Jim Langevin

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. I could not agree more.

Mr. LANGEVIN. I yield to the gentleman from California.

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Senate Appropriations Committee passed the defense appropriations bill containing $35 billion in funding to enhance our Nation's efforts to combat terrorism. Last week, the House missed an opportunity to do the same. The ranking member of the Committee on Appropriations had proposed an amendment to the defense appropriations act to add $7.2 billion for homeland security. Unfortunately, the rule failed to protect this amendment from a point of order, and the House was prevented from voting on one of the most important issues facing Americans today. Considering the Bush administration issued a third terror alert on Monday, it is imperative that Congress act now to provide greater security for the American people. Since September 11, States and cities have been forced to dig deep into their coffers to pay for unexpected emergency programs. I have met with Rhode Island officials to learn how they have responded to this crisis and to gauge their need for additional counterterrorism and security improvements. In the 6 weeks following the terrorist attacks, my State spent $18 million on homeland security and needs $56 million more to upgrade emergency response in public health systems. State and local governments have done an exceptional job at pinpointing and prioritizing areas in need of improvement to ensure the safety of their citizens, and Congress must act now to provide them with the resources that they require. Rhode Island's leaders recognize that law enforcement and emergency responders represent the first line of defense in the domestic fight against terrorism. As a result, they hope to invest $5.8 million for improvements in coordinated emergency response efforts. Through new equipment and training for hazmat teams, the State will be better prepared to deal with the threat of weapons of mass destruction. Also, the anthrax attacks highlight the need for a strong public health infrastructure. Rhode Island has proposed a $48 million plan to enhance medical surveillance, research, and investigation. Our health officials must be prepared to identify a biological attack in its early stages, respond swiftly to the threat, and prevent further contamination. As an original cosponsor of the Bioterrorism Prevention Act of 2001, which would provide $7 billion to improve our national public health infrastructure, I applaud the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey) for proposing funding to address the threat of bioterrorism in our communities. One particularly important provision included in the Obey amendment was a budget increase for the Coast Guard, which has now taken on new responsibilities since September 11. Daily life of Rhode Island is intricately tied to the ocean and Narragansett Bay. Commercial fishing netted $79 million for the State's economy in 1999, and recreational boating is a popular pastime among our residents. The Coast Guard's dependable presence and its work to keep our seaways safe have made them well respected among our boaters and our residents. However, the Coast Guard has been plagued by dwindling budgets in recent years, preventing personnel increases and equipment improvements. As a result, of the 41 nations with coastal patrols, the U.S. Coast Guard now has the 39th oldest fleet. Nonetheless, the Federal Government expects the Coast Guard to patrol the Nation's 361 ports and increase inspections of foreign vessels, and 121 Rhode Island reservists have been called to this mission. Commandant Admiral James Loy has pleaded with Congress for years to raise funding levels for the Coast Guard, but we have again taken the wind out of their sails. Moreover, the Obey amendment would have provided critical funding to strengthen our border patrol. Each day, 1.25 million people, 500,000 vehicles, and 50,000 containers cross our borders; yet far too few vehicles, containers, packages, and other possessions are properly checked. We must provide the Border Patrol with the resources needed to detect and prevent terrorism at our borders. Although the House was not able to address these and many other concerns by voting on the Obey amendment, I strongly encourage my colleagues to continue pushing for increased homeland security funding so that we may provide Americans the protection and peace of mind that they demand and that they deserve.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, today I wish to congratulate my colleagues, especially the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young) and the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar), on reaching an aviation security agreement that will provide unprecedented protection to our Nation's passengers and airways. As we enter the holiday season, it is essential that the flying public feel confident about air travel, and today's agreement will restore full faith in flying. Aviation security is of particular concern in Rhode Island, where our State airport is located in a populated urban area. We must safeguard this facility and all of our Nation's airports from potential threats, not only for the benefit of passengers and workers, but also to allay the fears of people in neighboring homes and businesses. H.R. 3150's provision requiring all checked baggage to be screened by explosive-detection devices is an important step to enhance security and guarantee peace of mind to the traveling public. H.R. 3150 will also provide a well-timed and much needed boost to the travel and tourism sector, which is the second largest industry in the State of Rhode Island. I have heard the concerns of airline employees and passengers, hotel workers, rental car companies, travel agents, and restaurant owners. We all agree that Congress must restore confidence in air travel in order to boost our nation's flagging economy. Finally, this legislation includes a provision to federalize airport security, which is one of the most important commitments we can make to air travelers. Countless constituents have contacted me in support of a federal aviation screening force, and I am pleased that H.R. 3150 reflects the will of the American people. Today's bipartisan legislation is an example of good government at work, and I urge my colleagues to vote for final passage.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak out against the Taliban's treatment of women and in support of H. RES. 281. There are no adequate words to describe the atrocities committed by the Taliban against women since 1996. The Taliban has denied women the right to work or go to school, to laugh, or to speak above a whisper. Women cannot see physicians who aren't female and they can't practice medicine, which effectively denies women the right to healthcare. Women can't wear shoes that click when they walk or wear white socks. And they can't leave their homes without a male relative, even to go to the market to buy food for their starving children. Worse when women disobey these outrageous edicts they are often brutally and publicly beaten, flogged, stoned or even murdered. But we do a disservice to the public and to ourselves if we view the treatment of women in Afghanistan as strictly a women's rights issue or a human rights issue. Women's participation in Afghan society is essential to its economic health. When the Taliban forbade women from working outside the home, Afghanistan lost 74% of its schoolteachers, 60% of its university professors, the vast majority of its nurses, 40% of its doctors, half of its university students, and 30% of its government workers. So, it is no surprise that the Afghan economy collapsed as soon as the Taliban took control. As in every country in the world, Afghanistan's very stability depends on the labor and skills of women. The Afghan culture fomented terrorism because Afghanistan has no economic power--its people are poor and desperate and angry. And tragically, some are channeling that anger at the West. Killing Bid Laden and his Al Quaeda associates may stem the next round of terror, but it will not result in a sustainable peace. Peace is only possible in Afghanistan if its economy, infrastructure and government recover and become strong enough to provide for its people. And women are not peripheral to that recovery effort--they are central. The Taliban understood that in order to impose a totalitarian regime on Afghanistan, they first had to remove the women. It is imperative that we understand that in order to eliminate that totalitarian regime, we have to restore to women their rightful, and indispensable role in society. I urge my colleagues to join me in categorically condemning the Taliban's treatment of women, and affirming the importance of women to the reconstruction of Afghanistan by passing H. Res. 281.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, the time has come to address the devastating impact the terrorist attacks have had on our travel and tourism industry, which is vital to America and to Rhode Island. Last year, this industry attracted over 15 million visitors and generated over $3.2 billion in Rhode Island and nearly $600 billion nationwide. It employs 61,000 Rhode Islanders and more than 19 million people across the country. The Travel America Now Act, sponsored by my colleague, the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Shadegg), encourages Americans to resume travel and provides targeted tax relief to businesses and consumers. We reacted quickly to help the airlines. Now Congress must do the same for the millions of businesses and people who are indirectly affected by the attacks and are in equal need of assistance. Not only will this bill strengthen the travel and tourism industry but also the American spirit.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise to express my support for enacting a fair and reasonable economic stimulus package, and to voice my strong opposition to H.R. 3090, the Economic Stimulus and Recovery Act. For the economy to get back on track, it needs insurance against a severe recession in the short run and insurance against escalating deficits and debts in the long run. A stimulus package consisting of temporary tax relief and temporary increases in government spending can provide both. With the exception of the household tax rebate aimed at lower- and moderate-income workers, this stimulus package does little to help those that need it most. The majority of the tax provisions contained in this package are permanent, including a cut in the capital gains tax, a retroactive repeal of the corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and an extension of benefits for multinational insurance and finance corporations. These permanent changes will not stimulate the economy in the short run and instead will put the Social Security and Medicare trust funds at risk in the long-term. Additionally, the acceleration of recently-enacted tax cuts would only benefit the top 25 percent of all income tax filers, who are likely to save more and spend less of these tax cuts than those with lower incomes. A more effective stimulus package would combine the household rebate aimed at lower- and moderate-income workers with a temporary incentive for business investment. Congress has historically responded to severe economic downturns by providing additional weeks of extended unemplovment benefits for workers. In fact, during the 1990-1991 recession, Congress extended unemployment insurance (Ul) benefits nationally on four separate occasions. H.R. 3090 blatantly disregards these past precedents by simply giving states a mere $9 billion worth of block grants that may or may not be used to extend or increase unemployment benefits for laid-off workers. This measure also falls to provide laid-off workers with adequate health care coverage. The average monthly COBRA premium is unaffordable for most displaced workers, who are barely making ends meet with their monthly Ul benefits. Although H.R. 3090 would (give states $3 billion in health care block grant funds, thousands of workers who have lost their jobs since September 11th would still remain uncovered. Equally important to these short-term stimulus policies is insurance against escalating debt. We need a multiyear budget plan that covers the real costs of both the war on terrorism and the country's commitments to current and future retirees. Unfortunately, if this measure is adopted, its permanent toll on government revenues will require even more painful trade-offs among the nation's priorities in the future. Even before the terrorist attacks, the enormous tax cuts scheduled over the next decade had dealt a severe blow to the nation's long-term fiscal outlook. According to both the Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office, during the next decade, the federal surplus will be limited to funds earmarked for Social Security and Medicare. The Administration's tax cuts for the most affluent households have already wiped out the remaining on-budget surplus. We must ensure these surpluses are replenished so that we can honor our future obligations. We must also provide every dollar needed to win the war against terrorism and to ensure the security of Americans wherever they may be. But in addressing these new and urgent priorities, we should remember the challenges that we faced even before the tragic attacks. Without compromising our vital commitments, we need to ensure that any policy changes address these new short-term challenges without worsening our continued long-term concerns. For these reasons, I support the balanced, fiscally responsible Democratic substitute that deals with our immediate economic concerns without damaging the nation's fiscal health. It provides immediate relief to displaced workers while stimulating the economy with temporary business and individual tax cuts. Unlike H.R. 3090, the substitute promotes long-term economic stability and national security by making targeted investments in our nation's infrastructure. Finally, the substitute pays for itself by delaying the top income tax rate cut approved earlier this year, which benefits only our nation's wealthiest individuals. I urge my colleagues to support the Democratic substitute and to reject this reckless and misguided economic stimulus package, which will further jeopardize our future fiscal security, while offering little assistance to those most vulnerable in the current economic climate.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, today I am joined by 43 of my colleagues in introducing the ``Accidental Shooting Prevention Act'' to address the large number of firearm injuries and deaths that occur when users mistakenly fire guns they believe are not loaded. This sensible bipartisan legislation would require that all semiautomatic firearms manufactured after January 1, 2005, which have removable magazines, be equipped with plainly visible chamber load indicators and magazine disconnect mechanisms. As with many other consumer products, firearm design can reduce the risk of injury. But unlike other products, gun design decisions have been largely left to manufacturers. Fortunately, firearms manufacturers have already produced many guns with safety devices, such as chamber load indicators and magazine disconnect mechanisms, which can help reduce the risk of accidental injuries. A chamber load indicator indicates that the gun's firing chamber is loaded with ammunition, but to be effective, a user must be aware of the indicator. Generally, chamber load indicators display the presence of ammunition via a small protrusion somewhere on the handgun. Unfortunately, most chamber load indicators do not clearly indicate their existence to untrained users or observers. We must ensure these indicators are easily visible to all gun users, and my legislation will do just that. By comparison, a magazine disconnect mechanism is an interlocking device which prevents a firearm from being fired when its ammunition magazine is removed, even if there is a round in the chamber. Interlocks are found on a wide variety of consumer products to reduce injury risks. For example, most new cars have an interlocking device that prevents the automatic transmission shifter from being moved from the ``park'' position unless the brake pedal is depressed. It is common sense that a product as dangerous as a gun should contain a similar safety mechanism. This is an issue of great importance to me. At the age of sixteen, I was left paralyzed when a police officer's gun accidentally discharged and severed my spine. Had the gun involved in my accident been equipped with a chamber load indicator, the officer would have known that the weapon was loaded. Clearly, mistakes can happen even when guns are in the hands of highly-trained weapons experts, which is why safety devices are so critical. I urge my colleagues to join me and the 43 original co-sponsors of this bill in reducing the risk of unintentional shootings. Please co- sponsor this responsible measure, and help make guns safer for consumer use while protecting those unfamiliar with the operation of guns.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding me time. Mr. Chairman, today I wish to thank my colleagues for addressing the important issue of airline security, and I urge passage of legislation that will provide the strongest safeguards to those who fly our Nation's airways. Because tourism is Rhode Island's second largest industry, my constituents have been particularly affected by the slow-down in air travel since September 11. I have heard the concerns of airline employees and passengers, hotel workers, rental car companies, travel agents and restaurant owners; and we can all agree that Congress must restore confidence in air travel in order to boost our Nation's flagging economy. Three weeks ago the Senate, both Republicans and Democrats joining in a bipartisan spirit, unanimously passed an airline security bill, the bill offered today as a substitute to H.R. 3150. The House and Senate bills have many points in common and both recognize the need to improve the structural security of our planes, place Federal air marshals on flights, and provide airports with the best technology. Mr. Chairman, I urge passage of the substitute offered today by the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar).

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to Douglas Pierson, principal of North Kingstown's Hamilton Elementary School who was recently named a National Distinguished Principal by the U.S. Department of Education and the National Association of Elementary School Principals. Mr. Pierson was selected for this honor for his outstanding leadership, and inter-personal and management skills. Throughout his tenure at Hamilton Elementary, Mr. Pierson has created a trusting environment where students, teachers, staff, and parents are encouraged to reflect, learn from their mistakes, and be thoughtful and creative about every aspect of their educational experience. While Federal officials are just beginning to fully recognize the value of continuous learning for teachers and staff, Mr. Pierson has been encouraging it among his faculty for years. By modeling teaching strategies and disseminating research on innovative education practices, Mr. Pierson has improved instruction for each and every student at Hamilton. It was Mr. Pierson's leadership that led Hamilton Elementary to conduct a study of its effectiveness, and it is his guidance that allows time for each teacher to consider his or her instructional methods in light of the study's conclusions. In addition to being an outstanding administrator, Mr. Pierson is an extraordinary teacher. From playing the ukulele to demonstrating mime to first-graders to dressing up as ``Zero the Hero,'' complete with tights, a cape and hood, Mr. Pierson shows that he values students above all else. Mr. Pierson was selected for this honor from among nominees of schools all over the State. U.S. Education Secretary Rod Paige will recognize him at a ceremony here in Washington on October 19. I am very much looking forward to welcoming Mr. Pierson to our Nation's Capitol and congratulating him on this impressive honor in person. Mr. Speaker, we all know the immense challenges associated with true leadership. True leadership inspires people to be their best, to collaborate, and to work together toward long-term and often intangible goals. Mr. Douglas Pierson consistently displays true leadership, and, on behalf of the Second Congressional District of Rhode Island, I would like to extend a heartfelt thank you for his efforts.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding to me. I, too, would like to join with my colleagues, and many other colleagues, in calling for greater security at our airlines. September 11 was a tragic day in this Nation's history. Let us take a strong lesson that we need to join together and focus attention on the problem of airline security to reinstill confidence in our travelers, in the knowledge that when they board an aircraft they do so in safety, and that they will arrive safely to their destination. Mr. Speaker, there are a number of things that we can do to improve airline security, the most important of which, I think, as a first step, is that we federalize airline screeners. We want people there who are totally focused on ensuring the utmost safety for those who are entering the airports and who are entering our airlines, who will be boarding our planes. We want people there that are motivated not by a company that is only motivated by profits, but are there, again, totally focused on security. Federalizing those employees is the best way to get us there. Mr. Speaker, as my colleagues stated, we have dealt with a number of bills since September 11. We need now to take up this issue in legislation in improving our airline security.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, 1 month ago a grave injustice was perpetrated on the American people. We were deeply saddened by the loss of several thousand brave Americans who will be missed terribly by their friends and families. In a community as close-knit as Rhode Island, our stinging loss was even more personal. I would like to take this opportunity to remember seven men and women from our great State who we lost in this tragedy. David Angell was a native of Rhode Island who rose to prominence in the television industry and was the executive producer of the popular show ``Frazier,'' a wonderful tribute to his talent and hard work. He was traveling with his wife, Lynn, back to California after vacationing in New England with his brother, Kenneth A. Angell, former auxiliary bishop for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Providence. Carol Bouchard lived in my hometown of Warwick, and worked as an emergency services secretary at Kent County Memorial Hospital. I spoke to her husband of 2 years, who wants everyone to know what a wonderful woman Carol was. She was traveling with her friend, Renee Newell from the City of Cranston, who was a customer service agent for American Airlines. Renee's husband of 10 years, Paul, would like people to know that she was not only a dedicated wife and mother, but also a proud airline employee. These two friends were combining a business trip for Renee with a brief vacation in Las Vegas. Michael Gould was an employee of Cantor Fitzgerald on the 104th floor of the World Trade Center. He grew up in Newport, Rhode Island, where his mother still resides. After graduating from Villanova University in 1994, he went to work in the financial sector, first in New York and then in San Francisco. Michael had just returned to New York in June. Amy Jarret, of North Smithfield, worked as a dedicated flight attendant for United Airlines. She began working there after she graduated from Villanova University. She was aboard the Boston to Los Angeles Flight 175. Sean Nassaney of Pawtucket, Rhode Island, was 25 years old and already a sales manager for American Power Conversion. He graduated cum laude from Bryant College in 1998, spent a year in Australia, and then enrolled in the MBA program at Providence College. Sean and his girlfriend, Lynn Goodchild, were on United Flight 175 en route to Hawaii. Mr. Speaker, these men and women are only a few of the victims of the tragedy that struck America 1 month ago. They will be sadly missed. Today, I want to honor and remember and celebrate their lives. As our Nation copes with the events of September 11, we should take comfort in the knowledge that the American principles of freedom and tolerance, democracy, will not be overcome by terrorism. I offer my sincere condolences and support to the family and friends of David and Lynn Angell, Carol Bouchard, Sean Nassaney, Amy Jarret, Renee Newell, and Michael Gould, and to all of those who have lost loved ones in the tragedy of September 11. We remain confident, though, that together we will persevere.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this rule and in opposition to the clandestine way in which what was once a strong bipartisan package was changed and rushed to the floor with no consultation with this side of the aisle. While I understand the difficult task of crafting legislation while the nation is still recovering from and investigating the terrorist attacks of September 11th, I am disappointed with the extremely limited choice placed before me. I want to provide our law enforcement with the tools they need to stop terrorism. I want to support this bill, but few of us even know what is in it since the Judiciary Committee never considered it. In the aftermath of the attacks, we must strengthen our ability to find and punish those connected with these tragic events, and enhance our preparedness to prevent similar tragedies in the future. However, we must meet the critical counter-terrorism need of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies without compromising the civil liberties of our citizens in the process. I have strong concerns about the bill we are considering today because I cannot be guaranteed it strikes this crucial balance. I urge my colleagues to vote against the rule so we all can be assured this goal is met by bringing the original measure which was unanimously approved the Judiciary Committee, to the floor instead.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I wish to extend to the people of Taiwan my congratulations on the occasion of National Day. Today's event reminds us of the strong ties and shared principles between the United States and the people of Taiwan. Today, the people in Taiwan continue to enjoy high standards of living. Under the leadership of President Chen Shui-Bian, Taiwan has demonstrated great economic resilience and has made gestures to improve dialogue with the mainland. Additionally, Taiwan's relationship with the United States is becoming increasingly strong. Bilateral trade between Taiwan and the United States topped $64.8 billion last year, and Taiwan is the United States' eighth largest trading partner. Last year, nearly 30,000 students from Taiwan were enrolled in United States colleges and universities. Additionally, the United States, outside of Asia, is the number one destination for Taiwan travelers. Clearly, Taiwan and the United States share many values in common such as attachment to freedom, democracy and human rights. I also wish to thank President Chen for his strong words of support after the terrorist attacks of September 11. The people of Taiwan recognize the importance of solidarity in times of difficulty, as they recently coped with the devastating effects of two typhoons, and I thank them for their offer to assist in international efforts to eliminate worldwide terrorism. On this day of celebration for the people of Taiwan, I offer them my best regards and gratitude for their support and friendship.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, today I had planned to offer an amendment to strengthen teacher quality. However, I withdraw this amendment out of respect for the hard work of Chairman Young, Chairman Regula, and Ranking Member Obey in crafting a strong, bipartisan bill. Mr. Speaker, before I withdraw my amendment, I want to address the importance of training not only our teachers, but our substitutes as well. Substitute teachers are critical to our children's education, yet less than 15 percent of them participate in any type of professional development. On average, students will spend the equivalent of 1 full year with a substitute teacher before high school graduation. America's substitutes have become an integral part of our teacher workforce, yet in all but 1 State, substitutes need no teaching certification, and in 28 States principals may hire anyone with a high school diploma or a GED who is over 17. In addition, over half of the school districts in this country do not require face-to-face interviews or reference checks for potential substitutes, and almost one-third of districts do not conduct background checks. Moreover, many substitutes want to become full-time teachers. But without training, few pursue this ambition. Most substitutes cite a lack of discipline among students as one of the most significant reasons they leave the profession. It is no surprise that they are unable to maintain discipline when they have not been trained in basic classroom management. With skills and content training, substitutes would be more inclined to stay and to take on full-time teaching responsibilities. In the spring, I conducted a survey of all the public schools in my congressional district. Among the many issues revealed, these surveys illuminated the great shortage of qualified substitutes and the desire for more professional development programs for teachers and principals in Rhode Island. These problems are not unique to Rhode Island. They exist nationwide and are likely to be exacerbated in the coming decade as growing levels of teacher attrition and retirement and increased school enrollment combine to create a massive teacher shortage. Indeed, the National Center for Education Statistics estimates that we will need 2.4 million additional teachers over the next 11 years. Encouraging States and local educational agencies to include substitute training in a comprehensive teacher quality program will improve the work of substitutes, the ability of teachers to attend professional development programs, and ultimately will improve education for our children. I urge my colleagues to work with me to find innovative ways to help our substitutes as well as our full-time teachers be better prepared for our classrooms and better teachers for our children. Mr. Speaker, I respectfully withdraw my amendment.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay tribute to David Neves, a Scituate music teacher who was recently named Rhode Island's Teacher of the Year. Mr. Neves has been a member of the Scituate High School music department for 25 years and has devoted his career to instilling a love and appreciation for music in all of his students. Throughout his tenure at Scituate, Mr. Neves has directed the band program and served as the conductor for the symphonic band, jazz ensemble and orchestra. Any one of these projects consumes an extraordinary amount of time, yet Mr. Neves has undertaken all four with tireless enthusiasm. In addition to providing basic music instruction, Mr. Neves has led his students on trips to Montreal, Toronto, Orlando, and Washington, DC, and even allowed them to produce top-quality recordings in professional studios. Through his efforts, the students in Scituate's music program have experienced life beyond their community, and they will relish and draw on those experiences for years to come. Mr. Neves was selected for this honor from among nominees of schools all over the state. He will now compete for National Teacher of the Year and will be recognized at a Presidential ceremony here in Washington in the spring. I am very much looking forward to welcoming Mr. Neves to our nation's capitol and congratulating him on this impressive honor in person. I think we all know the impact one exceptional teacher can have on his students. One teacher can change the course of a child's life by inspiring confidence, promoting excellence, and opening his students' eyes to possibility. Mr. Neves is truly an outstanding asset to his profession and community, and for that, I am grateful. I know the entire second district of Rhode Island joins me in extending hearty congratulations on his wonderful achievement.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding me time. Mr. Chairman, I am proud to join my good friend, the gentleman from Illinois, (Mr. Evans) who spoke just briefly a few minutes ago in addressing the important issue of stem cell research. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Evans) and I are deeply committed to pursuing ways to reevaluate the August 9 cutoff date of the number of stem cell lines that can be used for four simple reasons. First, research is needed. Nearly one-half of the American population could benefit from stem cell research. Two, in vitro fertilization. There are 400 in vitro fertilization clinics throughout the country helping hundreds of thousands of couples per year experience the joy of childbirth through in vitro fertilization. This process necessarily creates more embryos that can be used, so to relegate these potentially lifesaving cells to the trash heap instead of NIH laboratories after the arbitrary deadline of August 9 is inconsistent and unfair to 135 million Americans. Third, current stem cell supply. Since August 9 we have learned that the 64 cell lines identified by NIH are not all robust and may not be safe because many researchers have mixed human cells with mouse. Finally, fourth, government oversight. Irrespective of the President's guidelines, the private sector in the United States, as well as the public and private sectors abroad, will continue to conduct research on stem cells that fall outside the parameters established by the Bush administration. We cannot let America fall behind in this research, and cannot deny our citizens the cures and treatments that may result from research conducted on cells derived after August 9. We must provide strong oversight to ensure that research is conducted by ethical means that do not force us to wrestle with similar moral questions in the near future. Mr. Chairman, I thank the President for taking the first step, but I respectfully implore my colleagues to take the next. I look forward to working with Members in this endeavor.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, on September 11 our world changed forever. The United States suffered an attack unlike any the modern world has ever known. Thousands have been lost and will be forever missed by their friends and families. As we mourn this loss, we must find ways to strengthen our national homeland defense and to prevent terrorism both here and abroad. Critical to meeting this goal will be the brave and dedicated members of our Armed Forces. I rise today to pay my respects to these brave men and women, in particular, the dedicated members of the 143rd Airlift Wing of the National Guard who will be deployed today. The National Guard has tirelessly served our great Nation since the organization of its first units in 1636 in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The Guard fought in Korea, Vietnam, and the Gulf War. During the 1990s, the Guard's role dramatically increased to a total force partner at home and throughout the world. Today, we are relying on the Guard in our airports and communities throughout the country to guard us from a recurrence of what was unthinkable just a short time ago. Mr. Speaker, we have entered into an era in which homeland defense is a crucial concern for which we rely heavily on our National Guard. These remarkable people stand out among ordinary Americans because they have chosen to give of themselves and help defend our country in times of need. Many of our National Guard units are being called up and asked to leave their families, jobs and lives behind in order to serve and protect this Nation. From conducting intelligence work to being deployed to high risk regions of the world, these brave men and women will be critical to ensuring our safety here at home. Mr. Speaker, I am so proud of the 44 members of the 143rd Security Forces Squadron from the Rhode Island Air National Guard who were called up to active duty. They possess a fierce spirit which burns most brightly when it is given direction and purpose, and this is the time, more than ever, to utilize that spirit. While I take strength in their immense abilities and know that they will help ensure America's safety, I look forward to welcoming them all home to Rhode Island very soon.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise to urge quick action to address a crisis in our country. The number of workers displaced from the airlines and related industries since the devastating terrorist attacks of September 11 have been steadily growing and now stretches beyond 100,000. Our air infrastructure is, in many ways, the backbone of our economy; and its strength is essential to the economic health of the United States. The September 11 tragedy and subsequent shutdown of the airways had a severe financial impact on carriers and led to massive layoffs. In response, this House passed, with my support, a $15 billion package of cash assistance and loan guarantees to help the airlines weather this recent storm. It continues to be my strong hope that by promoting the continued viability of air travel this aid will also help other businesses relying upon the airline industry, businesses like aircraft manufacturers, travel agents, rental car agencies, hotels and restaurants, all of which have been affected by the recent shutdown in air travel. Unfortunately, the airline assistance package is unlikely to help the thousands of workers who have lost their jobs in recent weeks, and we must not turn our backs on them in this critical time. If we truly hope to boost our Nation's economy, we must ensure that these men and women receive unemployment benefits, health care, and the training needed to minimize the transition time between jobs. Mr. Speaker, I am proud to be an original co-sponsor of legislation which will give these workers a helping hand at a time when it is desperately needed. These measures introduced by the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Gephardt) and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Hastings) and the gentlewoman from Pennsylvania (Ms. Hart) would allow displaced airline industry employees to petition the Department of Labor for special benefits akin to those provided under the Trade Adjustment Assistance program. Specifically, eligible employees would receive unemployment benefits for 78 weeks instead of the usual 26, and even those who would not otherwise qualify for unemployment would be entitled to 26 weeks of benefits. In addition, laid-off workers would receive up to 78 weeks of job- training assistance to ensure they could re-enter the workforce as quickly as possible. Finally, displaced workers would be provided up to 18 months of federally subsidized COBRA premiums, and those workers without COBRA would receive temporary Medicaid coverage. Just as importantly, the assistance would be available to all airline and airport workers, including transit workers, as well as employees of airline suppliers, such as service workers and airplane manufacturers. Mr. Speaker, we took an important first step by providing financial assistance to stabilize the airlines, restore confidence in air travel, and protect the millions of workers still employed in the airline industry. However, our work cannot end there. We must act quickly on behalf of the workers and their families who have been impacted by widespread layoffs. They desperately need our help to pay bills, buy groceries, maintain access to health care, and learn the skills they need to quickly find new employment. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to join me in telling these hardworking Americans that we have heard their plea and they can count on us to respond.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to pay my respects to a great woman who passed away last month. Mrs. Anna Vayda was 91 years old and a vibrant woman all her life. She was instrumental in the chartering of the American Veterans and American Veterans Auxiliary. In 1946, she came to Washington, D.C. to lobby Congress on providing a national charter for the organization. Through her many trips and tireless efforts, she met the likes of former Speakers John McCormac, Frances Roberts and Tip O'Neill. In addition to lobbying for the national charter, she played a central role in gaining women veterans full membership in the American Veterans and not just the Auxiliary. Mrs. Vayda is survived by a son, Joseph Vayda; her brother, Walter Zupkofska; nine grandchildren, including my good friend Eva Geoppo; twenty great-grandchildren; and five great-great-grandchildren. They are a testament to Mrs. Vayda's long and successful life. She will be greatly missed and our thoughts and prayers go out to all those who mourn her loss.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 2926, legislation that will help our nation's air infrastructure recover from the shocking terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The September 11 tragedy dealt a dual blow to the airline industry; not only did American and United Airlines lose highly esteemed pilots and flight attendants in these violent hijackings, the subsequent federal shutdown of the airways also had a severe financial impact on carriers and led to the layoffs of more than 100,000 workers. Our air infrastructure supports the American economy by transporting goods and people across this great nation, and its continued strength is essential to the ongoing economic health of the United States. However, airlines also provide an opportunity to exercise the American freedom of movement. Every year, millions of Americans use air travel to visit their friends and families, take vacations, and conduct business throughout the country. Congress is now poised to bolster the airlines and restore confidence in our ability to fly. H.R. 2926 will provide $5 billion in immediate cash assistance to airlines to compensate for losses incurred during the federal grounding order. The measure also includes $10 billion in loan guarantees to help airlines adjust to the lingering effects of the September 11 attacks. By promoting the continued viability of air travel, this legislation will also assist other businesses reliant on the airline industry such as aircraft manufacturers, travel agents, rental car agencies, hotels, and other travel- and tourism-related companies--all of whom have been adversely affected by the recent slowdown in air travel. Coupled with significant improvements in airline and airport safety, which I urge Congress to address in the immediate future, H.R. 2926 will stabilize and restore confidence in air travel. However, I am quite dismayed that this legislation contains no provisions to help the 100,000 workers in the airline and airline- related sectors who have lost their jobs in the aftermath of September 11. If we truly hope to boost our nation's economy, we must ensure that these men and women receive unemployment benefits, as well as the educational and retraining assistance needed to minimize the transition time between jobs. Additionally, Congress must enact legislation to provide these families federally-subsidized COBRA health insurance during this difficult time. Finally, it is critical that we move quickly to adopt a legislative response to the need for enhanced security in our airports and on our aircraft. The federal government must play a major role ensuring the safety of our travel, and we must act soon. I understand that the House leadership intends to address these concerns in the near future, and, in the spirit of bipartisanship, I stand ready to work with them in these efforts.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, Sunday was an important day in the United States as we come to terms with the senseless terrorist attacks of September 11. In a brief mourning ceremony at Camp David, President Bush watched as the U.S. flag was hoisted to a full staff for the first time in 12 days. Later that afternoon, thousands of mourners gathered at Yankee Stadium in New York for a multi-faith event to remember their loved ones and all those lost in the terrorist attacks. Our collective grief and confusion during the last 2 weeks have not waned and will likely remain with us for years. However, Sunday's two events remind all Americans of the strong foundation on which this Nation is built, and of the need to defend our citizens and principles from future threats. Paramount among America's concerns following the attacks was the realization that terror could strike on our own soil. However, we cannot live in constant fear and hand a victory to the terrorists, so it is incumbent upon Congress to restore faith in national security. We need immediate action to enhance safety in airports and on planes by improving passenger and baggage screening procedures, strengthening airplane security features, and installing sky marshals on flights. Additionally, we must identify other vulnerabilities in our infrastructure, and work to safeguard food and water supplies, financial institutions, electricity grids, energy production facilities, and transportation and communications networks. Once we have improved any shortcomings in our infrastructure, we can enact fundamental reforms such as ensuring police departments, firefighters, rescue workers, health care systems, and local governments are prepared in the event of biological or chemical attacks. The Rhode Island Disaster Initiative has served as a pioneer in developing a model disaster plan for every State in the Nation. I am proud of this initiative, and hope that it will play an integral role in developing national solutions to problems revealed on September 11. Also, an investment in mental health services, whose importance is often overlooked in times of tragedies, would help Americans, especially children, deal with the trauma of witnessing violence and terrorism around the globe. All of these efforts must be pursued in conjunction with a careful, coordinated counterterrorism program. The new Office of Homeland Security is an essential step towards preventing terrorism, and Congress must provide this office with the authority it needs to be effective. By consolidating existing responsibilities from the 40 different agencies managing terrorism prevention, and by establishing information-sharing procedures with the FBI and CIA, the Office of Homeland Security can safeguard our lands, citizens, and facilities from future threats. I also look forward to working with the administration on its request for increased authority to combat terrorism. As terrorists gain access to new technology, our law enforcement offices must be equipped to intercept and analyze these communications. However, in our rush to action, any new authority Congress grants must be consistent with the civil liberties guaranteed in the Constitution and upheld by the courts. Furthermore, we must focus on the true perpetrators of terrorist crimes, and condemn the unfounded targeting or harassment of innocent Americans because of their skin color, customs, or beliefs. Mr. Speaker, we are just beginning to fathom the implications of the September 11 attacks. Yet, we may take comfort that our Nation's principles are still intact. The valiant and selfless efforts of emergency responders are to be commended. The generosity of those who have donated to relief efforts and the multifaith ceremony at Yankee Stadium all demonstrate that Americans of all backgrounds join in condemnation of terrorism. For many years to come, when we look at our flag proudly waving at full staff, we will remember the victims of September 11, but we will also be reminded of the principles that make the United States a great Nation, and which we must always strive to preserve.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, tonight I rise in support of the resolution authorizing the use of force to combat the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Mr. Speaker, the terrorist acts of cruelty and inhumanity committed 3 days ago have not weakened our Nation. Instead, the American people have forged stronger bonds and have demonstrated the compassion and concern that make our Nation great. United in our resolve, the United States is prepared to take action against those who have threatened us. America has the determination, strength and courage to combat the scourge of terrorism. We will identify the people, powers, and organizations that have contributed to terrorism, we will hold them accountable for their inhumanity, and we absolutely will not stop. We will succeed. In the coming weeks, the men and women in our military and intelligence communities will be called upon to serve their Nation. I commend them for their dedication and their bravery. I also call upon the American people to maintain the solidarity demonstrated in recent days and to focus on the true enemy instead of targeting innocent people because of skin color or customs or beliefs. Americans of all faiths, races, and backgrounds join in condemnation of terrorism and together we shall prove victorious.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, today I join my colleagues in support of this resolution before us. I come to the floor deeply distraught and outraged by the senseless, terrorist actions perpetrated yesterday against the American people. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims of these crimes and with their families, and I wish to pay special honor to those who call Rhode Island their home: Amy Jarret of North Smithfield; Carol Bouchard from my hometown in Warwick; Renee Newell of Cranston; Shawn Nassaney of Pawtucket; and David and Lynn Angell of Barrington. Sadly, in the coming days, I fear that the names on this list will grow, and I offer my deepest condolences to the loved ones of these innocent victims. For more than two centuries, Rhode Island, and indeed America, has been a bastion of democracy, freedom and tolerance, principles and ideals that were targets of yesterday's cowardly attacks. However, Rhode Islanders and all Americans are also known for their independence and strong spirit. Our resolve and love for freedom will not be broken by terrorism. As a member of the Committee on Armed Services, I vow to do all in my power to find those implicated in these attacks and bring them swiftly to justice. Mr. Speaker, make no mistake about it, all these terrorists have done is awakened a sleeping giant, and now this Nation stands united. It is our responsibility in Congress to protect the American people and our democratic ideals, and I stand by the President and our leadership in these endeavors.

Mr. LANGEVIN

Mr. LANGEVIN. Mr. Speaker, today I join with my colleagues in expressing our sincere condolences to those who have lost Americans in one of the most tragic and cowardly attacks on this country in our history. Make no mistake about it, this was an act of cowardice, an act of terrorism that struck at the heart of our Nation. This was an act of war against the United States. But, make no mistake about it, we as Americans and we as a Nation stand united. Those who have committed this act will find no safe harbor. We stand united in finding out who was responsible and taking quick and decisive action in response. This type of action has happened once before, a cowardice attack at Pearl Harbor. They thought without question that they would prevail, but they did not. All they succeeded in doing is waking a sleeping giant. Well, they have done it once before. The last time, this Nation became the most powerful Nation on earth. And in a short time this Nation, when those who are found responsible, will again loose the fateful lightning of our terrible swift sword and justice will prevail.