Member of Congress
Richard Durbin
- Role
- Current Senator
- State
- IL
- Party
- Democrat
- Leadership
- Senate Minority Whip
Speeches
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) are necessarily absent.
Vote on Staples Nomination (Executive Calendar)2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) is necessarily absent.
Mr. DURBIN. I ask for the yeas and nays.
Vote on Lopez Nomination (Executive Calendar)2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) is necessarily absent.
Mr. DURBIN. Madam President, may I make an inquiry of the Chair? How long was that last rollcall?
Mr. DURBIN. Can the Chair report the last Senator who voted?
Mr. DURBIN. Thank you, Madam Chair.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from New Jersey (Mr. Menendez) are necessarily absent.
Ukraine (Executive Session)2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that Senators Braun, Murray, and I be able to complete our remarks prior to the scheduled votes.
Appropriations (Executive Session)2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, I want to follow up on the statement made by the Republican Senate leader, and I agree with many of the things he said. We disagree with others. But there is a way for us to show our commitment not only to our troops but to the defense of causes that are important to America, and it is in his hands. It is known as the appropriations bill for the Department of Defense. It is known as the appropriations and budget for the United States of America. Where are we now? We are on something called a continuing resolution. That means we haven't decided. We can't get an agreement from the Republican leader to move forward on the spending bills for this fiscal year, which began October 1. We are spending at last year's levels when the Biden administration has asked for more money for the Nation's defense, and who is stopping him? The Republican leader. So he can't have it both ways and argue we need to invest more in the defense of America and then stop us from an appropriations process that does just that. Let's get it done. This should have been done before last October 1, and his cooperation means it can be done now. Now, let me say there is another aspect to it. Many speeches are given about the rise in crime in America. I know this personally, representing the State of Illinois and the great city of Chicago. The number of violent gun crimes in this last calendar year was just shocking. When you look at all of the people who have been hurt and killed with the use of guns in cities across America, it is clear that we need to invest in our police force and law enforcement. Hold them accountable for the right values and the right conduct, but put in their hands the resources to protect us in our homes and our neighborhoods. What is holding that up? The same decision by the Republican leader not to bring any appropriations bills forward for approval by the Congress. This is just mindless. You can't preach on one hand that you want to fund the police and then stop the appropriations process, which the Republicans in the Senate have done. It is time to pass the Omnibus appropriations bill so the resources are going to ATF and to the U.S. Attorney's Offices and other law enforcement agencies that can help the State and local law enforcement efforts to try to suppress this violent crime. So don't preach about the need for this money and then turn around and stop the effort here on Capitol Hill. Why aren't we voting on an Omnibus appropriations bill this week? Why? Why can't we get this done next week? It was supposed to be done last October, and it is time for us to do it.
Vote on Puttagunta Nomination (Executive Session)2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan), the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders), and the Senator from Maryland (Mr. Van Hollen) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Maryland (Mr. Van Hollen) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Maryland (Mr. Van Hollen) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from Delaware (Mr. Coons), the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan), and the Senator from Maryland (Mr. Van Hollen) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Maryland (Mr. Van Hollen) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-02
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) are necessarily absent.
Vote on Brennan Nomination (Executive Session)2022-02-01
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) is necessarily absent.
EXECUTIVE CALENDAR--Continued2022-02-01
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan), is necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-01
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) and the Senator from Vermont (Mr. Sanders) are necessarily absent,
Vote on Ruiz Nomination (Executive Calendar)2022-02-01
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan), is necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-01
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan), the Senator from West Virginia (Mr. Manchin), and the Senator from Virginia (Mr. Warner) are necessarily absent.
CLOTURE MOTION2022-02-01
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. I announce that the Senator from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan) is necessarily absent.
Ukraine (Executive Calendar)2022-02-01
Mr. DURBIN
Mr. DURBIN. Mr. President, there is a photograph that we have all seen: six battle-weary victorious marines raising the American flag on Iwo Jima. It is one of the most iconic photos of World War II. It was taken 77 years ago this month. Among those six brave marines was a coal miner's son from western Pennsylvania. His name was Sgt Michael Strank. At 25 years of age, he was the oldest of the six flag raisers. The men in his rifle squad idolized him. One of them said: ``He was the kind of Marine you read about, the kind they make movies about.'' Sergeant Strank used to tell his men: ``Follow me and I'll try to bring you all home safely to your mothers.'' One week after he raised the American flag atop Mount Suribachi, Michael Strank was killed in the Battle of Iwo Jima. He was the first of the six flag raisers to die. Today, he is buried among America's heroes in Arlington National Cemetery, but that is not the end of the story. In 2008, a Marine security guard based at the U.S. Embassy in Slovakia discovered that Michael Strank was not a natural-born U.S. citizen; he had received his citizenship through his father when his father became a U.S. citizen in 1935. So where was this marine's marine born? He was the first child born into an ethnic Ukrainian family in what is now Slovakia. Like my own mother, who was born in Lithuania, Michael Strank came to America with his mother as a toddler, as soon as his father could save the money for their passage. Those who were there that day on Iwo Jima will remember that a loud cheer went up from thousands of marines when they saw, finally, that red, white, and blue of the U.S. flag flying over the highest peak on that island. They knew that that day, in the war between freedom and tyranny, freedom had won. Today, almost 80 years later, the battle between freedom and tyranny continues, and one of its new flash points is Ukraine. The Ukrainian people have made it clear: They want to be free and independent. They want to chart their own future. They want to choose their own leaders through elections that they conduct. This is the future that more than 92 percent of Ukrainians chose in a referendum in 1991, after Ukraine declared its independence from the crumbling and corrupt Soviet Union, but Russian President Vladimir Putin--the old KGB agent--refuses to acknowledge Ukraine's right to exist, its right to independence, and its right to self-determination. For almost 100 days, from November 2013 to January 2014, the Ukrainian people waged a ``Revolution of Dignity'' to force from office a corrupt, Russian-backed, puppet President--and they won. In retaliation, Russia invaded and annexed the Crimean Peninsula and parts of eastern Ukraine and installed a Russian-friendly government. This forceful occupation of parts of Ukraine by Russia marked the first time, the first time since World War II ended, that one nation had redrawn the map of Europe by force. For the last 8 years, Russia has tried relentlessly to destabilize the democratically elected Government in Ukraine. This is part of the reason that President Trump's efforts to withhold congressionally approved military aid for Ukraine in order to extract political favors was egregious. Now, Putin has amassed more than 120,000 Russian soldiers on the borders of Ukraine. Whether Putin is driven by megalomaniacal delusions of restoring the Soviet Union or is simply seeking to create chaos and sow dissension among NATO allies is unclear, but here is what is clear: A Russian invasion of Ukraine would constitute a grave assault not only on Ukraine, but on the institutions and agreements that have kept peace in Europe for almost 75 years. A Russian invasion of Ukraine also could be seen as a danger to our NATO allies in Poland and in the courageous young Baltic democracies in Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia. It would be a catastrophic mistake on Putin's part, and President Biden has made that point over and over. Chicago is home to one of the largest Polish communities outside of Warsaw, the largest Lithuanian community outside of Vilnius, and one of the largest Ukrainian communities outside of Kyiv. More than 46,000 Ukrainian Americans live in the Chicago area, the third largest Ukrainian community in the United States. A week ago, I attended a celebration at the Cultural Center in Chicago, on Chicago Avenue in Ukrainian Village. Also speaking at that gathering was Oksana Markarova, Ukraine's Ambassador to the United States. I can tell you, the Polish and Lithuanian communities in Chicago were there standing in solidarity with the people of Ukraine-- and with the people of Poland, Lithuania, and the Baltic to decide their own futures. Vladimir Putin and his henchmen should know that the United States, NATO, and the entire community of democracies also believe that it is the right exclusively of Ukraine and other young democracies to protect their territorial boundaries and decide their own fate. The United States made its position clear yesterday in the U.N. Security Council. Ukraine, the United States, NATO, and the entire community of democracies all want a diplomatic solution to Russia's threats on Ukraine. That is what we seek. If Vladimir Putin wants to avoid a debacle that will cost his nation dearly in lives and treasure, he will agree to this solution. I commend President Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, and their teams for their strong support of Ukrainian independence and against Russian aggression. The Biden administration has provided significant military equipment for our Ukrainian friends to ensure that President Putin knows the price that a further invasion will cost. The administration has also bolstered the defense capabilities of our NATO partners in Poland and the Baltics. And if Putin is counting on partisan division in the Senate to weaken America's resolve to defend Ukraine and its neighbors, he is mistaken. Yesterday, Senator Grassley and I introduced a bipartisan resolution celebrating 100 years of diplomatic relations between the United States and the Baltic States and reaffirming our close relationship with these young democracies. Later this week, Senator Shaheen and I and several of our colleagues, from both parties, will meet with the Baltic and Polish Ambassadors to reaffirm U.S. support for their nations. I hope that we will also see strong, bipartisan support for legislation that is being drafted by Senators Menendez and Risch, the chair and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. That bill will impose severe, crippling economic sanctions on Russia for any further invasion of Ukraine. It would bolster similar bruising sanctions drawn up by the Biden administration. It will ensure that any Russian aggression against Ukraine or its neighbors will be felt in Russia by their economy and their people. I mentioned that my mom came to this country when she was 2 years old, from Lithuania, in 1911. Her boat landed in Baltimore. At the time, Lithuania was under the control of Tsarist Russia. It was a brutal, repressive place. After World War II, Lithuania became part of the USSR against its will, another brutal and repressive regime. But in 1991, Lithuania became the first Soviet Republic to declare its independence. In response, Soviet tanks under control of Gorbachev rolled in to crush the new Lithuanian democracy. I was there before those tanks arrived. Their Parliament is called the Seimas. They had put sandbags around the outside of it to try to stop the Soviets and their tanks. They took me in the back, in a small room off to the side, and showed me their arsenal. It consisted of about 10 rifles that had been borrowed from farmers in the countryside to try to defend their capital, Vilnius. Kids were assembled outside, praying the Rosary in the snow, lighting little candles by the sandbags to show the solidarity of the people of Lithuania, their determination to survive. Soviet tanks rolled in, killed 13 innocent people, and injured dozens more. But then, to the world's astonishment--and mine too--Prime Minister Mikhail Gorbachev ordered the tanks to withdraw. Later, another Russian President, Boris Yeltsin, supported Lithuanian independence. Years after his death, Lithuania honored him with an award for his commitment to Lithuanian statehood and bilateral relations between Lithuania and Russia. Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin understood that you can brutalize a people who are determined to be free, but you can never defeat them. Ultimately, freedom will win. It is a tragedy that Russian President Putin cannot or will not learn that same lesson of history today when it comes to Ukraine. Seventy-seven years ago, an American marine born in Ukraine raised the American flag on Iwo Jima. Today, a generation of young Ukrainians raised in freedom are holding high the yellow-and-blue flag of their own nation and saying: We too want to be free. Our message to them is very simple and straightforward: You are not alone. Like the shipyard workers in Gdansk and the other members of the Polish Solidarity movement who helped bring an end to the decrepit and brutal Soviet Union--like the 2 million Estonians, Latvians, and Lithuanians who actually physically joined hands to defend freedom across their nations--history and the free world will stand with you. I yield the floor. I suggest the absence of a quorum.