Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, the District of Columbia, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2007

Action history

1. 2006-07-26Committee on Appropriations. Reported by Senator Bond with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. With written report No. 109-293.
2. 2006-07-26Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 535.
3. 2006-07-20Committee on Appropriations. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
4. 2006-07-18Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation, Treasury, the Judiciary, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies. Approved for full committee consideration without amendment favorably.
5. 2006-06-15Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
6. 2006-06-14The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 5576.
7. 2006-06-14Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
8. 2006-06-14On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 406 - 22 (Roll no. 286).
9. 2006-06-14The House adopted the remaining amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
10. 2006-06-14The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 5576.
11. 2006-06-14Mr. Knollenberg moved for the Committee of the Whole to rise and report.
12. 2006-06-14UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of specified amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
13. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Bishop (NY) amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
14. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garrett amendment.
15. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson-Lee amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
16. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded witn 10 minutes of debate on the Garrett amendment.
17. 2006-06-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
18. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lee amendment.
19. 2006-06-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Rangel amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Rangel demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
20. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rangel amendment.
21. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moran (KS) amendment.
22. 2006-06-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Oberstar amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Oberstar demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
23. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Comittee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Oberstar amendment.
24. 2006-06-14POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Frank (MA) amendment the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
25. 2006-06-14DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Frank (MA) amendment.