H.R. 3964 · 113th Congress
Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Emergency Water Delivery Act
- Stage
- Passed a chamber
- Sponsor
- David Valadao
- Introduced
- 2014-01-29
- Latest action
- 2014-02-10 · Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 306.
Action history
- 2014-02-10Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 306.
- 2014-02-06Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
- 2014-02-05Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 229 - 191 (Roll no. 50).
- 2014-02-05Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- 2014-02-05On passage Passed by recorded vote: 229 - 191 (Roll no. 50).
- 2014-02-05On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 191 - 231 (Roll no. 49).
- 2014-02-05The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add Title IX- Preserving Local Water Supplies and Protecting Tribal Sovereignty.
- 2014-02-05Mr. Garamendi moved to recommit with instructions to Natural Resources.
- 2014-02-05The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
- 2014-02-05The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- 2014-02-05The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3964.
- 2014-02-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Peters (CA) Part B amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Peters (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 472, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters (CA) Part B amendment No. 8.
- 2014-02-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the McNerney Part B amendment No. 7, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. McNerney demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 472, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McNerney Part B amendment No. 7.
- 2014-02-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Huffman Part B amendment No. 6, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Huffman demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 472, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Huffman Part B amendment No. 6.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 472, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DeFazio Part B amendment No. 5.
- 2014-02-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Capps Part B amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Capps demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 472, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Capps Part B amendment No. 4.
- 2014-02-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Bera Part B amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Bera demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 472, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Bera Part B amendment No. 3.
- 2014-02-05POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Matsui Part B amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Matsui demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
- 2014-02-05DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 472, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Matsui Part B amendment No. 2.