Judy Biggert

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks on S. 3137.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my friend and colleague, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Shimkus), for taking the lead on this tribute to Congressman Tom Ewing tonight. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take a few moments to recognize and reflect on the outstanding public service record of our friend and colleague from Illinois, Tom Ewing. Tom is retiring after devoting more than 25 years, including 9 years in this House, to serving the people of Illinois and the people of this Nation. Over that time, I think that Tom has established himself as one of the most valuable, well liked and well respected Members of the House, and I think I speak for all of us to say that it has been a pleasure to serve with him. He did begin his public service in 1974 as a member of the Illinois House of Representatives which we have heard reference to several times, and he served there with distinction for 17 years. While in Springfield, Tom served as the assistant Republican leader of the Illinois House from 1982 until 1990, when he was named deputy minority leader. I too served in the Illinois House and as assistant Republican leader, but to my regret we never served there together. As ships that pass in the night, Tom left the General Assembly in 1991 and I was elected to serve there in 1992. In a way, it was agriculture that brought Tom to this House, the U.S. Department of Agriculture to be exact. When President Bush named the late former Congressman Ed Madigan as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Tom ran in the 1991 special election for the seat and won handily. In fact, he won so handily that he turned around and ran again during the next year, 1992, and won again handily. So there are many reasons, I think, why this body will miss this Member in particular, and will sorely miss this Member Tom Ewing. I would like to address the four top reasons that I will miss him. First and foremost is his invaluable expertise on all things relating to farms, farmers, farm financing, agriculture commodities and agriculture in general. In fact, before I actually met Tom Ewing, I thought of him as ``Mister Illinois Agriculture.'' That was not because of his impressive leadership role in this body but, frankly, for his weekly interviews on WGN's radio farm report with Orion Samuelson and Max Armstrong. Each week as I commuted from Chicago to Springfield, Illinois, for the Illinois General Assembly legislative session, the road that took me through this rich farmland of Tom's district, I-55, as I drove along I would hear these discussions with Orion and Max which enlightened me on the farm policy. So now as one whose suburban Chicago district has seen acres of rows and rows of corn replaced by rows and rows of single family dwellings, I must admit that it was Tom that I turned to for advice on issues relating to agriculture. He was always patient, always insightful and always frank. The second reason that I will miss him is that together he and I represent two-thirds of the Illinois Delegation on the Committee on Science, and together we have fought many a battle to ensure continued funding for two of the world's premier research institutions: The University of Illinois at Champaign and Argonne National Laboratory located in our respective districts. I cannot say that I rely as heavily on Tom's advice in the Committee on Science as I do on agricultural issues, however, but on occasions that he was sighted at a committee meeting I was always confident of his advice and always confident that we would be voting on an issue of interest to the University of Illinois at Champaign. The third reason that I will miss Tom is for his devotion to the principles of free and fair trade, and his leadership in pressing open markets for our products and services abroad. Together we served on the whip team for permanent normal trade relations with China and together we spent a lot of time locked down in Seattle during the WTO ministerial last year. Tom's district exports the farm products that feed the world, just as my district exports the manufactured products and services that the world demands. His efforts to open markets, not just for American farm products, but for all products and services will long be remembered. His council on agricultural trade, not to mention his insights into the issues that have dominated the past decade's trade negotiations are without compare. Last, but not least, I will miss Tom for his candor, his humor and his joy in life. Tom will be remembered for the great things he accomplished during his service here, from drafting and guiding passage of the Freedom to Farm Act of 1996, to fighting for the repeal of the unfair death tax, to leading the way in reforming and reauthorizing the Commodities and Exchange Act. But for those who of us who have had the privilege of serving with him, Tom will be remembered the best and missed the most for his warm friendship, his ready humor and his generosity of spirit and time. So I join my colleagues tonight in wishing Tom and his wife, Connie, and their wonderful six children all the best that their future life has to offer. So I thank the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Shimkus) for allowing me to participate in this tribute.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I am delighted to join the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Pryce) to honor the remarkable career of my friend and colleague, Tillie Fowler. Tillie has served the Fourth District of Florida, this body, and her country with integrity and loyalty. She has been a role model and a friend to me during my freshman term here in Congress, and I will miss her greatly. When I first met Tillie, I knew we would get along well because of our similar background. Tillie and I are two of only three Republican women attorneys in the House, and both of us have been very active in our home communities before coming to Washington. At the time when Tillie and I graduated from our law schools, there were very few women going into the legal profession and even fewer options for women attorneys. We had to create our own options, and Tillie certainly did so by deciding to move to Washington and begin a career in public service. She worked first as a congressional staffer, then as counsel in the Nixon administration before moving to Jacksonville, Florida, with her husband, Buck, to raise their daughters, Tillie and Elizabeth. Tillie established a solid reputation in Jacksonville as a local leader long before running for Congress. She was president of the Junior League, chairman of the Florida Humanities Council, and president of the City Council. Because of this background, Tillie is dedicated to maintaining excellent relations with her constituents. Tillie serves her district with pride, which you can tell just by walking into her office. In addition to the Jacksonville Jaguars football helmet proudly displayed in her office, artwork from her district lines the walls, and books around her district decorate the reception area. From the beginning, Tillie made strong national defense one of her top priorities. When bases around the country were being closed in the early 1990's, Tillie fought to ensure that two of the bases in Jacksonville were kept open. Because of such dedication, she is known and admired by the military community. Our Tuesday Lunch Bunch relies heavily on her expertise in military affairs. As such an effective leader, Tillie has been the true role model, not only for those of us who follow her in Congress but for people everywhere. An even greater testament to her character and leadership is that not only do so many Members respect and admire her but that her own staff does as well. Her staff is extremely loyal to her and most of them have been with her for many years. Tillie established herself as the leader from her first day in Congress. As a freshman, she was elected co-chair of the Freshmen Republican Task Force; and in her second term, she became a deputy whip. She is currently the chairman of the Committee on Transportation Subcommittee on Investigations, Oversight and Emergency Management and is the senior Republican woman on the Committee on Armed Services. As Vice Chair of the Republican Conference, she is not only the highest ranking woman in Congress but the first Floridian to hold the position. With such a record of leadership, it is no wonder she was elected unopposed in 1994, 1996, and 1998. A few weeks ago, I heard a fellow Member on the floor affectionately refer to Tillie as a real-life Steel Magnolia. I could not agree more. In fact, Tillie takes great pride in being referred to by Working Women Magazine as a drill sergeant disguised as a Southern belle. Throughout her career, Tillie has always been dedicated to standing up for what is right. The strength of character has made her a great asset to this body. Tillie has been a true friend, and we will all miss her leadership. However, I am very confident to say that this is not, as they say, farewell and not good-bye. I know this will not be the last time that we will hear from Tillie Fowler. I look forward to seeing what she will do next because I know that, in whatever capacity she chooses to serve, she will serve her country and the good people of Florida with integrity, courage, and unending enthusiasm.

Mrs. BIGGERT. I yield to the gentleman from Alabama.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. I thank the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Dickey) for his comments. It is nice to hear from somebody who has worked so closely with Mr. Porter and had such a wonderful experience from it. I would like to enter into the record, as I said before I had some statements, and this is from Governor George Ryan the governor of the State of Illinois. I am going to read some of it. I will not read the whole thing but that will be submitted for the record. This letter says, Dear John, on behalf of the State of Illinois please accept our heartfelt gratitude for your extraordinary contributions during a lifetime of public service. On the occasion of your retirement from the U.S. Congress, it is fair to recognize and applaud what you have accomplished for your constituents, for people within Illinois and throughout the United States. It is also not an exaggeration to highlight the fact that your leadership in human rights and on environmental issues has benefited people around the world. You are a strong advocate for a thoughtful Federal appropriations process, a clean environment and adequate funding for the arts. You have earned an influential role among the green Republicans to fight for the Nation's environmental interests in Congress. And you are only one of five House members ever to be appointed to the board of directors of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Your service in Illinois began in the Illinois House of Representatives during 1972 and I am proud that we served together in the State House before you were elected to Congress in 1980. Those of us who were fortunate to work with you then have not been surprised by what you have accomplished since. As a champion and supporter of the National Institutes of Health, your efforts have helped the Institute bring about numerous medical and health advances. You have successfully advocated Federal funding to expand the Metro commuter rails into the northern suburbs of Illinois, including many towns in your district. The 290 acres of open space at Fort Sheridan is an outgrowth of your creative determination and ability to persuade the Federal Government to transfer the land to the Lake County Forest Preserve District when Fort Sheridan was closed. That this land transfer occurred without cost to the district and continues to exist as an open space for all to enjoy is among your most special contributions. The Great Lakes Naval Station remains open, viable and an economic anchor in Illinois because of your efforts. Among the critical military missions conducted here is Navy and Coast Guard training. Your commitment and effectiveness as an advocate of free trade continues to produce immeasurable economic benefits for the people of Illinois. Our farmers have more markets in which to sell their crops and livestock. Our business community has additional opportunities to positively impact their bottom line. Our workers enjoy a more stable work environment with better compensation. Additional contributions that will not be forgotten include your efforts for comprehensive flood control measures for the north branch of the Chicago River; the enhancement of safety and operational capacities at Waukegan Airport, including new instrument landing equipment and runway improvements. Waukegan Harbor has been cleaned up with Federal resources and payments you helped secure from the firm who did the polluting. On behalf of my family and our shared constituents within all walks of life in Illinois, thank you for all you have accomplished. Your ideas and experience and voice in Congress will be sorely missed. We wish you the very best in your next endeavor and hope that it brings you all the joy and happiness that you deserve. Please extend our very best regards to your entire family and especially your children, John, Ann, David, Robin and Donna. Sincerely George H. Ryan, Governor. State of Illinois, Washington Office, Washington, DC, October 11, 2000. Hon. John Edward Porter, Chairman, Labor, Health & Human Services and Education Appropriations Subcommittee, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear John: On behalf of the State of Illinois, please accept our heartfelt gratitude for your extraordinary contributions during a lifetime of public service. On the occasion of your retirement from the US Congress, it's fair to recognize and applaud what you have accomplished for your constituents, for people within Illinois and throughout the United States. It's also not an exaggeration to highlight the fact that your leadership in human rights and on environmental issues has benefited people around the world. You are a strong advocate for a thoughtful federal appropriations process, a clean environment and adequate funding for the arts. You have earned an influential role among the ``Green Republicans'' to fight for the nation's environmental interests in Congress. And you are one of only five House members ever to be appointed to the Board of Directors of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Your service in Illinois began in the Illinois House of Representatives during 1972 and I'm proud that we served together in the State House before you were elected to Congress in 1980. Those of us who were fortunate to work with you then haven't been surprised by what you have accomplished since. The National Institutes of Health and biomedical research have been huge beneficiaries of your legislative skills and your leadership as Chairman of the Labor/HHS Appropriation Subcommittee. As a champion and supporter of the NIH, your efforts have helped the Institute bring about numerous medical and health advances. You have successfully advocated federal funding to expand the METRA Commuter rails into the northern suburbs of Illinois, including many towns in your district. The METRA extension into these areas via the Wisconsin Central tracks has stimulated wide ranging economic expansion. The passenger rail service this expansion made possible connected the northern suburbs to O'Hare International Airport and Chicago's Union Station. The 290 acres of open space at Fort Sheridan is an outgrowth of your creativity, determining and your ability to persuade the federal government to transfer the land to the Lake County Forest Preserve District when Fort Sheridan was closed. That this land transfer occurred without cost to the District and continues to exist as open space for all to enjoy is among your most special contributions. The Great Lakes Naval Station remains open, viable and an economic anchor in Illinois because of your efforts. Among the critical military missions conducted here is Navy and Coast Guard training. Illinois is among the first tier of states benefiting from new opportunities to market our products, produce and ideas internationally. Your commitment and effectiveness as an advocate of free trade continues to produce immeasurable economic benefits for the people of Illinois. Our farmers have more markets in which to sell their crops and livestock. Our business community has additional opportunities to positively impact their bottom line. Our workers enjoy a more stable work environment with better compensation. Additional contributions that will not be forgotten include your efforts for comprehensive flood control measures for the North Branch of the Chicago River. The enhancement of safety and operational capabilities at Waukegan Airport, including new instrument landing equipment and runway improvements. Waukegan Harbor has been cleaned up with federal resources and payments you helped secure from the firm who did the polluting. On behalf of my family and our shared constituents from all walks of life within Illinois, thank you for all that you have accomplished. Your ideas, experience and voice in Congress will be sorely missed. We wish you the very best in your next endeavor and hope that it brings you all the joy and happiness that you deserve. Please extend our very best regards to your entire family and especially your children-- John, Ann, David, Robin, and Donna. Sincerely, George H. Ryan, Governor. I think it is amazing all of the correspondence that we have had. The praise from several fellow Illinoians for John Porter's service in Illinois include a couple of members from the Illinois delegation that I would like to summarize what they have submitted. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski) points out that not only has John's work resulted in millions of dollars going to fund biomedical research but his legacy will be saving lives. While they have not always agreed on every issue, he commends John for his conservative stance on fiscal issues and his unwavering commitment to eliminating deficits and balancing the Federal budgets. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Costello) touts John's efforts to ensure funding for the National Institutes of Health, and his dedication to human rights issues. He expresses his admiration for John's work in the Illinois delegation and on the Committee on Appropriations. He states that his friendship will be missed. A couple of comments from former chiefs of staff to John Porter. Mark Kirk states that America is not great because we are rich or field the most powerful military. We are great because our Nation has been the largest force for good on this earth. John Porter and the Human Rights Caucus made our values and respect for human rights an essential part of our country's mission to the world. We here in Illinois will miss John Porter's calm, intellectual and dignified service to the Nation. At this point, I would like to submit his letter. Mark Steven Kirk Glenview, Illinois, October 18, 2000. Congresswoman Judy Biggert, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear Congresswoman Biggert: I want to applaud you for leading today's Special Order for John Porter. Our country and future generations owe a real debt to Congressman Porter. he led our nation's commitment to double funding for medical research. It was his decision that laid the foundation for the mapping of the human genome, finding the cause of Alzheimer's disease and a cure for some types of diabetes. John Porter's legacy is one of longer, healthier lives, not just for our nation but the world. John Porter also embodies the values we hold most dear. America is not great because we are rich or field the most powerful military. We are great because our nation has been the largest force for good on this Earth. We enshrined our values in the Bill of Rights and exported them through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. John Porter and the Human Rights Caucus made our values and respect for human rights an essential part of our country's mission to the world. After 21 years of John Porter's service to the nation, human freedom has spread throughout Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, turning enemies into allies. The new leaders in many of these countries were once prisoners of conscience whose best friend and advocate was John Edward Porter. The bond they formed in prison cells with their voice and friend in Congress will reap a permanent reward to the United States. We here in Illinois will miss John Porter's calm, intellectual and dignified service to the nation. He served us all in the highest tradition of public service and commitment to the greater good. Sincerely, Mark Kirk. Another chief of staff, Robert Bradner, who worked for John for 13 years, cites a specific example of John's foresight. Fifteen years ago, before anyone saw it as a problem, John began pointing out the potential problems with Social Security. While many thought it to be an act of political suicide, he had the courage to take on the issue of Social Security reform. Popular wisdom has finally caught up with him. Robert further states, ``John's belief in a fair process and his ability to work on the basis of mutual respect with colleagues of widely divergent views allowed him to shepherd difficult legislation through the House over the past 6 years that he has been the chairman of the Labor-HHS Committee, in a manner that confirmed to all the true measure of his policy making talent.'' I continue with Robert Bradner. ``Ultimately, I regard John Porter as a teacher. He taught me and a number of others who passed through his offices about the honor of public service and the importance of ideas.'' October 18, 2000. Hon. Judy Biggert, Member of Congress, Washington, DC. Dear Judy: I am delighted that you have organized a special order on the eve of John Porter's retirement from the House of Representatives to commemorate his many years of public service. I had the great honor to work for John Porter for a total of thirteen years, both during the time that he served as a member of the minority party in the House, and later when he rose to an important chairmanship in the majority. A litany of all that he accomplished in that time would run many pages. However, I would like to share a few observations. During the 1980s, John Porter distinguished himself as a tireless advocate for human rights and the environment, as a defender of the rights of women and an advocate for a common sense approach to family planning, and as a fierce opponent of federal budget deficits. One accomplishment deserves particular note, for it is emblematic of both his intelligence and his political courage. Fifteen years ago, John began pointing out the dangerous growth of unfunded liabilities in the Social Security system and, soon thereafter, he began introducing legislation to provide for individual social security retirement accounts. At the time, such behavior was considered an act of political suicide. But John had the courage to take on the issue, and a constituency that trusted and valued sound judgment over demagoguery. He was well ahead of his time in seeing this problem for what it was. Today, the popular wisdom has finally caught up with where John was well over a decade ago: recognizing this as a serious problem and beginning to come to grips with solutions. Indeed, a very closely related proposal to John's original legislation is playing a very prominent role in the current Presidential election. Later in his career, John had the opportunity to accede to the Chairmanship of the Labor, Health & Human Services and Education Subcommittee. This was no easy assignment. In recent years, the Labor-HHS bill has been a place where some of the most passionately held beliefs of conservatives and liberals about the shape and size of government and a myriad of emotional social issues collide headlong. And it is the place where, on an annual basis, those disagreements must somehow be resolved. I would argue that John Porter was almost uniquely qualified for this most difficult assignment. This capability stemmed not from his views on any particular issue but rather from the innate decency that he has always shown to his co-workers and his strong belief that the process by which issues are resolved in a democracy is of equal, if not greater, importance than the particular outcome achieved on a particular issue on a particular day. John's belief in a fair process and his ability to work on the basis of mutual respect with colleagues of widely divergent views allowed him to shepherd this most difficult legislation through the House over the past six years in a manner that confirmed to all the true measure of his policy making talent. Ultimately, I regard John Porter as a teacher. He taught me, and a number of others who passed through his offices, about the honor of public service and the importance of ideas. He encouraged intellectual discourse and vigorous policy discussion within the office toward the goal of developing a better understanding of the issues and a sounder approach to policy. And he showed me that, on the most trying and emotional issues facing the Congress--such as the resolution to authorize hostilities against Iraq--there is no substitute for a member of Congress that exercises, to the best of their ability, independent judgment to ascertain the best course of action and the courage to support that course. I thank you again for your efforts in organizing this fine tribute to John Porter, and join with you and so many others in wishing John all the best in his future endeavors. Sincerely, Robert H. Bradner. Another Chief of Staff, Gordon MacDougall, cites John's motivation for reducing Federal budget deficits as being ``based on his conviction of public service as a responsibility for perpetuating our free and democratic society.'' He also praises John as being a champion of the ideals upon which our system of governing was originally based. He states that ``today's young Americans and their children will be better off for Congressman Porter's 20 years of devoted service in Congress.'' October 18, 2000. Hon. Judy Biggert, U.S. Representative, Washington, DC. Dear Congresswoman Biggert: I understand that you have organized a ``Special Order'' to celebrate the career of Congressman John E. Porter, and that you have invited former staff to Congressman Porter to contribute sstatements. I was fortunate to have been introduced to Congressman Porter in 1983, during his second term in Congress. I was subsequently offered a position as Legislative Assistant in his office beginning in January, 1984. I was promoted to the position of Administrative Assistant in 1995, and served on his staff until early 1997. Since leaving his office I have had the opportunity to continue a professional and a personal relationship with Congressman Porter. John Porter is an individual of high integrity and deep intellect. He has an unwavering commitment to our open system of representative democracy. I believe that he is one of the finest Members of Congress to serve during the last quarter of the 20th Century. During the first eighteen years of his career, Congressman Porter devoted the majority of his time to efforts to reduce federal budget deficits. In my view, his motivation was not simple or myopic fiscal conservatism, his motivation was based on his conviction of public services as a responsibility for perpetuating our free and democratic society. Congressman Porter remained focused for the majority of his tenure in Congress on adopting fiscal policies to enable future generations to avoid being burdened with federal debt. Coming generations of Americans will benefit from his steady and deliberate effort to help balance the federal budget. I am pleased for Congressman Porter that he has been able to stay in the House long enough to see a balanced federal budget. With federal fiscal policy coming into balance during the past two years, Congressman Porter has refocused his efforts on federal programs of significance to future generations of Americans. He has led an effort in the House to increase funding for medical research, an investment which will improve the quality of life for future generations of all mankind. Also during this period he has conscientiously worked to forward proposals to stabilize a Social Security system which, without changes, will not last to serve our children. John Porter has been a champion of the ideals upon which our system of governing was originally based. He is a unique individual, and his character and demeanor will be missed in future Congresses. Today's young Americans and their children will be better off for Congressman Porter's twenty years of devoted service in Congress. I wish him well. Sincerely, Gordon P. MacDougall We also heard from former Illinois officials, Mr. Speaker. Former Illinois State Representative David Barkhausen from John Porter's district states that ``one has only to look at the example of John Porter to recognize that in him we have truly had an exemplary leader and representative in the mold that our Founding Fathers envisioned. The impact of his many contributions will endure, as will the high standards of public service that he has held high for others to follow.'' Lake Bluff, IL, October 18, 2000. Re ``Special Orders'' tribute for John Porter. Hon. Judy Biggert, U.S. Representative, Washington, DC. Dear Judy: It is my pleasure and privilege to participate in this special tribute to Congressman John Porter from his colleagues and friends. I am fortunate that my service in the Illinois General Assembly from 1981-1997 (2 years in the House and 14 in the Senate) coincided with most of John's years of service in Washington. He was both a great leader and team player. He also recruited and maintained a staff that was second to none and that was always extremely courteous, cooperative, and effective. John Porter has been an extraordinarily thoughtful and conscientious Congressman and a model servant. He has combined the characteristics that everyone could hope for in a Congressman from our kind of district. He is a deep and original thinker who has greatly influenced important policies in such areas as health care research. He has reflected and continuously sought the views of his constituents while maintaining an admirable independence of judgment. And he has been extremely attentive to problems and projects of local interest and influential in offering solutions. In the final Presidential debate last night, the candidates were asked at the end what might help to overcome the cynical and negative views that so many citizens have of their government and its leaders. Cloning John Porter might be one effective solution. One has only to look at the example of John Porter to recognize that, in him, we have truly had an exemplary leader and representative in the mold that our Founding Fathers envisioned. We owe him our deep thanks for the many good years of service he has given us. The impact of his many contributions will endure, as will the high standards of public service that he has held high for others to follow. I am confident that we can look forward to additional, important contributions from Congressman Porter in the service of his country. For now, I want to join all of you in this heartfelt, if inadequate, praise for his job extraordinarily well done as a member of the United States Congress for the past 21 years. Sincerely, David N. Barkhausen. Illinois State Senator Kathleen Parker worked on John's campaign for state representative, how many years ago was that, and remembers that he once tracked down a cabinet member in an airport to resolve a problem for a constituent. She further states that he was a man of integrity and, above all, a true friend. Illinois State Senate, Springfield, IL, October 18, 2000. Hon. Judy Biggert, Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC. Dear Representative Biggert: Thank you for the opportunity to be included in a Congressional tribute to John Porter. It's hard to believe that John will have served for 22 years in Congress. It seems like yesterday when I worked on his campaign for State Representative! I can tell you that through the years Congressman Porter has been loved by his district. He has never forgotten his constituents. While in Washington John has been ever mindful of local views and issues. Congressman Porter's staff is, if not the best, tied with the best in the country. They work hard, are always responsive and are a pleasure to work with. They work closely with John enabling him to take personal interest in helping his constituents. In one case that I know of Congressman Porter even went as far as to track down a cabinet member in an airport to resolve a problem for an individual in his district. Out of the four ways to leave office John is leaving the only good way! He has served the Northshore area of Illinois well. He leaves us with the memory of a true statesman and Congressman that we can always admire and be proud of. A man of integrity and above all a true friend. We will miss John as our Congressman. However, we are hopeful that there is a future ahead in some capacity he may serve our country again. We will all be better off if that occurs. Sincerely, Kathleen K. Parker, State Senator, 29th District. Illinois State Representative Jeff Schoenberg recounts the first time he met John Porter was when he was working in his first paid political job for John's election opponent, then Congressman Abner Mikva. Despite these beginnings, Jeff has had an extremely good working relationship with John, and states their offices have maintained a ``seamless cooperation'' in serving the residents of Chicago's North Shore. He agrees that John will best be remembered for his commitment and diligence in bettering the lives of millions of Americans. His words commending Congressman Porter follow: Please allow me to join the many others in offering my best wishes to my colleague and constituent, Congressman John Porter, in his future endeavors. I must concede that I first became acquainted with John when I was hired in 1978 for my first paid position in politics, as a young field organizer for his election opponent, then Congressman Abner Mikva. Nonetheless, despite that less than auspicious beginning to our working relationship, it has been an extraordinary pleasure to work with Congressman Porter to address our mutual constituent concerns and district needs. For the past ten years, our offices have maintained a seamless cooperation in serving the residents of Chicago's North Shore. And on the issues that matter most to those who we serve--whether it has been funding for health care and medical research, deficit reduction and greater fiscal accountability in government, or most recently, when we worked shoulder-to-shoulder with the United Power for Action and Justice coalition to increase the availability of funding for affordable housing and health insurance for lower-income women and children--John Porter will always be remembered for his commitment and diligence in bettering the lives of millions of Americans. I wish Congressman Porter the best of luck and hope his tenure in the Illinois legislature and the United States Congress will continue to inspire young people to public service. May you continue to go from strength to strength, John, in your pursuit of just causes. Sincerely, Jeff Schoenberg. Illinois State Senator Adeline Geo-Karis appreciates how responsive John always was to her constituents, and states how much he will be missed. Illinois State Senate, Springfield, IL, October 18, 2000. Congresswoman Judy Biggert, 13th Congressional District. Dear Judy: I worked with John Porter in the Illinois House, and he became my Congressman. He was always very responsive to my District and to my people, and he did a great job for the 10th District. I wish him the best that life has to offer and I shall miss him. Sincerely, Adeline J. Geo-Karis, Senator--31st District, Assistant Majority Leader. Illinois State Representative Elizabeth Coulson states that she will always remember the lessons she learned from John, and that his work on environmental issues was second to none. Elizabeth Coulson, State Representative, Springfield, IL, October 17, 2000. Hon. John Edward Porter, Congressman, 10th District, Deerfield, IL. Dear Congressman Porter: Congratulations on eleven terms in the United States House. We will miss your compassion and good judgment in our 10th District. As a State Representative, I have often looked to your leadership as an example. I watch with great interest your lead on the Labor, Health and Human Services and Education Subcommittees. Your work on environmental issues is second to none. Again, we will miss you. You will always be remembered for your independent thinking. As I continue my career in Government I will remember the lessons that I learned from you. I wish you the best of luck in your future endeavors! Sincerely, Elizabeth Coulson, State Representative, 57th District. I would like to take a moment to highlight one of John's most notable achievements, and that is his commitment to biomedical research. He is truly a champion in this field, as has been noted by so many who I have quoted. His work on the National Institutes of Health deserves particular mention. When he became chairman of the Labor-HHS appropriations subcommittee in 1995, NIH had been appropriated $11.3 billion for the previous fiscal year. While that is hardly small chump change, John recognized that NIH is responsible for so many of our country's scientific advances and could be responsible for so much more with additional funding. As a Congress we set out a few years ago, with the guidance of John, to double the funding for the NIH, and John has done this almost all by himself during his tenure. In the long-awaited conference report for Labor-HHS bill, he has set aside $20.5 billion for NIH. That is a 15 percent increase over last year, and an astounding 81 percent increase during his chairmanship. These increases in funding for NIH mean good things for so many people. It will, we hope, lead to cures for cancer, AIDS, heart disease, diabetes, depression, Alzheimer's and so many others. In fact, earlier this year in the Wall Street Journal, Al Hunt wrote that this funding increase ``may be the most significant achievement of this GOP Congress.'' The chairman of Research America, a former representative, Paul Rogers, said in the same article that achieving the consensus necessary for this increase ``would have been very difficult without John Porter. He has been the main purpose in this effort.'' With that praise, Mr. Rogers perhaps understated John Porter's role: He was the single motivating force. This, of course, is not the only praise that John has received, and I could use up the entire hour reciting the organizations that have honored John for his support for biomedical research. Suffice it to say, it is a long and noteworthy list, from the American Medical Association, to the American Society of Microbiology. So, on behalf of the American public who benefits from this critical research done at the NIH, I know we thank John Porter. I would also like to take a moment to pay tribute to John Porter's outstanding human rights record. In 1983, after witnessing the severity of human right violations in the former Soviet Union, John helped to form the Congressional Human Rights Caucus. He knew that applying Congressional pressure on foreign governments could be a significant step towards ending human rights abuses around the world. I doubt that even John Porter anticipated how successful the caucus would ultimately turn out to be, with a bipartisan membership now totaling 257 Members. Under John's solid leadership, the Human Rights Caucus thoroughly reviewed the actions of and subsequently condemned Chinese authorities for the 1989 Tiananmen Square incident. Under John's leadership the caucus has held regular briefings on important human rights issues, including religious freedom in China, the oppressive regime of the late Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha, the plight of North Korean refugees living in China, and the abhorrent use of children soldiers, just to name a few. In addition to his work with the caucus, John has been heavily involved personally in human rights work. He has provided a clear and loud voice for the oppressed, and has strongly supported human rights and democratic reform all over the world. John also cosponsored a Congressional fast and prayer vigil in which numerous Members of Congress fasted on behalf of specific oppressed individuals. Because of his leadership in this area, Representative Porter received the Anatoly Shcharansky Freedom Award from the Chicago Action for Soviet Jewry, who described him aptly as ``a champion of human rights and a powerful ally in the struggle against oppression and the fight for basic human freedoms.'' John introduced legislation to create a Radio Free China, a broadcasting service to bring uncensored news reports directly to the Chinese people without government intrusion. He then jointly introduced Radio Free Asia to serve China, North Korea, Burma, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. Congress authorized the program and John quickly secured funding for the new service. A Member of Congress who has served more than 20 years can amass a great deal of influence. John Porter as chairman of an influential appropriations subcommittee is certainly no exception. However, John has bucked the trend and has not used his power and influence for his own personal gain or enrichment. He has used his influence to help those less fortunate than himself, those less fortunate than most Americans. Gerald LeMelle, Deputy Executive Director for Amnesty International USA, eloquently summed this up when he said of Representative Porter at a recent farewell reception, ``Whether from your keynote speech at the Latin American Ambassadors Colloquium in 1991, or your steadfast support on issue after issue, you have always been there for us and for human rights, with integrity and principle.'' I agree. John Porter has always been beside those who could not fight for themselves. For this I admire him. John Porter has been a leader in so many areas, and in the middle of our testimonies to him on health care, human rights and health research, it is also important to emphasize his active interest and leadership on issues involving the environment. His record is clear enough on this point and long enough to document his strong and consistent support for major environmental legislation, including the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Wilderness Protection Act, the National Park Protection Act and the Land and Water Conservation Fund. But the fine print of his record also reflects his love of animals and his love of the outdoors. For instance, he voted for the Endangered Species Act and against the inhumane use of animals in product testing and the use of cruel leghold traps. Ten years ago John successfully stopped the radical destruction of tropical rain forests in developing nations by tying future lending to conservation efforts to protect the forests and the wetlands. Today he is fighting for the protection of the American bear with legislation to stop the illegal poaching of bears for their paws and gallbladders, which has garnered the support of 142 other Members of Congress. For these and many other efforts, he has received awards, honors and accolades from national and international environment groups like the Sierra Club, the Audubon Society, the United Nations Environmental Program and Conservation International. John is even the recipient of the prestigious Lorax Award from the Global Tomorrow Coalition, a group representing over 100 environmental organizations. But, most important to the people of the Tenth District of Illinois, have been John's efforts to protect human health and the environment at home. He orchestrated an agreement between the government and the polluters of Waukegan Harbor on Lake Michigan to clean it up. He led an effort to preserve the 290 acres of open space on the northern part of Fort Sheridan and make it available for recreation by transferring it from the army to the Lake County Forest Preserve District at no cost. He sought and found effective solutions to help area residents and businesses along the North Branch of the Chicago River who suffered from flood damage. Thanks to his efforts, flood waters are now diverted from people's basements to a number of large reservoirs. John also has been a leading supporter of environmental projects that benefit all the residents of northeastern Illinois. He obtained funding to study Lake Michigan's shoreline erosion and to stabilize it. He introduced legislation to alleviate high water levels in Lake Michigan by increasing water diversion down the Illinois River and secured additional funding for wetland preservation. So whether you are a resident of John Porter's district, the City of Chicago and any of its suburbs, or the tropical rain forests of any developing nation, your environment has been positively impacted by the efforts of a great environmental advocate, our friend, John Porter. Mr. Speaker, I would like to add that I also have received a statement from the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Frelinghuysen), and I would like to just say that he also applauds his work to increase funding for the National Institutes of Health and biomedical research, and says that believing that more funds would lead to more cures for disease and other medical advances. Chairman Porter embarked on an ambitious program to double the NIH budget. I would like to also say that he particularly remembers his work with John Porter as a Member of the Subcommittee on Foreign Operations. In particular, he recalls one battle that was waged with Mr. Porter. They worked together, in 1997, when they opposed certain provisions of the fiscal year 1998 foreign operations appropriation bill that they thought should not have been included. He says the one thing that he could say about John Porter is that he always he always stands up for his principles, and, in this particular case, like so many others, he prevailed in the end because he knew the facts and he knew the cause was just. The gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Maloney) says that she had had the privilege of working with Mr. Porter on such a wide variety of issues; women's rights, health care, human rights, family planning, the environment and many, many more. He was always a tremendous advocate for bipartisan cooperation. Over the years, they often worked together to forge common sense solutions to important issues facing our Nation. She says that she knows that there are many Members of Congress who would join her in this sentiment, and she believes that that alone is an outstanding tribute to any Member of the U.S. House of Representatives. In the case of Congressman Porter, it is an exceptionally fitting tribute. She had the distinct pleasure of working with Mr. Porter on international family planning issues and stood together in opposition to any antidemocratic gag rules which would interfere with the availability of family planning around the world. On this issue, as with so many others, Congressman Porter has touched so many lives; it is hard to measure the full impact of his efforts. I would like to then turn to some remarks which I think are very fitting, and that is a thank you to Mr. Porter from his staff. And they have said that the House of Representatives and the 10th District of Illinois will not be the same next year as Congressman John Porter sets off on a new career path. Members of his staff would like to take this opportunity to express their gratitude for the journey that they have traveled with him over the past 21 years. Mr. Speaker, I will quote: Some of us have worked for the Congressman almost his entire time in office. Our longevity is a testament to the respect and appreciation we have for his honesty, integrity, and leadership. The Boss, as we affectionately called him, has been the one constant amidst the hectic pace of a congressional office caught in a whirlwind of issues, including a government shutdown and impeachment hearings. He has vigorously pursued those issues of greatest interest to him, including biomedical research, human rights, and environmental conservation. He has never wavered from his duty to fairly represent the people of Illinois' 10th Congressional District. Congressman Porter rarely lets an occasion go by without acknowledging his appreciation for what he calls ``the best congressional staff in America.'' However, leadership and success come from the top. Congressman Porter has set service to his constituents as the highest priority. From his impeccable manners, to his insistence that no constituent request goes without response, he has taught us that everyone is to be treated equally. The honor of working for Congressman John Porter has enriched our lives in more ways than we can ever express. In the communities of Illinois' wonderful 10th Congressional District, it is a name that commands respect. We know this because we hear his praises sung daily. Even constituents who disagree with his vote respect his judgment and his courage to vote his conscience. So as you move on, Boss, we wish you the great success in your next endeavor. We know that you will continue to contribute your many talents to helping the people of this great Nation. Thank you, Congressman Porter for setting the standard that others follow. Thank you for giving us the joy of working in this exciting environment that allows us to learn something new each day and be of service to others. Thank you for standing by us during the ups and downs we have experienced in our personal lives over the past 21 years. Most of all, thank you for letting us be members of the Porter family, to work for you and be with you. We have loved every minute. Signed Linda Maneck, Dee Jay Kweder, Ed Kelly, Ginny Hotaling, Carol Joy Cunningham, Mary Jane Partridge, Nancy Johnson, Linda Mae Carlson, Jerri Lohman, Katharine Fisher, Spencer Perlman, Jeannette Windon, Michael Liles, Erik Rasmussen, Jori Frahler and David Fabrycky.'' Is that not a nice tribute to have from the members of your staff? Mr. Speaker, much has been written during this presidential election year of legacy of what a public servant bequests to his succeeding generations, not just on his last days in office, but over the entirety of his career. Let me close tonight's special order by summing up the sentiments expressed by my colleagues regarding the legacy of our esteemed colleague, John Edward Porter. What we have heard tonight is that John Porter has not sought out glory or tried to advance his name at any cost. John is the kind of Congressman that will leave a long record of accomplishments when he walks out of this Chamber as we adjourn sine die. First, John leaves a great legacy to the 10th District in the State of Illinois. As our governor, State senators and representatives mentioned in their letters and as my colleagues from Illinois attested tonight, John's contributions are without equal. Among the many projects for which he will be remembered, his funding for the METRA Commuter rails that link the northern suburbs of Illinois with downtown Chicago and O'Hare Airport. Second, John leaves a great legacy to this country. His crusade to increase NIH funding will no doubt lead one day to the cures for the diseases that will save millions of lives. His work on behalf of women's and children's health issues, it is unparalleled. John leaves a great legacy for our world community. He has represented those around the world who are not able to represent themselves. John fights not only for the most popular crusades, but also for the countries and people forgotten by the glare of CNN. This is a proud legacy. Perhaps most importantly, John leaves a great legacy for the people whose lives he has personally and directly touched. The thoughtful and loving testimony shared here tonight by his staff and former staff members speak out volumes on the quality and decency of this fine man. Tonight we heard of the legacy that John has created during his years of service in this body. We heard but a small part of the large impact he has made on his district, his State, his country, and the world. But tonight is not a leave-taking. It is the exciting commencement of the next stage of John's career. We will all watch with great pride and interest the new challenges that John will decide to tackle in the months and years to come. We all will know that whatever cause or causes he chooses to take on in his next career will be benefited and blessed by his fine touch. They say there is no limit to the amount of good that a man can do in this world if he does not care who gets the credit. Well, John never cares and never has cared who has gotten the credit, and John can never be credited sufficiently for the great good he has done in this world. We will all miss John Porter a great deal, but we are all honored to have been able to serve with a leader of such integrity, dedication, and commitment to principle. Tonight we celebrate his legacy, we delight in his friendship, and we wish John Edward Porter the very best that life has to offer. Mr. Speaker, I include for the Record the following speech: Speech Delivered by Gerald LeMelle, Deputy Executive Director for Amnesty International USA, on the Occasion of a Farewell Reception for Representative John Porter, Co-Chairman of the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, October 3, 2000 Distinguished members of Congress, distinguished staff, dear friends and colleagues, it is my bittersweet pleasure to be here to bid farewell to our dear friend and Co-Chairman of the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, Congressman John Porter. Chairman Porter has been a key leader in ensuring that the Congressional Human Rights Caucus did not just survive the abolition of caucuses, but has managed to thrive--even ``thrive'' might be an understatement! Today, the Human Rights Caucus has an almost frantic pace of briefings-- Guatemala, Burma, Sudan, Algeria, East Timor, Turkey--it matters not the range of countries or even issues, all these countries are covered in a week, with recognized experts or with the activists who are on the front line of these issues! But the Caucus does not cover only countries in the headlines but countries and peoples forgotten by the glare of CNN. The Caucus is here to ensure that human rights around the world remain a focal point for congressional activity--even when Congress gets caught up in other business. And for that, sir, we salute you. But Chairman Porter has gone beyond the Caucus in his pursuit of human rights. When Native American leaders converged on Washington earlier this year to call for the release of Leonard Peltier, they found a receptive ear in Chairman Porter who hosted an important briefing in which we in Amnesty International were honored to participate. When the Turkish government has gone on a public relations offensive, or when the Administration despite its wiser counsel has decided to pursue arms transfers to that NATO ally, it is Congressman Porter who has been publicly on the side of human rights. In 1995, at a briefing organized by the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, when Nigeria was suffering under the oppression of the late dictator Sani Abacha, Chairman Porter was one of the few voices calling Abacha what he was--a dictator--and one of the lone voices blasting the Administration's policy. And of course we cannot talk about the Chairman without talking about Kathryn Porter, a human rights activist in her own right. While her work on behalf of the Kurdish people and Afghani women is widely recognized and celebrated, we also remember the singular courage she exhibited when she spent some time with Jennifer Harbury in Guatemala, on a lonely stretch of rural road outside an Army base. While a politician might boast of the state dinners he or she has attended, Chairman Porter attended a ``stateless'' dinner on behalf of Chinese dissidents. While politics is well tuned to the powerful and the popular, Chairman Porter has stood by the underdogs, supporting the rights of religious and ethnic minorities throughout the world, including the Armenians and the Ba'hais. While many in Congress have shunned the challenge of confronting the violations by powerful allies such as Saudi Arabia, Chairman Porter seems to embrace such opportunities. While governments and their representatives tend to have relationships with other governments, we can safely say that Chairman Porter has built relationships with peoples. We in Amnesty International USA with its 300,000 members in the United states and more than a million members worldwide can say that we are a grateful people for your leadership and your support. I should also add, if I want my staff not to kill me, that your staff has also been fabulous, including Rachel Helfand, Karen Davis, Heidi Gasch, Katharine Fisher, Kelly Currie, and Jeannette Windon. We have grown to respect and rely on them as well. Whether from your keynote speech at the Latin American Ambassadors Colloquium in 1991 or your steadfast support in issue after issue, you have always been there for us and for human rights, with integrity and principle that is second to none. Dear Chairman Porter, it's not just staffers who voted you number one Congressperson who will be missed most--we also read Washingtonian magazine--we too will miss you deeply. Thank you sir for your wonderful example and contribution to human rights. You are a real hero to us.

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, it gives me great pleasure to host this special order tonight for the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter), and I want to thank the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. McInnis) for giving up his time to allow us to honor this very special gentleman tonight. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter) is retiring, after serving in Congress for 21 years. It is difficult for those of us who are gathered to honor John tonight to sum up in the short time everything that he has done for the 10th Congressional District of Illinois and for his country since joining this body in 1980. It is my hope, based on the words that my colleagues and I will offer tonight, that all who are within the sound of our voices will understand the tremendous character of this man and all that he has accomplished, most notably in the areas of human rights, health research, and protecting the environment. It is also my hope that based on our comments John Porter will know how well-respected he is, not only by his congressional colleagues but by the elected officials of his home State and district, his staff, former staff, his constituents, and the many groups who have had the pleasure of working with him throughout the years. Tonight, Mr. Speaker, we will hear of the legacy John has created during his years of service in this body. We will hear a small part of the large impact he has made on his district, his State, his country, and the world. I have a confession to make. I am an unabashed John Porter fan. It is not because I have lived for many years in his district and know how well his leadership and his views suit those of his constituents there, nor is it because of the small kindnesses he has always personally shown to me. Those are reasons enough to sing the praises of this wonderful man. Like hundreds of thousands of men and women in Illinois, throughout the United States and around the four corners of this globe, I know and love this man for his great humanity, his concern for the underdog, and his unquestioned commitment to making this world a better place in which to live. When I was elected in 1998, to serve the people of the 13th District of Illinois here in Congress, I knew that it would be helpful for me to look at the other members of the Illinois delegation for guidance. Knowing his excellent reputation, John Porter was the first person I sought out. Asking him for input was easy, given our similar political ideologies. However, I doubt John, and the ease with which he provided advice, fully understood how much guidance he truly gave. With that, Mr. Speaker, I am going to turn to some of my colleagues so that they too can share their thoughts on our dear friend. And I will first yield to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood). As my colleagues know, before his election, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood) served as the chief of staff to then House minority leader, Bob Michel of Illinois. In this capacity he had the opportunity to work on a number of issues with John Porter and, as a result, probably knows him as well or better than any other Member in this body. I yield to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood).

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for his comments. Is it not curious that it is always the thinnest people that can eat two pieces of pie while the rest of us try to avoid them so we can pass them on to him?

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, the other area that the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. LaHood) and I see a lot of the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter) is at the ``Tuesday Lunch Bunch That Meets on Wednesday But Does Not Have Lunch Group.'' We spent meetings once a week to discuss issues that are important to those of us that belong in that group what we call the ``Republican Moderates.'' Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to recognize my friend and colleague, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Shimkus). I should note that the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Shimkus) will hold a similar special order next week for another Member from Illinois who is retiring from the 106th Congress, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Ewing), who we will hear from in just a few minutes. But, unfortunately, we are losing two great members of the Illinois delegation due to retirement this year, and it is our pleasure to honor both of them. Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Shimkus).

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for his comments. Mr. Speaker, it really is a pleasure to be on the Illinois delegation. I think that we have had such a unique opportunity for both sides of the aisle to work so carefully together. So I think that we are going to miss the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter) so much because of his contribution to that Illinois delegation. We have another Member, as I mentioned before, from Illinois. So I am pleased to recognize the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Ewing), my friend and colleague. Unfortunately, like the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter), the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Ewing) is stepping down at the end of this Congress. That is not the only thing that these two men have in common, however. Much, like they have been in this body for 9 years together. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Ewing) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter) served together in the Illinois General Assembly in the mid-1970s. So they have been traveling on the same circuit for a long time. I am happy to have the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Ewing) here to say something about the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Porter). Mr. Speaker, I yield to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Ewing).

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to hear what the gentleman had to say about him. I know that he is both of our friends, and we will miss him. It is nice that the gentleman has expressed that so eloquently. We will now move to Arkansas. I am pleased to yield the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Dickey). The gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Dickey) serves on the Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education of which John Porter is the chairman. So given the attention and controversy that our appropriation bill always seems to attract, I know that John Porter and the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Dickey) have gone through some interesting battles together. So I am happy that the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Dickey) could join us tonight to honor our friend John Porter.

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material on the subject of the Porter special order.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 3926 and as a proud cosponsor of this legislation to increase the authorization of the Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage Corridor Commission. I want to commend my colleague, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Weller), for introducing this legislation, which affects my district as well as many others. Congress first recognized the national significance of the I&M Canal in 1984 when it passed legislation that created the country's first National Heritage Corridor. Since that time, the I&M Canal National Heritage Corridor Commission has worked energetically with local individuals, organizations and communities to preserve, enhance, and celebrate this monument to American engineering and ingenuity. When the Canal first opened in 1848, it created a vital commercial link between the Great Lakes and the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. Soon after its opening, the Chicago River became lined with grain elevators, warehouses and industry. A trip that took 3 weeks before the canal was built took only 1 day on a boat towed by mules after the canal opened. The I&M Canal made Chicago the Nation's largest inland port and fueled an unprecedented wave of settlement and growth in all of northeastern Illinois. Even more importantly, the canal was the final link in a new national trade route between the Eastern Seaboard and the Gulf of Mexico. But the canal is more than a physical link between communities. It is now a link to our area's historically and culturally rich past. Individuals and communities along the canal recognize the historical importance of the canal and celebrate its contribution to local identity and progress with festivals, fairs, and other community events. Last year, in fact, I submitted one of these festivals for the Library of Congress' ``Local Legacies'' project, which celebrated the Library's bicentennial by documenting America's grass-roots heritage. Started in 1972, Old Canal Days is a community-wide festival that celebrates the heritage of the Illinois and Michigan Canal and the city of Lockport. It is a living history festival that includes reenactment of 19th century life along the canal. As a result of festivals like Old Canal Days and the work of the Canal Commission, this corridor has become a living history museum of American enterprise, technological invention, ethnic diversity, and cultural creativity linked by parks and trails. Local teachers use the canal as a unique teaching tool for lessons on history, geography, and science. The additional funding provided by this bill will allow the Canal Commission, the Canal Corridor Association, and Canal communities like Lemont and Lockport in my district to build on this success. I urge my colleagues to support this bill. We must preserve the canal. These additional funds are essential to shore up aging infrastructure, enhance historic programs, and increase the canal's recreational value. I urge support of this legislation.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the McDonald's Corporation for its exemplary leadership in environmental conservation. McDonald's has been a pioneer in a range of efforts to conserve energy, protect natural resources, and reduce solid waste. In the past, the Corporation has been honored for its conservation work by major environmental organizations, including the Council on Environmental Quality and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As a result of its comprehensive waste reduction program, McDonald's has received further recognition for its efforts in this area by recently receiving the EPA's prestigious Waste Wise Partner of the Year award. In 1989, McDonald's partnered with the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) to develop a comprehensive action plan for reducing waste. This cooperative project laid the foundation for a new approach to solving environmental problems. It served as a model for additional EDF alliances with leading U.S. businesses and also as a catalyst for other corporate/environmental organization partnerships. The following year, McDonald's established one of the first corporate ``buy recycle'' programs. The Company also initiated an ongoing series of environmentally friendly changes in packaging design that continues to this day. In 1992, McDonald's enrolled in EPA's Green Lights program to institutionalize the use of energy efficient lighting and, in 1994, became the very first partner in the EPA WasteWise program. The impact of these commitments and partnerships has been extraordinary. During the course of the 1900's, McDonald's: Eliminated 297 million pounds of packaging; Recycled 2 billion pounds of corrugated cardboard, thus reducing restaurant waste by 30 percent; Purchased over $3 billion worth of products made from recycled materials--over 300,000 tons in 1999 alone; and Saved over 510 million kilowatt hours, the equivalent of all the energy used by 14,500 homes over ten years. These impressive numbers do not tell the whole story. By entering into these partnerships, McDonald's is proving that commitment to the environment and core business interests can go hand in hand. In so doing, they are helping to bring about a new environmental ethic and, in a broader sense, the growth of corporate social responsibility. The Waste Wise award is an appropriate recognition for such leadership and for McDonald's sustained, effective commitment to making the world a better place. I congratulate the McDonald's corporation and its employees for this outstanding achievement.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Leach) for yielding and this opportunity to speak. Mr. Speaker, I rise as a cosponsor and strong supporter of H.R. 5417, legislation to rename the Stewart McKinney Homeless Assistance Act as the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act. To borrow a line from our 16th President, arguably our greatest President, Abraham Lincoln of Illinois, it is altogether fitting and proper that we honor our recently departed colleague, Representative Bruce Vento of Minnesota, in this way. After all, if it were not for Representative Vento and his determined efforts, the Stewart B. McKinney Assistance Act would never have been created. Bruce Vento was one of the earliest and strongest proponents of enacting a major Federal legislative response to homelessness. His tireless efforts were rewarded with the enactment in 1987 of the McKinney Homeless Assistance Act, but his dedication to homelessness did not stop there. Up until the very end of his life, Representative Vento remained a vocal and true champion of homeless assistance programs. The success of the McKinney Act in helping hundreds of thousands of Americans regain the stability in their life is testament to the foresight, hard work and character of the man who helped to shape this law. In celebration of this success and of the gentleman's distinguished congressional career, it is only fitting that the act on which Bruce Vento worked with such passion is renamed in his honor, and I am very honored to be on this bill.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, October is National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, a time for us to reflect upon the damage done to American society by domestic violence. Scratch the surface of any of our Nation's most challenging social problems, from crime in schools to gang violence and homelessness, and one is likely to find the root cause is domestic violence. Law enforcement officials report that domestic violence calls are among their most frequent. Judges find that children first seen in their courts as victims of domestic violence return later as adult criminal defendants. Schools report that children with emotional problems often come from environments where violence is the norm. What does this tell us? It tells us that violence begets violence, and it is incumbent on all of us to try and break the cycle. That is exactly what the Violence Against Women Act, VAWA, of 1994 has helped us to do over the last 6 years. Let us get to the President's desk now the 5-year reauthorization of VAWA. It is a vital investment in this Nation's future.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me time. Mr. Speaker, I want to bring to the attention of my colleagues a provision in this legislation that I have authored that will help us address the growing problem of so-called ``club drugs,'' such as Ecstasy. Five months ago, three young adults in the Chicago area, including two in my Congressional District, died after ingesting what they thought was the club drug Ecstasy, but was in fact a much more powerful cousin called PMA. These club drugs are flooding our country, and it is not hard to see why. Ecstasy costs just pennies to make, but it is sold here in the United States for as much as $40 per tablet, and the penalties for trafficking are a joke. While the youth of this country believe that Ecstasy is harmless, the problems they face range from paranoia to brain damage, and even to death. Under this bill, the penalties for Ecstasy trafficking will be increased and we will authorize $10 million to teach our children that these club drugs are dangerous. I believe that this will get the attention of traffickers and the users of Ecstasy, and I urge passage of this bill.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 1248, legislation to reauthorize the historic Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) of 1994. A husband in the presence of his children strikes his wife, sending her to the floor and blackening her eye. A woman changes her job, phone number, apartment building and with them, her life, in order to hide from a stalker. A young woman out jogging on a beautiful late-summer evening is pulled into the woods and sexually assaulted by a stranger. All of these frightening things will happen in America today. It's hard to understand why someone would choose to purposely hurt a woman-- or a child, for that matter. But it happens--more than we care to think. Violence against women is a large, often unrecognized, and too frequently ignored problem in all of our communities. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, nearly one in three women experiences at least one physical assault at the hands of a partner. In 1998, nearly 3 out of 4 victims of intimate partner homicide were women. Approximately 1 million are stalked annually. In 1998 alone, an estimated 307,000 women were raped or sexually assaulted. Six years ago, Congress passed milestone legislation to combat domestic violence, stalking and sexual assaults. This legislation, which we are discussing today, is the Violence Against Women Act. VAWA has been successful in achieving its mission. Statistics show that violence against women by intimate partners has fallen an astounding 21 percent since enactment of this Act. The murder rate of partners also is down, with 1,830 murders attributed to intimate partners in 1998 compared to over 3,000 murders in 1976. As a result of funding allocated under VAWA, more than 300,000 women and their dependents each year are able to escape their batterers and find a better life by temporarily going to a local shelter. In my home state of Illinois, the number of reported criminal sexual assaults declined 8.2 percent between 1997 and 1998. But falling statistics, while good news, are not good enough. Violence continues daily to devastate the lives of thousands of women and children. This clearly sends a signal that Congress must keep its commitment to making our streets and homes safe for women and children. And that calls for reauthorizing and strengthening VAWA, which is exactly what this body should do today. As written, H.R. 1248 authorizes $3 billion over the next years to fund various programs that help state and local efforts to: prosecute abusers; enforce domestic violence and stalking laws; train law enforcement and judicial personnel on how to handle such cases; and provide a hotline and counseling services to battered women. In addition to continuing these important services, H.R. 1248 strengthens the existing Act by authorizing funding for a new transitional housing assistance program to help persons fleeing a domestic abuse situation and adding clarifying language that allows money under the Act to be used for date violence prevention. It authorizes $10 million in new funding to help prevent violence against women with disabilities and an additional $200,000 for training medical personnel in sexual assault identification techniques as well. Mr. Speaker, scratch the surface of any of our nation's most challenging social problems--from crime in schools to gang violence and homelessness--and you're likely to find the root cause is domestic violence. Our country's judges are beginning to find that children first seen in their courts as victims of domestic violence return later as adult criminal defendants. Local law enforcement officials are reporting that domestic violence situations are among their most frequent calls. Businesses from California to Maine are starting to recognize that domestic violence, in the form of absenteeism and reduced employee productivity, has tremendous economic costs. Schools are noticing that children with emotional problems often come from environments where violence is the norm. What does this tell us? It tells us that violence begets violence, and it is incumbent on all of us to try to break the cycle. By strengthening families, promoting strong values, and encouraging community involvement, that's exactly what the Violence Against Women Act helps us to do. Reauthorizing VAWA is a vital investment in this nation's future and it should be one of our highest priorities. Reauthorizing this Act is also the right thing to do, and I urge my colleagues to move this effort forward by voting for H.R. 1248. Let me conclude by commending the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, my colleague from Illinois, Mr. Hyde, for his strong support of H.R. 1248 and for his work in getting it to the floor for consideration. I also commend a real champion of women's issues-- Representative Connie Morella of Maryland--for sponsoring this crucial legislation. I also thank the co-chairs of the Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues--Representative Sue Kelly and Carolyn Maloney of New York--for all their hard work on promoting this legislation. Finally, let me extend my gratitude to the members of my violence against women advisory committee back in Illinois for their input and useful advice.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 4451) to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1001 Frederick Road in Baltimore, Maryland, as the ``Frederick L. Dewberry, Jr. Post Office Building''.

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks on H.R. 4451.

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, the bill before us, H.R. 4451, was introduced by the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Cummings). This legislation designates the post office located at 1001 Frederick Road in Baltimore, Maryland, as the Frederick L. Dewberry Post Office. H.R. 4451 is cosponsored by the entire House delegation of the State of Maryland. Frederick L. Dewberry, Jr. was born and raised in the City of Baltimore. He received his undergraduate degree from Loyola College and his law degree from the University of Baltimore. Mr. Dewberry served with distinction during World War II. He became the chairman of the Baltimore County Council from 1964 and was appointed deputy secretary of the Maryland Department of Transportation from 1979 to 1984. Mr. Speaker, I urge our colleagues to support H.R. 4451 and commend the gentleman from Maryland for introducing this legislation. Mr. Dewberry is most deserving of being honored by having a post office named after him in the city which he grew up in and spent much of his life. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from New York (Mr. McHugh), the chairman of the Subcommittee on Postal Service, of the Committee on Government Reform.

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I urge our colleagues to vote and pass this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and honor Nancy Johnson, a native of Downers Grove in the 13th Congressional District of Illinois, for making history this past weekend. Nine years after being advised to retire due to nerve damage in her arms and legs, Nancy Johnson overcame the odds to win not just a gold medal, but the very first gold medal of the 2000 summer Olympic games in Sydney, Australia. Nancy struck gold in the women's 10 meter air rifle competition. Like all Olympic events, the competition was tough and came down to the wire. In fact, it came down to the final 10 shots. Neither Nancy nor the 7 other final round competitors blinked, budged or crumbled under the pressure. But, when it was all over, Nancy had edged out Cho- Hyun Kang of Korea by two-tenths of a point. But Nancy's story is even more impressive than her Olympic triumph. Her victory is the story of perseverance. Her medal-winning performance was the culmination of years of hard work, dedication, competitiveness and, most importantly, family. Nancy first took up the sport of shooting as a teenager. She and her father, Ben Napolski, often shot together at the Downers Grove junior rifle club. Ben and Diane, Nancy's mom, also lent their support while she competed innumerous competitions, including the 1996 Olympics in Atlanta where she finished 36th in her sport. Tragically, Diane passed away before she could see her daughter's magnificent accomplishment. But Ben, and Nancy's husband Ken, were there in Sydney to provide support, advice and gold-winning embraces. Nancy Johnson's Olympic performance and shooting achievements also have helped to raise the level of awareness and appreciation for women's sports throughout the United States. her love for a sport not typically associated with women serves as an inspiration for all of us, regardless of age or gender, to participate in activities we might not otherwise. Her performance also reminds us that participation in sport provides women, as well as men, with a means to gain the experiences, self-confidence and skills that are needed to succeed in all other endeavors. Nancy's gold medal-winning performance epitomizes the goals and ideals of the Olympics. These goals, which have not changed since antiquity, include a commitment to a goal, grace under pressure, unity, perseverance, fair play and good will toward fellow competitors. Most of all, her performance teaches us that Olympic competition is about the quest for excellence. In closing, Mr. Speaker, Nancy Johnson has honored her family,her native home town of Downers Grove, her native state of Illinois and her country through her dedication to excellence and high achievement. More important, this young woman has left her mark in history. I ask that my colleagues join me in saluting her achievement and all that for which it stands.

Mrs. BIGGERT

Mrs. BIGGERT. Madam Speaker, I want to join my distinguished colleague from Illinois (Mr. Porter) in applauding the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Bachus) for his work on the subcommittee. I would like to associate myself with the comments from the gentleman of Illinois and the important issue that he has raised. One of the many currency concerns the distinguished chairman has addressed is the importance of maintaining the dollar's preeminence as the currency of choice in world trade. The ability of banks and other commercial entities to handle a given country's currency quickly and accurately is extremely important. Nearly 60 percent of U.S. currency is held abroad, mainly because of the purchasing power and recognized stability of the dollar. As a result, the dollar is a popular target for counterfeiting. As the gentleman from Illinois stated, without a U.S.-based manufacturer, there is concern that future technology upgrades may not keep pace with more sophisticated counterfeit operators. We, as a country, must remain vigilant in the fight against counterfeiting. Therefore, I hope that as the 106th Congress draws to a close and we begin to look forward to the issues we will address in the next Congress, that the chairman of the subcommittee will continue to work on efforts to maintain and enhance the preeminence of the dollar in world trade. I hope we continue to have an open and informational dialogue on these matters and perhaps hold hearings so that all concerned parties have a chance to express their views on this important subject.