Member of Congress
Geoff Davis
- Role
- Former Representative
- State
- KY
- Party
- Republican
Speeches
CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT2005-02-16
Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky
Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Class Action Fairness Act, and I speak as a former small business owner who has watched industry damage, jobs lost and costs increased across the entire spectrum of our economy here in the United States. This legislation will put an end to trial attorneys' forum shopping to find a friendly court where settlement awards will line their pockets while hitting victims and consumers in their pocketbooks. For too long, we have watched State courts try to manage a crush of cases that have been increasing year by year and that should have never entered the courtroom. These frivolous lawsuits frankly are merchandising the process of justice, making a profit for the few for the expense of freedom, liberty, and justice for the majority of people in this country. Overall, class-action filings in the United States have increased 1,000 percent in the last 10 years, yet there has been no increase in capacity in our courtrooms, and the net result of that is to assure that our courts are slowed. There is a tremendous backlog of legitimate cases that need to be heard, and we are doing our citizens a disservice, again while a few make a tremendous amount of money, and the alleged victims in these cases collect nothing in damages of any substance. In some jurisdictions, class-action filings have increased 4,000 percent, virtually bringing the legal system to a halt in those areas. Let me repeat that because it is such a significant number. Class- action filings in some jurisdictions have increased 4,000 percent. Mr. Speaker, this has become a money game, indeed a monopoly; ironically, very similar to the game of Monopoly. If we look at the chart to my right, we can see how that game is played. Those who are profiteering in this business come up with an idea for a lawsuit. The next thing they do is find a plaintiff to play that off and then finally make allegations. In fact, legitimate rules of evidence need not apply here to simply get a forum to create press and public opinion. And finally, they are free from rule 23 to begin shopping these cases. I have seen it in a variety of industries. I have seen it hurt our veterans in many ways while lining the pockets of just a few plaintiff attorneys in just a few States, and at the end of the day, business is impeded, jobs are going to be lost, and are lost in a wide variety of sectors. Let us look at an example of a variety of these claims. Blockbuster, the video rental company, had a claim against it. $9.25 million were paid to the attorneys who were bringing forth that case. What was the benefit of it to the alleged victims in that case? Free movie coupons. This is an injustice. It is a misuse of our legal system, and frankly, I believe that that money was unethically acquired by those attorneys utilizing the judicial system in an inappropriate way. The Bank of Boston case, $8.5 million were paid to attorneys, and indeed, some of the plaintiffs at the end of the settlement had to pay legal fees to cover the damages. What happens to us? Our employers are hit. Our health insurance and liability policies in small business go up. Ultimately, plaintiffs' attorneys win and the consumer loses. Every Member of this body loses. The American citizen loses. Unfortunately, the result of this class-action process, what it has become is it makes many of these settlements pass on to consumers considerable hikes in goods and services. It limits our access to markets, and frankly, it limits our ability to compete in the global economy for us, right now. This is bad for us as consumers and in business and for citizens. The Class Action Fairness Act offers solutions to judicial loopholes that are abused by a minority of trial attorneys. It does not impede the filing of any legitimate claim nor does it prohibit legitimate claimants from seeking redress from a company that has harmed them. Let me make it clear. We are not preventing anybody from having a right to redress for legitimate damages. We are simply preventing a scourge that is hurting our Nation and our economy now. The Class Action Fairness Act allows Federal courts to hear cases that involve true interstate issues while preserving the State courts for true local issues, which is as the founders built it into the Constitution. This is a good bill. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to support it.
URGING THE EUROPEAN UNION TO MAINTAIN ITS ARMS EMBARGO ON THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA2005-02-02
Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky
Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky. Mr. Speaker, on rollcall vote No. 18, I was unable to cast my vote. Had I been able to vote, I would have voted ``yea.''