H.R. 4089 · 112th Congress
Sportsmen's Heritage Act of 2012
- Stage
- Passed a chamber
- Sponsor
- Jeff Miller
- Introduced
- 2012-02-27
- Latest action
- 2012-04-18 · Received in the Senate.
Action history
- 2012-04-18Received in the Senate.
- 2012-04-17Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2012-04-17On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 274 - 146 (Roll no. 164).
- 2012-04-17On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 160 - 261 (Roll no. 163).
- 2012-04-17The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 2012-04-17DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Tierney motion to recommit with instructions, pending reservation of a point of order. The instructions contained in the motion seek to report the same back to the House forthwith with an amendment to authorize funds for the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to effectively enforce oversight of the oil market to combat speculation, and market manipulation. It would also prohibit Members from engaging in hunting or fishing trips on Federal land paid for by registered lobbyists. Subsequently, the reservation of a point of order was removed.
- 2012-04-17Mr. Tierney moved to recommit with instructions to Natural Resources.
- 2012-04-17The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
- 2012-04-17The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 2012-04-17The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4089.
- 2012-04-17UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
- 2012-04-17The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
- 2012-04-17Considered as unfinished business.
- 2012-04-17Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4089 as unfinished business.
- 2012-04-17On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
- 2012-04-17Mr. Hastings (WA) moved that the Committee rise.
- 2012-04-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Foxx amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Grijalva demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2012-04-17DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 614, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Foxx amendment No. 8.
- 2012-04-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Heinrich amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Heinrich demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2012-04-17DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 614, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Heinrich amendment No. 7.
- 2012-04-17DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 614, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Bishop (NY) amendment No. 6.
- 2012-04-17DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 614, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fleming amendment No. 5.
- 2012-04-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Peters amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Peters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2012-04-17DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 614, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters amendment No. 4.
- 2012-04-17POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Grijalva amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Grijalva demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.