H.R. 5441 · 109th Congress

Appropriations bill FY2007, Homeland Security

Stage
Signed by the president
Sponsor
Hal Rogers
Introduced
2006-05-22
Latest action
2006-10-04 · Signed by President.

Action history

  1. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the King (IA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
  2. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Poe amendment under the five-minute rule.
  3. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Marshall amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Marshall demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  4. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Marshall amendment under the five-minute rule.
  5. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Marshall amendment under the five-minute rule.
  6. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the DeFazio amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. DeFazio demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  7. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the DeFazio amendment under the five-minute rule.
  8. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Markey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Markey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  9. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Markey amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order. The reservation of a point of order was later withdrawn.
  10. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Pascrell amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Pascrell demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  11. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Pascrell amendment under the five-minute rule.
  12. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the DeFazio amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
  13. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Lynch amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Lynch demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  14. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Lynch amendment under the five-minute rule.
  15. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Markey amendment under the five-minute rule.
  16. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Stupak amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Stupak demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  17. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Stupak amendment under the five-minute rule.
  18. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Langevin amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Langevin demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  19. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Langevin amendment under the five-minute rule.
  20. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Jackson-Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  21. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson-Lee (TX) amendment under the five-minute rule.
  22. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the King (IA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
  23. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Brown (OH) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Brown (OH) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  24. 2006-05-25DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Brown (OH) under the five-minute rule.
  25. 2006-05-25POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kucinich amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kucinich demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.