H.R. 2354 · 112th Congress

Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012

Stage
Passed a chamber
Sponsor
Rodney Frelinghuysen
Introduced
2011-06-24
Latest action
2012-01-31 · Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 157.

Action history

  1. 2011-07-12UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
  2. 2011-07-12The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
  3. 2011-07-12Considered as unfinished business.
  4. 2011-07-12Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 2354 as unfinished business.
  5. 2011-07-12On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
  6. 2011-07-12Mr. Frelinghuysen moved that the Committee rise.
  7. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garamendi amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Garamendi demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  8. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Garamendi amendment under the five-minute rule.
  9. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Garamendi amendment under the five-minute rule, pending reservation of a point of order.
  10. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Schiff amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Schiff demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  11. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Schiff amendment under the five-minute rule.
  12. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McClintock amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McClintock demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  13. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the McClintock amendment under the five-minute rule.
  14. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Woodall amendment under the five-minute rule.
  15. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Wu amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Wu demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  16. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 357, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Wu amendment under the five-minute rule.
  17. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garrett amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Garrett demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  18. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Garrett amendment under the five-minute rule.
  19. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Tonko amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Tonko demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  20. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Tonko amendment under the five-minute rule.
  21. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Pompeo amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Visclosky demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  22. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on Pompeo the amendment under the five-minute rule.
  23. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Welch amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Welch demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  24. 2011-07-12DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 337, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Welch amendment under the five-minute rule.
  25. 2011-07-12POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Broun (GA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Frelinghuysen demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.