H.R. 2112 · 112th Congress

Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012

Stage
Signed by the president
Introduced
2011-06-03
Latest action
2011-11-18 · Signed by President.

Action history

  1. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Holden amendment no. 38 under the five-minute rule.
  2. 2011-06-16The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
  3. 2011-06-16Considered as unfinished business.
  4. 2011-06-16Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2112 as unfinished business.
  5. 2011-06-16On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
  6. 2011-06-16Mr. Kingston moved that the Committee rise.
  7. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hirono amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Hirono demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  8. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Hirono amendment under the five-minute rule.
  9. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  10. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson Lee amendment under the five-minute rule.
  11. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Scalise amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Farr demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  12. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Scalise amendment under the five-minute rule.
  13. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  14. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provsions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson Lee amendment under the five-minute rule.
  15. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garrett amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Farr demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  16. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Garrett (NJ) amendment under the five-minute rule.
  17. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Clarke (MI) amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
  18. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the King (IA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Farr demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  19. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the King (IA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
  20. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Engel amendment under the five-minute rule.
  21. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the King (IA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Farr demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  22. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the King (IA) amendment under the five-minute rule.
  23. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Blumenauer amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Blumenauer demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  24. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Blumenauer amendment under the five-minute rule.
  25. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Gibson amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Kingston demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.