H.Res. 1413 · 111th Congress
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the holding in Miranda v. Arizona may be interpreted to provide for the admissibility of a terrorist suspect's responses in an interrogation without administration of the Miranda warnings, to the extent that the interrogation is carried out to acquire information concerning other threats to public safety.
- Stage
- In committee
- Sponsor
- Todd Tiahrt
- Introduced
- 2010-05-27
- Latest action
- 2010-07-26 · Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Subjects
Crime and law enforcement
Criminal investigation, prosecution, interrogation
Criminal procedure and sentencing
Terrorism
Evidence and witnesses