Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012

Action history

1. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Gibson amendment under the five-minute rule.
2. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
3. 2011-06-16DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Jackson Lee amendment under the five-minute rule.
4. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Chaffetz amendment no. 14 under the five-minute rule.
5. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Chaffetz amendment no. 13 under the five-minute rule.
6. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Dingell amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Dingell demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
7. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Dingell amendment under the five-minute rule.
8. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kind amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Kind demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
9. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kind amendment no. 25 under the five-minute rule.
10. 2011-06-16The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Royce amendment no. 24 under the five-minute rule.
11. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Woolsey amendment no. 20 under the five-minute rule.
12. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Foxx amendment no. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Farr demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
13. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Foxx amendment no. 1 under the five-minute rule.
14. 2011-06-16POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Pingree amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Pingree demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
15. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Pingree amendment under the five-minute rule.
16. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Young (AK) amendment under the five-minute rule.
17. 2011-06-16DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Kingston amendment under the five-minute rule.
18. 2011-06-16Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 300, the Committee of the Whole resumed debate on pro forma amendments to H.R. 2112.
19. 2011-06-16The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
20. 2011-06-16Considered as unfinished business.
21. 2011-06-16Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
22. 2011-06-15Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2112 as unfinished business.
23. 2011-06-15On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
24. 2011-06-15Mr. Kingston moved that the Committee rise.
25. 2011-06-15Mr. Lucas raised a point of order against the content of the measure. Section 744 violates Clause 2 of rule XXI and constitutes legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.