Tom Davis

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chairman, let me address my friends on the other side, because they are aware of our traffic problems in Northern Virginia where we have tried to get infusions of money to take care of the second-largest traffic jams in the country, and we have arrived at something called the HOT lanes, these high-occupancy toll lanes that we are looking at for a public-private cooperation that we would use along the Beltway and possibly I-66. This is a partnership. The Federal Government will fund part of it, but there is just not enough money in the highway bill, or at least we have not been able to get enough money out of the highway bill, if the gentleman would help on that there would be no need for this amendment, to build these extra lanes. We have the private sector coming in and building the lanes, and then the users do the tolls on the lanes, and that is how we lay asphalt. Because there is not enough money at the State, local, and Federal levels to lay enough asphalt on these lanes; and so we are using tolls in some of these areas. The current bill contains several provisions that make it difficult for us to collect tolls on the interstate highway without trying to decide how much money people make, and there is almost a means testing into who uses them. It is very, very difficult to determine how much you are going to collect to get your bonds, what percent are low income and what percent are high income, and so we basically knock that out of the current language in this legislation. I support the provisions that allow the high-occupancy tolls, but I am concerned about the requirement for States to establish procedures to permit low-income individuals to pay reduced tolls. These are user fees. These are not taxes. This requirement would impose unmanageable requirements on those States who would otherwise like to make use of these tolling provisions, and in our case it is the only way we can lay down new pavement. The Commonwealth of Virginia now seeks to use toll provisions to finance several important projects, including widening of the Capital Beltway, adding HOT lanes to I-95, and adding dedicated truck lanes on I-81 in the Shenandoah Valley. The Capital Beltway HOT lane proposal, which would greatly benefit my constituents, as an example, is a public-private partnership. In addition, the I-81 partnership is another example. These partnerships are increasingly important as Virginia and, I think, other States in the Union grapple with massive infrastructure needs that are not met, even though this bill will help toward our final results. In this instance, the ability of tolls on a HOT lane to pay for construction has been determined by cost-benefit analysis, which would be skewed by some users not paying the full toll. As we look for these public-private partnerships to take over construction of some road projects, it is important not to set a precedent for eliminating or reducing tolls which could affect bond financing. In addition, the cost of a bureaucracy to administer a reduced-toll program would add tremendously to the cost of operating a toll facility and I believe would provide a strong disincentive for private investment. The existence of automated tolling technologies does not address the issue. The most fundamental question is how the Department of Transportation would determine the income. It seems to me this would be extraordinarily problematic and would make tolling an impractical option. Tolls are user fees, not taxes. There are currently no tolling facilities in the country that provide an income-based discount. Furthermore, no other highway-user expenses are regulated by the Federal Government to require discounts based on income: not the gas tax, not the price of automobiles, and not the price of auto insurance. Why do we single out tolls? Finally, I want to make clear that while I do not think that income- based tolling is a viable solution, my amendment would not stop anybody from doing it. The Governor of Virginia does not think it is practical, but the Governor of another State might have another view, and that flexibility would remain in this legislation if my amendment passes. Frankly, I would be interested in seeing how a State might implement income-based tolling. But this provision would amount to a considerable mandate upon the States, a mandate I do not believe we should add to their already full plate with growing transportation infrastructure needs. This just takes some of the flexibilities we are trying to employ outside the box now off the table. So, Mr. Chairman, I would hope the House would adopt this amendment. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate The Women's Center of Northern Virginia and Washington DC on the 20th anniversary of its Annual Leadership Conference. The Women's Center, which celebrated its 30th anniversary last year, has been a resource for women in the workplace from its beginnings. The Center's first conference in 1985 was titled ``On the Job Issues for Working Women.'' Held at the Vienna Community Center, the conference addressed four related areas of professional development: career strategy; development of management skills; networking and mentoring; and work relationships. It was at this event that the Center's hallmark program, The Information and Career Advisory Network (ICAN) was introduced. ICAN makes a customized network of professionals available to each of its participants. As the number of women in management positions grew, so, too, did the scope of the Annual Conference. Recent titles included ``The Global Community of Women,'' ``The Economic Equity of Women,'' ``Caregiving in a Time of Change,'' and ``Women Leaders, Changing the Dynamic.'' With this year's Conference, ``Women in Leadership: Your Success Portfolio,'' the Women's Center continues its legacy of relevance and diversity by addressing the multiple definitions of and opportunities for leadership now available to women. As the scope and size of the Annual Leadership Conference grew, so did the services of The Women's Center. Founded as a counseling and educational organization in 1974, the Center now offers a wide range of services and programs addressing the psychological, career, financial and legal issues of women and families. Counseling services, including group therapy and support groups, are now offered to women, couples, families and children. The Center's Information and Referral Service, which acts as a resource gateway for local human service issues, handles about 25,000 calls a year. The Center provides over 50,000 hours of direct client services annually, with approximately 75% at reduced or no fee. In 2004 The Women's Center was named Non-profit Organization of the Year by the Vienna-Tysons Regional Chamber of Commerce. Also in 2004 The Women's Center opened an appropriations-funded, Washington, DC location. This location focuses on psychotherapy/ counseling and career-related services. Bilingual, reduced and no-fee services are provided to clients through partnerships with 12 social and human service agencies located throughout the District. The Women's Center is currently serving as the central support organization of the DC Cash Campaign, an initiative providing free tax preparation and asset-building services to the residents of Wards 5, 7 and 8 in the District. In closing, Mr. Speaker, I congratulate The Women's Center on its comprehensive range of services and unique contribution to the community. On the occasion of this 20th Annual Leadership Conference, I ask my colleagues to join me in acknowledging this outstanding and distinguished organization.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Dr. Dennis W. Rowe for receiving the Black Engineer of the Year Award for professional achievement. Dr. Rowe has mentored many children through the Reach For Tomorrow, Inc. (RFT) program. In 2000, Dr. Rowe took initiative to establish the RFT program in Prince William County, Virginia. Since the program's inception, he has worked diligently with county officials in order to obtain necessary funding for their efforts. Through the RFT program, Dr. Rowe enables students to realize the practical applications of the subjects they are learning as well as the impact of scholastic achievement. Students spend a week in the summer focusing on career exploration, which includes time at college campuses where students are given ``hands on'' experiences in the areas of science and engineering. Dr. Rowe encourages students to improve in three specific areas: attitude, achievement and attendance. As a result of their RTF experience, most students show a significant shift in their attitudes toward education. Dr. Rowe also encourages students to develop a resume during their high school years which highlights their participation in extracurricular activities. In addition, he encourages students to give back to their surrounding community. Dr. Rowe has touched the lives of numerous students and educators. He should be honored and commended for his dedication to the RFT program and the surrounding community. Through his instruction and guidance, Dr. Rowe has enabled students to realize their potential and become successful adults. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I would like to extend my heartfelt thanks to Dr. Rowe for his years of service and dedication to the Northern Virginia community. His contributions and efforts are noted and greatly appreciated.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I would like to congratulate The Women's Center of Northern Virginia and Washington, DC on the 20th anniversary of its Annual Leadership Conference. The Women's Center has been a resource for women in the workplace from its beginnings. The first Conference in 1985 was titled ``On the Job Issues for Working Women.'' Held at the Vienna Community Center, the conference addressed four related areas of professional development: career strategy; development of management skills; networking and mentoring; and work relationships. It was at this event that the Center's hallmark program, The Information and Career Advisory Network (ICAN) was introduced. ICAN makes a customized network of professionals available to each of its participants. As the number of women in management positions grew, so, too, did the scope of the Annual Conference. Recent titles included ``The Global Community of Women,'' ``The Economic Equity of Women,'' ``Caregiving in a Time of Change,'' and ``Women Leaders, Changing the Dynamic.'' With this year's Conference, ``Women in Leadership: Your Success Portfolio,'' the Women's Center continues its legacy of relevance and diversity by addressing the multiple definitions of and opportunities for leadership now available to women. As the scope and size of the Annual Leadership Conference grew, so did the services of The Women's Center. Founded as a counseling and educational organization in 1974, the Center now offers a wide range of services and programs addressing the psychological, career, financial and legal issues of women and families. Counseling services, including group therapy and support groups, are now offered to women, couples, families and children. The Center's Information and Referral Service, which acts as a resource gateway for local human service issues, handles about 25,000 calls a year. In closing, Mr. Speaker, I congratulate The Women's Center on its comprehensive range of services and unique contribution to the community. On the occasion of this 20th Annual Leadership Conference, I ask my colleagues to join me in acknowledging this outstanding and distinguished organization.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, in mid January China and Taiwan agreed to allow direct flights between the Chinese mainland and Taiwan during this year's Lunar New Year holidays. This agreement was considered to be a small but important step toward a peaceful, diplomatic resolution. In this vein, it is important that the United States continue to lend help to maintain the crucial balance in relations between China and Taiwan. In December 2004, China unveiled its plan to introduce legislation that, under certain circumstances, would permit China to legally take military action against Taiwan. Chinese officials claimed the measure was defensive in nature, and that it was in response to radical pro- independence forces in Taiwan that have reached the point of no return. Critics, however, speculate the hard line Taiwanese independence movement that China laments gets much of its oxygen from China's confrontational fervor. Additionally, Beijing denied charges of unilaterally changing the status quo and underscored the measure as an ``anti-secession law'', as opposed to a ``unification law''. Ironically, Beijing's move seems to be breeding a popular clamor within Taiwan spawning a reactionary law in retaliation. Taipei has already begun drafting an ``anti-annexation'' law, which will likely include an immediate declaration of formal independence and mandate a referendum on any move by China to change the status quo. This type of back-and-forth exchange has the potential to yield grim ramifications on the vision of a peaceful diplomatic resolve. While this provision may be well intentioned, I am concerned about the adverse effects it could have on the fundamental balance of relations between Taipei and Beijing. Many Taiwanese citizens perceive this law as China using its iron fist to promote its ``one country, two systems'' vision. Additionally, they have voiced their concern over the unknown particulars in the measure. For instance, how will the anti- secession law define secession? Will it simply be against a formal declaration of independence? These concerns, along with gauging the necessity of such a law, have formed a deep sense of suspicion and reluctance within the Taiwanese. Mr. Speaker, in closing I would like to accentuate my concern over the ball of yarn this ``anti-secession'' law could end up unraveling. It is important for the United States to help maintain the balance in cross-strait relations and to discourage against actions that may muddy the proverbial waters. I urge my colleagues to closely examine Beijing's initiative along with the unintended implications it could pose in severely dampening the region's stability.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, my colleagues Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Wolf, and I rise today to recognize an outstanding group of men and women in Northern Virginia. As many may know, the Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce annually recognizes individuals who have demonstrated superior dedication to public safety with the prestigious Valor Award. Several members of the Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department have earned this highest honor that Fairfax County bestows upon its public safety officials. There are several types of Valor Awards that are awarded to a public safety officer: The Lifesaving Award, the Certificate of Valor, or the Gold, Silver, or Bronze medal of Valor. During the 27th Annual Awards Ceremony, 61 men and women from the Office of the Sheriff, Fire and Rescue Department, and the Police Department received one of the aforementioned honors for their bravery and heroism. It is with great pride that we enter into the record the names of the recipients of the 2005 Valor Awards in the Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department. Receiving the Bronze Medal: Hazardous Materials Technician Ronald G. Bauserman II; Captain I Steven D. Clark; Hazardous Materials Technician William L. Franklin; Firefighter Rudy Iturrino; the Lifesaving Award: Captain I John E. Hart; Technician Richard N. Mitchell; Captain I Gary D. Pemberton; Public Safety Communicator III Scott N. Pierpoint; Master Technician Virgil J. Weber Jr.; the Certificate of Valor: Volunteer Captain II Thomas K. Warnock. Mr. Speaker, in closing, we would like to take this opportunity to thank all the men and women who serve in the Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department. Their efforts, made on behalf of the citizens of the Fairfax County, are selfless acts of heroism and truly merit our highest praise. We ask our colleagues to join me in applauding this group of remarkable citizens.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, my colleagues Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Wolf and I rise today to recognize an outstanding group of men and women in Northern Virginia. As many may know, the Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce annually recognizes individuals who have demonstrated superior dedication to public safety with the prestigious Valor Award. Several members of the Fairfax County Police Department have earned this highest honor that Fairfax County bestows upon its public safety officials. There are several types of Valor Awards that are awarded to a public safety officer: The Lifesaving Award, the Certificate of Valor, or the Gold, Silver, or Bronze medal of Valor. During the 27th Annual Awards Ceremony, 61 men and women from the Office of the Sheriff, Fire and Rescue Department, and the Police Department received one of the aforementioned honors for their bravery and heroism. It is with great pride that we enter into the Record the names of the recipients of the 2005 Valor Awards in the Fairfax County Police Department. Receiving the Lifesaving Award: Charles F. Angle; Police Officer First Class Paul A. Basham; Detective Tina L. Brook; Police Officer First Class Douglas E. Coulter; Police Officer First Class Christopher W. Edmunds; Police Officer First Class Thea M. Haddix; Police Officer First Class James F. Kirk; Sergeant Shawn C. Martin; Master Police Officer Scott F. Moskowitz; Sergeant Trafton C. Parr; Police Officer First Class Louis A. Robinson Jr., Police Officer First Class Rimothy B. Schilling; Police Officer First Class Keith W. Shook; Police Officer First Class Mark J. Smith; the Bronze Medal: Lieutenant Roger E. Arnn; Police Officer First Class Richard W. Buisch; Detective Lincoln Kieffer; Police Officer First Class Kristi D. Kiernan; Police Officer First Class Carlos M. Lama; Police Officer First Class Kirk A. McNickle; Police Officer First Class Kenyatta L. Momon; Officer Mohammed S. Oluwa; Police Officer First Class David A. Parker; Police Officer First Class Michael A. Wheeler; the Certificate of Valor: Second Lieutenant Christopher C. Cochrane; Officer Lance A. Hamilton; Police Officer First Class Jason C. Herbert; Public Safety Communicator I Kathy A. Kaehler; Sergeant Paul J. Norton III; Officer Dana L. Robinson; Police Officer First Class Vincent M. Scianna; the Silver Medal: Police Officer First Class Mark J. Kracun; Sergeant Justin P. Palenscar. Mr. Speaker, in closing, we would like to take this opportunity to thank all the men and women who serve in the Fairfax County Police Department. Their efforts, made on behalf of the citizens of Fairfax County, are selfless acts of heroism and truly merit our highest praise. We ask our colleagues to join me in applauding this group of remarkable citizens.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, my colleagues Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Wolf and I rise today to recognize an outstanding group of men and women in Northern Virginia. As many may know, the Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce annually recognizes individuals who have demonstrated superior dedication to public safety with the prestigious Valor Award. Several members of the Fairfax County Sheriff's Office have earned this highest honor that Fairfax County bestows upon its public safety officials. There are several types of Valor Awards that are awarded to a public safety officer: The Lifesaving Award, the Certificate of Valor, or the Gold, Silver, or Bronze medal of Valor. During the 27th Annual Awards Ceremony, 61 men and women from the Office of the Sheriff, Fire and Rescue Department, and the Police Department received one of the aforementioned honors for their bravery and heroism. It is with great honor that we enter into the Record the names of the recipients of the 2005 Valor Awards in the Fairfax County Sheriff's Office. Receiving the Certificate of Valor: Officer Dwayne Archer; Private First Class Duane A. Cohenour; the Life Saving Award: Private First Class Sharon L. Douglas; Master Deputy Sheriff Andrew B. Duvall; Private First Class Peter J. Fox; Private First Class Timothy A. Haynes; Private First Class Amy K. Lewis; Deputy Anthony A. McGhie; Private First Class Leslie A. Sheehan; Private First Class Jamilah Suarez. Mr. Speaker, in closing, we would like to take this opportunity to thank all the men and women who serve in the Fairfax County Sheriff's Office. Their efforts, made on behalf of the citizens of Fairfax County, are selfless acts of heroism and truly merit our highest praise. We ask our colleagues to join me in applauding this group of remarkable citizens.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, pursuant to clause 2(a)2 of Rule XI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, I hereby submit the rules of the Committee on Government Reform for the 109th Congress for publication in the Congressional Record. These rules were adopted by voice vote on February 9, 2005 at an open meeting of the Committee. The Rules of the Committee on Government Reform Rule 1. Application of Rules Except where the terms ``full committee'' and ``subcommittee'' are specifically referred to, the following rules shall apply to the Committee on Government Reform and its subcommittees as well as to the respective chairmen. Rule 2. Meetings The regular meetings of the full committee shall be held on the second Tuesday of each month at 10 a.m., when the House is in session. The chairman is authorized to dispense with a regular meeting or to change the date thereof, and to call and convene additional meetings, when circumstances warrant. A special meeting of the committee may be requested by members of the committee following the provisions of House Rule XI, clause 2(c)(2). Subcommittees shall meet at the call of the subcommittee chairmen. Every member of the committee or the appropriate subcommittee, unless prevented by unusual circumstances, shall be provided with a memorandum at least 3 calendar days before each meeting or hearing explaining (1) the purpose of the meeting or hearing; and (2) the names, titles, background and reasons for appearance of any witnesses. The ranking minority member shall be responsible for providing the same information on witnesses whom the minority may request. Rule 3. Quorums (a) A majority of the members of the committee shall form a quorum, except that two members shall constitute a quorum for taking testimony and receiving evidence, and one-third of the members shall form a quorum for taking any action other than the reporting of a measure or recommendation. If the chairman is not present at any meeting of the committee or subcommittee, the ranking member of the majority party on the committee or subcommittee who is present shall preside at that meeting. (b) The Chairman of the committee may, at the request of a subcommittee chairman, make a temporary assignment of any member of the committee to such subcommittee for the purpose of constituting a quorum at and participating in any public hearing by such subcommittee to be held outside of Washington, DC. Members appointed to such temporary positions shall not be voting members. The Chairman shall give reasonable notice of such temporary assignment to the ranking members of the committee and subcommittee. Rule 4. Committee Reports Bills and resolutions approved by the committee shall be reported by the chairman following House Rule XIII, clauses 2 and 4. A proposed report shall not be considered in subcommittee or full committee unless the proposed report has been available to the members of such subcommittee or full committee for at least 3 calendar days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, unless the House is in session on such days) before consideration of such proposed report in subcommittee or full committee. Any report will be considered as read if available to the members at least 24 hours before consideration, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays unless the House is in session on such days. If hearings have been held on the matter reported upon, every reasonable effort shall be made to have such hearings available to the members of the subcommittee or full committee before the consideration of the proposed report in such subcommittee or full committee. Every investigative report shall be approved by a majority vote of the committee at a meeting at which a quorum is present. Supplemental, minority, or additional views may be filed following House Rule XI, clause 2(1) and Rule XIII, clause 3(a)(1). The time allowed for filing such views shall be 3 calendar days, beginning on the day of notice, but excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays (unless the House is in session on such a day), unless the committee agrees to a different time, but agreement on a shorter time shall require the concurrence of each member seeking to file such views. An investigative or oversight report may be filed after sine die adjournment of the last regular session of Congress, provided that if a member gives timely notice of intention to file supplemental, minority or additional views, that member shall be entitled to not less than 7 calendar days in which to submit such views for inclusion with the report. Only those reports approved by a majority vote of the committee may be ordered printed, unless otherwise required by the Rules of the House of Representatives. Rule 5. Proxy Votes In accordance with the Rules of the House of Representatives, members may not vote by proxy on any measure or matter before the committee or any subcommittee. Rule 6. Record Votes A record vote of the members may be had upon the request of any member upon approval of a one-fifth vote of the members present. Rule 7. Record of Committee Actions The committee staff shall maintain in the committee offices a complete record of committee actions from the current Congress including a record of the roll call votes taken at committee business meetings. The original records, or true copies thereof, as appropriate, shall be available for public inspection whenever the committee offices are open for public business. The staff shall assure that such original records are preserved with no unauthorized alteration, additions, or defacement. Rule 8. Subcommittees; Referrals (a) There shall be seven standing subcommittees with appropriate party ratios. The Chairman shall assign members to subcommittees. Minority party assignments shall be made only with the concurrence of the Ranking Minority Member. The subcommittees shall have the following fixed jurisdictions: (i) Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations--All matters relating to the oversight of national security, emerging threats, veterans affairs, homeland security, and international relations, including anti-terrorism efforts, both foreign and domestic, and international trade. (ii) Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources--All matters relating to the criminal justice system, the Nation's counter-narcotics programs, both foreign and domestic, and food and drug safety; all matters relating to the oversight of the Judiciary, public health and welfare, education, arts, the humanities, publicly sponsored media, and the National Parks. (iii) Subcommittee on Government Management, Finance, and Accountability--All matters relating to financial management of executive departments and agencies, excluding acquisition; all matters relating to governmental accounting measures; all matters relating to the overall efficiency and management of government operations including program assessment and review and excluding Federal property; all matters relating to public records, including presidential records, the public access to records, advisory committees, and the Archives; and all matters relating to the oversight of financial services, government-sponsored enterprises, and the nation's economic growth. (iv) Subcommittee on and Regulatory Affairs--All matters relating to regulatory reform, Congressional review, the costs of regulation, and paperwork reduction measures; and all matters relating to the oversight of tax policy. (v) Subcommittee on Federalism and the Census--All matters relating to inter-governmental relations and aid to the States and localities, including unfunded mandates, grant management reform, brownfields clean-up and redevelopment, and infrastructure; all matters relating to population and demography generally, including the Census, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. All matters relating to the oversight of housing and urban development. (vi) Subcommittee on Energy and Resources--All matters related to the oversight of environmental policy, natural resources, and federal land; and all matters related to the oversight of energy policy, commerce, housing, and urban development. (vii) Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce and Agency Organization--All matters relating to the federal civil service, including personnel, compensation, employment benefits and employee relations; all matters relating to reorganizations of the executive branch including the study of redundancy; and all matters relating to the oversight of workforce, retirement, and health policy. (b) The full committee shall retain jurisdiction over federal acquisition policy, federal property, information management, technology policy, the Postal Service, and the District of Columbia. (c) Bills, resolutions, and other matters shall be expeditiously referred by the Chairman to subcommittees for consideration or investigation in accordance with their fixed jurisdictions. Where the subject matter of the referral involves the jurisdiction of more than one subcommittee or does not fall within any previously assigned jurisdiction, the chairman shall refer the matter as he may deem advisable. Bills, resolutions, and other matters referred to subcommittees may be reassigned by the Chairman when, in his judgment, the subcommittee is not able to complete its work or cannot reach agreement therein. In a subcommittee having an even number of members, if there is a tie vote with all members voting on any measure, the measure shall be placed on the agenda for full committee consideration as if it had been ordered reported by the subcommittee without recommendation. This provision shall not preclude further action on the measure by the subcommittee. Rule 9. Ex Officio Members The chairman and the ranking minority member of the committee shall be ex officio members of all subcommittees. They are authorized to vote on subcommittee matters; but, unless they are regular members of the subcommittee, they shall not be counted in determining a subcommittee quorum other than a quorum for taking testimony. Rule 10. Staff Except as otherwise provided by House Rule X, clauses 6, 7 and 9, the chairman of the full committee shall have the authority to hire and discharge employees of the professional and clerical staff of the full committee and of subcommittees. Rule 11. Staff Direction Except as otherwise provided by House Rule X, clauses 6, 7 and 9, the staff of the committee shall be subject to the direction of the chairman of the full committee and shall perform such duties as he may assign. Rule 12. Hearing Dates and Witnesses (a) Each subcommittee of the Committee is authorized to meet, hold hearings, receive testimony, mark up legislation, and report to the full Committee on any measure or matter referred to it. (b) No subcommittee of the Committee may meet or hold a hearing at the same time as a meeting or hearing of the Committee. (c) The chairman of each subcommittee shall set hearing and meeting dates only with the approval of the Chairman with a view toward assuring the availability of meeting rooms and avoiding simultaneous scheduling of Committee and subcommittee meetings or hearings. (d) Each subcommittee chairman shall notify the Chairman of any hearing plans at least two weeks before the date of commencement of hearings, including the date, place, subject matter, and the names of witnesses, willing and unwilling, who would be called to testify, including, to the extent he is advised thereof, witnesses whom the minority members may request. (e) Witnesses appearing before the committee shall so far as practicable, submit written statements at least 24 hours before their appearance and, when appearing in a non governmental capacity, provide a curriculum vitae and a listing of any Federal Government grants and contracts received in the previous fiscal year. Rule 13. Open Meetings Meetings for the transaction of business and hearings of the committee shall be open to the public or closed in accordance with Rule XI of the House of Representatives. Rule 14. Five-Minute Rule (a) A committee member may question a witness only when recognized by the chairman for that purpose. In accordance with House Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2), each committee member may request up to five minutes to question a witness until each member who so desires has had such opportunity. Until all such requests have been satisfied, the chairman shall, so far as practicable, recognize alternately based on seniority of those majority and minority members present at the time the hearing was called to order and others based on their arrival at the hearing. After that, additional time may be extended at the direction of the chairman. (b) The chairman, with the concurrence of the ranking minority member, or the committee by motion, may permit an equal number of majority and minority members to question a witness for a specified, total period that is equal for each side and not longer than thirty minutes for each side. (c) The chairman, with the concurrence of the ranking minority member, or the committee by motion, may permit committee staff of the majority and minority to question a witness for a specified, total period that is equal for each side and not longer than thirty minutes for each side. (d) Nothing in paragraph (b) or (c) affects the rights of a Member (other than a Member designated under paragraph (b)) to question a witness for 5 minutes in accordance with paragraph (a) after the questioning permitted under paragraph (b) or (c). In any extended questioning permitted under paragraph (b) or (c), the chairman shall determine how to allocate the time permitted for extended questioning by majority members or majority committee staff and the ranking minority member shall determine how to allocate the time permitted for extended questioning by minority members or minority committee staff. The chairman or the ranking minority member, as applicable, may allocate the time for any extended questioning permitted to staff under paragraph (c) to members. Rule 15. Investigative Hearing Procedures Investigative hearings shall be conducted according to the procedures in House Rule XI, clause 2(k). All questions put to witnesses before the committee shall be relevant to the subject matter before the committee for consideration, and the chairman shall rule on the relevance of any questions put to the witnesses. Rule 16. Stenographic Record A stenographic record of all testimony shall be kept of public hearings and shall be made available on such conditions as the chairman may prescribe. Rule 17. Audio and Visual Coverage of Committee Proceedings (a) An open meeting or hearing of the committee or a subcommittee may be covered, in whole or in part, by television broadcast, radio broadcast, Internet broadcast, and still photography, unless closed subject to the provisions of House Rule XI, clause 2(g). Any such coverage shall conform with the provisions of House Rule XI, clause 4. (b) Use of the Committee Broadcast System shall be fair and nonpartisan, and in accordance with House Rule XI, clause 4(b), and all other applicable rules of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Government Reform. Members of the committee shall have prompt access to a copy of coverage by the Committee Broadcast System, to the extent that such coverage is maintained. (c) Personnel providing coverage of an open meeting or hearing of the committee or a subcommittee by Internet broadcast, other than through the Committee Broadcast System, shall be currently accredited to the Radio and Television Correspondents' Galleries. Rule 18. Additional Duties and Authorities of Chairman The chairman of the full committee shall: (a) Make available to other committees the findings and recommendations resulting from the investigations of the committee or its subcommittees as required by House Rule X, clause 4(c)(2); (b) Direct such review and studies on the impact or probable impact of tax policies affecting subjects within the committee's jurisdiction as required by House Rule X, clause 2(c); (c) Submit to the Committee on the Budget views and estimates required by House Rule X, clause 4(f), and to file reports with the House as required by the Congressional Budget Act; (d) Authorize and issue subpoenas as provided in House Rule XI, clause 2(m), in the conduct of any investigation or activity or series of investigations or activities within the jurisdiction of the committee; (e) Prepare, after consultation with subcommittee chairmen and the minority, a budget for the committee, which shall include an adequate budget for the subcommittees to discharge their responsibilities; (f) Make any necessary technical and conforming changes to legislation reported by the committee upon unanimous consent; and (g) Designate a vice chairman from the majority party. (h) The Chairman is directed to offer a motion under clause 1 of Rule XXII of the Rules of the House whenever the Chairman considers it appropriate. Rule 19. Subjects of Stamps The committee has adopted the policy that the determination of the subject matter of commemorative stamps and new semi- postal issues is properly for consideration by the Postmaster General and that the committee will not give consideration to legislative proposals specifying the subject matter of commemorative stamps and new semi-postal issues. It is suggested that recommendations for the subject matter of stamps be submitted to the Postmaster General. Rule 20. Panels and Task Forces (a) The chairman of the committee is authorized to appoint panels or task forces to carry out the duties and functions of the committee. (b) The chairman and ranking minority member of the committee may serve as ex-officio members of each panel or task force. (c) The chairman of any panel or task force shall be appointed by the chairman of the committee. The ranking minority member shall select a ranking minority member for each panel or task force. (d) The House and committee rules applicable to subcommittee meetings, hearings, recommendations and reports shall apply to the meetings, hearings, recommendations and reports of panels and task forces. (e) No panel or task force so appointed shall continue in existence for more than six months. A panel or task force so appointed may, upon the expiration of six months, be reappointed by the chairman.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H. Res. 80, which recognizes the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association on the occasion of its 75th anniversary and commends the Virginia Fire Chief's Association for being an annual sponsor of the Mid-Atlantic Expo and Symposium. Fire chiefs throughout the Nation provide decisive leadership that is key to the success of America's firefighters and first responders. The fire chief's associations in each State play a critical role in coordinating this important effort. Their members are literally on the front lines of the homeland security effort, ready to respond in a moment's notice to crisis situations anywhere in America. I have been able to witness the firm dedication and guidance the fire chiefs in my congressional district have provided. Unfortunately, their selfless efforts largely go unnoticed, which is why I am pleased the House is taking this opportunity to recognize the Virginia Fire Chiefs Association for their great achievements today. Mr. Speaker, I applaud Congressman Virgil Goode of my home State of Virginia for introducing this important resolution and urge an ``aye'' vote.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I rise today in support of H.R. 418. I want to thank my colleague from Wisconsin for his leadership and tireless efforts to secure our Nation's borders. Last year, the Congress passed the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act, enacting into law many of the recommendations made by the 9/11 Commission. Unfortunately, not all of the recommendations were included in the first round of legislation, which is why we are here today. The gentleman from Wisconsin (Chairman Sensenbrenner) and I committed to working together to make sure that one of the first orders of business considered by the House in the 109th Congress would be to address some of the recommendations in our jurisdictions that the Congress failed to address last year. I want to use my time today to discuss the provisions contained in H.R. 418 that fall within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Government Reform which I chair: security measures for Federal acceptance of state-issued driver's licenses and personal identification cards, commonly referred to as identity security. Last year's 9/11 Commission report identified a number of gaps and weaknesses in our Nation's intelligence and homeland security systems, providing recommendations for Congress to consider in fixing these problems. One of the most pressing recommendations proposed by the commission and one that fell within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Government Reform appears on page 390 of the 9/11 Commission report. It is the following: Secure identification should begin in the United States. The Federal Government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification, such as driver's licenses. Fraud in identity documents is no longer just a problem of theft. At many entry points to vulnerable facilities, including gates for boarding aircraft, sources of identification are the last opportunity to ensure that people are who they say they are and to check whether they are terrorists. For terrorists, travel documents are as important as weapons. The 9/ 11 hijackers relied on a wide variety of fraudulent documents. We know that the 19 hijackers held 63 driver's licenses or ID cards. Based upon guidelines proposed by State motor vehicle administrators and adopted by a number of States throughout the country, our committee worked with other interested stakeholders to craft legislation that would establish minimum standards to be accepted of state-issued identification that could be used for Federal purposes. These important provisions were overwhelmingly passed by the House as part of H.R. 10 and heralded by the 9/11 victims' families. Unfortunately, the House-passed provisions critical to strengthening identity security were dropped from the bill in conference. Instead, language was included that would set up a general framework for a Federal role in this area, but the language was filled with so many loopholes and opt-out clauses for States that it really only made matters worse. We find ourselves here today to correct these mistakes and to again enact meaningful reform. H.R. 418 provides the Congress with this opportunity. Our approach is very straightforward. Our legislation would set forth minimum document and issuance standards for Federal acceptance of driver's licenses and state-issued personal identification cards. The legislation would provide 3 years for States to come into compliance with these standards if their driver's licenses are to be recognized for Federal Government purposes and their documents as proof of an individual's identity. As the 9/11 Commission concluded, fraud in identity documents is no longer just a problem of theft. As we continue to strengthen our intelligence function to better identify and track terrorists, those individuals will be forced to find ways to conceal their identity in order to avoid detection. We know that the 9/11 hijackers used the United States as their staging area for training and preparation in the year prior to the attacks, traveling into and out of and around the country with little fear of capture. In fact, several of the hijackers lived less than 15 miles away from this building while making final preparations for their attack. We are dedicated to making sure we do not provide such a hospitable environment in the future. As chairman of the committee that oversees federalism issues, I am mindful of concerns about the Federal Government imposing burdens on States, so-called unfunded mandates. My response is threefold. One is that this is a national security issue that requires a unified national response rather than 50 separate responses. Secondly, the legislation authorizes grants to States to conform to the minimum standards set forth in the act. Third, I am confident that these minimum standards will not be a heavy lift for a majority of the States in our Nation. It is the handful of States that continue to have lax security standards more than 3 years after 9/11 that may have the most work to do. It is crucial that we do everything we can to enhance the security of the American people, and this important legislation takes a significant step in frustrating terrorists' attempts to integrate into our society. I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 418 and strengthen identity security. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the distinguished gentlewoman from Michigan (Mrs. Miller), a former Secretary of State of the State of Michigan, which issues driver's licenses in Michigan, and someone who has been very helpful in crafting this bill.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Before I recognize the next chairman, I wish to respond to the gentlewoman's question of why are we doing this. We are doing this because the 9/11 Commission Report asked that we do it. They made it a priority. We are doing it because our committee, the committee the gentlewoman sits on, the one I chair, authorized this last year and the House overwhelmingly passed this last year. The 9/11 victims' families have a letter that also requests this. And we are doing it because when I get on an airplane and somebody shows an ID to get on the airplane, I would like to know they are who they say they are. I think every other American would like to have that assurance in safety as well. And by the way, we do not tell the States what to do. They can issue a license to whoever they want to issue a license to. But if they want to use that State license for Federal purposes, like getting on an airplane, they are going to have to be able to show that the people are who they said they were. Also, Mr. Chairman, we worked with the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators in crafting this legislation, and 3 years is ample time. Mr. Chairman, I submit for the Record, the letter of the victims' families, which I just referred to: 9/11 Families for a Secure America, New York, NY, October 19, 2004. Hon. Tom Davis, Chairman, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Dear Chairman Davis: 9/11 Families for a Secure America, comprised of the families of hundreds of the victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks, are writing to express the support of our members for the provisions in H.R. 10, the 9/ 11 Recommendations Implementation Act, to establish minimum document and issuance standards for federal acceptance of state-issued driver's licenses and birth certificates. As the Conference Committee on the intelligence reform bills begins to consider the identity management security provisions contained in S. 2845 and H.R. 10, we plead with the conferees to remember our murdered loved ones and adopt the language of the House-passed bill. These provisions would go a long way toward closing the loopholes that allowed 19 terrorists--all of whom had violated our immigration laws in one way or another--to obtain sixty-three authentic state driver's licenses, which allowed them to live here unnoticed while they honed their plot to murder our loved ones. To us, who have suffered horrific grief, loss and rage, it is beyond belief that even one Member of Congress would oppose a law that will stop the next Mohammed Atta from obtaining the ``valid ID'' that will allow him to board an airplane. The state-issued driver's license has become the preferred identification document in America. It allows the holder to cash a check, rent a car or truck, board an airplane, purchase a firearm, enter a federal or state building, register to vote, and obtain other federally-issued documents. Despite the vast benefits simple possession of a driver's license now confers on its holder, it is one of the easiest documents to obtain, whether by citizen or illegal alien, friend or enemy. Recognizing this fact, the 9/11 Commission recommended that, ``The federal government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification, such as drivers licenses.'' We commend the House for taking the necessary and appropriate action on this important issue. Supporters of the Senate position have argued that a negotiated rulemaking process is the appropriate action to take in order to establish minimum standards. We could not disagree more strongly, knowing that inevitably the final rules will lack any teeth. The standards included in H.R. 10 come directly from the State Administrators of these programs and from law enforcement, developed since the terrorist attacks on our nation and founded on long-standing principles and best practices. We believe it is perfectly appropriate for Congress to establish baseline standards and give authority to the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Transportation to work with the States and issue regulations on how individual States can come into compliance. This is particularly true because experience in many States has shown that implementation of these standards involve minuscule financial costs. Also, states' rights issues are in no way infringed since H.R. 10 only affects federal non-recognition for federal purposes of licenses from nonconforming states. Congress has promised us repeatedly that they would honor our loved ones who were murdered three years ago by enacting reforms to ensure that Americans will never again face the same horror. The House provisions on identity management security are vital in this effort, and we urge you to oppose the Senate language, which will protect a status quo that aided the murderers who tore apart our families on September 11, 2001. In the names of our dead and ourselves we ask you: how much longer will you permit terrorists to obtain drivers' licenses? For what reasons can you possibly oppose such an essential law? And to those of you who are opposed: are you prepared to accept the responsibility for the next 9/11 terrorists who utilize US-issued drivers licenses? Sincerely, Peter Gadiel & Jan Gadiel, Parents of James, age 23, WTC, North Tower 103rd Floor. Al Regenhard, Det. Sgt. (retired) NYPD, Parents of firefighter Christian Regenhard. Joan Molinaro, Mother of Firefighter Carl Molinaro, age 32. Grace Godshalk, Mother of William R. Godshalk, age 35, WTC, South Tower, 89th Floor. Colette Lafuente, Wife of Juan Lafuente, WTC visitor. Wil Sekzer, Detective Sergeant (Retired) NYPD, Father of Jason, age 31, WTC, North Tower, 105th floor. Bruce DeCell (NYPD, Retired), Father in law of Mark Petrocelli, age 29, WTC, North Tower, 105th floor. Lynn Faulkner, Husband of Wendy Faulkner, South Tower. Bill Doyle, Father of Joseph, age 24, WTC, North Tower. April Gallop, Pentagon Survivor. Diana Stewart, Only wife of Michael Stewart. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Cantor), the deputy whip, who has been so active on this issue, and introduced the first legislation in this House that would have tied visa expiration to a driver's license date.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, may I inquire of the time on each side.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I am happy to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner), the former mayor of Dayton and chairman of our Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Let me just sum up and say this does not require anything from the States as far as driver's licenses go. States do not have to do anything under this for their driver's licenses. They can issue driver's licenses to whomever they want. But if they intend to use those licenses for Federal purposes, we have a right to say what the criteria should be and under those circumstances, they are going to have to show legal presence. It is not anti-immigrant. In fact, this allows the States to issue two different sets: one for illegal immigrants, one for everyone else. It takes the national security issue away from the argument there. Finally, the opt-out provisions in the current legislation that was passed just a few months ago are disastrous. We were worse with the 9/ 11 response that passed this Congress than we were without it. This rectifies that. It closes that loophole. Out of respect for the victims, the families, the work of the 9/11 Commission, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from North Carolina (Ms. Foxx).

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I look forward to working with the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran) on this issue as we move forward. Mr. Chairman, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Shays), the chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from San Diego, California (Mr. Cunningham).

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I note on page 390 of the 9/11 Commission Report, it recommends secure identification should begin in the United States. The Federal Government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification such as driver's licenses. Mr. Chairman, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman from Tennessee (Mrs. Blackburn).

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor Sandra Bates for over 36 years of dedicated service to the Federal Government. Sandra Bates has finished off an illustrious career in the Federal Government. She started out in 1969 as intern with the General Services Administration. She worked her way up as an agency liaison for telecommunications and automatic data processing acquisitions on the original governmentwide long distance services program, FTS, before moving on to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 1979. While at NASA, she served in various telecommunications positions until 1993 when she was named chief of communications with responsibility for all NASA operational, command, and control networks worldwide. She returned to GSA in 1996 and assumed the positions of assistant commissioner for service and delivery and deputy commissioner in the Federal Technology Service before taking over the role of commissioner of the Federal Technology Service in April 2000. As commissioner, she has, among other things, successfully guided the Federal Technology Service through the most recent edition of the governmentwide telecommunications program, FTS 2001. Throughout her career as a civil servant, Sandra Bates has been active in the federal technology community, serving in leadership roles with a number of government and industry councils and associations. She has received numerous awards, including NASA's Exceptional Service Medal, the Presidential Rank Award of Meritorious Service, the Government Information Technology Award, the Fed 100 Award, 3 separate years, the Industry Advisory Council's Outstanding Individual Government Communicator Award, and the American Council for Technology's John J. Franke Award for Extraordinary Contributions to Long Term Federal Service. She leaves behind a long list of accomplishments in her distinguished career of service to our Nation. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I would like to extend my best wishes to Ms. Bates on her retirement as commissioner of the Federal Technology Service. While I know that she will be greatly missed, her retirement is well deserved. I call upon my colleagues to join me in honoring Ms. Bates and in wishing her the best of luck in all future endeavors.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the Fairfax County Health Department Adult Day Health Care Program as it prepares to celebrate its 25th anniversary. The Fairfax County Adult Day Health Care centers provide a safe, fun and therapeutic environment for the frail, the elderly and adults who need supervision during the day due to cognitive and/or physical impairments. Each center has a registered nurse who monitors the health status of each participant; a therapeutic recreation specialist who designs daily activities to enhance cognitive and physical function and to offer opportunities for socialization; and several program assistants who lead the daily activities and provide personal care to the participants. In addition, the program is designed to provide respite, education, and support to family caregivers. The first Fairfax County Adult Day Health Care Program center opened its doors in Annandale on January 3, 1980. The Annandale center was the first public nonprofit elderly daycare facility in Fairfax County. This program was an exemplary example of inter-agency collaboration, a visionary approach to providing long-term care services, and innovative use of county resources. Over the next 22 years, four additional centers were opened including: the Lewinsville Adult Day Health Care center in June 1985, the Lincolnia Adult Day Health Care center in January 1990, the Mount Vernon Adult Day Health Care center in July 1990 and finally the Herndon Harbor Adult Day Health Care center in June 2000. In 2006 the county is planning to open a sixth adult day health care center in Fairfax City. In 1986, the Annandale and Lewinsville Adult Day Health Care centers were the recipients of the National Achievement Award given by the National Association of Counties. The centers were recognized for their new and innovative programs. Mr. Speaker, in closing, I would like to thank the Fairfax County Health Department Adult Day Health Care Program for the immeasurable contributions they have made to the community by taking care of the sick and elderly. I congratulate the program on its successes over the last 25 years and wish for continued success in the future. I ask that my colleagues join me in applauding this outstanding and distinguished institution.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr.Speaker, I rise today to join my colleagues in offering my warm congratulations to the Iraqi people for the successful elections they held on January 30, 2005. It is truly amazing to see the Iraqi people take their first steps toward democracy. To see a people who were once slaughtered and tormented under a brutal dictatorship take a stand and declare that enough is enough, shows their unwavering determination in deciding their own fate by the ballot instead of the bullet. Despite the predictions of widespread terrorist attacks on election day in Iraq, 60 percent of the registered voters turned out. Moreover, the physical courage of the Iraqi people to leave their houses, walk to the polls and cast ballots under this specter of violence speaks to the power of democracy and their passion for freedom. Sometimes in America, we take the right to vote for granted. No one who watched the moving images of Iraqi men and women proudly showing their purple-stained fingers will ever make that mistake again. It is also important to pay homage to the thousands of brave American soldiers, some of who lost their lives, who held the line. Let us not forget the bold sacrifices these courageous men and women made to liberate the Iraqi people. It is all of our hopes that this election marks the beginning of a new chapter for the Iraqi people, one in which they enjoy the sweet taste of the fruits of freedom, democracy and sovereignty. Mr. Speaker, in closing I would like to commend the sponsors and leadership for bringing this important resolution to the floor and I urge an ``aye'' vote.

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, for the past two years John Landers has served with utmost distinction as a professional staff member of our Subcommittee on Civil Service and Agency Organization. Anticipating an active agenda on Federal workforce issues and oversight when I assumed the Chairmanship of the Government Reform Committee in January of 2003, I requested the loan of a subject expert on civil service law and regulation from the Office of Personnel Management. The person selected by OPM for this assignment was John Landers. I expected John to be technically competent, but with over 30 years of experience in Federal personnel issues John brought with him an encyclopedic recall of pertinent statutes, regulations, court cases, and precedent that proved invaluable to our Committee's work. John began his career at the U.S. Civil Service Commission as a retirement claims examiner in 1972. He quickly progressed through the benefits programs to lead the Retirement Policy Division and eventually became a Senior Advisor. As a legislative and policy analyst, John wrote Government-wide regulations as well as legislative proposals on the retirement, health, and life insurance programs. Having learned these programs from the inside out, John took over OPM's Technical Analysis Branch in 1984 and the Retirement Policy Division in 1987, where he helped develop and implement the Government's new retirement system known as ``FERS.'' In 1998, John became a Senior Advisor to OPM's Associate Director for Retirement and Insurance, and in 2001 became a Special Assistant to the Director of OPM. In these positions John assisted in shaping broad Federal workforce policy, including introduction of pre-tax benefits as a component of compensation, and personnel elements written into the legislation creating the new Department of Homeland Security. For his contributions John received the Director's Award for Excellence in October 2002. John retired from OPM in January 2003, but his newly won status was short-lived when he was approached by the Director as her choice to represent the agency with our Committee. I am very grateful that John placed his dedication to public service above his own well-earned interests by accepting the appointment. During the past two years his expertise contributed directly to our key initiatives including establishing the new National Security Personnel System for the Department of Defense, improving benefits for Federal employees and retirees, and providing diligent oversight of personnel management across the Government. On January 7 of this year, John completed his last day of service with the Committee and resumed his status as ``retired.'' I believe John really means it this time, and we promise not to further interrupt his plans. On behalf of our entire Committee, I express deep appreciation to John for his superb service to our Nation, and I wish him many happy and healthy years ahead to enjoy with his wife Rita and their family.