Customer Protection and End User Relief Act

Action history

1. 2014-06-25Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
2. 2014-06-24On passage Passed by recorded vote: 265 - 144 (Roll no. 349).
3. 2014-06-24On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 191 - 220 (Roll no. 348).
4. 2014-06-24The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
5. 2014-06-24DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kuster motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to ensure that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission would: (1) immediately curb the role of excessive speculation in any designated facility within its jurisdiction through which oil and gasoline futures or swaps are traded to eliminate excessive speculation, price distortion, or sudden or unreasonable fluctuations or unwarranted changes in prices; (2) investigate the number of swap and security-based swap market participants that have moved their headquarters or operations out of the United States in order to avoid compliance with United States swap requirements; and (3) require overseas derivatives users to obey American laws prohibiting fraud and manipulation of American markets, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.
6. 2014-06-24Ms. Kuster moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Agriculture.
7. 2014-06-24The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
8. 2014-06-24The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
9. 2014-06-24The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4413.
10. 2014-06-24UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that, pursuant to clause 6 of Rule XVIII, the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
11. 2014-06-24The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
12. 2014-06-24Considered as unfinished business.
13. 2014-06-24Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4413 as unfinished business.
14. 2014-06-24On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
15. 2014-06-24Mr. Lucas moved that the Committee rise.
16. 2014-06-24POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Garrett amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Peterson (MN) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
17. 2014-06-24DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 629, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garrett amendment No. 8.
18. 2014-06-24DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 629, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Fincher amendment No. 7.
19. 2014-06-24POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 6, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
20. 2014-06-24DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 629, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 6.
21. 2014-06-24POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Moore amendment No. 5, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Moore demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
22. 2014-06-24DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 629, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore amendment No. 5.
23. 2014-06-24POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Waters amendment No. 4, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Waters demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
24. 2014-06-24DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 629, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Waters amendment No. 4.
25. 2014-06-24DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 629, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DelBene amendment No. 3.