Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, the District of Columbia, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2007

Action history

1. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Davis (AL) amendment.
2. 2006-06-13POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and announced by voice vote that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
3. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nadler amendment.
4. 2006-06-13Mr. Thomas raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Thomas raised a point of order against section 206 stating that it was in violation of clause 2 of rule 21 and constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
5. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Millender-McDonald amendment.
6. 2006-06-13The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
7. 2006-06-13Considered as unfinished business.
8. 2006-06-13Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 5576 as unfinished business.
9. 2006-06-13POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Gary Miller of California amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Gary Miller of California demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
10. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 865, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Gary Miller of California amendment under the five-minute rule.
11. 2006-06-13Mr. Mica raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Mica stated that Section 127 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
12. 2006-06-13Mr. Mica raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Mica stated that Section 120 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
13. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 865, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Waters amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
14. 2006-06-13Mr. Mica raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Mica stated that language beginning on p. 13, line 17, through p. 13, line 25 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
15. 2006-06-13Mr. Mica raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Mica stated that language beginning on p. 13, line 1, through p. 13, line 6, constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
16. 2006-06-13Mr. Mica raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Mica raised a point of order against section 101. Mr. Mica stated that this section constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
17. 2006-06-13Mr. Mica raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Mica stated that the language beginning on p. 5, line 23, and ending on line 24 constituted legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.
18. 2006-06-13POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Israel amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Israel demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
19. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 865, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Israel amendment under the five-minute rule.
20. 2006-06-13POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Bean amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Bean demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
21. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 865, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Bean amendment under the five-minute rule.
22. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 865, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kucinich amendment under the five-minute rule.
23. 2006-06-13POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the LaTourette amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Knollenberg demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
24. 2006-06-13DEBATE - By unanimous consent, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the LaTourette amendment.
25. 2006-06-13DEBATE - Pursuant to H. Res. 865, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Knollenberg amendment under the five-minute rule.