H.Res. 665 · 111th Congress

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2920) to reinstitute and update the Pay-As-You-Go requirement of budget neutrality on new tax and mandatory spending legislation, enforced by the threat of annual, automatic sequestration.

Stage
Passed chamber resolution
Sponsor
Michael Arcuri
Introduced
2009-07-21
Latest action
2009-07-22 · Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Action history

  1. 2009-07-22Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  2. 2009-07-22On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 243 - 182 (Roll no. 606).
  3. 2009-07-22Considered as unfinished business.
  4. 2009-07-22POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 665, the Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Dreier demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the resolution until a time to be announced.
  5. 2009-07-22The previous question was ordered without objection.
  6. 2009-07-22DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 665.
  7. 2009-07-22Considered as privileged matter.
  8. 2009-07-22All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The resolution provides that the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the report, as modified by the amendment printed in part B of this report shall be considered as adopted and the bill, as amended shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of order against the bill, as amended. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part C of the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Rep. Ryan (WI) or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent For purposes of the concurrent resolution on the budget, the amounts specified in section 421(a)(2)(A) and section 421(a)(2)(C) shall be considered to be those reflected in section 314 and section 316, respectively, of the House companion measure.
  9. 2009-07-21Introduced in House
  10. 2009-07-21The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 111-217, by Mr. Arcuri.
  11. 2009-07-21Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 93.