Joe Crowley

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I thank my friend and colleague from California for yielding me this time. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of the Miller-Schakowsky- Crowley amendment and urge all our Members here in the House to support it. Is this amendment a cure to our Nation's employee pension problems? No. The problem is PBGC jumped too easily at a deal to put taxpayers on the hook for pensions, while allowing United to walk away from its responsibilities to its employees. Representing the district that houses LaGuardia Airport and serving many Delta employees, I have real concerns about the bad precedent set by PBGC and worry that other airlines, and soon other industries, will follow United's lead. As we know, Delta recently stated that it must pay $2.6 billion over the next 3 years to meet the obligations of its defined benefit pension plan. The carrier has warned in the past that its growing obligation poses a threat to restructure and avoid a bankruptcy filing. At the same time, UAL Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein has said that United would gain a competitive advantage on rivals by dumping its employee pension obligation. This is bad precedent. Real pension reform is needed, and this amendment is to serve as a wake-up call to that fact.

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I thank my friend for yielding me this time, and I thank both the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) for his comments and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Linda T. Sanchez). I think that this amendment is wrongheaded. I do not believe it will have the effect that the sponsor wants to have, and that is that all undocumented illegal aliens will just ship up and move back home. It plays well on some radio and television stations, but in reality it will have no effect. In the State of New York, our constitution requires that every child be afforded an education, whether that child is a legal citizen and resident or an undocumented alien or their parents are. TB does not have the ability to discern as to whether someone is documented or undocumented. When that child's mother or father contracts that disease, they give it to their child and their child goes to school. Our children are the ones who are exposed to those diseases. Our children then become the victims of what this amendment would do if it were to pass. This amendment will not have that effect. It will just be a chilling effect on all people who question their status in this country, and they will then not go and get the care that they need to protect the rest of our children.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, In recognition of the Burmese State Peace and Development Council's (SPDC) failure to comply with the conditions described in H.R. 2330, ``Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003,'' I commend my colleague and the ranking Member of the Committee on International Relations, Rep. Tom Lantos for his strong stand on restoring democracy in Burma and holding the military Junta accountable. Seventeen years ago the people of Myanmar rose up in mass protest against the SPDC, which had established power through a military coup. Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, daughter of the country's founding hero, U Aung San, was arrested as a result of her pro-democracy stance during these protests. Following in her father's footsteps, she devotes her life to the people of Burma and freedom. As a leader of the National League for Democracy, NLD, she was seen as a threat to the SPDC power basis and unjustly imprisoned. In 1990 Parliamentary elections were held, in which an eighty percent majority voted in support the NLD. In 1991, Mrs. Kyi was awarded the Nobel peace prize in recognition for her instrumental role in Burma's struggle for freedom. Since the SPDC has taken power, it has continued to dismiss and neglect any meaningful dialogue with the United Nations in addressing their continuing persecution of opposition members. The SPDC continually fails to address their past and present human rights violations and fails to cooperate with U.S. efforts to stop the exporting of heroin and methamphetamines; while providing safety and harbor for persons involved with narcotics trafficking. The SPDC supports the integration of the military into all facets of the economy, thus destroying all notions of a free economy; while using currency generated from the Burmese people to purchase and sponsor an institution of terror and repression. The SPDC has done everything in its power to repress democracy and the will of the people of Burma. It is clear further sanctions must be taken in order for this struggle to come to an end. Despite sanctions taken by the U.S. the European Union and many other nations, economic relief is still available for the SPDC. China, India and many other ASEAN countries still trade with Burma providing them with the necessary lifeline to maintain their reign of oppression. If economic penalties are to be effective, multi-lateral support is necessary. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support with President Bush, Secretary General Kofi Annan of the United Nations, Ole D. Mjoes of the Nobel Committee and my fellow Congressional colleagues in calling for an end of state sponsored tyranny in Burma. Justice can only be served when the release of all political prisoners, freedom of speech and the press, freedom of association and the peaceful exercise of religion become constitutional rights. The fact that Bufria will be the rotating chair of the Association of South East Asian Nations, ASEAN is troubling. I believe President Bush and Secretary Rice should engage our allies Singapore, Thailand, India as well as China to focus on using their ties with the government of Burma to promote democracy in Burma and freedom for the Burmese people. An agreement between the SPDC and NLD must be made so that the transfer of power to a civilian government, that is accountable to the Burmese people through democratic elections under the rule of law, can be made. For those reasons H.R. 2330 must be renewed. We cannot waiver on our policy until democracy and freedom are restored to the people or Burma.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Madam Speaker, I thank my gentle friend and colleague from California for yielding me this time. I rise in strong support of the national intelligence bill. I want to thank the committee for its great work. I especially want to focus my praise on the gentlewoman from California (Ranking Member Harman) for her great work in leading on this issue. It was Democrats, led by the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Harman) and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Hastings), that pushed the 9/11 Commission to be started last year, as the Republicans and the White House blocked their work and opposed their mission. I believe the Republicans fear the truth that may come from that Commission. Later, when the 9/11 Commission issued its recommendations and the Speaker said he would not implement any legislative changes without a majority of the majority, it was again Democrats and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Harman) who led the fight for a real intelligence shakeup and for the creation of a director of National Intelligence. Democrats fixed those problems and fought back changes this year to bring us back to the bad old days of intelligence turf wars. This bill reflects the new world we live in, a dangerous world that has gotten more dangerous since September 11; and we need to be involved, and more heavily involved, to protect all Americans, no matter where they are on this planet and the bill does that. Representing one of the most diverse congressional districts in the U.S., I interact with a number of immigrants and their families who are from every corner of the globe. And the one thing that unifies them all is their love of this great country. And they can and will be helpful in helping this country infiltrate terror networks that threaten our country. This bill will help them do that.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to speak in support of the Lantos Shays substitute and in opposition to the United Nations Reform Bill sponsored by Chairman Hyde. While I am concerned about the withholding of funding from the United Nations, I believe that reforms are needed within this world body while enhancing not diminishing the U.S.'s moral authority in this august body. While I agree with many of my colleagues who have spoken on this bill that reform is needed, I am troubled by the way Chairman Hyde has drafted this bill. I have great respect for the Chairman but I think the bill could have been drafted in a less draconian manner. This bill makes it almost impossible for the United Nations to complete all the reforms within the time frame that has been set. I do not believe that the United States should be withholding contributions if reforms are not made at the pace this bill sets them at. Withholding our contributions from the United Nations until certain programs are shifted to voluntary is something that all of the member states would have to approve and I do not believe that this bill gives a reasonable enough time frame. The Lantos Shays substitute will arm the United States to promote serious reforms and not just forcing to cut off funds to the United Nations that would be counterproductive to our national interests. The substitute keeps the reform of the Chairman Hyde's bill as a goal, but does not link it to a mandatory $100 million deduction in U.S. contributions. Another important difference between the Chairman's bill and the substitute is the inflexibility on the issue of peacekeeping. The substitute retains the much needed reforms on peace keeping instead of just cutting aid to these missions. The substitute will provide the Secretary of State with a waiver in the event that a new mission is essential to America's national interest. We all know that the United States has problems and we see one of the most evident ones in its treatment of the state of Israel. The General Assembly has turned itself into a forum to bash Israel and until recently it had a policy equating Zionism as racism. The U.N. Commission on Human Rights also routinely castigates Israel and the General Assembly has gone out of its way to pass a one-sided resolution condemning Israel for protecting its citizens from terrorism. The General Assembly created two committees which focus negatively on Israeli actions and protectively on the Palestinians: the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, and the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People. The United Nation needs to be reformed so it is a body of creating diplomacy and understanding not a forum for hate. I do believe the United Nations needs to be reformed to remain a strong supporter not just because of its close proximity to my Congressional district or the large amounts of my constituents who work at the United Nations but because I strongly believe in the founding principals of the United Nations. This multilateral organization has helped the world come together since its creation and brought us out of the horrors of World War II. If we truly want to work toward reform we must work with our friends and partners to make this happen--not just threaten the loss of contributions. This will solve none of the reforms that are needed so badly to get the United Nations back on the right tract. I do not support this bill in its current form and urge all of my colleagues to support the Lantos Shays substitute so we can start to have a real dialogue on the much needed reform of the United Nations.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, June 19 marks the 60th birthday of Burma's Democracy Leader Aung San Suu Kyi. She has been held under house arrest since May 30, 2003--this is the third time since 1988 that the regime has confined Suu Kyi to house arrest for political reasons--after narrowly escaping an assassination attempt by Burma's ruling military regime in May of 2003. June 19 also marks the Women of Burma Day. In recognition of this day I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the courageous and honorable efforts made by Suu Kyi and other Burmese women who continue to struggle for democracy, human rights, and an end to brutal dictatorship in Burma. Today, Burmese women are a driving force in the fight for freedom and democracy in Burma. They inspire us all in their courage to carry out non-violent activities, challenging the military regime's repressive and violent rule. Burmese women are struggling to save a homeland that continues to deteriorate under military dictatorship. The military regime's response to non-violent political protestors has been abominable. Since winning the popular election by a landslide in 1988, supporters of democracy in Burma have been killed, arrested, imprisoned, and tortured by the thousands. Fearing certain imprisonment and death, many of these democracy supporters have fled the country. I would like to honor ten Burmese women who have dedicated their lives to improving the health, welfare, and future of Burma's people. With unwavering commitment, these women have sought to address critical issues affecting the people of Burma. These honorees have been involved in a diverse range of activities in the arena of social welfare and democracy and human rights. Eight of the honorees, Daw Aye Aye Mar, Daw Hla Hla Moe, Ma Mi Suu Pwint, Ma Nilar Thein, Ma Su Su Nway, Ma Than Than Htay, Ma Tin Tin Myint and Ma Zinmar Aung have endeavored to continue the ongoing struggle for freedom, human rights, and democracy in Burma. Two of the honorees, Dr. Myint Myint Khin and Ma Than Myint Aung, are deeply involved in organizing and engaging in social welfare and education programs. Demonstrating a unifying commitment to the people of their country, these extraordinary women have pursued their life's work with courage and perseverance. In the course of their lives, many have served, or continue to serve, lengthy jail sentences dealt by Burma's repressive military regime. I request that we honor and show solidarity with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and all of ``2005 Profiles in Courage'' honorees. We should celebrate their achievements, and honor their personal sacrifice and vision for the future of Burma. Democracy will come to Burma soon. I believe that one day, the people of Burma will have a chance to openly honor these women and I am very sure that they will do so with great happiness. For the time being, they need our help, and we need to assist them consistently and strongly so that they will attain the goal to which they have been aspiring for so long.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise to speak today concerning the recent dispute between Airbus and Boeing, which has developed into a clash between the European Union and the United States. The dispute is long and complicated and both sides are convinced they are right. Nevertheless, one incontrovertible fact remains: the EC/EU have given Airbus massive subsidies over the past three decades, which Airbus used to buy market share and skew competition against U.S. companies, mainly Boeing. The 1992 US-EC Agreement outlined the maximum amount of governmental support and subsidies a state could provide in aircraft production, while calling for progressively reducing subsidies. Further, Airbus agreed to provide a considerable amount of transparency in their business dealings, a standard they continue to ignore when it is not completely advantageous to them. The 1992 agreement presented Airbus with the best option, but they failed to abide by its terms. As a result, the U.S. terminated the 1992 agreement in October, 2004 and, looked to the WTO as the/international body to address this trade matter. The EU continues to provide Airbus with massive subsidies, which undermine the ability of Boeing to compete on a level field. If the EU continues to write off billions of euros in Airbus debt, how can Boeing fairly compete? Despite Europe's repeated flaunting of the terms of the 1992 agreement, the US pressed the EU to commit itself to fairer trade policies. As we all know, the EU refused to back down and continued their hard line stance regarding aircraft subsidies. Reluctantly, the U.S. government filed papers with the WTO so that a panel of judges could hear the complaint, a step our government does not take lightly. We would prefer to arrive at a private understanding with the EU, one that does not resort to this WTO panel. However, the ED's insistence on continuing to provide massive subsidies and refusing to reach a compromise, have forced us to act. I fully support the US government and Boeing in their dispute with the EU and Airbus. I believe that the EU must cease providing massive subsidies, which undermine competition and unfairly undercut Boeing. American workers can compete with anyone in the world. I'm only asking that this Congress and the Administration do everything possible to make sure that the competition is fair and equal for both sides.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of this amendment, and I thank Congresswoman Maloney, along with Congressman Shays and Congressman Israel, for joining me in support of this important issue. This amendment is simple. If you support the good work UNFPA does around the world, in approximately 150 countries, supporting women's health programs, fighting HIV/AIDS, and improving child health--then you will vote for the Maloney/Crowley amendment. This Congress has consistently voted to fund UNFPA. But the Administration refuses to release that money. They hide behind the fact that UNFPA works in China, helping move that country away from its abhorrent one-child policy. Of course, when the President sent over an investigative team, it reported that there was no coercion in the Chinese program and that UNFPA should be funded. Moreover, Congress has put into law that, if the U.S. contributes to UNFPA, it will deduct $1 for every $1 spent in China. Clearly, the China issue is simply meant to muddy the waters of this debate. But one thing that remained abundantly clear to me during my trip to see the impact of the recent tsunami--UNFPA funding is nothing short of critical. I recently visited tsunami-affected sites that, with UNFPA funding, often serve as the first line of support for women and families in need. But it is not only the important work they do in disaster zones, it is the work they do day in and day out to help women in the developing world. And while USAID is involved in related initiatives, the fact remains that the USAID is only in approximately 50 countries while UNFPA is in approximately 150. Let's focus on the facts. UNFPA saves lives, UNFPA brings dignity to those in need, and UNFPA helps women. UNFPA does not coerce. UNFPA does not provide abortion, and no U.S. money will go to China.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Madam Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the Resolution H. Con. Res. 47, which recognizes the establishment of the first, free public kindergarten in the United States, located in College Point, Queens, New York. As a native of Queens, I grew up learning about the history of this community, which includes the creation of the first free public kindergarten in the United States. The community of College Point, just a stone's throw from LaGuardia Airport, Shay Stadium--home of the Mets--and Flushing Meadows-Corona Park--the home of the U.S. Open Tennis tournament--this community was one of the first seeds in the creation of public education in America. Something that represents the Great Equalizer in American society. It all started in 1854, when Conrad Poppenhusen, a businessman from Germany, built a factory in College Point. There, he stressed an environment in which his immigrant workers could educate themselves in order to succeed financially, socially, and, most significantly, intellectually. Just as Henry Ford paid his employees high wages so they, in turn, could purchase his cars, Conrad Poppenhusen represented another industrial genius--that if educating his workforce to make them and their families more successful people in the community. Fourteen years later, in 1868, Mr. Poppenhusen continued his illustrious educational work by donating $100,000 and establishing the Poppenhusen Institute. His Institute sustained his original educational mission and expanded on it, by promoting the education of all adults from the greater community--not just his employees. In 1870, the Poppenhusen Institute once again expanded its educational services to include the first, free, public kindergarten in the United States, a seminal moment in American education and something we celebrate today with this resolution. The history of kindergarten has been a colorful one in America . . . and one that is big enough for all of us to share, recognize, and honor today. My friends from Wisconsin will happily point out that the first kindergarten in the United States was based in Watertown, Wisconsin and was founded in 1856 by Margarethe Meyer Schurz. This private, German-language kindergarten represented a landmark in the educational development of young Americans and we all salute her accomplishments. Additionally, any debate on the history of kindergarten would be incomplete without reference to the works of Elizabeth Palmer Peabody, a Massachusetts educator who opened the first English-language kindergarten in the United States in 1860. When she opened her kindergarten in 1860, the concept of providing formal schooling for children younger than six was largely confined to German practice. These educational pioneers led to the creation, by Conrad Poppenhusen, of the Nation's first, free public kindergarten--a sweeping educational development and a strong basis for the kindergartens we all know and recognize in our country today. It has always been known that education is the Great American Equalizer--the first step in young Americans lives to live the American Dream. The actions of Conrad Poppenhusen and his revolutionary kindergarten--the first kindergarten free and open to all, helped engrain the idea of free and public kindergartens throughout our great Nation--opening up the ideals of the American Dream to tens of millions of Americans since then. The American Dream of using education as a foundation for supporting oneself, one's family. The American Dream of using education as a foundation for a good job, home ownership, and a brighter future overall. This important moment, when this kindergarten opened in 1870 in College Point, Queens, NY, is all the more profound today, as Department of Education studies show the impact of kindergarten on the children that attend. Children who are enrolled in kindergarten benefit immensely from the knowledge and skills they learn, while simultaneously profiting from their interaction with children of a similar age. The reading and math skills, which students learn in kindergarten, are invaluable to a child's later education. Moreover, for many children, kindergarten is one of the first places in which they interact with students from a multitude of cultural, economic, racial, and religious backgrounds. These early interactions are pivotal in establishing relationships, which promote awareness of the importance of numerous cultures and ideas, something particularly important in Queens, New York, which is seen as one of the most diverse areas of the country. The effort that began in College Point today remains a significant feature of our education system. One of the greatest aspects of our nation is that through education, which often starts in kindergarten, each successive generation of children can succeed. Quite simply, the establishment of the first free, public kindergarten in College Point has made our nation a stronger, better place for generations. I want to close by recognizing the continued importance of the Poppenhusen Institute and those who serve it. This notable list extends from the first days of class to the work that persists. This list must include the first teacher, Bertha Ploedterl, all the way to Susan Brustmann, the current Executive Director, and James Trent, the President of the Board of Directors. Today, the work of these individuals and this community has resulted in activities, exhibits, and programs for people of all ages. Programs cover the fields of music, drama, karate, stress reduction. There are exhibits, such as one on the tragic events of September 11th as well as another on Native Americans. Individuals can take tours reviewing the archives of College Point to learn, not only about the history of this community, but about our shared American history, in this area, one of the most diverse and welcoming in the world. Additionally, the Institute collects the living histories of area seniors, so that they are documented for future generations. While the earliest days of this kindergarten will be remembered for being truly significant to New York and our nation, the true testament to the significance of this Institute is in the proud legacy that continues to live on through its works.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I am speaking today in strong support of the resolution regarding the manifestations of anti-Semitism by United Nations member states. I would like to praise Ms. Ros-Lehtinen for her tireless efforts as the chair of the Subcommittee on the Middle East and Central Asia. Her commitment to fighting anti-Semitism is unparalleled and she has raised awareness of the issue both within the United Nations and throughout the world. The state of Israel ardently strives to attain equality of rights which the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights recognizes as the best hope for freedom throughout the world. However, the past actions of many United Nations member states have challenged this equality through many of their anti-Semitic resolutions, actions, and statements. The regular manifestations of this blatant anti-Semitism occur throughout the course of the United Nation's history. Included in these acts are statements by members of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, those individuals who should be acting upon anti-Semitism rather than participating in it. I commend the UN for increasing awareness in the past few years of anti-Semitism and refusing to remain silent on this growing global problem. The recent session commemorating the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz marks a keystone in the United Nations' efforts to promote awareness of anti-Semitism. Nevertheless, members states annually remain critical of Israel and refuse to allow Israel equal rights and opportunities within the United Nations. Israel should have the same chance to participate in the United Nations, rather than be ignored by those states which would seek to spread hateful anti-Jewish and anti-Israel agendas. I believe that the United Nations should implement measures which: Publicly condemn those United Nations member states who make anti- Semitic and racial remarks, hold those same member states who make anti-Semitic remarks accountable, and promote awareness of anti- Semitism. The United States must take a firm stand on this issue today. We must declare that neglecting the problem of anti-Semitism is unacceptable.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of this resolution and would like to thank my good friend from California, Mr. Baca, for introducing this resolution. Cinco de Mayo represents many things, to Mexicans and Americans alike. To Mexicans and Mexican-Americans, Cinco de Mayo is a celebration of courage, patriotism, and Mexican unity. Cinco de Mayo honors all of the brave soldiers who successfully fought off foreign aggressors, in the town of Puebla, Mexico on May 5, 1862. Outnumbered, the Mexican Army willingly gave their lives in support of Mexican independence and justice. The battle that ensued in Puebla was instrumental in fighting of French aggressors. To Americans, Cinco de Mayo is a reminder of how our two nations strive for the same ideals and principles, freedom, justice and unity. It also marks the last time that a foreign power was the aggressor on North American soil. Both of our countries fought for their freedom in the face of great opposition. As a result of our struggles the United States and Mexico share a unique history that strengthens our unity. Millions of Mexican-Americans work, live, and contribute to our country every single day. Cinco de Mayo is a celebration of the rich culture, heritage, and tradition that Mexican-Americans have brought to the United States. This resolution recognizes our Mexican-American community and the close spiritual and economic ties the United States has with the people of Mexico. In honor of their accomplishments and unity, I urge all of my colleagues to support this resolution honoring Cinco de Mayo.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I thank the distinguished gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Skelton), the ranking member, for yielding me this time. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the Defense Authorization bill. I want to thank the gentleman from California (Chairman Hunter), chairman of the committee; and, again, his counterpart, the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Skelton), a man whom I greatly respect for crafting along, with the gentleman from California (Mr. Hunter), a very bipartisan bill. While this is not a perfect bill, in today's environment here on Capitol Hill, it is a testament to both of these men and their staffs that they are able to work so well together to put a bill forward that so many of us can support; and to both of them we are extremely grateful. I would also like to thank the Committee on Rules for making our amendment in order for debate today. My amendment is a Sense of Congress honoring the diversity of the men and women who have given their lives in defense of our country. The people of our Armed Forces are put in harm's way on a daily basis, and I am so proud of them for having the ability to keep fighting to protect our Nation's security. Over 1,500 members of the armed services have been killed while serving in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. And I believe it is important for this body to recognize the sacrifices being made by these diverse members of the Armed Forces and their families in the war on terror. Several members of our Armed Forces from my district have been killed while serving in defense of our Nation. I happen to represent one of the most diverse districts in our country today, and I am proud to say that this diversity is strongly represented in the military today as well. When I am back in my district, I make it my business to meet with veterans and members of the Armed Forces who have just returned from service, and I have found that many of these brave men and women are from the Latino and African American communities. While they are so happy to be home with their families, many of them still have the sense that their mission is not over, and they want to continue to protect our Nation against those who look to do us harm. The military is an opportunity for minority communities to start a better way of life for themselves, whether it is going to college after service or using the skills they have learned in the military to find a good job. I commend these men and women and send my sincerest condolences to the families of those who have lost loved ones in their service to our Nation.

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman from New Hampshire for yielding me the time and for his leadership here. I thank all of those who are participating in this evening's debate. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to speak in strong support of the Bradley/ Simmons/Herseth/Allen amendment to postpone the base realignment and closure. This amendment will force the Department of Defense to postpone BRAC for 1 year until more information is out there. I believe it is imperative to have a real discussion of this issue before the closures begin. The amendment would postpone the BRAC recommendations until 1 year after the last of the following actions occurs: the recommendations of the Commission to Review of Overseas Military Facility Structure are implemented by the Secretary of Defense; a substantial number of American troops return from Iraq as determined by the Secretary of Defense; the House and Senate Armed Services Committees receive the quadrennial defense review; the national maritime security strategy is implemented; and the homeland defense and civil support directive is implemented. While I do not have any bases in my district, I recognize the devastation too many of my colleagues' districts who have bases will incur by the closure of those bases. In today's environment of job loss all around the country, many of these towns that depend on the military bases for their livelihoods will be simply devastated if these bases were to close. Before the Department of Defense closes bases, they need to keep in mind what the closure will do to the communities that have been supportive of our military for many, many years. I urge all of my colleagues to support this amendment to make sure we have all the facts before us before this process moves any further forward.

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of the amendment being offered by the gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Davis), the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Harman), and the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Loretta Sanchez). No one here would dare question the contributions being made by American woman living on military bases overseas. Whether they are active servicemembers, spouses or dependents of military personnel, every last one of them is making a great sacrifice to support our country abroad. Every last one of them should have access to safe medical procedures that are legally available to every American woman here in the United States. Why would our government tell these women that they can receive abortion care in the U.S., that with their own private funds that it is too bad they are serving in our military and happen to be overseas, and therefore be denied access to care they could receive right here on terra firma? Why would our government tell women who are willing to die to protect their country that their country's laws on health care services do not extend to them when they leave U.S. soil? Regardless of one's personal feelings on abortion, I would hope that everyone could agree that it is most certainly wrong to discriminate against women in the military. For our government to tell this essential and noble group of women, some of whom literally dodge bullets to protect our interests, that we will not allow them the same range of quality care available to women living within our borders, that is not only dangerous; I believe it is un-American, and I urge an ``aye'' vote.

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to speak in support of the Defense Authorization bill. I would like to commend the distinguished Chairman of the Armed Services Committee Duncan Hunter and his counterpart Ike Skelton, a man who I greatly respect, for crafting a bipartisan bill. While this is not a perfect bill, in today's environment on Capitol Hill it is a testament to both of these men and their staff that they are able to work so well together to put a bill forward that so many of us can support. I would also like to thank the Rules Committee for making my amendment in order for debate today. My amendment is a Sense of Congress honoring the diversity of the men and women who have given their lives in defense of our country. Diversity is an essential part of the strength of the Armed Forces, in which members having different ethnic backgrounds and faiths share the same goal of defending the cause of freedom, democracy, and liberty. These brave men and women who come from such diverse backgrounds are one of the best foreign policy tools we have. When we have a broad mosaic of the diversity of our country all working together, like African Americans, Arab Americans, Asian Americans, Hindu Americans, Jewish Americans, Latino Americans, Muslim Americans, and Sikh Americans all working together fighting for the same cause, it says something to the rest of the world. I know a lot about diversity because I have the privilege of representing one of the most diverse Congressional districts and I'm proud to say that my constituents are members of the Armed Forces and unfortunately, several have lost their lives fighting to defend the cause of freedom, democracy, and liberty. As the former co-chair of the Caucus on India and Indian Americans, I read with interest about a young Sikh American, Specialist Uday Singh, who died fighting in Iraq. He was the first Sikh to die in combat operations during Operation Iraqi Freedom. As I read on, it told the story of how Specialist Singh joined the military--Singh joined because he believed in what the United States represents and felt the strong desire to fight for the freedoms we have here. I would like to commend the family of this young man for his sacrifice for our freedom. I also represent a large Latino community and have had the privilege of meeting with the Latino members of the Armed Forces. They've told me stories about what made them join, whether it was to defend the cause of freedom, democracy, and liberty or to make a better life for themselves through the military, regardless of the reasons their actions are commendable. A constituent of mine, Sergeant Christian Engeldrum was killed during service in Iraq. This patriot was a Firefighter in New York City and was one of the first people to raise an American flag over Ground Zero after September 11, 2001. The events he witnessed that horrible day spurred him to re-enlist into the Army to fight for our nation overseas and ensure our protection here at home. While he left his pregnant wife and two growing sons behind, he volunteered so they could live in a safer country, and a better world. Tragically, on November 30, he paid the ultimate price for his love of family and country when a roadside bomb exploded near his convoy outside of Baghdad. Sergeant Engeldrum was the fIrst New York City firefighter to die in service to his nation in Iraq. My heart and sincerest condolences go out to his family and all the other families who have lost loved ones, but we also need to focus our attention on those who have lost their lives but also the ones who have come back with injuries and unexplained ailments. I also have some veterans who are still struggling with the effects of serving in the military, both mentally and physically. One such veteran had gone undiagnosed and recently had a child born with birth defects. The military doesn't know why this happened but I believe it had to do with the large amount of depleted uranium found in his body. I would like to thank the committee for including language in the bill for the Department of Defense which addresses and acknowledges the widespread problem of exposure to depleted uranium by military personnel. The language, which I authored, was in honor of my constituent Gerard Mathew and his family. This language will require the Department of Defense to rework its strategy regarding depleted uranium, require the Department of Defense to update their testing methodology to the most modern standards and provide testing to all who request it and provide better protections and coverage for members of the military. This language is an important issue that all the members of our Armed Forces face and I want to thank the Committee for their willingness to address this concern. No piece of legislation is perfect but I would like to commend the chairman and the ranking member and their incredible staff for working hard to craft such a bipartisan bill that I hope many of the members of this House will support.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 810. I commend my colleague, the gentlewoman from Colorado (Ms. DeGette), for her leadership on this issue. Stem cell research is not about abortion. Stem cell research is not about human cloning. We are talking about finding cures for Alzheimer's, paralysis, Parkinson's, and other diseases. We are talking about improving the lives of countless numbers of people in this country. That is what stem cell research is about. We are talking about putting American health care and researchers in the best position to finding the cures for today's diseases tomorrow and to preventing the diseases of tomorrow today. This spring, I joined my colleague, the gentleman from New York (Mr. Israel), for a congressional roundtable on stem cells and on the biotech industry. Doctors, researchers, and scientists spoke about how the President's strict limits on stem cell research is prohibiting them from conducting the level of research that they would like to do. I agree, but who is missing out the most are the 650,000 people we represent and the potential this research holds. American medical research has extended lives through immunization, treatments, and innovations. From eradicating polio to advances in diabetes, American research has been on the forefront. But there is still so much more that can be done and much more potential that exists. I commend my colleagues again for this bill being on the floor, and I support it wholeheartedly.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise to recognize the accomplishments of The Motivating Youth to Achievement (My2A) Program and particularly its leader, John Ryu. Based in New York City, My2A was created to serve the needs of young people of New York who happen to be part of the foster care system. Young people in the foster care system routinely face challenges as they age and move onto their lives outside of foster care. Fortunately people have come together to encourage these young people to move confidently forward toward their futures, with access to job training, education, and professional employment. Fortunately, for these young people and the communities they serve, we have My2A. My2A has had tremendous success not only in training and encouraging its participants, but in creating well-qualified, thriving employees. How does such a success story come about? It was through the shared vision of the My2A founder, John Ryu, the Consortium for Worker Education (CWE), the Catholic Home Bureau, and the Central Labor Council. Working together--each with their unique and critical understanding of youth, service, and work--this vision was carried out to fruition. The result is the program that we celebrate here today. Of course, these results are dependent on the groups and individuals that come together to serve My2A, both through its initial development and through its continual day-to-day efforts. While John Ryu and his partner organizations have been tireless and committed in their efforts, there are other individuals that have also been instrumental. Some of these include Youth Ambassadors of My2A, Sung Eun Baek and Patricia Ji Young Jung, and Kyu Bong Sung, Business Manager of the ACE Printing Company. Overall, the Korean and Korean-American communities have been particularly supportive of My2A. Of course, this program's success is also dependent on the numerous My2A participants who take advantage of this wonderful opportunity that is made possible by inspirational people like John Ryu and those he works with, protecting the strength and goodwill of our community and this nation in countless ways.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the resolution offered by my friend from Virginia, Mr. Davis. I represent approximately 85,000 Asian Pacific Islander Americans in my Congressional district in New York City. I am proud to represent the most diverse Congressional District in the country. From the strong Korean community in Elmhurst to the Philippine community of Woodside to Indian American in Jackson Heights to Bangladesh Americans in Parkchester, this district reflects the diversity of the continent of Asia and is a true testament of the American melting pot experience. Thousands of Asian Americans and South Asians have left their lives behind in their homeland, just as my grandparents did, to make a better life for themselves in New York City. They have succeeded from the shops of 74th Street to the presence of Asians at all levels of law, medicine and commerce in our city. They have also become true stakeholders in our political system. From the election of Jimmy Meng and John Liu to the New York State Assembly and City Council respectively to Uma Sen Gupta's election as the first Indian American district leader, Asian and South Asians are a vibrant part of not only the culture and economic fabric of our City but the political fabric as well. Asian Pacific American Heritage month began on June 30, 1977 when the first 10 days of May 1978 were declared Asian Pacific American Heritage week. Today, there are over 12 million Asian Pacific Islander Americans living in the United States. By the year 2050, there will be an estimated 33.4 million U.S. residents who will identify themselves as Asian alone, which will comprise 8 percent of the total population. This is a projected 213 percent increase of Asian Pacific Islander Americans between 2000 and 2050. I am proud to represent Asian American and celebrate Asian Pacific American Heritage with all my constituents and colleagues.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to speak in strong support of the resolution today honoring the 57th anniversary of the Independence of the State Israel. I congratulate the people of the State of Israel and the greater Jewish community on the 57th anniversary of their Independence. The creation of the Jewish State in 1948 was met with the immediate support and recognition from the United States, and our country has continued to consider Israel our closest friend and strongest ally. As Israel continues to fight against terrorist groups, it is more important than ever the United States continues to show our solidarity and provide whatever aid and support both economic and moral, to our friend Israel. Israel, as the only truly democratic nation in the Middle East should be lauded for 57 years of democracy. Israel continues to show the world that this small state who has been surrounded by aggressive states for most of its existence is here to stay. I believe the survival of the Jewish state is paramount and the United States must continue to encourage Israel's sustained efforts to defend the freedoms and rights it has secured its citizens. Since its Independence, Israel has endured the unstable and troubling conditions in the Middle East that have sparked several wars and incited much violence. Yet the Israeli people remain united and strong and continue to stand up for their nation. That is why I re-affirm the right of the Israeli people to always protect themselves and their state from the forces of terrorism, no matter where it may exist. Israel is a modern success story, the only Democracy in the Middle East, the only Middle Eastern country where Arabs have the right to vote for their elected officials and their political leaders. Her detractors and those who hide their anti-Semitism behind anti- Zionism must not denigrate the success of Israel. I am proud to be one of Israel's strongest friends in Congress and to wish Israel a hearty Mazel Tov on 57 years of Independence.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, the extreme action Senate Republicans want to take later this week has nothing to do with seven judges who have yet to be approved by the Senate. No, the Senate has approved more of President Bush's nominees than any President since President Reagan. In fact, he has had so much success that he is now presiding over the lowest court vacancy rate in 15 years. The Republican power grab is about clearing the way for a Supreme Court nominee who only needs 51 votes instead of 60 votes. Conservative Senate Republicans do not want a David Souter or a Stephen Breyer, judges who were confirmed with nearly unanimous bipartisan support. Instead, they want a Clarence Thomas, who was confirmed with only 52 votes and has since been proven to be an extremist on the Court. Mr. Speaker, Senate Republicans are preparing to blow up 200 years of tradition in the U.S. Senate, abusing their power now, so they can have greater control over the judiciary later on. That is not how our Founding Fathers envisioned the checks and balances that exist between the branches of our government. The sad fact is, I do not think my colleagues on the other side of the aisle care.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to the amendment being offered by Congressman Tancredo. The amendment does not only target victims of crime, it is dangerous to the very security of our homeland. This amendment coerces state and local police officers to step into the role of federal immigration agents. And if they do not assume this responsibility--they are punished. I ask--who benefits from such a system? Does such a system mean safer streets? No. As the son of a New York City police officer, I am very aware of the importance of trust between local police and the communities they serve. If an immigrant fears talking to police--there will be fewer reported crimes, fewer witnesses offering information, and more dangerous streets for all of us. Does this amendment mean better national security? No. Under this amendment, foreign nationals who might otherwise be helpful to security investigations will only be more reluctant to come forward. Does this amendment mean better communication between localities, states, and the Department of Homeland Security? No. Cities with these quote-unquote ``sanctuary policies'' are already often the ones who communicate with DHS most regularly--to deal with foreign nationals who have committed crimes. Does this amendment mean crime victims will be better protected? Sadly, no. Crime victims who unfortunately happen to be immigrants will fear their immigration status might be called into question, and will avoid stepping forward to seek justice. So who benefits from this amendment? People who don't like immigrants and people who mean our country serious harm. Instead of working to support the efforts of state and local police. Instead of working to make reasonable improvements to our immigration system. Instead of state and local governments being able to decide which policies allow them to best ``serve and protect'' their communities. Instead--we get an amendment that pushes people further underground, leaving our cities even more vulnerable to terrorist threats. If some are interested in scapegoating hard-working immigrants across the US who contribute to our country, schools, cities, and tax base every day--then at the very least we should avoid jeopardizing our homeland security in the process. A ``yes'' vote on this amendment is a vote for Osama bin Laden; a ``no'' vote is a vote for America. I urge a ``no'' vote on this very un-American and very dangerous amendment.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, we all know about the axis of evil. Iran and North Korea's pursuit of nuclear weapons is frightening, and we need to do everything we can do to stop it. But now there is a new axis of evil, apparently, and it starts right here in Washington. The axis of evil for this administration is bull's- eye, square one, the United States Senate and the 45 members of its minority. Because while not yet a nuclear State, that is exactly what the Republicans want to make it by eliminating the filibuster rule. Not only does the Republican Party demonstrate yet again that when they do not get their way, they do not believe in playing fair, they want to change the rules. When they cannot change the rules, their leadership bullies judges and pushes legislation that has no business being in the United States Congress and is left best to the States. When that does not work, they eliminate the voice of the minority and appoint, for lifetime appointments, to the Federal and supreme Court. Let us remember that Democrats in the United States Senate combined represent more Americans than do their Republican colleagues. We have a proud history of an independent judiciary and checks and balances. That is something that Iran and North Korea cannot say. If Bill Frist gets his way, it is something we will not be able to say, either.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Slaughter) for yielding me time. Let me say as President Reagan used to say, Here we go again. Another supplemental spending bill for the war in Iraq and why? Because time and time again, the Republicans refuse to spend one cent for this war in their sham budget, a budget every Democrat opposed this year and last year; because we need these so-called off budget bills to cover up the exploding deficits the Republicans have given, not to us, but to our children and grandchildren totaling $27,000 for every American. We are going to need a death tax relief just to pay for the birth tax that our children and grandchildren will have to pay. To add insult to injury, the Republicans have added to this must-pass spending bill for our troops the REAL ID Act. These provisions, which are supposed to make our country more secure, will do nothing but place more anti-immigrant restrictions making it harder for honest people fleeing religious prosecution from entering our country, and added a $100 million unfunded mandate onto our States. If this were in place, it would not have prevented the attacks of 9/11. That is purely false. The 9/11 Commission has said they are unwarranted. It was added by the right wing extremist from the Republican conference. This legislation, which, again, the 9/11 Commission has called ``unwarranted,'' was added by the right wing extremists in the Republican caucus whose joy in bashing immigrants is exceeded only by their zest for tax cuts for the wealthy in this country.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commemorate the Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Day, known in Hebrew as Yom Hashoah. This is the day that not only the Jewish people should mourn the loss of the six million people stolen from this earth, but a day recognized by all. We must never forget the attempted extermination of the Jewish people but we must also never forget so we can ensure that is never happens again. We still see these mass slaughters around the world whether it's in Sudan or what we saw in the 1990's in Rwanda. The world community must take immediate action so the murder of so many Jews never happens again to any of our brothers and sisters around the world. This day has a bit more of a special meaning to me this year; 2005 marks the 60th anniversary of the end of the concentration camps that stole the lives of six million innocent human beings in ways that are still unfathomable to me. I had the unique opportunity this year to attend the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on the 60th anniversary of the Liberation of the Nazi Death Camps. It was a very emotional day listening to the speeches made by many of the world's leaders who were in attendance. Also this was the first time that I know of that the United Nations convened to commemorate the Holocaust, and the first time that the United Nations convened a special session at the request of Israel. Along with many of my colleagues, I contacted foreign embassies I have close relationships with to urge them to encourage their home governments to write a letter to Secretary General Annan to allow the general assembly to hold the special session. Over 135 countries responded to make sure that the special session got underway. My day at the U.N. also brought me to a special breakout session sponsored by B'nai B'rith International with several Holocaust survivors to talk about their experiences and how they survived the death camps. One of the speakers was my good friend from California, Mr. Lantos. When we speak about Yom Hashoah in Congress we should remember that we have a survivor among us and should listen and respect his words when he speaks about the current humanitarian crisis like he has done most recently with Sudan. At the end of the day a special exhibit was held by the Vad Vashem Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Authority about the Auschwitz death camps. It's impossible to describe the overwhelming feeling you get when you see the visuals of the condition the victims of the concentration camps were in. It still troubles my heart that one human could do this to another. We must never forget and never allow this to happen again in the world to any group of people.

Mr. CROWLEY

Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, while I have problems with the concept of this supplemental and supplementals, and the misplaced budget priorities of the Republican Party, this bill, I believe, is needed for our men and women who are fighting the war on terrorism. This bill includes much needed higher death benefits for our military. And while it will never return these patriots such as Christian Engeldrum in my district to his family, what we can do as Americans is ensure that his wife and children have financial security for his personal sacrifice to his country. This bill finally provides funding for body armor for our troops, something that this administration has refused to do for over 2 years now. So hopefully less families can claim the new death benefits for their loved ones fighting overseas. This bill provides much needed aid for the victims of the December tsunami. I led a delegation to Sri Lanka in January, and I saw first hand the resources needed in that country, multiplied by the effects on other countries; and this money will go to good use. This funding, along with the sheer generosity of the American people, is a true testament of our country in comparison to the tepid actions by the White House in the immediate days after the crisis. While this money is important, I would be remiss if I did not express my disappointment at no funding being included for the U.N. Population Fund for children and maternal health care in the tsunami region. I offered an amendment to fix this, but yet again this administration has played politics and refuses to fund the UNFPA. This bill provides $50 million in important aid to the State of Israel as they embark on the critical disengagement plan and withdraw from the Gaza Strip. We have the support, the courage of the Israeli people; and this is the right thing to do at this time. And, finally, this bill includes important language to create the 9/ 11 Heroes Medal of Valor, for which I am deeply indebted to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Wolf), the gentleman from New York (Mr. Serrano), the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Oxley), and the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Frank) for including this provision in this bill. On behalf of my cousin, John Moran, who was killed on 9/11, a battalion chief of the Fire Department of New York, and the over 400 families in New York City that are affected by this legislation, I want to say thank you for this honor that is going to be bestowed by the President in September of this year.