Kevin Kiley

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I say briefly that I very much do applaud the gentleman from New York, who I think has shown tremendous leadership in many ways in standing up for Israel and fighting against anti-Semitism in this country. I think one of the valuable things that we have seen over the last several weeks is that we have had bipartisan support on both counts. I actually sponsored a separate resolution dealing specifically with the problem of anti-Semitism on college campuses, and that got overwhelming bipartisan support on this floor. I think it had only about 21 ``no'' votes. That has been very encouraging. With respect to the three charges that were mentioned, number one, there is legislation in the House right now to codify the President's executive order, on which I think it is important that we move forward. Number two, far from saying we shouldn't have an Office of Civil Rights within the Department of Education, Representative Burgess Owens and I wrote a letter to the head of the Office of Civil Rights in the Department of Education telling them they need to be doing more, they need to be more proactive in looking into anti-Semitic incidents at our universities, and we would certainly welcome their support on that letter. Number three, as far as the protection for synagogues and other facilities, I would be very interested in partnering with you on any such efforts. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. Kustoff).

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and insert extraneous material on H. Res. 894.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I move that the House do now adjourn.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commend the passage of the No Funds for Iranian Terrorism Act, which I am a cosponsor of, which overwhelmingly has passed the House of Representatives and would permanently freeze $6 billion that the administration had released to Iran. Now, this was released by the administration as part of a deal. They claim the money was only for humanitarian purposes, but we know full well that money is fungible; that Iran is very skilled when it comes to sanctions evasion, and that Iran is funding terrorist organizations and their proxies on a massive scale, including Hamas and Hezbollah and, thereby, posing a serious existential risk to the State of Israel. In fact, FBI Director Christopher Wray recently confirmed that Iran is the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism and has even attempted attacks on American soil. By imposing immediate, mandatory sanctions on foreign financial institutions that facilitate the transfer of these restricted $6 billion in funds covered under that deal, the No Funds for Iranian Terrorism Act will ensure that that money remains permanently off-limits to the Iranian regime. Mr. Speaker, I am grateful that the House came together on a bipartisan basis to pass this legislation that I have coauthored. I urge the Senate to give it prompt consideration and for the President to sign it. Governor Newsom is Making California Worse

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, last night there was a televised debate between the Governor of my State, Gavin Newsom, and the Governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis. It was set up as sort of a comparison of the two States' models of governments and which is the better model for other States and the country to follow. While it is true that Florida has done quite well in any number of areas, really the comparison could have been made between California and virtually any other State in the country. When it comes to the key metrics of economic performance and quality of life, California is the very worst State in the country. Despite that, we have a Governor who went on television and, in fact, has for months, for years now been trying to claim that California is, in fact, leading the Nation. He has said time and time again that California is a model for the Nation. He has said the future happens first in California. Indeed, it is true that the current administration here in Washington has copied any number of California's policies and, in fact, has elevated many of California's officials--Julie Su, the Acting Secretary of Labor held that position for Governor Newsom; Vice President Kamala Harris; the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra was formerly California's attorney general; Alejandro Mayorkas; Douglas Parker, the head of OSHA. Therefore, a matter of great national concern is to really look at the facts of what is happened in California. What the Governor tried to do last night, Governor Newsom, that is, was to present a complete alternative reality using false, misleading, in some cases simply delusional, assertions about the true nature of life in California. I wanted to take a moment today to correct some of the misstatements that were made by Gavin Newsom in last night's debate. First, there was a discussion of the California exodus, and the Governor refused to acknowledge the fact that people are leaving our State in record numbers. In fact, he even asserted that more people are moving to California than to Florida. Here is the reality: Between 2019 and 2022, 1,044,000 people left California, while 737,000 people moved to Florida. So many people have been leaving California that the State literally did run out of U- Hauls. In fact, for three straight years, California has led the Nation in U-Haul departures. What is so notable about this is that prior to the Newsom Governorship, California has gained population every year since our founding in 1850. We have always been the State that people want to come to, the State where anyone could get ahead, and now we are the State that so many people can't wait to leave behind. It was just this complete abrupt change in the trajectory. California continued to grow and then Governor Newsom took office and suddenly we are leading the Nation in departures. We have the highest out-migration rate in the country. In fact, it is even more stark when you look at San Francisco, the city that Newsom was the mayor of, the city represented by Congresswoman Pelosi, the city that Vice President Harris is from. This is a city that is on the verge of collapse. Those aren't my words. That is the editorial page of the San Francisco Chronicle. This is a city where businesses are leaving seemingly every day, citing the intolerable conditions in that city. In fact, San Francisco right now is losing residents faster than any major city in United States history. That is right, San Francisco is losing residents faster than even Detroit when Detroit went bankrupt. What is Newsom talking about when he actually said on live television that there are more Floridians going to California than vice versa? The reality is that, actually, if you do a direct comparison, over 50,000 more people went to Florida than came to California. What Newsom did is very revealing. He said that the rate of Californians per capita moving to Florida is lower than vice versa, but he did an asymmetrical comparison where he used per capita numbers when looking at the State that people are departing from but used raw, absolute numbers looking at the State that they are going to. If you were to do it in a symmetrical manner, whichever way you did it, whether you did raw numbers on both sides or per capita numbers on both sides, of course, California does much worse. It is, after all, the State that has the highest outmigration rate in the country. The Governor's willingness to go on television and distort the numbers so egregiously, use this completely nonsensical trick where you make it per capita on one side but not the other, shows how willing he is to mislead both his own constituents and people throughout our country. A second area where major correction is needed is when it comes to the handling of COVID-19. Here is the reality: California had the single most draconian and longest-lasting lockdowns in the country when it came to school shutdowns, business shutdowns, church shutdowns and when it came to mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports. Each and every step of the way, California had the highest level of government coercion and control. Yet, the Governor gets up in last night's debate and says, no, Florida was the lockdown State, which is truly boggling to the mind that he would stand up and, with a straight face, make that assertion. Yes, it is true that basically every State, right when COVID arrived, did take drastic measures when we didn't know what this was in those first couple of weeks in February and March. The difference is some States learned and others did not. Some States looked at the evidence on how best to handle this public health challenge and acted accordingly in an evidence-based manner that placed trust in their citizens, whereas California never learned and continued a state of emergency until 2023. In fact, if you look at a direct comparison, Newsom last night claimed that Florida shut down schools, but in fact, if you look at the facts, Florida ranked third out of the 50 States in getting kids back to school. Where did California rank? California ranked 50 out of 50 States in getting kids back to school. We had the longest-lasting school shutdowns in the country. Those harms are going to be with us for a long, long time. Newsom was saying one thing last night, but just a few weeks ago, he actually admitted--this is a Politico story--we would have done everything differently when it came to COVID. He tried to make excuses. He said we didn't know what we didn't know, but that is not true. It is not a matter of hindsight being 2020 because so many other States--in fact, every other State--managed to do a better job. Here is the truly perverse thing: Despite everything California did to take away the rights of its citizens, to shut down beaches, to shut down youth sports, to keep kids out of school, many of whom have not come back, by the way, despite the incalculable damage to our young people, to our businesses, to our democratic institutions in the name of public health, California wound up with an excess mortality rate exceeding the national average even though we had the benefit of a relatively young population. That is why the recent Lancet study actually says California had one of the highest standardized COVID mortality rates in the entire country. Yet, Newsom, of course, ignores that. He simply accuses Florida of having tens of thousands of lives die unnecessarily, completely ignoring the actual facts of the situation. The reality is, having lived through Newsom's one-man rule in California, at every turn, the Governor prioritized getting himself in the headlines and rewarding special interests over the health and well- being of Californians, and this continued for years. In fact, things got worse as time went on. Even after he had set the record for how long he was keeping kids out of school, on October 1, 2021, the Governor announced that California was going to be the first State in the Nation to impose a student vaccine mandate for COVID-19. It applied to all grade levels, public and private schools alike, with no exceptions for religion and personal belief. He was the first Governor to announce such a mandate. He boasted about being the first Governor to announce such a mandate, and he wound up being the only Governor to announce such a mandate. At the beginning of this year, he formally withdrew the mandate without it ever going into effect. Even the World Health Organization now says COVID vaccines are not needed for healthy kids and teens. A third issue that came up in last night's debate was homelessness. Newsom claimed that he has spent unprecedented resources on homelessness and has gotten 68,000 people off the streets. The first part is true; the second is preposterous. California has spent $20 billion on homelessness over the last 5 years, and the problem has gotten worse. We spent all that money, and it has gotten worse. In recent years, homelessness in California has increased 15 times faster than the country as a whole. Half of all the unsheltered homeless in the whole country now live in California. Newsom himself acknowledged that Californians are ``wondering where the heck all their tax dollars are going.'' If you want to do a direct comparison, the Federal Government has counted over 171,000 homeless in California last year versus 25,000 in Florida. Newsom himself even said when he was in Los Angeles recently that it looked like a third-world country. San Francisco, frankly, is much worse, with the one exception of a couple of weeks ago when the President of China came to town when there was the AIPAC conference with world leaders in San Francisco. The New York Times wrote a story talking about the makeover and beautification efforts that were hastily undertaken. The Times article said: ``San Francisco had the air this week of teenagers frantically cleaning up after a house party with their parents on the way.'' The Times continues, ``Perhaps the most obvious change has been seen at the Speaker Nancy Pelosi Federal Building. For 2 years, . . . people regularly used drugs in an adjacent alley. Most have seemingly disappeared in a poof.'' The Times reported that San Francisco added more than 200 beds to its shelter system just for the arrival of President Xi from China. It notes: ``Some residents have wondered why San Francisco has been able to fix its notorious problems for the President [of China] but not for them.'' A fourth issue that came up in the debate was education, and Newsom tried to claim that California is outperforming Florida. He cites fourth grade reading and eighth grade math. Here is the reality: Number one, California spends a lot more money than other States. California spends 45 percent more per pupil on K-12 education than Florida does. What do we get in return for that money? California has the lowest literacy rate in the country. There are 800 California schools where 75 percent of students do not read at grade level. California's most recent eighth grade reading scores are the worst of any State in the country that was measured. Our fourth grade reading scores are the third worst in the country. That is why it was unbelievable to me when, last night, Newsom asserted that our eighth grade reading scores are somehow indicative of good leadership when we literally have the worst eighth grade reading scores in the country. Poor students, by the way, fare worst of all in California's education system. California has ranked 49 out of 50 States in achievements for students who are eligible for free and reduced lunch. The issue of gas prices also came up last night, and Newsom tried to say that Californians are being ripped off. I agree with him on that. Californians are being ripped off. He said we are being ripped off by the oil companies. The reality is that California has by far the highest gas prices of any State in the country. Right now, gas prices in California are $1.58 above the national average, so if the oil companies are ripping us off, why are they ripping us off so much more in California than any other State? There are a few reasons why gas prices are so much higher in California. Primarily, it is that we have the highest gas tax in the country. We have all kinds of regulations and fees that add much more to the price of each gallon. The reality is that we are getting ripped off, but we are getting ripped off by our own government. By the way, what do we get in return for this, for paying the highest taxes on gas in the country, money that is supposed to be going to transportation? California generally ranks as having about the second or third worst roads of any State in the country, which people will be sure to tell you if you drive through California for any reasonable stretch of time. That is the sad reality of Gavin Newsom's California-- highest taxes, deepest potholes. We sacrifice the most and get the least in return. The issue of taxes also came up last night, and Newsom tried to somehow slice and dice the data to say that California for certain people has a lower tax burden than Florida does. The reality is this: California has the highest income tax in the country and the highest gas tax in the country. When you look at the overall tax burden in California, total taxes are $10,167 per person. In Florida, it is about half that, $5,406. Newsom wanted to talk about the working class. Well, here is the reality of life in California for the working class. California has the third highest cost of living in the country. California has, by far, the highest gas prices in the country, thanks to an extremely regressive set of taxes. California has the third worst inequality in the country. California has the highest poverty rate in the country. California leads the Nation in the real poverty rate. Last year, California had the lowest wage growth in the country. Wages went up less in California for workers than in any State in the country. That is why the California exodus, when you think of all the people leaving, is not just people who are well off who want to escape the very high income tax rates. It is actually working people who just cannot afford to get by in our State, who are not allowed to pursue their career, who are unable to buy a home because of skyrocketing home prices. That is the reality of life in California under Gavin Newsom. There was also discussion of the economy, both nationally and in California. Newsom said something very interesting. He said that the Nation's current unemployment rate is a sign of a booming economy. He said the unemployment rate is pretty low nationally. That is the link that he drew--low unemployment rate, good economic stewardship. The first response to that is that that is a mirage on a national level, given that the workforce participation rate has gone down significantly. Any small business owner will tell you that they are still to this day having a very hard time getting workers. However, if we take Newsom at his word that the low unemployment rate is a sign of good leadership, well, then we can look at California's unemployment rate to assess his leadership. As it turns out, California has the second highest unemployment rate in the entire country. If you want to do a direct comparison between California and Florida, just to pick one example, since January 2019, employment has increased by over a million--1,031,000--in Florida. It has declined by 85,000 in California. If you ask Californians themselves how they think the economy is doing, 71 percent of Californians expect bad times economically over the course of the next 12 months. That is a majority of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents who believe the economy is on the wrong track and expect things are going to get worse in California. As a final point, the Governor was just a few months ago boasting about how California had a surplus the last couple of years and how that was, again, a great sign of positive governance, of economic stewardship. Well, you didn't hear him mention that last night, and the reason why is that California has a massive deficit right now, a $31.5 billion deficit, which is out of step with what was happening last year. Right now, Florida has a $17.7 billion surplus. Now, when it came to immigration and the border, Governor Newsom made a truly outlandish claim. He said that it is Congress and not President Biden that is responsible for the border crisis. Let's just look at the basic facts. From 2014 until the beginning of the Biden administration, there were only 4 months out of that whole span of 6-plus years that had more than 100,000 encounters along the southern border, so only 4 months out of all those months for 6 years where there were more than 100,000 encounters at the border. Under the Biden administration, there were 29 straight months with more than 100,000 border encounters. If you ask what changed between the time before Biden took office and the time that he did take office, it wasn't Congress. The President had a Democrat Senate and a Democrat House for the first 2 years of his administration. The total numbers now are: 6.4 million illegal crossings at the southern border. There have also been 1.7 million known got-aways. In fiscal year 2021, this administration set a record for illegal border crossings. In fiscal year 2022, the administration broke that record. In fiscal year 2023, the administration broke that record. This is another area where Newsom's tendency to grasp for some distorted factoid and paint a completely alternate picture of reality is on display. When he did his initial interview with Hannity in June of this year, Newsom said, no, no, no. Biden is doing a great job at the border. Look, this month illegal crossings are down 70 percent. There happened to be a blip in June. You didn't hear him use that talking point last night. Why is that? In subsequent months, illegal border crossings have been off the charts. In September of this year, we set an all-time record for a single month where we had 269,735 crossings across the southern border. There was also mention of sanctuary policies in the debate last night. Newsom has tried to mislead everyone about the extent to which he supports sanctuary policies and exactly what these policies do. I will read to you something he said in 2018. Newsom said, ``Let me be clear: California is a sanctuary State.'' That is what he said. ``Let me be clear: California is a sanctuary State.'' He said, We have defied and resisted the Trump administration's policies at every turn. We will do it again. Newsom even signed a law closing ICE detention facilities that was overturned by the Ninth Circuit as unconstitutional. The evidence is extremely clear that we have a crisis at the southern border, that this administration has refused to take the actions that are necessary to address it, and that Governor Newsom has made the situation worse in our own State. For him to now blame Congress or to blame the House specifically is beyond belief when in the House we passed the Border Security Act earlier this year, the most robust border security bill that has passed the House in a long, long time--maybe ever--which would make a huge difference in the crisis at the border, which is contributing to the fentanyl crisis, to human trafficking, and is introducing potential national security and terror threats into our country. In the House of Representatives, we passed that bill. What has happened since? It has been gathering dust on Chuck Schumer's desk in the Senate. It is well past time for action on this issue. The ninth area where the Governor completely misled in last night's debate was when it came to crime. He said crime is down in California. In fact, FBI data shows violent crime in California increased 13 percent the last few years as it has gone down across the country. California cities have seen an epidemic of retail theft. In San Francisco this year a string of high-profile businesses, Whole Foods, Nordstrom, Anthropologie, have left the city, and they basically all cited the crime problem as the reason. In Los Angeles, police have advised residents not to go outside wearing jewelry. In fact, if you want to do a direct comparison between Florida and California when it comes to crime, there were a few figures cited in the debate last night. One that is very interesting and is very telling is when it comes to motor vehicle theft. Now, why is this telling? Because in California, a lot of the crime doesn't even go reported because it won't be prosecuted. You have all these laws that have basically legalized retail theft, have legalized open air drug use, like Prop 47. We have other laws like Prop 57 that have downgraded a lot of offenses. We have cities that have defunded the police. We have these so-called progressive prosecutors like George Gascon who Newsom initially appointed as D.A. of San Francisco who refused to prosecute even those crimes for those laws that are on the books. You have businesses that will be robbed in broad daylight and they will just let the people go. They won't bother to file a police report because they know that nothing is going to happen. You can't actually look at reported crimes as an accurate gauge of how much criminal activity there is. When it comes to vehicle thefts, that is different because there is usually an insurance claim. We get realistic, accurate numbers when it comes to motor vehicle thefts. How does that compare? In 2022, reported vehicle thefts per capita were 250 percent higher in California than they were in Florida. That will be no surprise to anyone who has been to San Francisco. The advice often is you should roll down your windows when you leave your car parked so at least they won't break them when they are trying to break in. I want to mention one final issue, the 10th and final issue--although there are certainly plenty of others--where the Governor of our State gave a completely false and misleading characterization about what life is like in California, and that is on the issue of personal freedom. The Governor called California the freedom State, but the Cato Institute rankings of freedom in the 50 States ranked California as the 48th most free State. Florida ranked second out of the 50 states. Just look at what happened, of course, during the COVID lockdowns where California had the highest measure of government control and the least measure of personal choice and freedom. It began long before that. California has every year continued to erode the rights and freedoms of its residents. When it comes to economic freedom, for example, Newsom signed into law AB 5, which has deprived countless people of their right to earn a living, effectively abolishing independent contracting for many professions in California. Now, his former Secretary of Labor, Julie Su, is trying to do the same thing through the regulatory process here in Washington, D.C. Look at things like bans on straws, bans on gas-powered leaf blowers, bans on chopsticks and other single-use food items, bans on even gas- powered vehicles by 2035, if Gavin Newsom has his way. Every day in California, we wake up wondering what is going to be banned next. For Newsom to somehow claim we are the freedom State is a delusion of the highest order. I will close by making this point, though, Mr. Speaker, which is that California, I believe, is the greatest State in the country. It is the State where everyone has always wanted to come to. We have everything to offer, and there are still so many great things about our State: the amazing people and diversity of cultures and world-leading companies in California. We have great universities in our State, as well. We have so many great things going, and we still have parts of our State that people are moving to and want to live in--specifically, my district. My district is one of the few parts of California that is growing right now. In fact, while the State as a whole has for three straight years led the Nation in U-Haul departures, the largest city in my district, Roseville, was second in the Nation in U-Haul arrivals. Why is it that people are moving to our area while they are leaving other parts of California? The reason is that we have fought against the failed governance model that Gavin Newsom has tried to impose on the State as a whole and that is in an especially advanced stage in places like San Francisco. During the COVID years, we fought in every way we could to allow our communities to follow the evidence and allow citizens to live their lives as they saw fit. We ended up getting our kids back to school sooner than any other part of California. We ended up having an unemployment rate in Placer County, for example, that was about half the rest of the State. What was the result of that? We actually ended up having way better COVID-19 outcomes than the State as a whole because we focused on the things that would actually make a difference on disease control rather than population control, rather than gratuitously taking away the personal freedoms of our residents. Even before COVID and now after--at least as we have moved away from that paradigm--we continue to try to chart a different course than California as a whole has taken. We support small businesses in our communities rather than attacking them. We support law enforcement in our communities rather than defunding the police and rather than contributing to a false and misleading narrative, a negative narrative about our law enforcement. We have led the entire Nation in going after fentanyl dealers and charging them with murder, so we don't have more of our kids continuing to get victimized. When Gavin Newsom says California is a model for the Nation, nothing could be further from the truth. I am very proud to represent communities that do represent a model for how California as a whole can once again become the Golden State. I encourage everyone who watched the debate last night to take a close look at the facts because there is an increasing tendency for California's failures to become national failures. As a Representative from California, I will be fighting in every way I can to make sure that that doesn't happen. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor the memory of Nancy Palmer, a longtime Grass Valley resident and community leader who passed away peacefully in her home in September. Nancy was born in Jacksonville, Florida, on September 18, 1938, and later went on to attend Jacksonville University. She and her husband, Captain Gary H. Palmer, moved to western Nevada County in the 1970s where she soon began devoting her time and talents to many local organizations, including Music in the Mountains, Hospice of the Foothills, Grass Valley Rotary, and Sierra College. Having grown up in a college town, Nancy recognized the value of community-based education. In 1994, she was elected to the Sierra College board of trustees, a position she was to hold for an impressive 29 years. During her tenure, Sierra College opened two other campuses, serving thousands of students in Placer and Nevada Counties. Trustee Nancy Palmer's passion for community colleges extended beyond the Sierra College district. She coordinated professional trainings for fellow trustees at the State level, coaching student trustees from the 73 California community college districts across the State. As the keynote speaker for numerous Sierra College commencement ceremonies, she often inspired students with her motto: Action Requires Courage. Nancy's accomplishments demonstrated a life lived with action and courage. She will be lovingly remembered by the people she influenced and for her invaluable contributions of time and effort to her community. The Sierra College board of trustees wrote that they are deeply saddened to announce the passing of their valued colleague. President of the board, Paul Bancroft, stated that Nancy cared about the college so much and her dedication as the representative for Nevada County was evident in everything she did. Willy Duncan, Sierra College's superintendent and president, spoke for his colleagues by stating that Nancy was a wonderful colleague, but more than that, she was a dear friend, and he will miss her greatly. On behalf of the Third Congressional District and the United States House of Representatives, I offer heartfelt condolences to Nancy's colleagues; her sisters, Judy Butler Good and Roberta Butler; her daughter-in-law, Lisa Palmer; her nephew, Rodney Shawn Scott; and the countless other lives that she touched. Celebrating the 100th Anniversary of the Dow Hotel and Dow Villa Motel

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to mark and celebrate the centennial anniversary of the Dow Hotel and Dow Villa Motel located in my district in Inyo County, California. Over a century ago, in 1923, Walter and Maude Dow built the hotel to provide lodging for big movie crews that were filming the stunning eastern Sierras. Today, the hotel still hosts guests from the film industry as well as tourists visiting the nearby natural attractions. In 1957, Joe and Verna Bonham and Ivan and Barbara Turner took over ownership and played an integral role in expanding the hotel's facilities. With their leadership, an adjacent motel named ``The Dow Villa Motel'' was built and additional sections were constructed, expanding the hotel's overall capabilities by more than double, from 20 rooms to 50. With a core value of being a family-operated hotel, it was then sold in 1978 to the Bonham's daughters, Lynne Bunn and Jeanne Willey, who still own it today. The historic Dow Hotel overlooks a magnificent view of the Sierra and Mt. Whitney and is well known for its hospitality and charming atmosphere. It holds countless memories and historical significance for the area, having hosted producers, directors, and stars, including Clayton Moore, John Wayne, Roy Rogers, and many more. One hundred years ago, Walter and Maude Dow saw the economic benefit of having movie business in the region and responded by building what has become a treasured and iconic landmark for the Lone Pine community. Therefore, on behalf of the United States' House of Representatives and the Third Congressional District of California, I am honored to recognize the Dow Hotel and Dow Villa Motel for their 100 years of contributions to our local economies and participation in the business community. Congratulating the Rocklin High School Football Team

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I wish to recognize and congratulate the Rocklin High School football team on winning the CIF Division 2 Sac- Joaquin Section championship game. The Rocklin Thunder football team beat St. Mary's Rams last week by a score of 17-6, winning their first section title since 2009. Rocklin head coach Jason Adams set this goal for his team and the defense led by defensive coordinator Greg Benzel was ready for the challenge. The stout Rocklin defense stopped the Rams in the red zone time and again, forcing four turnovers in the process. The offense took advantage of the defensive stops and turnovers when Rocklin quarterback Reeve Slone scrambled for a 44-yard touchdown run to put his team up 14-6 just before halftime. From that point, Rocklin never looked back. Coach Adams' team was able to achieve this because of their commitment to a common goal and every member of the team playing their role. However, the job is not quite finished for the Rocklin Thunder. They will be hosting Grant Union High School tonight in the Division 2 NorCal Regional game. Mr. Speaker, I wish Coach Adams and his team the best of luck in their pursuit of a State championship. Go Thunder. Discovery of a Secret, Illegal Chinese Biolab in California

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, following the discovery of a secret, illegal Chinese biolab in California, I requested an investigation by the House. The Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party recently released its highly disturbing report, and I commend the select committee and Chair Gallagher for getting to the bottom of many of the disturbing facts in play here. The lab was run, we have learned from the committee's report, by an international fugitive from China named Jesse Zhu. After running various state-connected companies in China, Mr. Zhu moved to Canada where he set up dozens of corporations to steal valuable American intellectual property and unlawfully transfer it to China. The Supreme Court of British Columbia found he committed fraud on an epic scale, resulting in a $330 million judgment. He then fled to America, assumed a new alias, David He, and set up several more companies, including the one behind this lab in Reedley, California. The lab was discovered nearly a year ago when a code inspector came upon a suspicious warehouse in Reedley. There was a hose out of the back of the warehouse. Inside, she found many Chinese nationals wearing white lab coats, glasses, masks, and latex gloves, along with thousands of vials of biological substances, and 1,000 mice. Some of the mice were actually found dead. It was later learned that these were transgenic mice, genetically engineered to catch and carry the COVID-19 virus. A further inspection found blood tissue and other bodily fluid samples and serums, along with thousands of vials of selected biological material. Some of the vials were labeled with the names of infectious agents, while others were labeled in a code that was never deciphered. At first, the CDC refused to investigate. They even hung up on local officials who had called to ask for help when they learned about the lab. The local Representative got involved and, finally, the CDC did do an inspection. They found at least 20 potentially infectious agents, including HIV, tuberculosis, and the deadliest known form of Malaria. Yet still, the CDC didn't bother to test any of these samples. They simply accepted what was on the label even if the contents were unknown. They didn't test it even if there was a code they couldn't decipher. The committee said this made it impossible for them to fully assess the potential risks that this specific facility posed to the community. The select committee report calls this decision by the CDC ``baffling.'' Later, local officials discovered a refrigerator in the lab that had eluded the CDC that was labeled ``Ebola.'' Now, while the supposed purpose of the lab was to sell various medical test kits, all this company actually did was buy counterfeit kits from China and then resell them here in the United States. Thus, as the committee put it, there was a lack of apparent legitimate or even profit-motivated criminal motive in the operation of the illegal facility. This raises the question: What was it there for? What was the true purpose of the facility? This is especially pressing to ask given that Jesse Zhu, the illegal operator of the lab, was receiving unexplained payments via wire transfer from Chinese banks. The report further notes that no one knows whether there are other unknown biolabs because there is no monitoring system in place. It is very clear that we need further congressional action and investigation here. First of all, we need to examine the role of the CDC, which seemed to completely drop the ball here. Why did the CDC ignore local officials about the lab for months? Why didn't they test any samples from the thousands of vials with unclear or coded labels? How did they manage to miss a freezer that was actually labeled ``Ebola''? Then we also have to ask: How did this lab escape detection? How many more such operations could there be in California and across the country? Finally, we need to learn more about what was the lab's true purpose. Why was it there? What was it planning on doing? Why is it that its operator was receiving so much money from China? These are questions that we need answers to. Furthermore, it has also become clear that we need to update the monitoring and regulatory framework, which clearly has gaps because a facility like this was allowed to go undetected. In fact, it relocated several times and potentially posed a serious risk to the surrounding communities. I commend the work that was done by the select committee, and we need to move forward to make sure that we are doing everything we can to get to the bottom of what happened here and to keep our communities safe. $6 Billion Permanently Off-Limits to the Iranian Regime

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Chair, throughout the COVID-19 era, the United States was an outlier in many ways, but perhaps most of all when it came to the treatment of young children. A very clear example of that is the policy of forcing toddlers to wear masks. This is from an article from NPR in January 2022. It says: ``The United States is an outlier in recommending masks from the age of 2 years old. The World Health Organization does not recommend masks for children under age 5, while the European equivalent of the CDC doesn't recommend them for children under age 12.'' When it came to the Head Start program, not only was it recommended, but it was mandated that children as young as 2 years old, over a million kids in Head Start, had to wear masks up until January 2023. Now, this flew in the face of not only international norms, but of all scientific evidence. Study after study has shown no public health benefit to forcing young children to wear masks. For example, a 2022 study by Dr. Ambarish Chandra and Dr. Tracy Beth Hoeg was titled, ``Lack of correlation between school mask mandates and pediatric COVID-19 cases. . . . `' At the same time, the evidence continues to pile up as to the harms done to young children when it comes to the disruption of holistic processing, of face perception, of social skills, of emotional development, not to mention the misery that they cause young children having to wear masks for hours on end each day. Perhaps the need for this amendment was most clearly demonstrated in some truly unbelievable testimony by Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra earlier this year. I asked Secretary Becerra whether the policy of forcing 2-year-olds to wear masks saved lives. He responded by saying: Who did the forcing? The answer, of course, was him. When I pointed this out, he said: ``We never forced anyone to do anything.'' That is what he said. ``We never forced anyone to do anything.'' When, in fact, the relevant regulation stated that there was a requirement for universal masking for all individuals ages 2 and older. I asked him: Can you point to any public health benefit to forcing young children to wear masks? He could provide none. I asked: Do you, as the Secretary of Health and Human Services, can you point to any evidence that there was a public health benefit to forcing young children to wear masks? The flailing Secretary, unable to come up with anything, simply said that fewer people are dying in 2023 of COVID than were dying in 2020. What a farce, Mr. Chair. Let's think about the parents who had to send their 2-, 3-, 4-year-old kids to school every day under this policy. And here the Secretary of Health and Human Services doesn't offer an apology, even though he can come up with not a single public health benefit to the policy that was enforced on these families. We need to make sure with this amendment that this never happens again. This amendment will assure that Health and Human Services does not dedicate a single dollar to enforcing mask mandates for Head Start. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Chairman, the gentlewoman from Connecticut referred to evidence-based policies, and yet the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services could not cite a single piece of evidence in support of this policy. Not only that, this policy has been rejected by the World Health Organization and the European equivalent of the CDC. I yield back to the gentlewoman and ask if she has come across any evidence that has somehow alluded the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the World Health Organization, and countries and our counterparts in Europe. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Chair, to be very clear, I just asked the gentlewoman to provide us with some evidence in support of her position after she, herself, claimed that her position was evidence based, and she could not do so; just like the Secretary of Health and Human Services could provide no evidence for a policy that has been rejected broadly across the world. Mr. Chair, I strongly urge passage of this amendment. It is past time to restore some sanity in this country and to make sure that the sort of harmful, unevidence-based policies that so many Americans have to live with never again return in this country. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, H.R. 3506 makes technical amendments to update statutory references to provisions in title 7, title 20, and title 43 of the United States Code. In the process of updating statutory references, there were some related technical errors found. The bill also makes amendments to correct those errors. These changes come at the request of the Office of Law Revision Counsel, which is a nonpartisan office in the House of Representatives that prepares and publishes the U.S. Code and performs the very important role of keeping the code up-to-date.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, today, I will be voting for the transportation appropriations bill, and one of the reasons why is that it provides exactly the right amount of funding for California's high- speed rail, which is zero dollars. Zero dollars are appropriated for high-speed rail in this bill, and it is well past time that we stop throwing good money after bad. High-speed rail was an idea in the early 2000s in California that might have initially had some promise, but because of sheer political dysfunction, it has become perhaps the biggest boondoggle in United States history. The price tag is now pegged at $128 billion, and a decade and a half after it was approved, there is still absolutely nothing to show for it. When you look at the press releases that come out from the high- speed rail authority, it is almost beyond belief what now counts as success. This press release is from just 5 days ago: ``California High-Speed Rail Authority Moves Closer to Designing Tracks and Systems.'' This is a decade and a half after the project was conceived. According to The New York Times, at the current pace, the high-speed rail project will not be completed in this century. Last year, an investigation by The Times produced a story headlined: ``How California's Bullet Train Went Off the Rails.'' The Times explained that the tortured effort to build the country's first high- speed rail system is a case study in how ambitious public works projects can become perilously encumbered by unrealistic cost estimates, flawed engineering, and a determination to persist on projects that have become too big to fail. The Times reported how one of the early operators that actually knows how to build high-speed rail systems, SNCF, became so frustrated after their ideas and plans were repeatedly discarded that they pulled out in 2011 and decided to go to North Africa, where it was less politically dysfunctional. Indeed, they then helped Morocco bring a high-speed rail system online in 2018. All the while, the condition of California's roads continues to deteriorate and are among the very worst in the country. They are unsafe. They cause needless wear and tear on vehicles. They cause Californians to be stuck in traffic for hours on end. This is an area where my particular district has unique needs. The Third Congressional District is one of the few parts of California that is still growing. Cities like Roseville, Folsom, and Lincoln are growing as fast as anywhere. People want to come to our communities because of the high quality of life. We have eluded the downward spiral that has afflicted many other parts of California because we support small businesses, law enforcement, and public safety. We have local governments that are accountable to taxpayers. Precisely because of this success, many people want to move into our communities, and it is creating major challenges when it comes to traffic. Because of that, I have made it a top priority to look for every possible opportunity to stop spending Federal dollars on wasteful projects like the high-speed rail boondoggle and instead direct those funds to needed local road projects that will alleviate traffic for my constituents. I was very glad to participate earlier this year in the groundbreaking for the I-80 fifth lane project, which is going to improve travel times westbound on I-80 between Douglas Boulevard and Riverside Avenue. In the Transportation appropriations bill, which will be voted on by the House today, I have secured funding for three important projects in our district. The first is the U.S. 50/Empire Ranch Road Interchange Project, which would reduce traffic congestion and improve safety on adjacent interchanges, ultimately enhancing local and regional circulation and transportation infrastructure in Folsom and surrounding areas. The second is the Blue Oaks Boulevard Roadway and Bridge Widening Project, which is going to alleviate a critical transportation bottleneck. The third is the Folsom Lake Crossing safety improvement phase two project, which would enhance road safety on Folsom Lake Crossing by adding a median barrier rail to minimize head-on collisions, injuries, and fatalities. Mr. Speaker, this is the way that Federal funding should be directed toward infrastructure and projects that will improve the quality of life for our constituents. I am glad in the bill that we will vote on today that is the priority and that we will be sending zero dollars to the failed California high- speed rail.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Madam Speaker, earlier this year, I drafted a resolution condemning anti-Semitism on our college campuses. There had been a deeply disturbing rise in anti-Semitic incidents on campuses in California and across the country, and also a totally inadequate response by university faculty and administration who were unable or unwilling to condemn this activity, and sometimes it happened with their tacit or even outright support of individual faculty members. This has been a growing problem on university campuses. Just a few years ago, a task force of university faculty in California was tasked with preparing an ethnic studies curriculum for high schools. What they produced was a deeply anti-Semitic document that Gavin Newsom condemned saying that it was offensive in so many ways it would never see the light of day and that the California Legislative Jewish Caucus said echoed the propaganda of the Nazi regime. Nonetheless, in spite of all of this, nothing could have prepared us for what has happened in the aftermath of Hamas' terrorist attack on the State of Israel. Nothing could have prepared us for the failure of moral leadership where you have university faculty and administration-- which have been all too willing to wade into every political controversy of the day with clearly defined views--that have been unable to render the most straightforward of moral judgments, to condemn in clear language an assault and an attack on innocent men, women, children, and babies, an attack on Israel's very right to exist. Many student groups taking their cue have now targeted Jewish students, and Jewish students are feeling unsafe on our campuses. Larry Summers, who is the former president of Harvard and a high- ranking Obama official, said this on October 9: ``In nearly 50 years of Harvard affiliation, I have never been as disillusioned and alienated as I am today. ``The silence from Harvard's leadership, so far, coupled with a vocal and widely reported student groups' statement blaming Israel solely, has allowed Harvard to appear at best neutral towards acts of terror against the Jewish State of Israel. ``Instead, Harvard is being defined by the morally unconscionable statement apparently coming from two dozen student groups blaming all the violence on Israel. I am sickened.'' Today's resolution, which is joining mine with one offered by Representative Owens, is providing the moral leadership that many of our universities have failed to provide. It ``condemns the support of Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terrorist organizations at institutions of higher education which may lead to the creation of a hostile environment for Jewish students, faculty, and staff.'' It ``calls on campus administrators to condemn all forms of anti- Semitism on college campuses; and to ensure Jewish faculty, students, and guests can exercise the same free speech rights that are guaranteed to all other faculty, students, and guests without intimidation. . . . `' Madam Speaker, it is vitally important that this resolution pass and that it do so with strong bipartisan support.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, first, I extend my wishes and prayers to the family of Senator Feinstein. Dianne Feinstein dedicated her life to public service, and her passing is a profound loss for our State and country. I also congratulate Laphonza Butler on her appointment to the Senate by Governor Newsom, and I say that with all sincerity. I harbor no ill will in any form against Ms. Butler. She apparently wasn't even expecting this appointment and only learned about it when she got a call from the Governor, and she agreed to serve. She should be commended for that. I should say that there has been raised a question concerning whether she meets the requirements to hold this office and to represent California, given that apparently she is a registered voter in Maryland. I trust that the Senate, which is responsible for judging the qualifications of its Members, is taking that inquiry seriously. I will say, however, that we need to, at this point, kind of pause to reflect on the fact that if Ms. Butler is sworn in, which I believe she is supposed to be sworn in today, California will now have two Senators who gained their office not by the authority of voters but, rather, by the whim of a single individual, Governor Gavin Newsom. We will have two Senators who gained their office via appointment. We also, by the way, have a Senator from New Jersey whose own conference is calling on him to resign, which could create another appointed Senator in the United States Senate. This is very much contrary to the spirit of the 17th Amendment, which calls for the direct election of Senators. When this amendment was adopted, it was put in place, according to one scholarly article, to replace a distrusted aristocratic regime of appointed Senators with one of popular enfranchisement. Indeed, since the 17th Amendment, which provided for the direct election of Senators but allowed that governors could appoint Senators still to fill vacancies, these appointments have been subject to all manner of abuses. You have had instances of nepotism. Governors have appointed their children. They have appointed their spouses. Some have even appointed themselves to the U.S. Senate. Indeed, the appointment that Governor Newsom has just made demonstrates the risks that are inherent in an appointment system. As one headline in today's San Francisco Chronicle reads: ``Newsom's handling of Feinstein's replacement was a highlight reel of his political flaws.'' The writer says that he twisted himself into rhetorical pretzels over the last 2 years because he looked at this appointment through the lens of what is going to help his Presidential aspirations as opposed to what is going to be best for the State of California. As long as 2 years ago, Governor Newsom made statements about who he might appoint in the event of a vacancy. Then just a few weeks ago, he said he was going to appoint an interim Senator. Then a couple days ago, he walked back that statement and said, no, the person would be free to run for reelection. This is just not the sort of dynamic that ought to influence who is going to hold a position as important as being the United States Senator from California. I should also add that it is quite unfair to the candidates who have been running to hold this position in 2024, three of whom currently serve in the House, who have been very actively campaigning and now face the prospect of running against an incumbent who didn't actually have to get to that office and face voters in order to get there. For this House, the House of Representatives, every single person who walks onto the floor of this House is there by the authority of voters, is there having been elected. There is no reason why it shouldn't be the same in the United States Senate. I have introduced H. Res. 57. This is a constitutional amendment that will simply say that in order to be a United States Senator, just as to be a United States Representative, you have to get there by an election of the people. If this really is a government of, by, and for the people, as Lincoln put it, then we should make sure that those who are here at this Capitol making important decisions on behalf of the people are there because the people chose them to be so.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I am taking a moment to recognize a cheerful, spirited, and vibrant community member residing in my district, Ms. Lisa Eck, for her 40 years of public service at the downtown Roseville library. Ms. Eck embarked on her journey as a young teen, starting at the library as a quotidian shelver in 1983. In her tenure, she has become one of the most beloved librarians in our region. She is well known for her ability to captivate the magic of childhood through her lively readings. Dressing in full costume and performing books theatrically are just some of the ways that she captures the attention and adoration of Roseville children and residents. Ms. Eck's determination and dedication to bringing these stories to life knows no bounds, and her unique approach makes her storytime sessions a cherished tradition. Her special touch reaches all generations, as she has marked the lives of tens of thousands of people over the years. Ms. Eck has an unfaltering commitment to promoting literacy and educational opportunities for our local youth, and her efforts have made an indelible impact in our communities. As a former English teacher, I understand the importance of developing a love for reading in students and value the efforts of those like Ms. Eck to foster that passion through her creative and innovative storytelling abilities. Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I am pleased to join the Roseville community in celebrating and recognizing Ms. Lisa Eck for her four decades of leadership as a librarian and her continued commitment to inspiring children and adults alike with a desire for knowledge and learning. Celebrating Virginia Lakes Resort 100th Anniversary

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I am taking a moment to recognize the centennial anniversary of a special business in my district, the Virginia Lakes Resort in the heart of the High Sierra, located in Mono County, California. In 1923, Walter Foster and Charles Foster signed an agreement with the Forestry Department to build a fish camp at Virginia Lakes. After the first year of operation, Walter Foster and his wife, Anita, became the sole owners and operated the business for 30 years. They quickly found success, as within the first 5 years of the business they built several cabins that housed guests such as Hollywood stars Fred MacMurray, Betty White, and Lon Cheney. They are also known for hosting the 1938 USC football team for training before the team went on to win a national championship. The resort had a few different owners, such as the Coopers and Bill Newman, before the current owners, John and Carolyn Webb, began their journey in 1974. The Webbs will celebrate their 50-year anniversary as owners next year and are well known by others for their commitment to community engagement and dedication to providing an exceptional experience for their visitors. Today, the Virginia Lakes Resort offers key amenities such as rental cabins, boat rentals, tackle shop, and a cafe. Visitors enjoy the stunning scenery of the Sierra Nevadas while participating in a variety of recreational activities at the resort, such as camping, fishing, and hiking. Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I am honored to recognize the Virginia Lakes Resort for their 100-year anniversary and commend them for their significant contributions throughout the years to their community and the local economy. Thanking Jaime Robles

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, I recognize an exemplary individual who interned in my district office this summer. Jaime Robles ensured that people's voices were heard, by taking down their concerns and sharing them with me. He even helped people renew their passport and access the services and benefits they are entitled to receive from the Federal Government. Jaime is a recent graduate of Sierra College in Rocklin and will be attending UC Berkeley in the spring to major in economics. He served as vice president and student senator of the Sierra College Student Senate, vice president of student engagement for the social science club, and is a Phi Theta Kappa honor society member. Jaime is also bilingual, and I have repeatedly been impressed with his ability to utilize that skill and serve our Spanish-speaking constituents. Mr. Speaker, Jaime has been a pleasure to have in my office and, like all our interns, has been a tremendous help to me and my team in serving the people of the Third Congressional District of California. I am incredibly grateful that he chose to invest his time and talents with us. On behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I thank Jaime for his commitment to public service.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Education and the Workforce Committee hosted a roundtable with Eva Moskowitz, the founder of Success Academy Charter Schools, which was first opened in 2006 and now has 47 schools. The network of schools is known for setting high expectations of academic excellence and achieving exemplary results. Black and Hispanic students, which make up most of Success Academy's students, achieve proficiency rates double to triple what their New York City district peers do. As AEI senior fellow Robert Pondiscio put it: If Success Academy were a stand-alone school district, it would be by far the highest performing one in the State of New York, including places like Scarsdale, and Jericho on Long Island with multimillion dollar homes. This is an example of why charter schools have been such an important innovation in American education and are a vital part of the landscape for school choice and why they are widely supported by the public. In 2022, the Harris Poll found in a national survey that 81 percent of parents support expanding the number of slots at existing public charter schools in their area and 78 percent want more public charter schools in their area. In California's Third District, we have many tremendous schools, both district schools and charter schools. Some of the popular charters include John Adams Academy, Placer County Pathways Charter, Newcastle Elementary Charter, Vantage Point Charter, and Plumas Charter. As a former high school teacher and a member of the Education and Workforce Committee, I am truly inspired by schools like Success Academy and will work to support charter schools and to scale up successful models throughout our public education system. Suspend the State Gas Tax

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, a local business in my district, Snooks Candies and Chocolate Factory, is celebrating their 60-year anniversary on Friday. Founded by John Snook in 1963, John and his wife, Jeannine, started their business at the Arden Fair Food Circus. The family opened up a store in Tahoe City in 1981 and later moved to historic Folsom in 1985, where the store remains today. Each one of John and Jeannine's 6 kids and some of their 11 grandchildren and 13 great-grandchildren have spent time working in Snooks. To witness the bond of family in the business community and the successful operation of a thriving small business is truly inspiring. After retiring and entrusting the store to his son, Jim, and Jim's wife, Renee, in 1999, John continued to be a consistent presence in the store, talking to customers and helping with work when needed. Sadly, John Snook passed away earlier this year, but his legacy as a husband, father, and successful businessman continues to live on. Over the span of six decades, Snooks Candies has faced many challenges, from nationwide recessions to the recent COVID-19 pandemic. However, these challenges have only reinforced the status of Snooks Candies as a true pillar in Folsom and the surrounding communities. I applaud the commitment to their business and to producing iconic candies and treats for all to enjoy. Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I am proud to join Folsom and our surrounding communities in congratulating Snooks Candies and Chocolate Factory for reaching this momentous milestone. Folsom Community Service Day

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, today I recognize the 10-year anniversary of Folsom Community Service Day, an event which will be held this year on Saturday, September 16. Organized by the city of Folsom and partner organizations, Community Service Day mobilizes hundreds of volunteers to complete projects across the city to improve public resources and benefit the community. In its tenure, the Folsom Community Service Day event has made a considerable and positive impact on the area. Since its inception, over 19,000 volunteers have participated. More than 900 projects have been completed, and 500 of them have been performed to serve senior citizens. There have been 537,000 pounds of food donated by the Twin Lakes Food Bank, and thousands of care packages to Active Duty military members have been sent. In addition, thousands of donated items have been collected for local nonprofits. Their efforts have truly made a remarkable and lasting impact. To witness the hard work of this community over the span of a decade to deliver necessary change, improve neighborhoods, and help those in need is truly inspiring. Therefore, on behalf of the United States House of Representatives, I am proud to recognize the city of Folsom and countless volunteers and partner organizations for providing 10 years of invaluable service and contributions to their communities. Success Academy

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, today, I am calling on the California Legislature to suspend the State gas tax, as other States--including just recently Georgia--have done to provide consumers with relief from soaring prices. The legislature can provide a modest measure of relief by passing Assembly Bill 53 by Assemblyman Vince Fong, which would immediately suspend the State's gas tax and lower prices by 58 cents per gallon. The bill would also assure that no funding is lost for road projects throughout the State. At a time when Californians continue to struggle with the effects of inflation, this relief would make life a little easier for millions of people. It is a commonsense proposal that merits bipartisan support, and I urge the legislature to act on it immediately.

Mr. KILEY

Mr. KILEY. Mr. Speaker, today I am urging support for the Preserving Choice in Vehicle Purchases Act, which will prevent California from banning gas-powered vehicles. I am as strong a supporter as anyone of clean energy, and I could not be more excited about the future of clean energy that awaits us, but the way to move rapidly towards that future is through innovation. It is not through regulation. No State has gone further down the road of overreaching, overbearing, inattentive regulation to the needs of its citizens than California has. This particular measure that California is now attempting is more radical than any that came before it. Specifically, the California Air Resources Board approved a plan in August and is now asking the Environmental Protection Agency to approve a waiver under the Clean Air Act to implement its new rules that set yearly rising zero-emission vehicle rules starting in 2026 and would end the sale of vehicles only powered by gasoline by 2035. This is no trivial matter. The majority of vehicles on the road today in the United States, 95 percent, run on internal combustion engines. What is the consequence of this going to be? First and foremost, there is the cost. The price of an electric vehicle is $17,000 higher than a gas-powered car. This is going to make life even harder for people in California where we already have the highest energy prices, the highest gas prices, the highest cost of living, the highest poverty rate, and far too many people having to leave our State because it is simply too hard to get by. Make our State more affordable. This bill will save Californians from this burden and help many of my constituents.