H.R. 5325 · 112th Congress

Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013

Stage
Passed a chamber
Sponsor
Rodney Frelinghuysen
Introduced
2012-05-02
Latest action
2012-06-11 · Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 425.

Action history

  1. 2012-06-06POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the First Flake amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Flake demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  2. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the First Flake amendment.
  3. 2012-06-06The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on pro forma amendments to H.R. 5325.
  4. 2012-06-06The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
  5. 2012-06-06Considered as unfinished business.
  6. 2012-06-06Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 5325 as unfinished business.
  7. 2012-06-06On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
  8. 2012-06-06Mr. Frelinghuysen moved that the Committee rise.
  9. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flores amendment.
  10. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fortenberry amendment.
  11. 2012-06-06POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Lummis amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Lummis demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  12. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lummis amendment.
  13. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schweikert amendment.
  14. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Brooks amendment.
  15. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Second Landry amendment.
  16. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the First Landry amendment.
  17. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Graves (MO) amendment No. 1.
  18. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jordan amendment.
  19. 2012-06-06POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the King (IA) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. King (IA) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  20. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the King (IA) amendment.
  21. 2012-06-06POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Mulvaney amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Mulvaney demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  22. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Mulvaney amendment.
  23. 2012-06-06POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Fourth Jackson Lee (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
  24. 2012-06-06DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous special order, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fourth Jackson Lee (TX) amendment.
  25. 2012-06-06POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Stearns amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Stearns demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.