Robin Hayes

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Child Custody Protection Act. This legislation will make it a federal misdemeanor for a person to transport a minor across state lines in order to circumvent state law so that the minor may obtain an abortion. In North Carolina--Parental consent is required. A Physician cannot perform an abortion on a minor unless they have the consent of a parent or legal guardian. The Child Custody Protection Act is designed to give parents input in one of the most serious and lasting decision a child could make. While North Carolina parents are guaranteed a voice in our state, there is still an enormous federal loophole in this effort. The fact that someone else could transport that same young woman to another state with more lenient parental laws completely undermines this common sense measure. I hope that we will work for policies that keep young women from having to make this type of decision in the first place. Abortion should not be a decision that a school aged girl has to make. The pressures in our society are so great on young women to have sexual relations before marriage. We need to go one step further in our schools and communities by teaching abstinence until marriage as the correct and healthy method of sex education. This would be a life saver for our children--keeping them from ever having to make the decision of whether or not to have an abortion.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, last night I was going through my dad's things. He died in November. I found in his drawer this Bible. On the front it says ``May this comfort and protect you.'' Inside it says, ``Commander in Chief, I take pleasure in commending the reading of the Bible to all who served in the Armed Forces of the United States. Throughout the centuries men of many faiths and diverse origins have found in the sacred book words of wisdom, counsel, and inspiration. It is the foundation of strength, and now as always an aid in attaining the highest aspirations of the human soul.'' Franklin Roosevelt. The next page, ``Our prayers are constantly with you, thanking God daily for your joy and faith in him. Heartfelt love, Mother.''

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for yielding me this time. I thank the gentleman from California (Mr. Cunningham) for bringing this to the floor of the House. To put this issue in context, I was at Fort Bragg this Monday morning for the retirement ceremony for Sergeant Major David Henderson. To see over 500 of our finest young men and women of the 82nd Airborne assembled behind our colors, just put this whole issue in the proper perspective for me. I support the resolution of the gentleman from California (Mr. Cunningham). Our Nation's history is replete with tales of courageous Americans who have ventured to foreign lands to defend the principles represented by the Stars and Stripes. These young patriots fought for our freedom and democracy, not because they were forced, but because they knew in their hearts that their cause was righteous, that making the ultimate sacrifice for freedom, liberty, and justice was worth the risk. We today, as a Congress, also have the opportunity to do in our hearts what we know is right. The American flag is a symbol of more than nationhood. It is a symbol of the land we love, the home of the free and the brave. It is known around the world as a symbol for democracy and the noble ideals that characterize our democratic republic: Rights, responsibility, equal opportunity, and freedom. I, along with the vast majority of Americans, believe that Congress can afford our flag protections consistent with the first amendment. It is my duty, it is our duty to defend our flag from desecration and to protect the honor of generations of courageous Americans who have fought and died for the freedoms that all Americans enjoy today.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to join my friend and colleague the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Fletcher) in co-sponsoring this amendment. I appreciate the remarks of the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott). Our amendment will allow local schools to go to work with their communities to develop character-based education programs that will complement their current coursework. I believe that we need to give local schools the resources to teach character-based education and deal honestly with forces in our culture that are diminishing the family. I visited two elementary schools in the 8th District of North Carolina over the Memorial Day work period. At East Washington Street Elementary School in Rockingham, the principal specifically asked me to speak to the students about the importance of character and citizenship. The second school I am especially proud of. Shiloh Elementary in Monroe was recognized as a Blue Ribbon School by the Department of Education. In fact, Shiloh Elementary has also been nominated for an award by the Department of Education for its character education programs. I will insert their efforts at the end of my remarks. The school's administration has incorporated parent and local community groups to help instill the values of honesty and good citizenship into the everyday lives of their students. They, too, asked me to speak about character and citizenship, and I was glad to do that for them. ``Shiloh Elementary School is where it all comes together,'' states the Department of Education Blue Ribbon School Report. This simple statement speaks volumes about Shiloh's vision, caring adults who lead by example to share what stewardship for our world is about. Students come here and meet parents who only want the best for their children. The local Kiwanis Club in Monroe sponsors the Terrific Kids awards program, which puts emphasis on character education not only in school, but throughout the community. Great satisfaction comes from cooperation among all the stakeholders in the community. Volunteers frequent the halls of Shiloh, adding extra support where needed. Administrators and teachers search for creative means of enabling the school to fulfill its vision. This kind of commitment makes Shiloh stand out. Through this team effort, the result is predictable: Students who practice caring and sharing and kindness. Shiloh, unfortunately, is the exception to the rule. Most schools do not have a successful character education program. This amendment provides the resources for schools across the country to develop a local character and value based program, like Shiloh Elementary, without having to divert the resources for their other essential needs, like books, teacher pay, and supplies. Parents today are faced with incredible challenges in raising children. We need to give our schools leadership, resources, and flexibility to help parents meet these challenges. We need to empower our local teachers and families to work with their communities to incorporate the timeless aspects of character, honesty, integrity, citizenship, courage, respect, personal responsibility and trustworthiness. Let's send a strong message home that we want to help our students blossom into responsible citizens and are willing to do whatever it takes to help them accomplish their goals. Special Emphasis Area character education Strolling through the halls of Shiloh Elementary School is a delight--much care has been taken to create a nurturing learning environment and emphasize the importance of character education in the life of the school and the children. In effective ways, the Bullseye Class of the Month is spotlighted (complete with the class' picture), keywords (e.g., honesty, loyalty, and respect) are displayed in many innovative ways: Incorporated into the gymnasium red, white and blue theme, in classrooms hanging from the ceiling, and on TV monitors in the cafeteria. Blaze the Bulldog (the school's mascot) displays the Bullseye words for each month. It was interesting that March's word (honesty) was also posted in Spanish. In the interview with students (individually and as a group) they were very proud of wearing a badge for being one of Shiloh's Best Behaving Bulldogs--a program which awards badges to wear on Monday for displaying excellent behavior. (The site visitor toured the building on Monday, and it was rewarding to see so many buttons!) An effective recognition initiative tied very closely to the schoolwide emphasis on character education is the Terrific Kids Program sponsored by the local Kiwanis Club. Students from each classroom are honored monthly for displaying good citizenship, improved behavior, and/or improved academics by posting their pictures and celebrating this recognition in a breakfast (provided by the PTA) with parents invited as well. (Again, on the site visit it was heartening to so proud parents of Terrific Kids enjoy the before-school celebration with their Terrific Kids. In summary, this overall category focusing on Character Education came alive through reading Cathy Frailey's newspaper article about the success of the Bullseye class published in the local newspaper, The Enquirer Journal, and, above all, the respect demonstrated by the students and teachers. When students open the door for adults (like the site visitor) and respect school and classroom rules, these are evidence that character education is an integral part of the total school program, and decisionmaking is based on the core values necessary to create a caring and democratic community. (1) Shiloh Elementary School clearly puts into practice restitution (along with using consequences) for violations. For example, when students do not complete homework, the principle of restitution comes to the forefront by assigning homework hall according to school guidelines. For students who do not demonstrate appropriate behavior (and these are absolutely minimal), schoolwide discipline policy takes over with described restitution (e.g., fulfilling a cafeteria responsibility if that was the violation site). Respect and responsibility go hand-in-hand at Shiloh. (2) Developing an intrinsic commitment to values begins the first day students begin school. Pride, honesty, and loyalty are instilled in children in the early grades as verified by an entire school building (halls, classrooms, common areas like the cafeteria, gymnasium, and restrooms) and grounds which are immaculate and cared for as a result of students' making responsible decisions. Children in this school community follow school rules because it is the right thing to do--without any fanfare or rewards involved. When new students enter Shiloh, present students, as well as the entire staff, model respectful behavior which serves as intrinsic teaching tools. Keywords reflecting the basis of character education are discussed in the classroom, for example, through literature and are on display throughout the building in creative ways (e.g., TV monitors in the cafeteria)--all of which develop an intrinsic commitment to values.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I ask my colleagues to join me in paying tribute to Command Sergeant Major David Henderson, who will retire from the Army on Monday, June 21, 1999. CMS Henderson has distinguished himself through more than twenty-five years of service to this great nation. I've had the privilege of getting to know CMS Henderson over the last several months, and it is clear after a moment in his company that he possesses a most unique quality of leadership. Like so many of our nation's great figures, CMS Henderson leads by example, bringing out the very best of all those who serve under his command. His genuine concern for and commitment to his soldiers serve as a model for others who seek to inspire excellence. Over the last ten years, CMS Henderson has served as his unit's senior Non-Commissioned Officer. He has thrice led his men into combat missions which include Operations Urgent Fury, Just Cause, and Desert Shield/Storm. CMS Henderson's service during training, field exercises, and forward deployments is exemplary in every respect. Mr. Speaker, the Army and our nation will lose a fine soldier this coming Monday. And while his departure from service is a loss for this country, I'm confident that he has instilled in many young men and women the motivation to strive for the best. I'm honored that I will be a guest at CMS Henderson's retirement ceremony. I ask that my colleagues join me in expressing our heartfelt gratitude to CMS Henderson and in wishing him the absolute best in his future endeavors.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, we have awoken to a day in which hatred is overlooked, violence is glorified, and random acts of indecency are tolerated. I fear that this has led to a generation that no longer understands the difference between right and wrong. This segment of our youth population has abandoned the notion that human life should be treasured. It saddens me to conclude that many of these youth are, by their own account, morally destitute. Regrettably, Americans have witnessed a series of heart-wrenching incidents of youth violence, casting light on the magnitude of our Nation's problem. I do not support the Aderholt amendment because I want to impose religion in our schools. I strongly support this amendment because our States should have the opportunity to expose their students to a timeless code which, I believe, could instill ageless values. I have given much thought to why some of my colleagues are so resistant to the proposal of the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Aderholt), and, frankly, I remain incredulous. Do some truly believe that teaching our children that lying, stealing, and killing is wrong? Listening to some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, one might conclude that the amendment of the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Aderholt) would tear at the fabric of our Nation. It is amazing to me that many of these same Members will, no doubt, vehemently defend the right of commercial vendors who wish to distribute pornography, filth, and violence to our children, and yet rail against States that wish to allow their school districts the right to post the 10 basic tenets of the Judeo-Christian tradition. Mr. Chairman, when will we as a Congress humbly acknowledge that this Nation was founded on a simple principle of trust in God? We need to get our priorities straight. I support the freedom of religion, and I support this amendment.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Madam Chairman, I rise in support of this amendment and to commend the chairman and ranking member, the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Buyer) and the gentleman from Hawaii (Mr. Abercrombie) for cooperation and their hard work and their can-do spirit. Madam Chairman, as I mentioned earlier this morning, members of the Committee on Armed Services were firmly committed to making this the year of the troops. We recognize that American military personnel and their families were bearing the brunt, the 10-year shrinkage in annual defense spending. The result has been devastating. Military quality of life is severed to the point that all of our service branches are having difficulty recruiting and retaining quality military personnel. This year's defense authorization legislation reverses the downward spiral in defense funding and begins the difficult process of rearming our military both as a fighting force and as a family. While sophisticated hardware and advancements in technology are critical elements of this rebuilding effort, it is our exceptional personnel, the engine of the American fighting force. I believe our legislation takes an important first step in reaching out to our men and women in uniform and letting them know that they count and that we appreciate the difficult job they do. The Buyer-Abercrombie amendment would make our already good authorization bill even better. This amendment provides our service personnel the same benefit we provide to all civil servants, the opportunity to participate in the Federal Government's Thrift Savings Plan. Such an initiative would give every sailor, soldier, airman and marine a chance to plan and prepare for the future through participation in the plan. Individual service personnel could make tax- deferred deposits into accounts similar to IRAs. Madam Chairman, this measure would have a positive effect on recruiting and retention and does not begin to describe the benefit. The Buyer-Abercrombie amendment is an effective tool in our effort to ensure our highly qualified men and women remain in service. We express our appreciation for their protection by our support of the Buyer- Abercrombie amendment.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I support the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York, Mr. Reynolds, and appreciate his concern for the operational readiness of the 82nd Airborne Division. The 82nd Airborne Division is the jewel in the crown of the Army, and I'm proud that this elite division makes its home at Ft. Bragg in the 8th District of North Carolina. When conflict arises in any corner of the world, it's a safe bet that the United States will call on the 82nd Airborne first to defend her interests. Since its inception in 1942 when it contributed greatly to the Allied victory of WWII, the 82nd Airborne has amassed a record of military successes unrivaled by any fighting force in the world. To maintain the integrity of the 82nd Airborne's warfighting capability, Congress must provide them the equipment, weapons and training necessary to accomplish the many missions with which they are charged. Currently, two obsolete, non-secure hand held radios are in use by the 82nd, representing what I believe is an operational risk. As outlined in an Operational Needs Statement by the commanding officer of the XVIII Airborne Corp, Lt. General Buck Kernan, secure means of communications are a critical element of reconnaissance operations. To ensure the safety of 82nd Airborne scouts whose surveillance missions bring them in close proximity to the enemy, we must provide the our reconnaissance teams with lightweight, secure radios. I commend my colleague's efforts to see to it that our forces have the equipment they need, and I will certainly support his amendment.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Madam Speaker, I object to the vote on the ground that a quorum is not present and make the point of order that a quorum is not present.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I am proud to rise in support of the defense authorization bill. I commend all of my colleagues, especially the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Spence), the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Skelton), the ranking member, for a fine bill. The committee has put forth legislation that signifies the great support this Congress has for the million and a half patriotic Americans who voluntarily defend our freedom. Mr. Chairman, I recently visited Ft. Bragg in the 8th District of North Carolina. Over the past 6 months, I have been to Ft. Bragg and Pope Air Force Base a number of times. My last visit was unique. I went to the base with my wife, Barbara, to speak with our soldiers and their spouses about issues important to our military families. Once again, we came away from our discussions thoroughly impressed by the quality of men and women who serve in the Armed Forces. After meeting with three separate groups of personnel, junior enlisted soldiers, senior commissioned officers, and junior officers, it was clear that our troops demonstrate a ``can do'' spirit and pride in their service unrivaled anywhere in the world. They deserve this bill. Unfortunately, we also heard stories of hardship from our soldiers and their families that made me ashamed, ashamed that the government of a Nation so rich in military tradition could be so negligent in meeting the needs of our military families. I came away convinced we should add to this budget things that take care of their needs. Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to report that the House Committee on Armed Services has successfully accomplished its mission and this bill reflects our efforts. We have included in the bill measures which will enhance quality of life for our personnel and their families, 4.8 percent increase in pay, reform pay tables, repealed REDUX. Mr. Chairman, I look forward to returning to Bragg and Pope and telling those wonderful young soldiers that this is indeed the year of the troops. I thank the committee. Our troops protect us. We must support them. This bill does that. Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to discuss two recent events in my life; in order to better relate the common concerns among our troops and veterans. Our veterans and troops are concerned about military pay and benefits, readiness, and modernization shortfalls confronting our military services. Mr. Chairman, it has nearly been a month since I joined a congressional delegation that traveled to Germany, Albania, Macedonia, Italy and Belgium. While it was somewhat disheartening to see the effects of this tragedy up close, it was comforting to see the courageous spirit that persevered among our troops and the many non- government organizations aiding in the current crisis in the Balkans. It is incomprehensible to imagine the scope of this tragedy until you see it in person. On the ground and among the refugees, I was able to interact and listen to the stories of this human tragedy. Putting faces behind tragic accounts, I heard about the killing of innocent men and boys, the wanton burning of homes, and the brutal rape of Kosovar women. In addition to confronting the humanitarian crisis, I had the good fortune of interacting with our troops. I am pleased to report that our troops had high spirits and that they remain committed to the NATO operation. As is customary with U.S. Armed Forces their preparedness, attention to detail, and commitment to duty and country was very impressive. Mr. Chairman, I also had the privilege of joining in the 50th Anniversary of the Houston Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. This Medical Center is dedicated to upholding President Lincoln's call ``to care for him who shall have borne the battle.'' The men and women of this facility have answered the challenge of their dedication by providing the best medical care to veterans residing in the Houston community and southeast Texas. The common theme from my two experiences has been the unwavering dedication to our nation's defense and national security interests displayed by our veterans in the past and by our young men and women today in the Balkan region and throughout the world. Mr. Speaker, as we approach the Memorial Day holiday we owe it to our nation to pass a defense authorization that will provide for a viable and cost effective defense. We owe it to the young service men and women I met during my trip to the Balkan region and to the veterans in the Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center to address their concerns and issues. Mr. Chairman, this bill authorizes a total of $288.8 billion for defense programs. This request is approximately $8.3 billion (3%) more than the administration's request. On May 21, President Clinton signed H.R. 1141, which included an additional $1.8 billion to pay for increases in military pay and pensions in fiscal year 2000. Thus, the total increase over Clinton's defense budget request would be more than $10 million. This bill does reflect Congress's continuing efforts to address systemic quality of life, readiness and modernization shortfalls. The bill addresses those programs like pay, housing, retirement that have the most noticeable and direct effect on service personnel and their families. The bill also addresses other significant areas of military readiness including meeting the recruitment challenge and the training of our soldiers. While this bill addresses significant quality of life issues and provides significant funds for modernization and procurement of weapons systems, it fails in three significant aspects. First, this bill prohibits the use of FY 2000 funds authorized in this bill for ongoing operations in Yugoslavia, and directs the administration to submit a supplemental budget in the military operations continue into FY 2000. Mr. Chairman, if this body adopts this provision we would be sending the wrong message to the Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic. As negotiations continue and the air campaign inflicts continuing damage on the Yugoslavian army and police units, this body cannot send mixed signals. This measure of the defense authorization bill will only encourage Milosevic to hold out against the NATO terms. This body must remain committed to NATO's objective of a peaceful multi-ethnic democratic Kosovo in which all its people live in security. You know when I was walking among the refugees in that camp in Albania, I had the chance to ask many of them, if they thought NATO's action were to blame for their current situation. Mr. Speaker, every person in that camp placed the responsibility for this crisis squarely at the feet of Milosevic. The body cannot relent from our mission of peace and must ensure that Milosevic pays a heavy price for his present policy of repression. The second area in which this bill fails, is its failure to eliminate a provision that interferes with a woman's right of choice. The fiscal 1996 defense authorization law bars female service members or military dependents stationed overseas from obtaining abortions in U.S. military hospitals abroad, even if they pay for the procedure, except in cases where the pregnancy threatens the woman's life. This bill slightly expands current law by allowing the use of appropriated funds to support abortions for military beneficiaries whose pregnancy is the result of an act of forcible rape or incest--but only when such incidents have been reported to a law enforcement agency. Though this change is welcome the law still denies women who have volunteered to serve their country, their legally protected right to choose abortion, simply because they are stationed overseas. Prohibiting women from using their own funds to obtain abortion services at overseas military facilities continues to endanger women's health. Finally, I oppose the extent of funding increases for defense programs proposed in H.R. 1401. The democratic alternative provides for an increase over FY 1999 levels and ensures that critical readiness needs are met. Our plan allows for weapons modernization and proposes a generous military compensation package for our service men and women. But our plan ensures that other critical priorities like education and agriculture receive sufficient funding. This bill could be improved in these three areas while still providing for a viable defense and more importantly addressing the needs of our service men and women and of our veterans.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of the amendment introduced by my friend, the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Ryun), fellow member of our Committee on Armed Services. I have the utmost respect for the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Skelton) and Members on that side of the aisle. I appreciate what is being done by the Cox/Dicks amendment. There are many steps in the right direction. My friend, the gentlewoman from New Mexico (Mrs. Wilson) has great concern for her district, country, and her labs, and she very carefully and meticulously explained to me her views on the bill. I appreciate her willingness to talk with me at length about this. But as I evaluate the situation from my perspective as a member of the Committee on Armed Services, it is apparent to me that to simply rely on the Cox/Dicks amendment is a potential underreaction to an extremely serious situation. With that in mind, I strongly support the efforts of the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Ryun) to put our security first, to put the future security of our Nation at the absolute top of our priority list. I have listened to a number of colleagues. The amendment of the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Ryun) does nothing but strengthen the recommendations put forth by the Cox commission. It is clear from our debate that we are all in agreement over the seriousness of what is at stake. Events at Los Alamos reflect a collapse in DOE counterintelligence and a compromise of national security. Again, the Cox/Dicks amendment is crafted to address these counterintelligence lapses, and outlines no less than 13 new initiatives for DOE implementation. This is good. There is no doubt that the measures, if properly executed, will close loopholes exploited by Chinese spies. It seems to me, however, impossible to set in place an extensive, verifiable counterintelligence system in a mere 90 days. I would remind my colleagues, and there is not a member in this Chamber that did not support the Cox/Dicks amendment, that this amendment establishes three new agencies of counterintelligence oversight. Do we really believe these new agencies will be operational in 3 short months? I submit the answer is no. The gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Ryun) is simply providing the DOE adequate time to ensure that some of America's most sophisticated technology is safe from foreign espionage. I contend any Member that is troubled by events at Los Alamos and is interested in legitimate solutions will support this amendment.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Madam Speaker, 2 weeks ago the long-awaited Cox report was released. I keep this chart because I think it is important for the American people to realize that while this administration was drastically cutting our defense budget, we were giving away our nuclear secrets to the Chinese. This should not, cannot and must not happen as we begin the debate on the all important defense budget today in that bill. Because the administration leaks to the New York Times, we have come to know one of the most stunning bombshells about theft of our sensitive nuclear secrets by the Communist Chinese at our nuclear lab. We also know that the other side of the aisle is in mark contrast to the statements of the gentleman from California (Mr. Cox) in this unanimous report. The partisan statements have begun while pleading with Republicans not to be partisan. Let us go back to the Vice President's reaction to the loss of our most sensitive nuclear weapons information. First words out of his mouth were to blame someone else, Ronald Reagan, and the Secretary of Energy, Bill Richardson, has cautioned over and over again let us not over react. Madam Speaker, let us do react. It is time that we got the Communist Chinese out of our labs, protected our secrets and protect this country. We find out the absolute worst possible case has come to pass, the Communist Chinese penetration of our nuclear laboratories is total. We knew about it since 1995. We have done virtually nothing about it. Madam Speaker, let us do something now. Our future is at stake.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of words. Mr. Chairman, I rise today in strong support of the fiscal year 2000 Agriculture Appropriations bill. I commend the gentleman from New Mexico (Mr. Skeen), the chairman, and the gentlewoman from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur), the ranking member, and all my colleagues on the subcommittee for bringing this bill to us, a bill which supports American farmers in rural communities. This bill comes to us after much time, deliberation, and discussion. I thank the subcommittee for their hard work. I want to address the current amendment to eliminate the Market Access Program. This program is vital to the success of our farmers. If this amendment passes, we as a Congress are to blame for handing over U.S. agricultural market share to foreign competitors. I believe with my whole heart that the American farmers are the most efficient in the world and produce the best products at the lowest prices and provide the safest food of anyone in the world. With this knowledge, I confidently say that given an equal opportunity, American farmers can compete and succeed against agricultural products from any other country. However, American farmers are not being given this equal opportunity. The United States is outspent by more than 20 to 1 by our foreign competitors, promoting and subsidizing their own product. In 1997, the leading U.S. competitor spent $924 million to promote their agriculture exports, $100 million of that spent on promotions here in the United States. Conversely, we grant our farmers assistance to the tune of $90 million to help them compete against our competitor's $924 million. Rather than having this annual debate aimed at eliminating the program, I argue that Congress should rather be discussing a funding increase for the Market Access Program. This is the only program aimed correctly at helping U.S. agriculture products around the world. Our competitors have no limits on what they will spend to assist their farmers in edging out our product. Their success is evidenced by the fact that U.S. ag exports have decreased by $11 billion since 1996. In conclusion, let me simply say the Market Access Program is a valuable tool we are able to provide our farmers. This tool not only helps them compete abroad, but it also supports thousands of U.S. export jobs, 24,000 in my State of North Carolina alone. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of U.S. farmers by voting against this amendment.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I rise to strongly support this rule; I repeat, to strongly support the rule. Now I have heard Members on both sides who have made very strong and compelling arguments about a number of very important issues. But Fort Bragg and Pope Air Force Base are an integral part of the Eighth District of North Carolina, and to me the issue here is simply putting forth a rule that allows us to buy ammunition for training, it allows us to buy fuel for our helicopters, it allows us to buy spare parts that are missing. So I would simply ask that these very important issues not be laid aside but be temporarily displaced so that we can send a message and the materiel that are badly needed by our troops. This rule is about advancing the cause of our men and women in the Armed Services, and both parties have done an excellent job of speaking out and saying this is the year of the troops. So please join me, support this rule, and let us support our troops.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to congratulate four Stanly County students who are among the 1999 recipients of the North Carolina Teaching Fellows scholarships. Each Fellow receives a $26,000 scholarship loan from the state of North Carolina. The full loan is forgiven after the recipient has completed 4 years of teaching in North Carolina public schools. In addition, all Fellows take part in academic summer enrichment programs during their college careers. The Teaching Fellows Scholarship program was created by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1986 and has become one of the top teacher recruiting programs in the country. This innovative program attracts talented high school seniors to become public school teachers. This is a common sense, state based program that will help encourage our best and brightest to come back to their communities to teach. The 1999 recipients from Stanly County, North Carolina are Catherine Ellen Hinson and Mai Lee Xiong, both of Albemarle High School, Adam Allen Cycotte of South Stanly High School, and Anna Beth Spence of West Stanly High School. Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate these individuals for the courage and desire to enter the teaching profession.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I rise today in strong support of the American Land Sovereignty Protection Act. I and 182 of my colleagues who co-sponsored this bill believe that it is not only common sense, but also Congress' Constitutional duty, to protect the sovereignty of America's people and her land. As you have heard, UN Land Designations, World Heritage Sites and Biosphere Reserves, take place without the approval of Congress and with little or no Congressional oversight; consequently, the citizens of the United States are excluded from the process. These decisions infringe upon State sovereignty, individual rights of United States citizens, and private interests in real property. Mr. Chairman, I am proud of the beautiful forests, monuments, national parks and other lovely places in the U.S. as anyone and am thrilled that others outside the U.S. see the beauty in them as well. However, I feel very passionately that if the United Nations decides to designate the Uwharrie Forest--in the 8th District of North Carolina-- as a World Heritage Site, that the people of my district should have the opportunity to address how this designation might affect them. Receiving this designation would mean that United States agrees to manage the Uwharrie Forest in accordance with an underlying international agreement which may have implications on private property outside the forest. At best, a World Heritage Site or Biosphere Reserve designation gives the international community an open invitation to interfere in how the Uwharrie, and land surrounding it, are used. The voters of my district might decide it would be in their best interest to accept the UN designation. If that were the case, I would gladly honor the will of my constituents. However, it is their community, their lands and their livelihoods being affected, they have the right, and should have the opportunity, to have a say. The Uwharrie Forest is just one example of a beautiful site in my district. I know each of you can think of several beautiful places in your own districts that would be prime for a UN World Heritage Site designation. I urge you to give your constituents the chance to be involved in decisions that affect them, their private property rights and our sovereignty as a nation. I urge you to vote in favor of the Land Sovereignty Protection Act.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to congratulate Willene C. Nesbitt of Concord, North Carolina for her commitment and dedication to her community. On Saturday, May 22, 1999, Mrs. Nesbitt will be celebrating her retirement from Northeast Medical Center in Concord. Mrs. Nesbitt has worked for more than 50 years at Northeast Medical Center, formerly Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, and has helped it grow and change into the fine regional hospital it is today. The celebration on Saturday is not only a retirement celebration, but also a show of appreciation for all of her efforts in the community. Mrs. Nesbitt has been active in the Shankletown-Sidetown Community Organization. She was one of the founding board members of this organization. One project that she recently spearheaded was gathering members of the community and surrounding areas together to help rebuild an elderly woman's dilapidated home to make it liveable again. Her selfless acts of kindness have brought so many in our community a better life. Mrs. Nesbitt and her husband, John C. Nesbitt, have also been active in their church, Gilmore Chapel AME Zion Church. Mr. Speaker, I congratulate Willene Nesbitt in her retirement from the hospital, but hope that her community activity will only escalate with her new found free time. She truly brings a smile to the faces of the people she touches and improves the quality of life for everyone in Cabarrus County.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to congratulate six Richmond County Senior High students who are among the 1999 recipients of the North Carolina Teaching Fellows scholarships. Each Fellow receives a $26,000 scholarship loan from the state of North Carolina. The full loan is forgiven after the recipient has completed four years of teaching in North Carolina public schools. In addition, all Fellows take part in summer and academic summer enrichment programs during their college careers. The Teaching Fellows Scholarship program was created by the North Carolina General Assembly in 1986 and has become one of the top teacher recruiting programs in the country. This innovative program attracts talented high school seniors to become public school teachers. This is a commonsense, state-based program that will help encourage our best and brightest to come back to their communities to teach. The 1999 recipients from Richmond County, NC, are James Haltom, Kristen McDonald, Shana McLaughlin, Matthew Pence, Patience Whitehead, and Melissa Allen. Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate these individuals for the courage and desire to enter the teaching profession.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in honor of National Police Week to pay tribute to the men and women who serve as Law Enforcement officers across the United States. This includes police officers, sheriff's deputies, correctional officers, parole and probation agents, and pretrial services officers. Police officers are on the front lines everyday protecting our streets, communities, and neighborhoods. So often we overlook the many duties that police officers perform on a daily basis. Crime statistics nationwide have shown a dramatic decrease over the past 3 years in homicides, violent crimes, and property crimes. But, until those statistics become nonexistent, we need to support our law enforcement officials at every level of government. On a federal level, we need to give local law enforcement the support they need to be successful and safe. Programs like the Bulletproof Vest Initiative, has given rural communities the chance to quality for grants to increase officer safety. Advancements in the Criminal Justice Information Network have given local agencies the ability to better communicate and exchange critical information. Mr. Speaker, we will also be celebrating Peace Officers Memorial Day this week. Two communities in my district in North Carolina have been leaders in paying tribute to fallen officers. Ann Cannon led the effort in my hometown, Concord, N.C., to erect a memorial in the center of town. Even today, citizens in Albermarle, N.C., are dedicating a memorial to their fallen officers. I want to highlight the efforts of one local sheriff in my district. Sheriff Tony Frick, of Stanly County, is looking inward to community members to help solve crime problems. Stanly County residents are sponsoring the Save our Sheriff (S.O.S.) Walk-a-thon in support of the Sheriff's Department and updating obsolete equipment. I would remiss if I did not mention the families of those we recognize today. The families of our peace officers deserve our admiration for their steadfast support of those selfless citizens who willingly make the necessary sacrifices to preserve public safety.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I begin with the following quote: ``Without the assistance of the Divine Being who ever attended him, I cannot succeed. With that assistance I cannot fail. Trusting in Him who can go with me, and remain with you, and be everywhere for good, let us confidently hope that all will yet be well.''--Abraham Lincoln as he began his inaugural journey from Illinois to Washington, D.C., February 11, 1861. Mr. Speaker, throughout the history of our Nation, leaders have turned to prayer for guidance and inspiration. Our Founding Fathers built this country on the principle that its citizens had a God-given right to freedom, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Since that time, America has been a beacon for millions in search of religious freedom. The first Thursday of May of each year is set aside as the National Day of Prayer. This day serves to recognize the important role of prayer in our nation's past, present and future. We recognize today, Thursday, May 6 as the National Day of Prayer. Because of the recent events here at home and abroad, I believe this day has a special significance this year. The recent events in Yugoslavia and Colorado have sharply reminded us that life is fragile and sometimes fleeting. While our nation is troubled by the senseless death and destruction that surrounds the war in Europe and the shooting in Littleton, we can take comfort in the fact that our nation is also actively working to repair and heal itself. As a new member of Congress, I have been thrust into the middle of the many policy debates that shape our nation. Often times there are tough choices to be made, and I am comforted by the fact that I have the ability and the freedom to turn to prayer as a source of guidance. I hope that we as a nation will make time everyday for a period of prayer and reflection.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of our nation's farmers and therefore, in support of Mr. Latham's amendment. On March 24th, over a full month ago, we passed a supplemental appropriations bill which included $110 million to support $1.1 billion for loans that farmers and ranchers need to finance this season's work in the fields and pastures. These farmers needed that money a month ago; they are now nearing desperation. In my district alone, the eighth district of North Carolina, there are several million dollars worth of loan applications that have been turned in to the local FSA offices. These farmers are struggling to get their finances in order because they are relying on what appears to be an unreliable source--the Federal Government. This is more than a matter of delay in many cases, this is a matter of continuing to be a farmer, or finally giving up and throwing in the towel on the livelihood they know and love. In addition to the farmers who are depending on these loans to put a crop in the field this year, I also have poultry and dairy farmers who are going to miss a season of revenue due to the loan situation. Many of my poultry farmers have been in the process of transitioning from raising turkeys to raising chickens and have lost their chicken house contractors because the builders have moved on to sites where they are sure to receive prompt payment. Again, that leaves those chicken farmers without chicken houses and therefore, without revenue. A full season of no revenue will affect these farmers for more than just one season. To make matters worse, even when we do finally pass this legislation, we have caused a loss of faith from traditional lenders. Banks are now turning down farmers simply because they don't want to deal with farm applications. This is further limiting farmers because of Congress' inability to pass appropriations and provide a loan program that is reliable. I will close by saying what we all already know, we have a critical situation right now in farm country. Congress has within its power the ability to alleviate some of the financial duress that agriculturists are feeling. Do the right thing today, pass this amendment and let's get to work on restoring faith in our system.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the requisite number of words. (Mr. HAYES asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I wish to state my support for this emergency supplemental bill. Our national security is at stake here today, and I believe that a vote against this emergency bill is equivalent to turning our backs on the young men and women in our armed forces. The President has offered a version of this emergency defense bill that represents a first step, but one that is inadequate in meeting the true emergency before us. The Clinton Administration has asked that we only provide enough funds to cover the costs of the war in Yugoslavia. But we were running out of cruise missiles before we ever launched one over Kosovo. And our airplanes faced a spare parts shortage before we sent a single one to take on Milosevic. In other words, the President wants to only invest enough to maintain our military's current weakened status. That's not good enough. We owe it to America and our troops to do more than just return the military to its previous unacceptable level of readiness. We have a moral obligation to give our soldiers, pilots and sailors the tools to carry out their missions. Just as they are doing their duty to protect us, we must do our duty to support them. Mr. Chairman, if we want a true assessment of our current situation, then we should heed the concerns of our nation's top soldier--Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Henry Shelton. A recent article in Jane's Defense Weekly said the following: With the number of US combat aircraft involved in NATO's Operation ``Allied Force'' in Yugoslavia set to reach 800 in the coming weeks, senior Department of Defense (DoD) officials are downgrading the armed forces' ability to meet its national military strategy of being able to concurrently fight and win two major regional conflicts. The article continues, As a result Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Henry Shelton now believes the armed forces' ability to prevail in a second MTW [Major Theater War] in a reasonable amount of time and with minimum casualties has been dulled by the continuing commitment in the Balkans. Mr. Chairman, we simply cannot afford to play games with our national security, and I believe that it is essential to support this emergency defense bill. And, while I believe that this bill represents a critical investment in preserving our national security, I do not take its price tag lightly. Mr. Chairman, we have made great strides in recent years under the leadership of this Congress to balance the federal budget for the benefit or our future generations. I am disappointed today that the President chose to send us this emergency funding without a corresponding offset in the budget. The bottom line, however, is that the money has to come from somewhere and the only alternative to cutting spending is to add this bill to our nation's federal debt. Mr. Chairman, I made a pledge to my constituents in the 8th District in North Carolina that I would lock away Social Security funds and not allow them to be used for other government spending. While I truly believe that our Nation faces a critical situation with our national security, I believe that it is better to pay for this measure by other means rather than adding to the deficit as the President has proposed in his request. That is why I will support the Coburn, Toomey, and Sanford amendment to offset this emergency appropriations bill with reimbursements from other NATO countries and a minor reduction in other areas of government spending. I am supporting this amendment with the understanding that our government will aggressively pursue reimbursements from other NATO countries, because I believe that we have shouldered a disproportionate share of the costs of this operation. Mr. Chairman, I will vote in favor of this amendment. However, if it is not successful, I will still support final passage of this emergency spending bill because I truly believe that our nation faces threat in its national security. Mr. Chairman, this operation has stretched our armed forces too thin, and we all know that a rubber band will break when it's stretched too far. This Congress cannot run that risk with the U.S. military. We need this emergency legislation to help restore our military readiness. We must restore our military resource because this strain is compromising our security here at home.

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Chairman, I would just wish to state my support for this emergency supplemental bill and for all the hard work that the chairman and the minority members have done to put this together. I hear the passion here today, and I appreciate all the effort. I have friends on both sides, and I always support my friends, but I do appreciate the passion here today. The President has offered a version of this emergency defense bill. That represents a first step. It is just not enough. It is inadequate in meeting the emergency before us. We owe it to America and our troops to do more than just return the military to its previous unacceptable level of readiness. We have a moral obligation to give our pilots and soldiers and sailors the tools to do their mission. Just as they are doing their duty to protect us, we must do our duty to support them. Mr. Chairman, we need this emergency legislation. I would hope we would put this amendment aside, bring the bill forward, support it, and vote for it. Let us do it for our troops.

Mr. HAYES

Mr. HAYES. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the life of Ken Strain, a man dedicated to serve his community. Mr. Strain passed away this week while serving the community of Hemby Bridge, North Carolina as a volunteer fireman. His fire truck flipped while Mr. Strain was returning from a rescue call. Mr. Strain comes from a long line of firefighters. His father Bill and his youngest brother Darren both have served as firefighters in North Carolina. Mr. Strain is survived by his wife, Sharon and their 18-month-old son Kristopher. Mr. Strain kept a picture of his son in his tool box and often visited the fire station with Kristopher. Mr. Strain will be deeply missed as a member of the Hemby Bridge business community. He along with his colleague, close friend and fellow firefighter, Paul Ramsey, were partners at their business, Neighborhood Automotive. While Ken's death is tragic, I must commend his partners at the Union County Volunteer Fire Department for their exemplary record of safety and reliability. This is the first death the department has suffered in 30 years. Mr. Speaker, I want to express my deep remorse to the family and friends of Mr. Ken Strain, but also honor him for his selfless service to his community. Mr. Strain was dedicated to his family, his job and his community and will be missed by all.