H.R. 5672 · 109th Congress

Appropriations bill FY2007, Commerce, Justice, Science, State

Stage
Passed a chamber
Sponsor
Frank Wolf
Introduced
2006-06-22
Latest action
2006-07-17 · Star Print ordered on H.R. 5672.

Action history

  1. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lynch amendment.
  2. 2006-06-28POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garrett (NJ) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. George Miller (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  3. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garrett (NJ) amendment.
  4. 2006-06-28POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Reyes amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Thompson (CA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  5. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Reyes amendment.
  6. 2006-06-28The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
  7. 2006-06-28Considered as unfinished business.
  8. 2006-06-28Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 5672 as unfinished business.
  9. 2006-06-28On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
  10. 2006-06-28Mr. Wolf moved that the Committee rise.
  11. 2006-06-28UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of specified amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
  12. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Millender-McDonald amendment.
  13. 2006-06-28POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kennedy (MN) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kennedy (MN) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  14. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kennedy (MN) amendment.
  15. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committe of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Barrow amendment.
  16. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceedeed with 10 minutes of debate on the Kennedy (MN) amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
  17. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Mollohan amendment, pending reservation of a point of order.
  18. 2006-06-28POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Stearns amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Stearns demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  19. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Stearns amendment.
  20. 2006-06-28Mr. Mollohan raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Mr. Mollohan raised a point of order against page 15, line 8 through page 16, line 4 stating that it constituted legislation in an appropriations bill and was in violation of clause 2 of rule 21. The Chair sustained the point of order.
  21. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Johnson (CT) amendment.
  22. 2006-06-28POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  23. 2006-06-28DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nadler amendment.
  24. 2006-06-28POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Velazquez amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Velazquez demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  25. 2006-06-27DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order of the House, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the Velazquez amendment.