Eddie Johnson

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. When it comes to quantifying the implications of this proposal on the environment and public health of this Nation, the Agency is silent. The burden of proof regarding soundness of this proposed rule rests squarely on the shoulders of EPA. Thus far, the Agency has failed, at best, to make even a lackluster case. My constituents in Dallas and the surrounding area are already burdened by the scarlet letter of nonattainment. I refuse to let their public health be subject to another further deterioration from a proposal laced with tortured assumptions. This is an unsound policy that should be stopped. I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting clean air, a healthy environment, and a strong Clean Air Act. Vote ``yes'' on the Johnson amendment and the Interior and the Environment Appropriations bill. While I appreciate the vigor of the opposing side's view on this matter, it is my respectful view that they are simply wrong on this matter. I would like to amplify an area of concern raised by EPA's own regional offices regarding enforcement should the once in, always in policy be negated. In a 2005 Regional Memorandum to EPA Headquarters, the regions assert the following: A related concern with regard to the draft changes as written is that a facility, by changing from a major source to an area source, and back again, could virtually avoid regulation and greatly complicate any enforcement against them. Take, for example, a facility that is covered by a MACT standard, and has 3 years from the date the rule is promulgated to come into compliance. Three years go by, and just before the end of that time period, the facility announces its area source status. If an area source regulation exists, there may also be some equivalent waiting period before the facility is required to comply with the area source requirements. If the facility later announces that it is after all, a major source, then it may again enter a grace period, possibly up to another 3 years, before it is subject to the MACT standard requirements. Thus, by continually going back and forth between major and area source status, a facility could be a major source [polluter] for most of its operating life and never have to comply with the MACT standard requirements. Again Mr. Chairman, these are not my words but those of EPA's own regional offices. Mr. Chairman, my congressional district lies within the heart of EPA Region 6. Throughout Region 6 there are approximately 3,000 major source polluters according to EPA data. If EPA's rule were to take effect, based on the guidance of EPA's own regional offices I just referenced, 3,000 major source polluters could continually backslide on a public health safeguard meant to minimize my constituent's exposure to toxic, cancer causing air pollutants. Clearly, this was not the intent of Congress as reflected in Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. Mr. Chairman, I include for the Record a memorandum dated December 13, 2005, from Michael S. Bandrowski, Chief, Air Toxics, Radiation and Indoor Air Office, Region IX, of the Environmental Protection Agency. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX. San Francisco, CA, December 13, 2005. Regional Comments on Draft OIAI Policy Revisions David Cozzie, Group Leader, Minerals and Inorganic Chemicals Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Thank you for allowing the Regional Offices the opportunity to comment on the draft proposed changes to the General Provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, intended to replace EPA's Once- in-Always-In (OIAI) policy established in a May 16, 1995, memorandum entitled, ``Potential to Emit for MACT standards-- Guidance on Timing Issues,'' from John S. Seitz to the Regional Air Directors. A draft copy of the proposed changes, dated November 16, 2005, was received by Region IX on November 30, 2005, and we shared this copy with the Regional Offices. As sub-lead Region for air toxics, we have summarized and consolidated the feedback received from the Regional Offices, and are forwarding these Regional comments and concerns through this memo. Eight Regions provided comments. For your convenience, the original comments from each Regional Office are included as attachments to this memo. Over the years, many questions and implementation issues have arisen that have initiated the reconsideration of the OIAI policy. The new revisions being planned by OAQPS would essentially negate the original policy, and this change would be codified in the 40 CFR Part 63 General Provisions. This change in policy would have major implications for implementation and enforcement of the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards. The Regional Offices, therefore, appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on HQ drafts before the revisions are proposed in the Federal Register for public comment. However, we are disappointed that OAQPS formulated revisions to the OIAI policy without seeking Regional input and was reluctant to share the draft policy with the Regional Offices. This trend of excluding the Regional Offices from involvement in rule and policy development efforts is disturbing. We are requesting that OAQPS establish a means for Regional input during the development of future policies and rules. With regard to the OIAI policy, all the Regional Offices that submitted comments acknowledged the need for a change from the 1995 guidance in limited circumstances. For example, if EPA finalizes the delisting of methyl ethyl ketone as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP), it would be logical for EPA to allow existing major sources of HAPs to reevaluate their PTE, excluding emissions of methyl ethyl ketone. Likewise, if a source eliminates, or significantly reduces their use of HAPs, then it would be reasonable for EPA to allow such a source to reevaluate MACT standard applicability. In addition, certain pollution prevention benefits may follow in circumstances where a source has an incentive to obtain actual reductions in emissions of HAPs equivalent to or greater than the level required by the MACT standard with less burden and cost. Overall, the Regions support the intent behind the draft proposed amendments to provide incentive to companies for engaging in emission-reducing activities. Several Regions also explicitly stated their support of revising the policy through a public rulemaking process and encouraging sources to explore different control technologies and pollution prevention options to reduce emissions and potential to emit (PTE). One Region was supportive of the change in policy as drafted. However, all other Regional Offices expressed varying degrees of concern about allowing any source to take synthetic minor limits at any time, for any reason. The concerns are described below, followed by suggestions for addressing these concerns while still encouraging existing MACT sources to take actions towards pollution prevention. Our comments are organized as follows: Health and Emissions Concerns 1. Reversal of Position with Inadequate Justification The May 16, 1995, Seitz memo regarding potential to emit for MACT standards states: EPA believes that this once in, always in policy follows most naturally from the language and structure of the statute. In many cases, application of MACT will reduce a major emitter's emissions to levels substantially below the major thresholds. Without a once in, always in policy, these facilities could ``backslide'' from MACT control levels by obtaining potential-to-emit limits, escaping applicability of the MACT standard, and increasing emissions to the major-source threshold (10/25 tons per year). Thus, the maximum achievable emissions reductions that Congress mandated for major sources would not be achieved. A once in, always in policy ensures that MACT emissions reductions are permanent, and that the health and environmental protection provided by MACT standards is not undermined. (See page 9) Elsewhere, the Seitz memo states: In the absence of a rulemaking record supporting a different result, EPA believes that once a source is required to install controls or take other measures to comply with a MACT standard, it should not be able to substitute different controls of measures that happen to bring the source below major source levels. (See page 5) While it is true that policy is not set in stone, and that policy decisions may be reversed, the preamble, as currently drafted, does not set forth an adequate rulemaking record to justify this drastic change in interpretation. In 1995, EPA believed that the OIAI policy follows ``most naturally'' from the language and structure of the statute, and that allowing facilities to backslide would undermine the maximum achievable emissions reductions mandated by Congress. Now, in 2005, EPA is claiming that ``there is nothing in the statute which compels the conclusion that a source cannot attain area source status after the first compliance date of a MACT standard'' (see page 15 of the draft proposed changes). In order to provide an adequate rulemaking record, the preamble should more clearly articulate why EPA no longer believes that the OIAI policy flows naturally from the statute. 2. Increased HAP Emissions Resulting from Abandoning MACT Control Levels The Clean Air Act requires the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of HAPs from sources subject to the MACT standards. The reductions anticipated through the MACT program will not be achieved through the strategy described in the draft rule proposal. A key concern is that the draft proposal allows facilities to obtain synthetic minor permits after the MACT standard compliance date by taking potentially less protective requirements than the MACT standard would otherwise require them to install. The proposal, as written, would be detrimental to the environment and undermine the intent of the MACT program. Many MACT standards require affected facilities to reduce their HAP levels at a control efficiency of 95% and higher. In many instances, the MACT requirements could lead to greater reductions when compared to sources accepting synthetic minor limits of 24 tons per year (tpy) for a combination of HAPs and 9 tpy for a single HAP. Clearly, the intent in promulgating MACT standards was to reduce emissions to the extent feasible, not just to the minor source level. However, under the current draft proposal, the reductions that were intended to be achieved through the MACT standards would be offset by synthetic minor limits that allow sources to emit HAPs at levels higher than those allowed by the MACT standard. The cost of the increased HAP emissions would be borne by the communities surrounding the sources. On pages 15 and 16 of the draft preamble, EPA states: ``A concern has been raised that sources that are currently well below the major source threshold will increase emissions to a point just below the threshold. We believe these concerns are unfounded. While this may occur in some instances, it is more likely that sources will adopt PTE limitations at or near their current levels to avoid negative publicity and to maintain their appearance as responsible businesses.'' This statement is unfounded and overly optimistic. Regional experience indicates that sources requesting synthetic minor limits to avoid a MACT standard typicaI1y request, and are frequently given, limits of at least 24 tpy for a combination of HAPs and 9 tpy for a single HAP. The Regional Offices anticipate that many sources would take limits less stringent than MACT requirements, if allowed. Thus, the cumulative impact of many ``area'' sources whose status is derived after the MACT compliance date could be significant. This change in policy would offset the intended environmental benefits of the MACT standards. Although the draft changes could serve to alleviate some possible inequity under the current OIAI policy, or encourage some sources to further reduce emissions to achieve area source status, EPA should look closely at this issue to determine whether the likely benefits would be greater than the potential environmental costs. This analysis should occur before the proposal is put forth for public comment. One Region suggested that EPA should not enact a policy allowing facilities to qualify out of the MACT standards until a strong area source toxics program is in place, or until state, local and tribal air quality agencies have programs that can provide an equivalent level of protection. A related concern with regard to the draft changes as written is that a facility, by changing from a major source to an area source, and back again, could virtually avoid regulation and greatly complicate any enforcement against them. Take, for example, a facility that is covered by a MACT standard, and has three years from the date that the rule is promulgated to come into compliance. Three years go by, and just before the end of that time period, the facility announces its area source status. If an area source regulation exists, there may also be some equivalent waiting period before the facility is required to comply with the area source requirements. If the facility later announces that it is, after all, a major source, then it may again enter a grace period, possibly up to another 3 years, before it is subject to the MACT standard requirements. Thus, by continually going back and forth between major and area source status, a facility could be a major source for most of its operating life and never have to comply with the MACT standard requirements. The 1995 OIAI policy recognizes this and states, ``The EPA believes the structure of section 112 strongly suggests certain outer limits for when a source may avoid a standard through a limit on its potential to emit.'' This type of problem must be addressed if the OIAI policy is changed. Michael S. Bandrowski, Chief, Air Toxics, Radiation and Indoor Air Office, Region

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Chairman, before I begin, I would like to commend the gentleman from Washington and Chairman Dicks and the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Tiahrt) for their good work on this underlying bill. The amendment I offered today stems directly from concerns I have over a recently proposed rule by the Environmental Protection Agency that could radically alter the current interpretation of the Clean Air Act and adversely impact public health. On December 21 last year, 4 days before Christmas, EPA introduced a cleverly timed proposal that would essentially weaken hazardous air pollutant emission standards for major sources of pollution as defined by section 112 of the Clean Air Act. My amendment would prohibit the use of fiscal year 2008 funds by EPA to promulgate this ill-advised and environmentally dangerous proposal. Currently, major sources, major source polluters, facilities that emit 10 tons per year of a single air toxin or 25 tons per year of any combination of toxic pollutants are required to comply with the Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards, called MACT, permanently, a policy adopted in 1995 known as Once In, Always In.'' MACT standards are technology-based area emission standards established under title 3 of the 1990 Clean Air Act amendment. Compliance with MACT standards can require facility owners and operators to meet emission limits, install emission control technologies, monitor emissions and/or operating parameters and use specified work practices. These public safeguard standards have proven most effective in reducing toxic, harmful, cancer-causing eye pollutants such as mercury, chlorine, benzene, methanol and asbestos. If EPA's proposed rule were to take effect, industrial facilities could emit hazardous air pollutants at levels just below 10/25 major source thresholds and not be subject to the MACT standards. This move has been criticized by the State clean air agencies, our regional officers, our major metropolitan leaders, as well as the county leaders and environmental groups. A majority of EPA's own regional offices initially excluded from viewing and providing input on the proposed policy have been highly critical of the proposed rule citing health and emission concerns. EPA has done very little to justify such a dramatic shift in congressional intent or the agency's own long-standing interpretation. Moreover, the Agency has performed very little, if any, substantive emissions analysis, and they have performed no public health analysis for any industrial sector. In my view the Agency's proposed rule represents another installment of regulatory attacks designed to gut the Clean Air Act. The public health of this Nation should not be forced to take the back seat to the interest of big polluters. The congressional authorities captured in section 112 of Clean Air Act are intended to ensure that major source emitters of hazardous air pollutants are required to comply with MACT standards permanently to ensure that the elimination of air toxics are achieved and maintained in the interest of public health. In 1995, upon adoption of the ``once in, always in'' policy, EPA stated the following: ``EPA believes that this once in, always in policy follows most naturally from the language and structure of the [Clean Air Act] statute. In many cases, application of MACT will reduce a major emitter's emissions to levels substantially below the major thresholds. ``Without a once in, always in policy, these facilities could 'backslide' from MACT control levels by obtaining potential-to-emit limits, escaping applicability of the MACT standard, and increasing emissions to the major source threshold. ``Thus, the maximum achievable emission reductions that Congress mandated from major sources would not be achieved. ``A once in, always in policy ensures that MACT emission reductions are permanent, and that the health and environment protection provided by MACT standards is not undermined.'' In the Federal Register, the Agency raged on and on about how great the proposed rule is for major source polluters, because it will create incentives for industry to reduce emissions.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, it is an honor today for me to pay tribute to Mr. Jack Valenti. As it has been said, by age 15, he was the youngest high school graduate in Houston. He began work as an office boy with the Humble Oil Company, which is now Exxon Mobil, which is near my congressional district. As a young pilot in the Army Air Corps in World War II, Lieutenant Valenti flew 51 combat missions as the pilot commander of a B-25 attack bomber with the 12th Air Force in Italy. He graduated with a B.A. from the University of Houston and an M.B.A. from Harvard. In 1952, he cofounded the advertising and political consulting agency, Weekly & Valenti, which was in charge of press during President Kennedy's and Vice President Johnson's tragic visit to Texas. He was in the motorcade, six cars behind the President, in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Within an hour of the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Mr. Valenti was aboard Air Force One flying back to Washington with the new President as the first newly hired special assistant to President Johnson. Later in his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the MPAA, Mr. Valenti presided over tremendous worldwide change in the industry. New technologies, the arrival of the importance of international markets and the tyranny of piracy radically changed the landscape of the American film and television industry. It was Mr. Valenti's leadership and personal efforts that led the confrontation with these global dangers, problems and opportunities. Mr. Speaker, our communities and our country have always relied on the contributions of those individuals who have the ability to rise above and beyond the call of duty to make a difference in the lives of others, both personally and professionally. Jack Valenti was one of those rare individuals that demonstrated unfailing and tireless commitment to the betterment of the U.S. movie industry and the entire Nation. Mr. Speaker, though our community is diminished by his loss, I ask that my colleagues join me and his friends and his family in celebrating the remarkable life of this man who truly symbolized America at its best, Jack Valenti, a true and loyal Texan.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize a milestone that was achieved by the oldest and largest peace and justice organization in north Texas. This year the Dallas Peace Center will celebrate its 25th anniversary. The Dallas Peace Center is based on a vision of reconciliation to promote education, dialogue, and action for peace and justice. Along with other contributions, the Dallas Peace Center hosts forums and conferences advocating for peace in America and the world. Moreover, the center hosts community service initiatives that help promote justice in the north Texas area. The heart of the Dallas Peace Center reaches well beyond its members through its dedication and commitment to the community. The Dallas Peace Center also meets with other organizations that promote peace including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and Amnesty International. The center hosts free workshops and book club meetings so that members and non-members can learn about pertinent subject areas. This year, the Dallas Peace Center is supporting the upcoming 3rd Women's International Peace Conference, which will bring women leaders from across the world to Dallas to engage in dialogue leading to peace. On behalf of the 30th Congressional District of Texas, I am elated to congratulate such an invaluable asset to the Dallas community on its 25th anniversary. I thank the members of this center on their dedicated service to Dallas and the great State of Texas and I wish them many more years of prosperity.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize and honor U.N. World Refugee Day. Some 40 million people worldwide are uprooted by violence and persecution. It is likely that in the future we will see even more people on the run--as a growing number of push factors compound one another to create conditions for further forced displacement. People do not just flee persecution and war but also injustice, exclusion, environmental pressures, competition for scarce resources and all the miserable human consequences of dysfunctional states. We need to rise together to advocate for the plight of refugees. We need to raise global awareness to remedy the conditions for which people are forced to leave their homes and become refugees.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, today I would like to recognize a landmark that was achieved by an organization that addresses critical issues of hunger in the north Texas area by securing wholesome foods and grocery products for distribution through a network of charitable organizations. This year the North Texas Food Bank will celebrate the completion of its Oak Cliff warehouse project in time for its 25th anniversary. The North Texas Food Bank was founded in 1982 and in the first year of operation the food bank distributed 400,000 pounds of food. The food bank is committed to serving the community and has continuously done so by reaching out to all of Texas and the entire Nation. Recently, the food bank completed an extraordinary renovation and will now be able to store and distribute more food within its 72,000 square foot facility. The food bank is now equipped with an entirely new shelving system, two large freezers and a refrigerator that can hold 400 pallets of food. Even during all of the reconstruction, which took more than a year, the food bank continued its commitment to food distribution. With the new renovation, the food bank has the capacity to move 50-55 million pounds of food through the warehouse and bring the community into the warehouse. I am delighted to congratulate the North Texas Food Bank on its 25th anniversary and expansion. The North Texas Food Bank is an important asset to the Dallas area, and their dedication and hard work is seen throughout our community. I would like to thank Jan Pruitt, the Chief Executive Officer, the volunteers and members of the North Texas Food Bank on their dedicated service to the Dallas community and I wish them many more years of success.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Chairman, I would like to commend the chairman of the Military Construction and Veterans' Affairs Appropriations Subcommittee--Congressman Edwards, Chairman Obey, and my colleagues for passing the Military Construction and Veterans Appropriations for FY 2008. This bill is the largest increase in veterans funding in the 77-year history of the Veterans Administration. As a result, this measure supports high priority programs such as Homeless Veterans Care, Mental Health Care, and Long-Term Care. As a former psychiatric nurse at the Dallas Veterans Administration Hospital, I know firsthand the disparities contributed by lack of funding. I am particularly pleased to see the bill provides increased funding for homeless veterans programs, three centers for Centers of Excellence for Mental Health and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder to become fully operational this year. It also matches the VA's request to fund programs for minority contractor procurement and streamlines the VA billing system. The Dallas VA has been a leader in outreach to homeless veterans, who comprise almost a fourth of the homeless adults in the Nation. The North Texas VA Health Care System in Dallas was the first to establish a comprehensive homeless program, which helps homeless veterans with mental and physical illnesses. Dallas is one of eight cities in the country with a veteran's homelessness program targeted towards women. I am also pleased with the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs FY 08 funding because it includes funds for mental health centers. I have continually advocated for increased access to mental health care by returning veterans through the science committee. This bill also grants the Veterans Administration request for administrative functions, including operation of Veterans Administration Medical Centers, quality of care oversight, informational technology--hardware and software, legal services, billing, coding activities, and procurement. Funding for administrative functions is especially important to decreasing claims backlog for veterans waiting for disability and other benefits by adding more than 1,100 new claims processors. The funding also makes five polytrauma centers and three Centers of Excellence for Mental Health and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) fully operational this year. These centers will afford care for those returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Subsequently, sufficient funding for procurement and billing activities is in particular important to Dallas, since the Dallas Veterans Administration actively encourages large businesses to partner with small businesses through subcontracting plans. This bill makes available resources to support military construction projects and ensures America's servicemen and women have more effective training facilities, and better housing, health care and day care facilities. I would like to take this opportunity to once again commend my colleagues, Congressman Edwards and Chairman Obey for providing a comprehensive Military Construction and Veterans Appropriations for FY 2008 possible.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I strongly support S. 5, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007. This bill directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to support a comprehensive program of embryonic stem cell research. In my 14 years with the Committee on Science and Technology, I have exhibited a firm and consistent commitment to scientific research. That includes stem cell research. Nearly all of the scientific societies are strong supporters of this legislation, and many have contacted me urging support of S. 5. The bill supports the development of techniques to derive stem cells from non-embryo sources for the improved understanding of and treatments for diseases. Mr. Speaker, this bill that will enable critically important, ethical stem cell research. The President vetoed such legislation in the past, and I hope that he will listen to the majority of Americans and support this measure.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of House Resolution 391, recognizing the employees of the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, the North Texas Commission, the USO, and the people and businesses of North Texas for their dedication to the ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program. The ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program is a daily gathering of volunteers to celebrate the homecoming of soldiers returning from Iraq, Afghanistan and Kuwait. The tremendous effort has made the ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program one of the largest ongoing community service efforts in North Texas; and these committed employees have given of their time so that our troops, as well as their families, can be welcomed. On June 12, the 500,000th soldier will come home for a well-deserved 2 weeks of rest and recuperation, and I'm proud to share that the ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program in the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport has been selected by the U.S. military to host this celebration; and, Mr. Speaker, I would ask for support when this resolution comes up. I know we couldn't do it today, but I extend my personal gratitude to the program's volunteers for their efforts in supporting our dedicated men and women in uniform who are proudly serving our Nation.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 2560, the ``Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2007.'' This legislation, offered by my colleague, Representative DeGette, specifies that it is illegal to utilize cloning technology for unethical purposes. The bill text defines human cloning as the implantation of the product of human somatic cell nuclear transfer technology into a uterus. In my view, H.R. 2560 would allow important stem cell research to be done in an ethical manner. However, it specifies criminal penalties for individuals who do attempt to clone humans. Mr. Speaker, as a nurse and long-time member of the Committee on Science and Technology, I have long advocated for federal resources to be used to support stem cell research. After careful review of the bill text, I feel that this is a sound piece of legislation that does what it says it will do--prohibit stem cell technology from being used unethically to ``clone'' human beings. I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 2560.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 632, the H-Prize Act of 2007. The federal government should become more involved in supporting cutting-edge technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and move our nation toward renewable energy. As a member of the House Committee on Science and Technology, I committed toward supporting a variety of renewable energy technologies--including hydrogen. H.R. 632 would create competitive cash prizes to reward innovative research, development commercial application of hydrogen energy technologies. Hydrogen cars and other vehicles would make such a difference in air quality, Mr. Speaker, especially in Texas. Cities in Texas have some of the poorest air quality in the Nation. Hydrogen-powered vehicles could be designed for mass-scale use. These vehicles would emit only water vapor as a byproduct and reduce our dependence on foreign oil in the long term. Hydrogen, solar, wind, geothermal, and nuclear are all cleaner energy sources than fossil fuels. H.R. 632 is a positive step toward developing energy technologies that create a brighter future for our children and grandchildren.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1716, the Green Energy Education Act of 2007. Mr. Speaker, ``green energy'' is defined as energy that is produced and used in ways that lessen air pollution and other environmental impacts. An investment in green energy education will benefit our Nation in important ways. It is good for the environment, because it reduces environmental impacts of the production and delivery of energy. Green energy also reduces harmful greenhouse emissions. H.R. 1716 directs the Department of Energy to contribute funds to the National Science Foundation for the Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship program. This program is important in supporting graduate education related to green energy projects. The bill also supports energy technology research and development for high tech buildings and for educational activities to teach students how to improve building design that is not harmful to the environment. Mr. Speaker, I support H.R. 1716 and urge my colleagues to support it also.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1467, the 10,000 Trained by 2010 Act. The bill requires the National Science Foundation to award competitive grants for research to improve health care information systems. As our health care information moves from paper to computer-based storage methods, it becomes increasingly important to develop systematic methods for organizing and sharing biomedical information. Digital medical records must be transferable, and above all, patient confidentiality must be ensured. H.R. 1467 would fund scientific and engineering activities to improve education in the health care information fields. The funding would be used to develop innovative approaches in health care information; and help students earn advanced degrees in these fields. Mr. Speaker, this bill would promote technologies that will save us taxpayer dollars over the long term. I urge my colleagues to support H.R. 1467.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H. Res. 446, honoring the life and accomplishments of Astronaut Walter Marty Schirra and expressing condolences on his passing. Astronaut Walter Marty Schirra was a member of the Mercury 7, who were named by NASA in April of 1959. He piloted the six orbit Sigma 7 Mercury flight, the Gemini 6 flight and was Command Pilot on the Apollo VII. Walter Schirra became the first man to fly in space three times after being pilot of the Apollo VII. Schirra received numerous awards and honors while being a member of NASA. Schirra logged more than 295 hours in space. After he left NASA in 1969, he worked as a television commentator during the Apollo moon landings, was an engineering consultant and worked on corporate boards. Not only was Walter Schirra an astronaut, but he was an advocate for students who want to pursue careers in science and engineering. He helped to found the Mercury Seven Foundation, which creates college scholarships for engineering and science students. The passing of Walter Schirra has been a huge loss to the space community and America as a whole. His contributions will never be forgotten, and he leaves a strong legacy of bravery and service. I urge support of this resolution.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H. Res. 421. This resolution recognizes the brave ``Mercury 13'' women who in the early 1960s undertook the human exploration of space. The members of the ``Mercury 13'' include Myrtle Cagle, Geraldyn ``Jerrie'' Cobb, Jan Dietrich, Marion Dietrich, Mary Wallace ``Wally'' Funk, Jane Briggs Hart, Jean Hixson, Gene Nora Stumbough Jessen, Irene Leverton, Sarah Lee Gorelick Ratley, Bernice Trimble Steadman, Geraldine ``Jerri'' Sloan Truhill, and Rhea Hurrle Allison Woltman. The ``Mercury 13'' women successfully passed the same physical and psychological tests as those of their male counterparts, the ``Mercury 7.'' Just before leaving for the next phase of training at the Naval Aviation Center in Pensacola, Florida, they were told not to come. In 1961, their efforts marked a milestone in American history and these women paved the way for those who would follow in their footsteps. The Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas has been the leading NASA center for more than 40 years and continues to encourage women to participate in the area of space exploration. H. Res. 421 is an important way to help young women understand the importance of space and science. As of today, there have been 34 women in space, and although this is a great accomplishment, there should be more. It is my hope that this resolution encourages girls to pursue what they may feel is impossible. The ``Mercury 13'' continue to inspire women of all ages to go above and beyond, so that they can fulfill their dreams. The sacrifices of these women deserve to be honored.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to the ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport. The ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program is a daily gathering of volunteers to celebrate the homecoming of soldiers returning from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kuwait. This program is one of the Nation's foremost morale builders for our troops with over 150 civic organizations, governmental departments, and businesses volunteering during its 3-year tenure. This tremendous effort has made the ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program one of the largest ongoing community service efforts in north Texas. These committed volunteers have given of their time so that our troops, as well as their families, can see how proud we are as a community, and as a nation, of their service and sacrifice. Madam Speaker, the north Texans that participate in the ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program are the first people the troops see upon their return to the United States, and they speak on behalf of all Americans in thanking them and celebrating the safe return of each soldier. On June 12, 2007, the 500,000th soldier will come home for a well-deserved 2 weeks of rest and recuperation, and I am proud to share that the ``Welcome Home a Hero'' program at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport has been selected by the U.S. Military to host this celebration. I extend my personal gratitude to the program's volunteers for their efforts in supporting our dedicated men and women in uniform who are proudly serving our Nation. Madam Speaker, I am indeed honored to pause and pay tribute to these wonderful volunteers and valiant soldiers who represent the very best of the United States of America.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to a proactive citizen from Dallas, Texas, Lucious L. Newhouse, Jr. As youth education is of great importance, I am delighted to recognize his 39 years as an educator and wish him well regarding his upcoming retirement. I would like to take a few moments to reflect on his many achievements and contributions to the city of Dallas and the Dallas Independent School District. As the son of two educators, Lucious L. Newhouse, Jr., showed early signs of excellence, graduating as salutatorian from Galilee High School in Hallsville, Texas. Lucious then went on to obtain a bachelor of science degree from Prairie View A&M University and to star on the university's baseball team. Also to note, he obtained two graduate degrees from this same institution, a master of science and master of the arts. Shortly after completing his undergraduate study and starting his teaching career at J.N. Irwin Junior High School in Dallas, Lucious was called to serve our great Nation as both an army sergeant and platoon leader in Vietnam. He would then return to DISD where he taught and coached for 24 years and served as an administrator for 14. Supplementing his 39 years as an educator, Lucious is additionally a very spiritual man and has been an active member of the community. Lucious is an avid member of the Cedar CME Crest Cathedral, the Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, and has served as both president and vice president of the Dallas Coaches Association and Dallas Schools Administrators Association. Lucious Newhouse, Jr., has always taken pride in his work and been dedicated to the children of Dallas. This compassionate man never failed to show that he cared for his students, his fellow teachers, administrators, and staff members. I urge the rest of my colleagues to join me in applauding Mr. Newhouse, Jr., for all he has done for Texas's educational system and the wonderful city of Dallas.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I want to call to the attention of all of the Members that our new Clerk of the House is continuing to make impressions. She is on the cover of Crisis magazine for this month, the official publication of the NAACP. And she is president of the local chapter. I just thought that if you don't have a copy, she is standing right over there.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Madam Speaker, I rise today to recognize the efforts of the Raindrop Turkevi Foundation of Dallas, TX. As a non-profit, relatively new organization, the Raindrop Turkevi Foundation of Dallas is committed to facilitating common ground amongst diverse communities and assisting Turkish Americans in the Dallas area. The Foundation provides Turkish Americans with various resources in order for them to prosper socially and culturally. In regard to education, the Raindrop Turkevi Foundation hosts various cultural scholarship opportunities and creates programs that benefit the Turkish-American Youth, such as K-12 and SAT tutoring, ESL classes, Turkish classes, and college advising. As for social development, the foundation holds conferences that promote diversity. In collaboration with various local entities, the Raindrop Turkevi Foundation hosts meaningful events as well. It sponsors and cosponsors ethnic picnics and organizes athletic events for children, such as weekly soccer games. All in all, this organization's benevolent objectives and current exploits make it an invaluable member to the Dallas area. The Raindrop Turkevi Foundation has playing an integral part in aiding the success of the Turkish American population and unionizing different communities in Texas. On behalf of the 30th Congressional District of Texas, I am honored to recognize and commend Raindrop Turkevi of Dallas for accepting all ethnicities and for their leadership and hard work in the Dallas community as well as in the great State of Texas.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the late Lamar Hunt, a tireless contributor to the National Football League, NFL, and to the United States. Originally from El Dorado, Arkansas, Lamar Hunt was educated in Texas at Southern Methodist University, where he obtained a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology and served as a 3-year reserve end on the varsity football team. At the young age of 27, Hunt persevered through much criticism and founded the Dallas Texans, now known as the Kansas City Chiefs, and facilitated the creation of the American Football League. By undertaking these two tasks, he paved the way for the expansion of professional football. Hunt's impeccable management skills and keen perception of the game propelled him to spearhead groundbreaking developments in the NFL. These developments include, among many others, the installation of the 2-point conversion option and the inclusion of names on the back of game jerseys. Although known for such contributions to the NFL, Hunt's commitment to the community went far beyond the football field. Hunt was an avid supporter of societal betterment, hosting and sponsoring many philanthropic efforts. He made significant financial contributions to higher learning institutions, the Heart of a Champion foundation, and the fine arts, notably the Dallas Symphony Orchestra and the Dallas Museum of Art. In closing, Lamar Hunt was a very special man who touched the lives of many Americans. I am delighted and honored to recognize such a distinguished, forward thinking gentleman, and I urge my colleagues to join me in saluting this remarkable citizen.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Chairman, I rise today to support this amendment and certainly want to thank the chairman of the committee and other members of the committee. My amendment, as modified, addresses the need for public knowledge and understanding of basic financial principles. It also seeks to reduce our Nation's already enormous consumer debt. My amendment requires that anyone who receives Federal assistance through the affordable housing fund committee attend a financial literacy program. We must educate our Nation's consumers to make informed decisions when managing their personal finances. Many consumers, especially first time homeowners, do not fully understand the complex financial agreements into which they are entering. For most families, their home is their single largest financial investment. Therefore, it is vital to provide working families with the knowledge on how to buy and keep their homes. The number of foreclosures rise every month all over the country. And in the Dallas area, we have one of the highest foreclosure rates in the Nation. My amendment will work to reduce the number of foreclosures and solidify a strong housing market. Education truly is the key to building a strong housing market and strong communities. Homeownership is a dream for many Americans. It represents security and it builds pride in our neighborhoods, and it is essential in creating positive, productive communities. My amendment will help families fully understand their financial commitments and allow them to successfully achieve their part of the American dream. I appreciate the chairman including my amendment en bloc.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I would urge the passage of this measure, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. National Public Works Week is celebrated yearly during the third week of May. The week has been designated by a variety of organizations to celebrate our public works professionals and the critical work that they do to keep our infrastructure and transportation systems working efficiently and economically. House Resolution 352 pays tribute to these professionals, recognizing their work the week of May 20 through 26, 2007. ``Public works'' are loosely defined as projects that are carried out for the public good, aptly named because they enable the public to complete its work. Hazardous materials, pipelines, municipal infrastructure such as water supply infrastructure and sewage and refuge disposal systems, and transportation systems, such as rail, highways, airports and public transit, all fall under the public works umbrella. Our public works are vital to our Nation. Our commerce depends on the shipment of goods through rail, on our roads and through the air. Public transportation provides many with a cost-effective way of travel, while also reducing harmful effects on our environment. Our public health depends on our water supply infrastructure as well as our sewage and disposal systems. According to a U.S. Geological survey, one person uses an average of 150 gallons of water per day. Although running water is expected in most homes in our Nation, many developing countries still consider this a luxury. Globally, 50 percent of the world's hospital beds are filled with patients suffering from water-borne illnesses, with one child killed every 8 seconds due to water-related sickness. People in more developed nations, such as the United States, use up to 10 times more water than those in the underdeveloped poor countries. And we do take it for granted. For the importance that they play in our daily lives, our transportation and infrastructure systems and facilities often get the bad end of the deal, that is, although public works are depended on consistently, they receive no glory or praise when accomplishing the job. Rather, many only pay tribute and attention to these public works when they fail, such as sewage line breaks that flood our basements, or levee failures that result in flooded communities. This legislative session the House has passed several key bills that will improve our water and wastewater infrastructure to further reduce facility and system failure. H.R. 569, the Water Quality Investment Act of 2007, amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize appropriations for sewer overflow control grants. H.R. 700, the Healthy Communities Water Supply Act of 2007, amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend the pilot program for alternative water source projects. H.R. 720, the Water Quality Financing Act of 2007, amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize appropriations for State water pollution control revolving funds. And lastly, H.R. 1495, the Water Resources Development Act, authorizes water projects and U.S. Corps of Engineers policy changes. It has been more than 6 years since a water resources bill was signed into law. And although water resource legislation is expected to be signed into law every 2 years, President Clinton was the last White House occupant to take an active role in our country's water and public health needs. I recognize the importance of public works for our communities and our country, and I am grateful for the administrators, engineers and servicemen who continue to utilize their skills and provide hours of service and dedication to ensure these necessary facilities and systems work for our Nation. I support this resolution and urge my colleagues to support it as well. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the bill under consideration.