H.R. 839 · 112th Congress
HAMP Termination Act of 2011
- Stage
- Passed a chamber
- Sponsor
- Patrick McHenry
- Introduced
- 2011-02-28
- Latest action
- 2011-03-30 · Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Action history
- 2011-03-30Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
- 2011-03-29The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 839 as may be necessary to reflect the actions of the House in amending the bill, to include striking "paragraph (1)" on page 5, line 16, and inserting in lieu thereof "subparagraph (A)".
- 2011-03-29Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2011-03-29On passage Passed by recorded vote: 252 - 170, 1 Present (Roll no. 198).
- 2011-03-29On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 185 - 238, 1 Present (Roll no. 197).
- 2011-03-29The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
- 2011-03-29DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Larsen (WA) motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment which adds a new paragraph entitled "CONTINUATION OF PROGRAM FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES AND GOLD STAR RECIPIENTS".
- 2011-03-29Mr. Larsen (WA) moved to recommit with instructions to Financial Services.
- 2011-03-29The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
- 2011-03-29The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 2011-03-29The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 839.
- 2011-03-29UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
- 2011-03-29The Speaker designated the Honorable Ted Poe to act as Chairman of the Committee.
- 2011-03-29House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 170 and Rule XVIII.
- 2011-03-29Considered as unfinished business.
- 2011-03-29Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 839 as unfinished business.
- 2011-03-29On motion that the committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
- 2011-03-29Mrs. Biggert moved that the committee rise.
- 2011-03-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 170, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Loretta Sanchez amendment.
- 2011-03-29POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Maloney amendment, the Chair put the question on the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Maloney demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2011-03-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 170, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Maloney amendment.
- 2011-03-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 170, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Matsui amendment.
- 2011-03-29POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee(TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on the amendment and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee(TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2011-03-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 170, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee (TX) amendment.
- 2011-03-29DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 170, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Waters amendment.