Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014

Action history

1. 2013-11-14On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference Agreed to without objection.
2. 2013-11-14Mr. Shuster moved that the House disagree to the Senate amendment, and agree to a conference.
3. 2013-11-05Message on Senate action sent to the House.
4. 2013-11-04Senate appointed conferee(s) Boxer; Baucus; Carper; Cardin; Whitehouse; Vitter; Inhofe; Barrasso.
5. 2013-10-31Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
6. 2013-10-31Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
7. 2013-10-31Senate insisted on its amendment, requested a conference.
8. 2013-10-31See also S. 601.
9. 2013-10-28Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 224.
10. 2013-10-23Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
11. 2013-10-23On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 417 - 3 (Roll no. 560).
12. 2013-10-23The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
13. 2013-10-23The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3080.
14. 2013-10-23UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on the adoption of amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
15. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gardner amendment No. 24.
16. 2013-10-23POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Richmond amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Richmond demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
17. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Richmond amendment No. 16.
18. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Velazquez amendment No. 13.
19. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jones amendment No. 8.
20. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Bentivolio amendment No. 7.
21. 2013-10-23POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Hastings (FL) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
22. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment No. 6.
23. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Young (AK) amendment No. 5.
24. 2013-10-23DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 385, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Shuster amendments en bloc No. 1.
25. 2013-10-23POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flores amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Farr demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.