Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to the Secretary of Agriculture's administration of tariff-rate quotas for raw and refined sugar.

Action history

1. 2013-10-12Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
2. 2013-10-12On agreeing to the resolution Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 192 - 212, 1 Present (Roll no. 545).
3. 2013-10-12Considered as unfinished business.
4. 2013-10-11POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 378, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Peterson demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing the resolution until a time to be announced.
5. 2013-10-11The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
6. 2013-10-11DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 378.
7. 2013-10-11Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 380.
8. 2013-10-11Introduced in House
9. 2013-10-11Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
10. 2013-10-11Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.