Henry J. Hyde United States and India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act of 2006

Action history

1. 2006-12-05On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection.
2. 2006-12-05Mr. Hyde asked unanimous consent that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.
3. 2006-12-04Senate appointed conferee(s) Lugar; Hagel; Allen; Frist; Biden; Dodd.
4. 2006-12-04Message on Senate action sent to the House.
5. 2006-11-16Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
6. 2006-11-16Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S. 3709 amended.
7. 2006-11-16See also S. 3709.
8. 2006-11-16Passed Senate with an amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 85 - 12. Record Vote Number: 270.
9. 2006-11-16Senate insisted on its amendment, requested a conference.
10. 2006-07-27Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
11. 2006-07-27On passage Passed by recorded vote: 359 - 68 (Roll no. 411).
12. 2006-07-27On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 192 - 235 (Roll no. 410).
13. 2006-07-27The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
14. 2006-07-27DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Markey motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment adding a new paragraph which states that the President must certify that India is fully and actively participating in U.S. efforts to dissuade, isolate, and, if necessary, sanction and contain Iran for its efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction, including a nuclear weapons capability (including the capability to enrich or process nuclear materials), and the means to deliver weapons of mass destruction.
15. 2006-07-27Mr. Markey moved to recommit with instructions to International Relations.
16. 2006-07-27The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
17. 2006-07-27The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
18. 2006-07-27The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 5682.
19. 2006-07-27Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 537.
20. 2006-07-26UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of specified amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
21. 2006-07-26DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 947, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fortenberry amendment.
22. 2006-07-26POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Berman amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Berman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
23. 2006-07-26DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 947, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Berman amendment.
24. 2006-07-26POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Sherman amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Sherman demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
25. 2006-07-26DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 947, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Sherman amendment.