H.R. 3582 · 112th Congress

Pro-Growth Budgeting Act of 2011

Stage
Passed a chamber
Sponsor
Tom Price
Introduced
2011-12-07
Latest action
2012-02-06 · Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.

Action history

  1. 2012-02-06Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
  2. 2012-02-02Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  3. 2012-02-02On passage Passed by recorded vote: 242 - 179 (Roll no. 30).
  4. 2012-02-02On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 183 - 237 (Roll no. 29).
  5. 2012-02-02The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
  6. 2012-02-02DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Boswell motion to recommit. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add a new subsection entitled "Impacts on Medicare Benefits, Beneficiaries, the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds".
  7. 2012-02-02Mr. Boswell moved to recommit with instructions to the Budget Committee.
  8. 2012-02-02The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
  9. 2012-02-02The previous question was ordered without objection.
  10. 2012-02-02The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3582.
  11. 2012-02-02UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
  12. 2012-02-02POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cicilline substitute amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Cicilline demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  13. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cicilline Part B amendment No. 8.
  14. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake Part B amendment No. 7.
  15. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Quigley Part B amendment No. 6.
  16. 2012-02-02POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  17. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee Part B amendment No. 5.
  18. 2012-02-02POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Fudge amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Fudge demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  19. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fudge Part B amendment No. 4.
  20. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Walz Part B amendment No. 3.
  21. 2012-02-02POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly (VA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  22. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly (VA) Part B amendment No. 2.
  23. 2012-02-02POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Peters amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Peters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
  24. 2012-02-02DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 534, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters Part B amendment No. 1.
  25. 2012-02-02GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 3582.