Dean Heller

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, today I wish to pay tribute to a Nevadan who spent his life working to strengthen his local community and enrich the lives of its residents. After a courageous 9-year battle with cancer, Bruno Benna passed on April 1, 2012. Our State has lost a selfless and giving Nevadan. My thoughts and prayers continue to be with his family. From starting a small concrete company that would later become a staple in Reno to his patronage for the fine arts, Bruno was involved in nearly every facet of Northern Nevada's community. In 1958, he co- founded C.B. Concrete Company, which literally laid the foundations for modern Reno. For the next 50 years, Bruno contributed to the construction of Reno's major infrastructure projects. Generations of Reno residents have become familiar with C. B. Concrete Company's iconic yellow trucks emblazoned with the bumble bee logo. C. B. Concrete Company exemplifies the vital role small businesses play in both our economy and local community. As the backbone of our economy, they must continue to remain vibrant and healthy in order to create jobs at a time when Nevadans need them the most. I am saddened that Reno has lost such a passionate entrepreneur who was responsible for employing hundreds of Nevadans. Northern Nevada was fortunate to have such a talented businessman who was continuously striving to improve the business community while serving on the Reno Chamber of Commerce Board, the U.S. Interstate Commerce Commission, and as an advisor to the U.S. Small Business Administration. In 1997, Bruno and his wife, Edna, started the Benna Family Foundation to give back to their community. Through the foundation, the couple were avid supporters of the University of Nevada, the Nevada Discovery Museum, the Nevada Opera, the Nevada Art Museum, and the Reno Little Theater. In 2002, Governor Kenny Guinn awarded the Bennas with the Governor's Arts Award for their decades of service for arts in Northern Nevada. Bruno's extensive philanthropic endeavors and generous contributions to our State continue to be inspiring to those within the Reno and larger northern Nevada community. I am both grateful for and humbled by his commitment to the Silver State. I ask my colleagues to join me today in remembering the life of a great Nevadan.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Madam President, I come to the floor today to highlight an issue I fight for every day; that is, jobs in Nevada. In Nevada, having a strong tourism industry means more jobs in the State. Las Vegas, Henderson, Lake Tahoe, and Reno have long been favorite destinations for millions of visitors both domestically and, more increasingly, internationally. The entire southern Nevada economy is heavily dependent on the hotel, gaming, and convention industry, which employs over one-quarter of the region's labor force. Plain and simple, tourism is the lifeblood for business and job creation in Nevada. Like many taxpayers, I was shocked and disappointed to read the GSA inspector general's report that found inappropriate spending at the 2010 Western Regions Conference that was held in Nevada. This conference was excessive, wasteful, and it completely ignored Federal procurement laws and internal GSA policy on conference spending. I believe it is appropriate for Congress to exercise its oversight authority on GSA to look into the agency's practices and provide corrective oversight to ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely by this administration. However, I want to be clear: This is not an issue about location, this is the result of poor decisionmaking and leadership by the GSA. Las Vegas is one of the greatest locations in the world for a conference, a meeting, or a vacation. With over 148,000 hotel rooms and 10.5 million square feet of meeting and exhibit space citywide, it is ideally suited to host companies and organizations both large and small. In fact, this past January Las Vegas hosted the Consumer Electronics Show, which had more people attend than the Iowa caucuses. I fully agree that it was inappropriate for the GSA to waste taxpayer dollars, but it is not inappropriate to come to Las Vegas for conventions and meetings. The actions of GSA should not reflect negatively on Las Vegas, and I am asking all of my colleagues to be mindful of that as they conduct their investigations. The viability of the economy in Nevada is dependent upon the volume of visitors to our State. Last year nearly 39 million visitors came to Las Vegas alone. These visitors came because Las Vegas continues its reign as the No. 1 trade show and convention destination in North America. Las Vegas hosts thousands of meetings and conventions annually and generates billions in revenue. It is no secret that Washington politicians and this administration have had a negative impact on the Las Vegas economy due to their comments issued publicly. For example, in 2009 attendance at conventions and meetings in Las Vegas fell by 13.6 percent. The following year attendance fell by another 7.2 percent. In total from 2009 to 2010, Las Vegas lost 1.4 million convention attendees. While I recognize that it is unfair to blame total decline on a few ill-advised lines in a speech, there is no doubt that spoken words by politicians clearly have an impact on the Las Vegas economy. Las Vegas and the great State of Nevada should not be political targets because of GSA's misconduct. Las Vegas is an excellent destination for conferences, and I am proud of my State's ability to entertain and accommodate businesses, organizations, and individuals from all over the world. Again, while several congressional committees investigate this issue, I would respectfully advise my colleagues that it is not the location that can be blamed for the misuse of taxpayer funds. The convention services my State offers are the best in the world. And no town in Nevada should be singled out due to poor judgment by the GSA. It is my hope that all of my colleagues will focus on the misconduct of the GSA and push for a new initiative that spurs growth in the tourist industry instead of blaming Nevada for the mistakes of incompetent government bureaucrats. I yield the floor.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I wish to congratulate Pierron Tackes for being selected as Nevada's Cherry Blossom Princess for the 2012 Centennial Cherry Blossom Festival. Ms. Tackes is an accomplished and ambitious student whose unwavering commitment to the Silver State embodies the very essence of what Nevada's Cherry Blossom Princess should be. Ms. Tackes is an exemplary constituent, chosen by the Nevada State Society to represent Nevada at the National Conference of State Society's Cherry Blossom Princess Educational and Cultural Exchange Program. Nevada is proud to support one of our own as she joins young women from across the Nation in this educational and leadership forum that celebrates the enduring friendship between the United States and Japan. I am proud to recognize Ms. Tackes for her extensive community involvement, educational performance, and passion for our home State. I join the citizens of Nevada in congratulating Ms. Tackes on this accomplishment and wish her all the best during this cultural and educational event.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, today we honor the life and service of Judge David Huff, whose passing on March 27, 2012 signifies a great loss to Nevada's judiciary. David's commitment to the people of the State of Nevada will never be forgotten. I send my condolences and prayers to David's family in this time of mourning. David served the communities of Fallon and Yerington for 15 years as District Court Judge for Nevada's Third Judicial District Court and the recently-formed Tenth Judicial District Court. Since being elected to the bench in 1996, David's main priority was to maintain and secure justice for the residents of Churchill and Lyon Counties. Throughout his career, David was deeply invested in community efforts to improve the justice system by developing policies that promoted excellence in court administration. As a Vietnam veteran and Navy Justice School graduate, David made a commitment to his country long before he served the great State of Nevada. He joined the United States Navy and after being deployed, worked for the Judge Advocate General's--JAG--Corps to provide military individuals with legal support and assistance. David also served as a military judge, demonstrating his continued resolution to upholding the laws of our land. Throughout his life, David maintained a dedication to the preservation of justice and integrity which I am honored to commend. Today, I join the Churchill County community and citizens of the Silver State to celebrate the life of an upstanding Nevadan and dedicated advocate on behalf of our State.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, here we go again. Once again, Washington is doing its old familiar song and dance: pushing another measure that is big on talking points but very light on solutions. The truth is, the measure we are debating will not help anyone struggling with rising gas prices. It is past time for Congress to get to work on solving our Nation's most pressing issues. Nevadans have already been hit hard by this economic downturn. Gas prices are only making a tough situation worse. Congress should do everything within its power to provide relief to Americans who are already struggling to make ends meet. In Las Vegas, the average price of gas is $3.93 a gallon. Up north in Reno, gas prices are already more than $4 a gallon. In the rural town of Elko, the local newspaper recently reported that gas prices have increased by 48 cents in the last month. I received a text message recently from a prominent businessman in my State. He wrote: Regular gas at $4.56 per gallon in southern California-- beginning to really affect our businesses. This is an issue Congress has ignored for far too long. Instead of addressing gas prices, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are retreating to failed policy in hopes of distracting Americans from the dramatic price and rise of prices at the pump. They are merely following the lead of this administration, whose own Secretary of Energy statements before Congress indicated that their overall energy goal is not to lower gas prices. Unfortunately, my colleagues fail to understand what the American people have understood all along; that is, to have a healthy economy, we need affordable energy. Developing domestic energy resources and building the infrastructure to get it to market will not only create jobs, but it will bring more energy resources to market. Nevada still has the unfortunate distinction of leading the Nation in both unemployment and foreclosures. Whether you live in the vast expanse of rural Nevada or in urban Las Vegas, high gasoline prices disproportionately impact my home State. The current state of our economy and the rising gas prices represent an extreme blow to many sectors of Nevada's economy, tourism in particular. Tourism and the jobs dependent on that industry will be further devastated as gas prices increase at a time when Nevadans are hurting most. Additionally, Nevada is roughly 110,000 square miles. High gas prices mean more vacant hotel rooms. It means more empty restaurants. It means more closed small businesses. Many of my constituents must travel great distances to work or for basic goods and services. At a time when middle-class families across Nevada have already been forced to tighten their belts, the last thing they need is to feel the squeeze of higher gas prices. In Nevada we need jobs, not policies that make job creation more difficult. I believe continuing to develop renewable and alternative sources is important to Nevada for the clean energy and job creation it brings. The development of renewable energy is something I have long advocated. However, our Nation must have a diverse energy strategy. A truly comprehensive approach to our domestic energy security will create jobs and improve our economy. We must develop all of our resources, and I would argue that the positive impact increased domestic production would have on our economy in terms of jobs and revenue would actually facilitate the development of the technologies of the future. There is no doubt alternative sources of energy are our future. While we work to develop and perfect those technologies, we need to secure our economy now by having an energy policy that respects the cause of the problem; that is, supply and demand. What concerns me is we are not debating a bill that today provides solutions. Today's debate is about a bill that is merely two failed policies repackaged as a political stunt. Congress should not double down on failed stimulus programs that have put Nevadans out of work and have done little to salvage our economy. Americans do not want more political gimmicks. They want solutions. What Congress needs to focus on are policies that will lower gas prices for Americans and fuel job creation. For this reason, I have authored an amendment to this legislation that is truly a compromise containing solutions to the issues we are facing today. My amendment, the Gas Price Relief Act, would relieve gas prices at the pump, increase domestic energy production, and close tax loopholes. Under the Gas Price Relief Act, every American who drives a car will reap the benefit of tax relief. My legislation closes tax loopholes for the major integrated oil companies and cuts the gas tax while ensuring revenue is still being delivered to the highway trust fund. My amendment also provides for domestic energy production and infrastructure, which will create jobs and at the same time increase supply. It is truly a commonsense ``all of the above'' strategy to provide for the development of our domestic energy resources in order to meet our energy needs. It is imperative Washington takes on our Nation's most pressing issues, not simply instigate partisan fights. Washington should not continue to play politics with America's paychecks. The longer Congress delays making tough decisions the more people in Nevada and across our Nation suffer. In my home State of Nevada, gas prices have more than doubled since 2009. Higher energy costs impact every aspect of life: from the cost of food and clothing to virtually every good and service on which we rely. Expanding domestic energy production, improving our energy infrastructure, and passing savings along to the American people are the right objectives to meet our Nation's immediate and future energy needs. Let's move beyond the partisan fights of today and start producing the results Nevadans and all Americans are asking for. Mr. President, I yield the floor. I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, it is my privilege to recognize LTC Daren S. Sorenson, an extraordinary American, whose heroic acts to defend his country and fellow servicemembers has earned him a second Distinguished Flying Cross, DFC. The State of Nevada and the U.S. Air Force are proud to commend Lieutenent Colonel Sorenson for all of his accomplishments. I am grateful and humbled to honor Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson for his dedication and sacrifice to this Nation. He has been deployed seven times and served as the deputy mission commander during the first preemptive strike on the inaugural night of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003. During this combat operation, Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson earned his first DFC for targeting and assisting the destruction of an armored unit of the Iraqi Republican Guard. Not only has Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson been recognized for this prestigious award once, but he received his second DFC during his deployment to Afghanistan for air support in Operation Enduring Freedom. On May 25, 2011, during an operation in Eastern Afghanistan, Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson implemented techniques and strategies learned at Nevada's Nellis Air Force Base to defend and save the lives of nearly 50 coalition members. Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson's valiant aeronautic techniques drew away opposing fire and enabled air controllers and ground forces to locate combatants and defeat the enemy. His devotion to duty in the face of perilous flying conditions is admirable and maintains the highest standards and traditions of the U.S. Air Force. As America's oldest military aviation award, the DFC was created by Congress more than 85 years ago to award individuals for acts of heroism or achievement in aeronautics. I applaud Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson for earning this prestigious award twice during his service. His continuous acts of bravery are a testament to his commitment to the United States. Today, we commend Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson's acts of valor and the continuous sacrifices made by all of our servicemembers to ensure the safety and security of our Nation. We owe them and their families a great deal of gratitude for their personal sacrifices. I am proud to join the citizens of Nevada in recognizing Lieutenant Colonel Sorenson's accomplishments. I ask my colleagues to join me in honoring and congratulating him for his incredible bravery on behalf of his comrades and this great nation.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, today I wish to congratulate Dr. Heath Morrison, who has been recognized as the 2012 American Association of School Administrators--AASA--National Superintendent of the Year. My home State of Nevada is proud and privileged to acknowledge such an extraordinary educator and leader. Since 2009, Dr. Morrison has served as superintendent for the Washoe County School District where he has proven to be an innovator in education. During his tenure, the Washoe County School District has achieved higher test scores and has seen their graduation rate rise to 70 percent. Outside the classroom, Dr. Morrison continues to encourage and develop student performance by creating personal connections with the local community. Engaging with Washoe County residents has allowed Dr. Morrison to foster relationships with parents, volunteers, and local businesses in order to create and enhance scholastic opportunities for students. I commend Dr. Morrison for his strong leadership and positive influence on Nevada's youth. I admire and recognize the desire of our educators to uphold high education standards for our nation. Their guidance and encouragement provide students with the ability to become lifelong learners with a thirst for knowledge. Now more than ever, it is of paramount importance to prepare our children and grandchildren to compete in the 21st century. Nevada is fortunate to have such great educational leadership serving the students across our great State. I ask my colleagues to join me in congratulating Dr. Morrison and celebrating the achievements of our Nation's teachers, administrators, and staff who help to guide our students to educational excellence.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I wish to pay tribute to the life and work of Bill Raggio, a steadfast Nevadan, my mentor, and dedicated public servant who passed away on February 23, 2012. Our State has lost a truly devoted leader and influential icon in Nevada politics. We mourn the passing of a dear friend and celebrate the life of a man who lived and fought for the betterment of our State. The loss of Bill is something that will be felt all across Nevada. He was truly a giant in every sense of the word. His recordbreaking 38 years in the Nevada State Senate can only be described as selfless. Over the course of 10 terms, Bill was dedicated beyond question. He not only demonstrated a tactful leadership style but also devoted himself to fiscal responsibility. His ability to compromise and his willingness to work across party lines helped him to overcome partisan differences and legislative hurdles to meet the needs of the great State of Nevada. Bill influenced my work, and for that I am forever thankful. Never afraid to tackle the difficult problems, Bill pledged his commitment to dutifully protecting the citizens of northern Nevada as the Washoe County district attorney. He was a great man who fought hard for Nevadans and was respected by many. We are fortunate and proud to remember Bill, a second-generation Nevadan and Reno native. Bill touched the lives of tens of thousands of Nevada families, spanning generations. He served Nevadans with honor and devotion, and we are blessed by Bill's enduring and undeniable passion for public service. I ask my colleagues to join me today in celebrating the life of a great statesman who will always be remembered for his unwavering commitment to Nevada. His passing is a tremendous loss, and his legacy will be cherished for generations to come. I wish to extend my deepest sympathies and condolences to Bill's wife Dale and the entire Raggio family.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, our Nation is more than $15 trillion in debt. The President's budget will increase government spending by $47 trillion over the next decade. Included is the largest tax increase in American history, while our national debt increases to $25.9 trillion over the next 10 years. That is right. This budget proposes a massive tax increase, not as a plan to address the national debt but to fuel more reckless big government spending. Our Nation cannot afford to continue down this path. This reckless budget will not only saddle our children and grandchildren with massive government debt, but it proposes to raise taxes on the very businesses we need to create jobs. How can this President and the majority party claim to be projobs when everything they are doing is antibusiness? This budget threatens our long-term economic security and places a greater burden on our children and grandchildren who will be forced to live and pay for Washington's inability to solve this problem. While I believe the President's budget spends too much, borrows too much, and taxes too much, in the Senate the majority party has chosen to go to the other extreme. They have now refused to pass a budget for more than 1,000 days. It is our responsibility as legislators to develop a real, workable budget that will put our Nation back on the path of economic prosperity. Unfortunately, the majority simply has not taken this responsibility seriously. Now, there are some who claim that spending caps established in the Budget Control Act constitute a budget. Quite frankly, I disagree. At a time when millions of Americans are out of work, this behavior in Washington continues to create great uncertainty and stifles economic growth. No State has felt the failures of Washington more than the State of Nevada. My State continues to lead the Nation in unemployment, with more than 150,000 Nevadans looking for a job. With the so-called stimulus plans, Cash for Clunkers, and bailouts, Washington's response to our economic problems has been woefully inadequate and, in Nevada, a complete failure. Here is the kind of story I hear all too often from my fellow Nevadans: You may recall that my wife Pam and I own Straw Hat Pizza here in Carson. Pam has owned and operated the restaurant since May of 1985. Unfortunately, after 25 years of operation, today is our last day of being in business. We are forced to close our doors and likely file for bankruptcy due to the horrible economic situation in our state, and Carson City in particular. It's a true tragedy that a lifelong endeavor ends this way, and Pam feels that she is a failure. I keep reminding her that the failure was not hers, but rather a failure of liberal elected officials to do what's right for our country and get out of the way, let free enterprise work its magic, and in turn let individuals flourish. Members of Congress are willfully refusing to put our Nation on a path of long-term fiscal responsibility, creating greater uncertainty, and contributing to an anemic economy that is forcing small businesses to close their doors. As long as this is the case, Americans will continue to be frustrated and angry with Washington's inability to produce real results. Our Nation's Capitol remains the only place in the country where difficult decisions are not made. Congress continually kicks the can down the road leaving tough fiscal decisions for future Congresses, future administrations, and worse, the next generation. In light of these facts, is it any mystery why Congress is currently experiencing its worst approval ratings in history. I introduced the No Budget, No Pay Act to force Congress to face reality, to take responsibility for running this country. This bipartisan legislation requires that the Senate and House of Representatives pass a budget and all appropriations bills by the beginning of each fiscal year. Failure to do so would result in the loss of pay until Congress takes its job seriously. If Congress does not complete its constitutional duties, then its Members should not be paid. It is that simple. If we do not do our job, then we should not be paid. This concept resonates with the American people. I know this because I asked Nevadans during a series of telephone townhall meetings last year whether they supported a bill that would hold the pay of Members of Congress if they failed to pass a budget. More than 4,000 Nevadans participated in this poll, and 84 percent of them supported the No Budget, No Pay concept. The budget is not a trivial piece of legislation or a campaign document. It is a roadmap that identifies goals, priorities, and establishes a multiyear fiscal course for the Nation. If done right it can provide stability and set expectations for where we want to take our Nation. Budgeting is not a strange concept. It is something that is done at all levels of government, businesses large and small, and at every kitchen table across the country. It is past time for Congress to actually implement policies that would encourage the economic growth we need to ensure that workers can have good jobs and provide for their families. While the No Budget, No Pay Act will not solve every problem in Washington, I sincerely believe it would be a step in the right direction. These essential functions of Congress are vital to fiscal responsibility and creating greater certainty so our job creators can flourish. I was pleased to see reports of growth--small growth--in our economy. But lack of clarity provided by Washington continues to hamper economic growth. Back home, Nevadans continue to struggle. Small businesses are trying to survive while gridlock in Washington is making it harder for employers to know what to expect in the coming years. Establishing a responsible budget would be a good first step toward placing our Nation on a path for a more prosperous future. I yield the floor, and I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, when our Nation's economy was thriving, Nevada was at the heart of the construction boom. Buildings and homes were going up across the State. Neighborhoods were growing, schools were being built at record rates, and the construction industry was flourishing. All of this activity drove investments into other areas of the economy, and for many life was good in Nevada. But when the crisis hit, the highs that my State experienced were matched by the lows that followed. Nevada now leads the Nation in unemployment with more than 160,000 Nevadans looking for a job. Many can no longer afford their homes. Nevadans are being forced into bankruptcy and facing foreclosure. While Nevada is home to some of the most resilient, hard-working people in the country, almost one-quarter of Nevadans are so frustrated that they have simply given up hope for better employment. Much of the difficulty Nevadans are experiencing can be traced back to the crisis in my State. The ill effects of the depressed housing market are widespread. High rates of foreclosures are devastating to families, neighborhoods, and entire communities. Families who have been foreclosed upon are already having a hard time paying their bills. Add to those difficulties the time spent finding a new place and the costs of moving and their problems are compounded. Time spent fighting the bank to avoid foreclosure and relocating would likely be better used to find a job or better paying employment. One of the biggest problems distressed home owners are facing is the programs that have been put into place to help keep people in their homes that have not lived up to expectations. My office spends a great deal of time with Nevadans on the cusp of losing their homes, looking for help, and trying to keep families in their homes. It is truly heart wrenching to hear some of these stories. These homeowners do not want to foreclose, and obviously they do not want to lose their homes. I recently received this e-mail from a constituent in Reno who is fighting to keep their home. I would like to share that with you. We hoped for a win-win situation but in the end all we got was a nightmare in which everyone loses: my sister and I obviously lose, our neighborhood loses as another house sits vacant with a rusting metal sign in the front, our State loses as the housing plight increases again, the bank loses because they lose a customer who just needed another chance and, most importantly, democracy loses as the plutocrats roll over another family. When families move, their children often have to change schools. So now not only are children forced to move from their homes, they are also leaving behind their schools and their neighborhoods. This kind of destabilization is harmful for families who are already struggling. Consider the effects of foreclosures on neighborhoods and communities. The widespread availability of housing is flooding the real estate inventory in Nevada. This is forcing down home values and making it difficult for other people to sell their homes as well. In February 2006 the average home in Nevada was valued at $309,000. Today the home values have dropped to $120,000. Homes left vacant and uncared for can quickly become an eyesore, pushing low home values even lower. This means others in the neighborhood can have a difficult time selling their homes if they want to move. If they find a better job elsewhere, for example, they may not be able to take it because they cannot sell their homes for a reasonable price, if they are able to sell them at all. Today I am introducing legislation to help reverse these destabilizing forces. The bill I am introducing today, the Keeping Families in their Home Act, will help address large unsold housing inventories and give families a chance to stay in their homes. This bill would allow banks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to enter into long- term leases, including an option to purchase properties acquired through foreclosure with the prior homeowner or any individual. By providing an opportunity for the homeowner to stay in their home, the bank is giving families a chance to regain sound financial footing. This commonsense solution helps provide some much needed stability is available for all families. While I believe this bill is a good step in the right direction, let me be clear: much more needs to be done to help the housing problems facing Nevada. The programs already in place simply have not done enough and have not lived up to expectations. I was pleased to see reports of growth in our economy, but people in my State continue to suffer. Back home Nevadans still believe there are no jobs. Small businesses are trying to survive while gridlock in Washington is making it harder for employers to know what is expected in the coming year. Crushing regulations are bringing Nevada's growth industries to a halt. In order for Nevada to experience real long-term recovery, Washington needs to fundamentally change the way it works. Congress needs to stop overspending. Republicans and Democrats should come together to close unfair loopholes and make the Tax Code easier for businesses to understand and to follow. This bill is just one solution to help turn around this housing crisis. It is also an idea that both Republicans and Democrats can support. I look forward to working with my colleagues to pass this bill and others into law so that we can help families dealing with foreclosures across the country. As I have said before, moving forward I welcome any and all ideas on how to fix the housing crisis in this country. Nevadans cannot afford to wait any longer. In the meantime, I urge my colleagues to seriously consider supporting this bill. This legislation can go a long way toward helping families, stabilizing neighborhoods, and stem any further reduction in home prices. I hope Senators will join me in this endeavor so the President can sign this bill into law and help families who badly need it.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. HELLER. I yield the floor.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, today I wish to honor SFC Jeremiah Mock on the occasion of his oath of reenlistment in the Nevada Army National Guard. His commitment to the citizens of the Silver State is unwavering, and Nevada is honored by his service. I would first like to recognize all of our Nation's service men and women. Each and every day, our troops are serving the United States to protect our freedom. They dedicate their lives to serve this great Nation and constantly make grave sacrifices to ensure the safety of our country. Our servicemembers and their families deserve our gratitude and thanks. Before serving in the Nevada National Guard, Sergeant Mock served 9 years in the Army Reserve, where he was deployed repeatedly on combat tours to Iraq and Afghanistan. His continued dedication to service led him to join the Nevada National Guard in 2007, and he continues to serve his State, despite becoming the innocent victim of a brutal shooting in Carson City, NV, on September 6, 2011. I will never forget this tragic event, and I continue to send my thoughts and prayers to the victims and their families. I commend Sergeant Mock for his bravery and thank him for his faithful service to his State and country. I also wish to recognize Sergeant Mock's wife, SSG Stephanie Mock, who enlisted in the Nevada Air National Guard shortly after the tragic events of September 6, 2011. The Mock family is a true inspiration and illustration of a proud Nevada family who have overcome great hardship through faith and determination. I congratulate Sergeant Mock on his reenlistment and am humbled by him and all of our courageous service men and women. Let us continue to be mindful of our dedicated servicemembers who fight to protect and preserve the ideals of freedom and democracy.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, when our Nation's economy was thriving, Nevada was at the heart of the construction boom. Buildings and homes were going up across the State. Neighborhoods were growing, schools were being built at record rates, and the construction industry was flourishing. All of this activity drove investments into other areas of the economy, and for many life was good in Nevada. But when the crisis hit, the highs that my State experienced were matched by the lows that followed. Nevada now leads the Nation in unemployment with more than 160,000 Nevadans looking for a job. Many can no longer afford their homes. Nevadans are being forced into bankruptcy and facing foreclosure. While Nevada is home to some of the most resilient, hard-working people in the country, almost one-quarter of Nevadans are so frustrated that they have simply given up hope for better employment. Much of the difficulty Nevadans are experiencing can be traced back to the crisis in my State. The ill effects of the depressed housing market are widespread. High rates of foreclosures are devastating to families, neighborhoods, and entire communities. Families who have been foreclosed upon are already having a hard time paying their bills. Add to those difficulties the time spent finding a new place and the costs of moving and their problems are compounded. Time spent fighting the bank to avoid foreclosure and relocating would likely be better used to find a job or better paying employment. One of the biggest problems distressed home owners are facing is the programs that have been put into place to help keep people in their homes that have not lived up to expectations. My office spends a great deal of time with Nevadans on the cusp of losing their homes, looking for help, and trying to keep families in their homes. It is truly heart wrenching to hear some of these stories. These homeowners do not want to foreclose, and obviously they do not want to lose their homes. I recently received this e-mail from a constituent in Reno who is fighting to keep their home. I would like to share that with you. We hoped for a win-win situation but in the end all we got was a nightmare in which everyone loses: my sister and I obviously lose, our neighborhood loses as another house sits vacant with a rusting metal sign in the front, our State loses as the housing plight increases again, the bank loses because they lose a customer who just needed another chance and, most importantly, democracy loses as the plutocrats roll over another family. When families move, their children often have to change schools. So now not only are children forced to move from their homes, they are also leaving behind their schools and their neighborhoods. This kind of destabilization is harmful for families who are already struggling. Consider the effects of foreclosures on neighborhoods and communities. The widespread availability of housing is flooding the real estate inventory in Nevada. This is forcing down home values and making it difficult for other people to sell their homes as well. In February 2006 the average home in Nevada was valued at $309,000. Today the home values have dropped to $120,000. Homes left vacant and uncared for can quickly become an eyesore, pushing low home values even lower. This means others in the neighborhood can have a difficult time selling their homes if they want to move. If they find a better job elsewhere, for example, they may not be able to take it because they cannot sell their homes for a reasonable price, if they are able to sell them at all. Today I am introducing legislation to help reverse these destabilizing forces. The bill I am introducing today, the Keeping Families in their Home Act, will help address large unsold housing inventories and give families a chance to stay in their homes. This bill would allow banks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to enter into long- term leases, including an option to purchase properties acquired through foreclosure with the prior homeowner or any individual. By providing an opportunity for the homeowner to stay in their home, the bank is giving families a chance to regain sound financial footing. This commonsense solution helps provide some much needed stability is available for all families. While I believe this bill is a good step in the right direction, let me be clear: much more needs to be done to help the housing problems facing Nevada. The programs already in place simply have not done enough and have not lived up to expectations. I was pleased to see reports of growth in our economy, but people in my State continue to suffer. Back home Nevadans still believe there are no jobs. Small businesses are trying to survive while gridlock in Washington is making it harder for employers to know what is expected in the coming year. Crushing regulations are bringing Nevada's growth industries to a halt. In order for Nevada to experience real long-term recovery, Washington needs to fundamentally change the way it works. Congress needs to stop overspending. Republicans and Democrats should come together to close unfair loopholes and make the Tax Code easier for businesses to understand and to follow. This bill is just one solution to help turn around this housing crisis. It is also an idea that both Republicans and Democrats can support. I look forward to working with my colleagues to pass this bill and others into law so that we can help families dealing with foreclosures across the country. As I have said before, moving forward I welcome any and all ideas on how to fix the housing crisis in this country. Nevadans cannot afford to wait any longer. In the meantime, I urge my colleagues to seriously consider supporting this bill. This legislation can go a long way toward helping families, stabilizing neighborhoods, and stem any further reduction in home prices. I hope Senators will join me in this endeavor so the President can sign this bill into law and help families who badly need it.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, later today the debate will center on the fundamental question of whether Members of Congress should be responsible for upholding the same laws as the American people. The unified answer from this Congress must be an unequivocal yes. It is no secret that Congress has a track record of exempting itself from the very laws it writes. Former Senator John Glenn said such exemptions are ``the rankest form of hypocrisy. Laws that are good enough for everyone else ought to be good enough for us.'' Former Congressman Henry Hyde once quipped that ``Congress would exempt itself from the laws of gravity if it could.'' I have long supported efforts to ensure that Congress refuses to give into any temptation to exempt itself. When I was serving in the House of Representatives, I was proud to be a leader in the effort to require Members of Congress and their staffs be subject to the same requirements that the Obama health care bill put on all citizens. While the bad old days of Congress exempting itself from major occupational safety and health and fair labor standard laws were done away with to some extent after passage of the Congressional Accountability Act, and other reforms of the mid-1990s, Congress should not miss this opportunity to show the American people that it is willing to live by the very rules that are imposed on the American people. The people of this Nation are tired of business as usual in Washington. They are tired of the congressional exemptions or carve- outs that create a chasm between the working class and the political class. My home State of Nevada is currently enduring the highest unemployment rate in the country. In fact, Nevada has led the Nation in unemployment for more than 2 years. As I travel the State, I hear from individuals who are frustrated because the public servants who are supposed to be representing them don't feel their pain. While our economy limps on, the Nation's Capital remains untouched by the difficulties Nevadans experience every day. In light of these facts, is it any mystery why Congress is currently experiencing its worst approval ratings in history? I am a cosponsor of the STOCK Act because I believe confidential information acquired as a result of holding public office should not be used for private gain. The STOCK Act would prohibit Members or employees of Congress and executive branch employees from profiting from nonpublic information obtained because of their status and requires greater oversight of the growing political intelligence industry. Members and employees should also be required to report the purchases, sales, and exchange of any stock, bond, or commodity transaction greater than $1,000 within 30 days. As a strong supporter of transparency in Congress and the Federal Government, I believe the STOCK Act is an important step for Congress to take and start earning back the trust and faith of the American people. Restoring that confidence will surely be a long journey because public servants have in too many cases not taken their job seriously. But through legislation such as the STOCK Act, we send an important message to the citizens of this Nation that we understand our position requires us to uphold the highest ethical and moral standards, and we are willing to undergo the scrutiny required to regain that trust. Members of Congress should follow the same rules as every other American. No American can trade on insider information without the risk of prosecution, and Congress should be held to the same standard. Elected officials should take every precaution to ensure that they do not use public information for personal gain. I hope both Chambers will take the time to thoughtfully consider this legislation and send it to the President for his signature. My hope is that the American people will view passage of this legislation as an earnest bipartisan effort to change the way Washington does business. I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this important bill. I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, today I wish to bring awareness to an event being hosted in my State this weekend. The National Handicapping Championship, NHC, will take place on January 27 and 28 at Treasure Island Las Vegas. Tourism and gaming are the backbone of Nevada's economy. It's a legacy that we must continue to nurture and I welcome events like the NHC to my state. Las Vegas is a world-class destination unmatched by any other, and I have and will continue working to support policies that will keep Nevada's gaming industry growing and prosperous. Travel and tourism are a major part of my State's economy, attracting millions of visitors every year because of the variety of attractions and entertainment options available. Considered the most anticipated tournament in the world for horseplayers, the NHC marks the conclusion of a year-long series of tournaments endorsed by the Daily Racing Form and the National Thoroughbred Racing Association, NTRA, where Thoroughbred racing handicappers wager more than $12 billion each year. In turn, these dollars are put back into the horse industry contributing significantly to this agribusiness' future growth. I commend the Daily Racing Form and the NTRA for choosing Las Vegas, NV to host this prestigious tournament and wish them a successful event this weekend. I look forward to building upon this success and encourage more events to visit my State. As a United States Senator from Nevada, I will continue do all that I can to make sure that organizations such as these have the opportunity to enjoy all that my great State has to offer.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, today the Senate will consider my legislation again to extend the temporary payroll tax cut. This week, the Senate has been given another opportunity to do the right thing and provide much needed relief to the American worker. It shouldn't be news to anyone that Americans are desperate for solutions. Millions of Americans are unemployed, underemployed, or have simply given up looking for a job. In between looking for a job or higher paying employment, Americans are busy trying to figure out how to handle high health care costs, looming bankruptcy, and the threat of foreclosure. As a Senator from Nevada, I understand how difficult it is, perhaps more than any of my other colleagues. My State has the unfortunate distinction of leading the Nation in unemployment, in bankruptcies, and in foreclosures. I hear from my constituents every day on these issues. Nevadans--Democrats, Independents, and Republicans--are looking to Congress for answers, and they are frustrated that they are not getting them. Even with the economic difficulty Americans across the country are experiencing, Congress appears to be prepared to stage a partisan standoff rather than extending a payroll tax cut for hard-working Americans. I cannot allow this to happen. Americans deserve solutions. The plan I have introduced to extend the payroll tax cut is a workable solution that will provide relief for Americans responsibly. In fact, the solution I am proposing today borrows a cost-cutting idea from the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles Commission that can actually pass Congress and be signed into law. My proposal allows American taxpayers to hold on to more of their hard-earned wages while not punishing the Nation's job creators as the majority proposes. Under my plan, American taxpayers will not see a tax increase. In fact, my plan prevents a tax increase on those already receiving a payroll tax credit. Today, Congress can do the right thing by allowing employers to continue to invest in their businesses so they can plan for the future and, of course, hire more workers. I understand that Democrats would prefer to pay for the payroll extension by raising taxes on employers. But treating tax dollars responsibly is absolutely necessary if we are going to see long-term economic growth in this country. In this case, we can extend the payroll tax cut and still pay for it. I also understand that not all Republicans support my plan. To be honest, I disagree with some of my colleagues who claim a payroll tax holiday is not necessary. I believe that we should allow more Americans to hold on to their hard-earned wages. For those who are already struggling to live within their means, this payroll tax cut will continue some much needed relief. Today, I am asking my Republican and Democratic colleagues to come together and join me to help continue the payroll tax holiday without raising taxes on businesses in America. This will help preserve long- term job growth in the future. My proposal is a workable solution containing provisions endorsed by both the majority and my colleagues in the House of Representatives. This is the only version of the payroll tax cut that has the potential to pass Congress and to be signed into law. My proposal pays for the payroll tax cut by reducing government spending where it is no longer needed and requires the richest Americans to pay higher premiums for Medicare. This will allow us to strengthen and preserve Medicare for those Americans who rely on the program the most. This is the same approach endorsed by Democrats who say the richest Americans should do more. Americans want solutions. They do not want more partisan bickering. This week Congress has another opportunity to do the right thing to help hard-working Americans extend the payroll tax cut holiday. I make calls back to my home State every week. In those calls, I ask Nevadans if they think their children will have access to a better, brighter future than their own. For the first time in history, a majority of Americans and a majority of Nevadans believe their children will have less opportunity. By continuing down this path of partisanship, Congress is robbing the American people of the dream for their children. This needs to stop. We in this body need to seriously consider the high stakes of the political games that continue to unfold on this Senate floor. American workers need solutions and they need relief right now. Congress should come together today, put partisanship aside, and pass meaningful legislation that will benefit all Americans. Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, the Senate today has an opportunity to put aside some of the partisan differences and come together and do something that will benefit all Americans. The legislation I propose is a solution, and I support solutions which Republicans, Democrats, and Independents can all support. By supporting my legislation and imposing tax increases on employers, Congress can also preserve opportunity for job growth in the future. Increasing taxes on small businesses will not help my State overcome the highest unemployment rate in the Nation. By asking millionaires and billionaires to pay higher premiums for government health care, my proposal asks the richest Americans to do more, just like my colleagues on the other side of the aisle ask that they should. Lastly, this proposal is the only one that has a chance of passing the House of Representatives and be signed into law. I urge all of my colleagues to support this piece of legislation and this effort to help Americans already struggling to make ends meet. I yield the floor.

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I ask for the yeas and nays.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I thank you for the opportunity to spend a few minutes here on the Senate floor. And I want to thank the previous speaker, Senator Moran from Kansas, for his timely comments, specifically regarding housing, the ability for small institutions, community banks to be able to produce the capital they need to help these small businesses and these homeowners, but, specifically, for the ability to create jobs. It dovetails into what I want to talk about today; that is, solutions, solutions for the American people. This week, Congress has an opportunity to come together to help hard- working Americans, those taxpayers, and extend the payroll tax cut holiday. No State needs Congress to put aside political bickering more than the great State of Nevada. Right now, as a percentage, more Nevadans are looking for jobs than in any other State. Right now, more Nevadans are having difficulty holding on to their homes than in any other State. And right now, more Nevadans are filing for bankruptcy than in any other State. There was a report released yesterday that named Nevada the toughest place in the country to find a job. Our No. 1 priority in this Congress should be to turn this economy around and get people working again. Yet here I am standing on the U.S. Senate floor today trying to convince the majority not to raise taxes on small businesses. I am proud of my State. I am confident that, with the right policies in place, Nevadans can find job opportunities and overcome these difficult times. But in order for that to happen, Congress must put partisanship aside and come together to pass meaningful legislation that benefits Americans who need help in this tough economy and expand opportunities for employers looking to hire. Extending the payroll tax cut will allow Americans to hold on to wages they worked hard to earn. Under my plan, hard-working American taxpayers will not see a tax increase. Under my plan, we will prevent a tax increase on those already receiving the payroll tax credit. And under my plan, employers can continue to invest in their businesses, so they can grow, expand, and hire more workers without the fear of a tax increase. Americans need jobs desperately. Congress should be focused on policies that create jobs and drive long-term economic growth. The legislation I have proposed allows Congress to responsibly extend the payroll tax cut and treat taxpayers' dollars appropriately. There is no question Congress should extend the payroll tax cut. Republicans, Democrats, Independents, everyone agrees on that. But we should not do it by turning around and raising taxes on employers everywhere. Nevadans are looking for jobs. Increasing taxes on small businesses in Nevada is bad economic policy, and taking away the capital they could use to invest makes little sense. Rather than finding a solution for hard-working Americans, the majority has chosen to go down a path that is engineered purposely to fail. They know there is little chance a tax increase on hard-working American taxpayers and their businesses will pass the Senate, and they know there is no chance their tax increase will pass in the House. So instead of success and reaching bipartisan agreement, the majority has chosen to focus on failure and scoring political points. Honestly, these are the games the American people are tired of: the ``my way or the highway'' mentality, proposals that have no chance for success, bickering at the expense of our economy. We have a divided Congress. That means to ensure 160 million Americans receive an extension of this tax cut, we need to move beyond petty politics of this majority. As a Senator from the State that is leading the Nation in unemployment, I am particularly disturbed by this determination to play the political game rather than focus on solutions that work for all Americans. With a little common sense, we can pay for the payroll tax cut without raising taxes on job creators, we can reduce government spending where it is no longer needed, and require the richest Americans to pay higher premiums for Medicare. This will allow us to strengthen and preserve Medicare for those Americans who rely on the program the most. And since my colleagues on the other side of the aisle frequently talk about how the richest Americans should be doing more, I believe this is an approach that both Democrats and Republicans can support. By voting for this alternative plan, Congress can put political gamesmanship aside and support a workable solution for all Americans. The bipartisan veterans jobs bill, along with the 3-percent withholding bill Congress passed earlier this month, is proof that when Congress has the will to work together, we can find a pathway forward. My proposal provides Congress with another opportunity to break the political gridlock here in Washington, DC, and vote for a solution that can pass Congress and be signed into law. I am hopeful Congress can work together to extend the payroll tax cut and preserve opportunities for job growth. It is past time Congress put aside politics and focused on policies that work for Nevadans and all Americans already struggling in this difficult economic environment. Mr. President, I yield the floor.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, the Senate will soon vote to overturn the open internet order, widely known as net neutrality. This measure that was passed days before the start of the 112th session of Congress by the Federal Communications Commission is a rule that many believe the FCC had no legal right to make and will harm job creation in the technology sector of our economy. Plain and simple, this measure will cost the Nation good-paying jobs. That is why I do not support net neutrality and will vote in favor of the resolution of disapproval to overturn it. Since privatizing the Internet in 1994, the FCC and Congresses led by both Democrats and Republicans have handled the Internet with a light regulatory touch by classifying it as an information service. This classification originated from a Democrat-led FCC, and the U.S. Supreme Court supported efforts to classify the Internet as an information service when it upheld the FCC's Cable Modem Order on June 27, 2005. The FCC's policy has been that subjecting providers of enhanced services, even those offered via transmission wires, to title II common carrier regulation was unwise given the fast moving, competitive market to which they were offered. In other words, the FCC, led by Democrats and Republicans, has been consistent in the belief that regulating the Internet the same way we regulate land telephone lines even if those lines are used to connect to the Internet was counterproductive to good public policy given the speed of innovation and the competition present. Even the U.S. Supreme Court supported this position. So Congress has never passed a law that gives the FCC the power to regulate the Internet, the FCC has gone to great lengths to avoid regulating the Internet, and the U.S. Supreme Court has supported previous FCC administration policy toward zero regulation of the Internet. Yet here we are voting to overturn a Federal Communications Commission order to regulate the Internet. Make no mistake, as FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell said, ``To say the net neutrality rules don't regulate the Internet is like saying that regulating on-ramps, off-ramps, and its pavement doesn't equate to regulating the highways themselves.'' But why does this matter? Why don't we just say: You know what, these unelected bureaucrats at the FCC know so much more than Congress and the Supreme Court. Let these rules go through. Because they will cost us jobs. U.S. broadband has seen an investment of hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure expansion and upgrades over the last 10 years and that has led to hundreds of thousands of jobs in this industry. This year alone, broadband providers are estimated to invest over $60 billion in their networks. That is more money than the Federal Government has spent on highways in previous years. I am well aware that the FCC insists the rules will not have a significant impact on the industry, but they did little to prove this. Minus a market or cost-benefit analysis, there is no way of knowing what exactly the impact of this regulation will be. That is why I asked the FCC to conduct a market benefit analysis to prove the exact impact on jobs and the economy. The FCC stated the analysis was in the Internet order, but I still have not been able to find what they are referring to. I suspect the analysis was not ever actually done. If it was completed, the FCC would have seen that the costs of net neutrality would be significant and justifying the rules would not have been possible. The fact is, net neutrality regulation is costly. As explained by the Federal Trade Commission in 2007 when they said in part: Policy makers should proceed with caution in evaluating calls for network neutrality regulation. . . . No regulation, however well-intentioned, is cost free, and it may be particularly difficult to avoid unintended consequences here. Policy makers should be very wary of network neutrality regulation . . . simply because we do not know what the net effects of potential conduct by broadband providers will be on consumers, including among other things, the prices that consumers may pay for Internet access, the quality of Internet access and other services that will be offered, and the choices of content and applications that may be available to consumers in the marketplace. The FTC clearly stated that Congress must proceed with caution because we cannot fully quantify what the reaction by broadband providers would be if they were not able to manage their networks. Again, let me state, some reports have said that over the next 5 years, there will be hundreds of billions of dollars invested in broadband infrastructure which will result in half a million jobs. If broadband wire line and wireless service providers rolled back their investment by just 10 percent because of this regulation, the benefits of regulation would never outweigh the costs of job loss. I assure you, these companies will roll back their investments if this rule is allowed to move forward, which will in turn eliminate jobs. Because of the unpredictable nature of the Internet and evolving consumer demands, broadband providers must have the ability to change their business models to ensure maximum utilization of their network. These net neutrality rules impose restrictions on how a broadband provider can offer Internet service, which means broadband providers can't adapt to an evolving Internet. If a broadband provider does not have the ability to manage their own network to ensure maximum profits, the incentive to invest diminishes. If you minimize investment, you lose jobs. Estimates have put the number of jobs lost because of this regulation at 500,000 over the next 10 years. In my home State of Nevada, the unemployment level is at 13.2 percent, the highest in the Nation. Any regulation that increases unemployment both nationally and in my State is unacceptable. Finally, some people believe we need this regulation to ensure competition in the industry. I believe this is as ridiculous as saying that this measure will not cost jobs. Fixed and mobile broadband Internet access is growing rapidly. In 2003, only 15 percent of Americans had access to broadband. In 2010, 95 percent of Americans do. Competition, investment, innovation, and job creation are all growing because of the light touch policymakers and the FCC have put on the Internet. We are in this wonderful era of innovation and investment where people can use an I-pad to read their e-mail in the Sierra Nevadas because the government did not regulate the Internet. Now our friends on the other side of the aisle and the FCC are saying: Yes, but in order to continue this amazing innovation, we must regulate. Competition is robust in this industry, and when weighed against the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs, the need for this regulation is simply not there. Net neutrality should not be enacted. It makes no sense for Nevada and will cause unnecessary job loss nationwide. I urge my colleagues to vote for this measure and disapprove of the FCC's net neutrality order.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I rise today to address the economy as it affects my home State of Nevada. This recession has hit my home State of Nevada harder than it has hit any other State in the country. My State has the unfortunate distinction of leading the Nation in unemployment, foreclosure, and bankruptcy. As we discuss yet another stimulus this week, I hear from my friends on the other side of the aisle their claim that their priorities are jobs, jobs, jobs. I have one question about their economic policies: Is this working? In January 2009 President Obama was inaugurated as President of the United States. Democrats controlled both Houses--both the House and the Senate--and Nevada's unemployment rate at that time was 9.4 percent. The next month the stimulus was passed. Supporters claimed the national unemployment level would not rise above 8 percent if we passed the stimulus bill. Nevada's unemployment at that time then grew from 9.4 percent to 10.1 percent. In June of 2009 Congress passed the Cash for Clunkers legislation and Nevada's unemployment then grew at that point from 10.1 percent to 12 percent. With the success of Cash for Clunkers, we passed Cash for Clunkers II the following August, and Nevada's unemployment rose from 12 percent to 13.2 percent. Then in March of 2010, Congress passed the President's health care law. Nevada's unemployment rose again, from 13.2 percent to 13.4 percent. In July of that year, Congress then passed the Dodd-Frank reform of the financial services industry legislation that effectively limited access to capital, both for individuals and small businesses, and Nevada's unemployment rate went from 13.4 percent to 14.3 percent. In fact, if we go back to May of 2010, Nevada overtook Michigan as the State with the highest unemployment rate at 14 percent. With the passage of Dodd-Frank, it then rose again to 14.3 percent. Then we passed the State bailout in August of 2010, and then stimulus No. 2, and Nevada's unemployment rate rose again to 14.4 percent. So with the unemployment rate at 14.4 percent and due to the lack of economic activity, some people in Nevada have stopped looking for work or, worse, some Nevadans have actually left the State for employment elsewhere. This has resulted in Nevada's unemployment dipping from 14.4 percent to 13.4 percent. I guess I raise the question for the second time: Have these economic policies worked? There is a local paper that had a readers' poll and the question of this readers; poll was: Is Nevada's economy recovering? Of those who responded, 82 percent said no. So regardless of what Washington, DC, is trying to tell them, 82 percent of Nevadans understand that the economic recovery has not yet occurred in the State of Nevada. One of my constituents recently wrote: I am writing you today because I am outraged over the stimulus proposal that President Obama is trying to intimidate you into passing. Despite the evidence that the first two stimulus plans have failed, despite the promises that there were shovel ready jobs, despite the other false promises that the first trillion would upgrade our infrastructure and keep unemployment under 8 percent, despite the overwhelming evidence that nearly a TRILLION dollars of taxpayers' dollars were completely wasted in the first stimulus, this President had the audacity to demand that you immediately pass another half a trillion dollars' worth of stimulus. Don't do it! So it is that the approach of this administration and its supporters have taken for economic recovery has failed miserably. Another stimulus bill is not the solution. We now have a string of economic policies that are big on talking points, light on solutions. People from all over the country are struggling just to get by and are desperate for real solutions. It is time for new ideas and a new direction, not more of the same. Out-of- control spending, a health care law that no one can afford, and a seemingly endless stream of regulations are crippling employers, stifling economic growth, and killing jobs. The American public and businesses alike are awaiting a plan that can provide the stability and certainty necessary to provide confidence to the American people and bolster economic growth. I hear some of my friends on the other side of the aisle claim there are no ideas for job creation coming from Republicans. Since coming to the Senate, I have repeatedly filed job-related amendments when given the opportunity but have yet to see an open debate on any of these amendments. So if it is true there are no ideas coming from Republicans, then there is nothing to fear from an honest, real debate on jobs. Instead of symbolic votes and political grandstanding, let's actually do the difficult work and address this problem. As I suggested to President Obama, Nevada needs a proposal that reforms the Tax Code, stops excessive government spending, and provides the certainty businesses need to hire. Instead, the administration and the Senate majority have recycled the same failed policies, but this time they increase taxes on the same businesses we need to create jobs. There are a number of actions Congress can take immediately to bolster our Nation's economy such as opening our country to energy exploration, streamlining the permitting process for responsible development of our domestic resources, and reforming our Tax Code, making it simpler for individuals and businesses alike, and cutting out the special-interest loopholes while reducing the overall tax burden for all Americans. Instead of looking for new ways to tax the American public and our job creators, we should make our Tax Code more competitive and provide businesses the stability they need to grow and create jobs. As I have stated before, this continual threat of tax increases feeds the uncertainty that serves as an impediment to economic growth. These are all things that both this administration and Congress can do immediately to boost economic recovery. I came to Washington to make a difference. Let's start doing the hard work we were sent here to do. Mr. President, I yield the floor and note the absence of a quorum.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I rise today to speak in favor of the two amendments filed by my good friend from Ohio, Senator Portman, my amendment No. 674, and above all the issue of the day, jobs. Americans have had to endure great hardship over the past few years. This recession has robbed millions of people of their jobs, their homes, their businesses, and their sense of security. No State has been hit harder than the State of Nevada. My State has the unfortunate distinction of leading the Nation in unemployment, foreclosures, and bankruptcies. And there is no question that the status quo of dysfunctional government must end. People from all over the country are struggling just to get by and are desperate for real solutions. The underlying legislation takes the wrong approach to job creation and can be very detrimental to economic growth in our country. Inciting a trade war with China will not create jobs. In my home State of Nevada, a trade war would hurt tourism. It would stifle growth in renewable energy development and increase costs to consumers at a time when they can least afford it. Working to sell American goods in foreign markets is what we should be fighting for. Instead, it seems job creation and economic growth have taken a back seat to political posturing and grandstanding in Washington. It is clear that the approach this administration and its supporters have taken for economic recovery has failed miserably. Out- of-control spending, a health care law no one can afford, and seemingly endless streams of regulation are crippling employers, stifling economic growth, and killing jobs. Instead of fighting for measures that create and protect jobs, this administration has created more government that continues to impede economic growth at every turn. This government continues to tax too much, spend too much, and borrow too much. The American public and businesses alike are waiting on a plan that can plant the seeds of economic growth and bolster job creation. Instead, all they get from this government when it comes to job creation is a big wet blanket. They need Washington to provide relief from new burdensome and overly intrusive regulations. Congress must help job creators by ensuring every regulation is vetted with a full understanding of the impact it will have on businesses across the country. So I am pleased to join with Senator Portman in this fight to rein in excessive government regulation and to implement a market-benefit analysis for all agencies, both executive and independent, so the American public will know the true cost of these regulations. As President Obama said: We must rein in government agencies and force them to help businesses when they refuse to do so. I could not agree more. There are a number of actions Congress can take immediately to help bolster our Nation's economy. The adoption of Senator Portman's amendments is one of those actions. I look forward to continuing to work with him on these issues. I believe our best days are still ahead, but we need to change course now. We need to roll back the regulations that are tying the hands of entrepreneurs across America. We can help hasten an economic recovery by embracing progrowth policies that place more money in the pockets of Americans. I would also like to highlight another issue that would help create jobs and provide certainty for the businesses across the country; that is, Congress should pass a budget. Congress has not passed a budget in nearly 2\1/2\ years. Passing a comprehensive budget is one of the most basic responsibilities of Congress, but it has failed to accomplish this task. America desperately needs a comprehensive 10-year plan that offers real solutions to the economic and fiscal problems in this country. We cannot lower unemployment rates in Nevada or restore the housing market without a holistic approach to reining in Federal spending and lowering the national debt. Congress passed another continuing resolution that lacks a long-term approach to restoring our Nation to fiscal sanity. Instead, this bill funds the government for just a few more months. Congress cannot continue to function without a measure of accountability to hold Members of Congress to their constitutionally mandated responsibility, which is why I introduced the no budget, no pay amendment, amendment No. 674. This measure requires Congress to pass a budget resolution by the beginning of any fiscal year. If Congress fails to pass a budget, then Members of Congress do not get paid. How can Congress commit to a debt reduction plan without a budget? Any serious proposal to rein in Federal spending and create jobs starts with a responsible budget. At home in Nevada and across this country, if people do not accomplish the tasks their jobs require, they do not get paid. Somehow this very basic standard of responsibility is lost upon Washington. The no budget, no pay amendment is not an end-all solution to our economic difficulties. It is, however, an important measure that Congress should adopt in order to show the American people that Members of Congress are serious about restoring our country to a period of economic prosperity. Nevadans work hard for their paychecks. So should Congress. And since the majority believes the legislation before us today is a jobs bill, I encourage them to take up other measures that will help with job creation, such as opening our country to energy exploration, streamlining the permitting process for responsible development of our domestic resources, and taking the aggressive step of reforming our Tax Code. Let's make the Tax Code simpler for individuals and employers. Cut out the special interest loopholes while reducing the overall tax burden for all Americans. Instead of looking for new ways to tax the American public, we should make our Tax Code more competitive and provide businesses the stability they need to grow and to create jobs. The continual threat of increased taxes feeds the uncertainty that serves as an impediment to economic growth. These are all things that both this administration and Congress could do immediately to boost economic recovery. Let's give the American people a government that works for them. Removing impediments to job creation will get Americans working again and ensure our children and grandchildren have a brighter future. I yield the floor and I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. HELLER

Mr. HELLER. It is an honor serving the people of the great State of Nevada, and today I am speaking on their behalf for the first time in the Chamber of the Senate. Before I begin, I would like to take a moment to reflect on two tragic events that have taken place in Nevada recently. In Carson City, our Nation lost three Nevada National Guard members at a local restaurant shooting. Those members were MAJ Heath Kelly, SFC Miranda McElhiney, and SFC Christian Riege. The other was the horrific crash at the Reno air races this weekend. As with the shootings in Carson City, this terrible event not only impacted the communities in northern Nevada but the entire State and the Nation. Having visited the scene where the crash occurred, it is difficult to describe the amount of damage that took place there. Our State's first responders and medical personnel did an amazing job in a very difficult situation. My thoughts and prayers go out to all the victims and their families, and I wish the injured a quick recovery.