H.R. 1106 · 111th Congress

Helping Families Save Their Homes Act of 2009

Stage
Passed a chamber
Sponsor
John Conyers
Introduced
2009-02-23
Latest action
2009-07-23 · Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.

Action history

  1. 2009-07-23Referred to the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.
  2. 2009-03-11Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
  3. 2009-03-09Received in the Senate.
  4. 2009-03-05Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  5. 2009-03-05On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 234 - 191 (Roll no. 104).
  6. 2009-03-05On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 182 - 242 (Roll no. 103).
  7. 2009-03-05The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
  8. 2009-03-05Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Price (GA) motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment adding a new title pertaining to limitations on use of funds for prevention and mitigation or mortgage forecloures.
  9. 2009-03-05Mr. Price (GA) moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary and Financial Services.
  10. 2009-03-05The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
  11. 2009-03-05The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  12. 2009-03-05The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1106.
  13. 2009-03-05The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
  14. 2009-03-05Considered as unfinished business.
  15. 2009-03-05Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1106 as unfinished business.
  16. 2009-03-05On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to without objection.
  17. 2009-03-05Ms. Lofgren, Zoe moved that the Committee rise.
  18. 2009-03-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 190, the Committee of Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Titus amendment.
  19. 2009-03-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Peters amendment the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Goodlatte demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  20. 2009-03-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 190, the Committee of the Whole proceed with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters amendment.
  21. 2009-03-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Price (GA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Price (GA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  22. 2009-03-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 190, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Price (GA) amendment.
  23. 2009-03-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Lofgren amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Goodlatte demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  24. 2009-03-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 190, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with thirty minutes of debate on the Lofgren amendment as modified. The modification would (1) allow a court to consider, in lieu of reducing mortgage principal, lowering the interest rate to reduce the debtor's mortgage payments according to the Administration's Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan as implemented on March 4, 2009; (2) give the mortgage holder a greater proportion of the appreciation in a home on a graduated basis if it is sold during the 5-year period that the case is pending; and (3) provide that when a debtor seeks to reduce a mortgage's principal, the court must determine whether such relief is in good faith based on whether debtor was offered a mortgage modification under the Administration's plan and the debtor was able to afford payments under such plan.
  25. 2009-03-05The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.