San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act

Action history

1. 2012-03-05Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 332.
2. 2012-03-02Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
3. 2012-03-01Received in the Senate.
4. 2012-02-29Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 246 - 175, 1 Present (Roll no. 91).
5. 2012-02-29Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
6. 2012-02-29On passage Passed by recorded vote: 246 - 175, 1 Present (Roll no. 91).
7. 2012-02-29On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 178 - 248 (Roll no. 90).
8. 2012-02-29The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
9. 2012-02-29Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi motion to recommit. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add a section titled Protecting the Constitution and States' Rights.
10. 2012-02-29Mr. Garamendi moved to recommit with instructions to Natural Resources.
11. 2012-02-29The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
12. 2012-02-29The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
13. 2012-02-29The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1837.
14. 2012-02-29UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
15. 2012-02-29The Chair announced that it understood that amendment No. 9 offered by Mr. Garamendi, made in order by the provisions of H.Res. 566, would not be offered.
16. 2012-02-29POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Markey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Markey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
17. 2012-02-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Markey amendment No. 8.
18. 2012-02-29POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garamendi amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Garamendi demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
19. 2012-02-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi amendment No. 7.
20. 2012-02-29POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Napolitano amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Napolitano demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
21. 2012-02-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Napolitano amendment No. 6.
22. 2012-02-29POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garamendi amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Garamendi demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
23. 2012-02-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi amendment No. 5.
24. 2012-02-29POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McNerney amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McNerney demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
25. 2012-02-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 566, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McNerney amendment No. 4.