Thad Cochran

Mr. COCHRAN

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote, and I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to. Amendment No. 393

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I have requests to make, on behalf of the managers of the bill, with respect to amendments that have been cleared on both sides of the aisle. Amendment No. 352 I now call up amendment No. 352, on behalf of Mr. Salazar, regarding the renaming of the death gratuity.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.

Mr. COCHRAN. I thank the Chair. Mr. President, for the information of Senators, I have been asked and others have been asking the leadership about the intention of the Senate to proceed to votes on other amendments tonight. That is certainly up to the Senate. We are here open for business. We have an emergency supplemental appropriations bill pending before the Senate, and we need to move with dispatch to complete action on this bill to get the money to the Departments of Defense and State for accounts that have been depleted and that we need in the war on terror, that we need for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. So I hope we can proceed to further consideration of amendments that are pending. There are amendments pending. I hope Senators can cooperate with the managers and the leadership in moving this bill ahead. I thank all Senators. I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. COCHRAN. The Dorgan amendment is the pending amendment.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I appreciate very much the Senator from West Virginia offering the amendment and bringing this issue to the attention of the Senate and making the suggestion that is included in this amendment, which would ``prohibit the use of funds by any Federal agency to produce a prepackaged news story without including in such a story notification for the audience that the story was prepared or funded by a Federal agency.'' That is what the amendment says the purpose is, and that looks totally OK to me--harmless, no reason we should not support it. Then if you read down in the body of the amendment itself as to what it actually would provide in law, it says: None of the funds provided in this act or any other act may be used by a Federal agency to produce any prepackaged news story, unless the story includes a clear notification to the audience that the story was prepared or funded by that Federal agency. This creates a new obligation--not one that is enforced now by the FCC, not one that is embraced by Members of Congress or Senators when they send news releases out to news organizations about their activities or their views on a subject, it includes an obligation on anyone sending such a news story or statement or video release to communicate to the audience--the person looking at the television show or listening to the radio or reading the newspaper--that it is prepared by a Federal agency, or it uses funds to prepare it that are given to a Federal agency. It creates a new requirement, one that is almost impossible to meet. Think about it. When we send a news release to a newspaper back home, we don't send it to all of the readers or subscribers of that newspaper. We send it to the newspaper, the address, the name of the newspaper in the town where it does business. So that is the defect in the amendment. That is why Senator Bond, speaking as chairman of the subcommittee that has jurisdiction over the funding and the laws under the jurisdiction of the subcommittee that would be involved and affected by this, spoke against the amendment. That is why the Senate should not adopt the amendment. We all agree you need to include a disclaimer. We have to do that and we do that. Federal agencies do that. We cannot make the news editor or the producer of the news show include the disclaimer in the broadcast though. Nor should we be held responsible personally or criticized if that news agency didn't disclaim or print or announce where they got the news story. That is an entirely different obligation and one that the FCC will enforce now and that we all support. So what I am suggesting is that these are great speeches. This is a good political issue--to accuse the administration of trying to fool the American people by creating the impression that some of their news stories that are produced for the news media are produced by them and not the radio station or the television station or the newspaper that published it or broadcasted it. That is nothing new. But it is not up to the agency or the person who writes the story to communicate it to the audience. That is the problem. We cannot support it. So it would be my intention to move to table the amendment because of that--not because it is not motivated by the right reasons or doesn't carry with it the sentiment that is appropriate. Of course, it does. But the wording of the amendment itself--not just the purpose of the amendment--is defective in that it imposes an obligation that should not be imposed on Federal agencies, the Government, or individual Members of Congress. I am hopeful that--and I am sure the Senator from West Virginia will, if he can--the Senator will modify his amendment so it can be accepted. But if that cannot be done, I am prepared to move to table the amendment. I will not do that and cut off the right of any other person to talk about the subject.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I have no objection.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I notice that the distinguished Senator from New Jersey is on the floor. He is a cosponsor of this amendment. I assume he is here to talk on the amendment. I was going to try to bring the discussion to a close so we could vote on the amendment or vote in relation to the amendment, but I am happy to withhold because I do not want to cut off anyone who wants to talk on this subject.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, we have no objection to the modification.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I thank the Senator for the explanation of his amendment. There is one thing, in looking at the amendment, that I am not sure of, and I am wondering if he could advise the Senate. Does the Senator have an estimate from anyone at the Department of Defense or in the Hospital Services Agency of the Department of Defense as to what the costs of the amendment would be during the balance of this fiscal year?

Mr. COCHRAN. I ask unanimous consent the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.

Mr. COCHRAN. I move to reconsider the vote, and I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote, and I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.

Mr. COCHRAN. I thank the Senator and thank the Chair. I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, what is the regular order?

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I move to reconsider the vote, and I move to lay that motion on the table. The motion to lay on the table was agreed to.

Mr. COCHRAN. I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. COCHRAN. Reserving the right to object--I, of course, will not object--it is my hope that we can continue to deal with the Byrd amendment and dispose of the Byrd amendment. Then the Senator can talk about the Mikulski amendment or any other amendment he wants to talk about. I do not have an objection.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. COCHRAN. I ask unanimous consent the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I now send an amendment to the desk, on my own behalf, to make a technical correction to the bill. I ask it be reported.

Mr. COCHRAN

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation be authorized to meet on pending Committee business, on Thursday, April 14, 2005, at 10 a.m.

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia be authorized to meet on Thursday, April 14, at 10 a.m. for a hearing entitled, ``Passing the Buck: A Review of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.''

Mr. COCHRAN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Citizenship and the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security be authorized to meet to conduct a joint hearing on ``Strengthening Interior Enforcement: Deportation and Related Issues'' on Thursday, April 14, 2005 in Dirksen room 226 at 2:30 p.m. Panel I: Jonathan Cohn, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC and Victor Cerda, Acting Director of Detention and Removal, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC. Panel II: David Venturella, U.S. Investigations Service, Washington, DC and Lee Gelernt, Senior Staff Counsel, Immigrant's Rights Project, American Civil Liberties Union, Washington, DC.