H.R. 5522 · 109th Congress

Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2007

Stage
Passed a chamber
Sponsor
Jim Kolbe
Introduced
2006-06-05
Latest action
2006-07-10 · Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator McConnell with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 109-277.

Action history

  1. 2006-07-10Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator McConnell with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 109-277.
  2. 2006-07-10Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 512.
  3. 2006-06-29Committee on Appropriations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
  4. 2006-06-28Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. Approved for full committee consideration with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
  5. 2006-06-12Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
  6. 2006-06-09The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 5522.
  7. 2006-06-09Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  8. 2006-06-09On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 373 - 34 (Roll no. 250).
  9. 2006-06-09The House adopted the remaining amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
  10. 2006-06-09The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  11. 2006-06-09The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 5522.
  12. 2006-06-09On motion to rise and report Agreed to by voice vote.
  13. 2006-06-09Mr. Kolbe moved for the Committee of the Whole to rise and report.
  14. 2006-06-09UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of specified amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
  15. 2006-06-09POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hefley amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hefley demanded a recorded vote and the Chair post poned further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  16. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hefley amendment.
  17. 2006-06-09POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Sanders amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Sanders demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  18. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committe of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Sanders amendment.
  19. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committe of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Poe amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
  20. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committe of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Poe amendment.
  21. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
  22. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Brown (OH) amendment.
  23. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Musgrave amendment pending reservation of a point order.
  24. 2006-06-09POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kucinich amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kucinich demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  25. 2006-06-09DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committe of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kucinich amendment.