Nicholas Langworthy

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and congratulate Mr. Eric Musser, President and Chief Operating Officer of Corning Incorporated, on the occasion of his well-earned retirement. For nearly four decades, Mr. Musser has exemplified steadfast leadership, technical excellence, and an unwavering commitment to innovation and service. Since joining Corning Incorporated in 1986 as a shift supervisor at the company's optical fiber plant in Wilmington, North Carolina, Eric Musser has risen through the ranks, bringing stability, growth, and global perspective to one of the Nation's most innovative companies. His deep operational expertise and visionary leadership have been instrumental in driving Corning's success across its five Market-Access Platforms and international regions. As Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Musser has led efforts to enhance operational performance, strengthen Corning's global footprint, and implement systems that drive long-term efficiency and growth. He championed key improvements in productivity and efficiency, institutionalized operational best practices, and built a strong foundation for future leaders. His efforts have helped Corning strengthen its market leadership and long-term competitiveness. Mr. Speaker, I ask that this House join me in honoring Eric Musser for his exceptional contributions to Corning Incorporated and to American industry. We thank him for his years of service and leadership and wish him and his family all the best in this next chapter.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the rule to consider H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The stakes for the American people could not be higher. We are rapidly approaching a fiscal cliff. If we do nothing, the Trump tax cuts, the most progrowth tax reforms in generations, will expire. That means higher taxes on nearly every American. That means a gutted child tax credit. That means small businesses will lose the tools they need to survive and to thrive. That means less take-home pay for working families that have already been crushed by the Biden-era inflation. This isn't some hypothetical scenario. This is the Democrats' game plan. They want to raise taxes. They want to punish success. They want more people dependent on government and fewer people building independent lives. Republicans will not let that happen. With H.R. 1, we are stepping in to lock in the Trump tax cuts permanently and to provide targeted new relief to the workers and the families who keep this country running: seniors, tipped workers, and those putting in overtime to get ahead. Mr. Speaker, this bill also takes a critical step to protect and strengthen Medicaid, a vital program for millions of Americans. Let me be very clear about something: This isn't anything radical. We are restoring the same commonsense work requirements that President Bill Clinton signed into law in the 1990s, one of the most popular things he did. Back then, a Democratic President worked with a Republican Congress to say that if you are able-bodied and adult without dependents and receiving government assistance, you should be expected to work, train, or volunteer and participate in the economy. It worked. Poverty dropped, employment rose, and millions of Americans moved from welfare to work and independence. Democrats today have abandoned that model. They want permanent government dependency. They will oppose any form of accountability, and they will vilify anyone who dares to suggest that opportunity should come with responsibility. Republicans are standing up for what works and what is right. We are saying Medicaid must remain a lifeline for the truly vulnerable: children, seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income parents. However, for able-bodied adults without kids, yes, you should try to work, just like in the 1990s, just like under President Bill Clinton. This isn't extreme. It is not partisan. It is proven policy that respects both taxpayers and lifts people up. Mr. Speaker, this bill delivers economic relief, fiscal sanity, and basic fairness. It secures the future of our economy and our safety net. Let's choose the path that has been tested and proven to work. Let's approve this rule. Let's pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and let's get this country back on track.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, today, I rise to pay tribute to the extraordinary life and dedicated service of John W. Grotke, a proud resident of Eden, New York, who recently passed away on June 19, 2025. John proudly served in the United States Marine Corps, where he dedicated several years of his life to upholding the values of honor, courage, and commitment. During his time in uniform, his service exemplified a deep sense of patriotism and dedication to our country. After serving in the military, John also served as the commander of the Hamburg American Legion Post 527, where he played a leading role as a voice for the organization and representing his members effectively. He devoted his time advocating for veterans in the community and ensuring their families receive the care they deeply deserve. John was not only an exemplary marine but a strong leader and wonderful husband, father, and friend. He was the beloved husband of Karen Grotke; loving father of Matthew, Keith, Gregory, and Joshua; and the cherished grandfather of six grandchildren. John W. Grotke leaves behind a legacy of service and unwavering dedication to his community and his country. His accomplishments and leadership leave a lasting impact and set a gold standard that will continue to inspire generations to come. The western New York community was blessed to have such a remarkable resident. May he rest in peace.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize a major milestone for American manufacturing for New York's southern tier. Alstom, a global leader in smart and sustainable mobility, has opened its new, cutting-edge plant 4 facility in Hornell, New York. This 135,000-square-foot expansion brings stainless steel railcar body production back to the United States, strengthening our domestic supply chain, and reaffirming Hornell's position as the Nation's premier center for passenger train manufacturing. Plant 4 isn't just a facility. It is a symbol of what investment in American industry looks like. It will retain 390 good-paying jobs locally and create 258 new ones for families across my district. These are high-quality, high-tech jobs that provide economic stability and opportunity for the hardworking people of the southern tier. Production will soon begin on 200 multilevel commuter railcars for Chicago's Metra system, proof that what is built in Hornell rolls across the Nation. This project is a powerful example of how we strengthen our economy by investing in our communities, empowering our workforce, and leading the way in advanced manufacturing. I commend Alstom for their continued commitment to Hornell and thank the skilled men and women who are driving this legacy forward.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to join the Town of Carroll in celebrating an extraordinary milestone--200 years of history, heritage, and community spirit. Established in 1825, the same year the Erie Canal opened New York to the world, Carroll stands as a testament to the vision and determination of the American spirit. They came here seeking opportunity, building a town that would reflect the strength, faith, and perseverance that defines Western New York to this day. Carroll was named in honor of Charles Carroll of Carrollton, the last surviving signer of the Declaration of Independence--a man who stood for liberty, patriotism, and principle. That legacy lives on here in every sense. This town has given much to our state and Nation, including the birth of Reuben E. Fenton, one of New York's great statesmen. As Governor and later as U.S. Senator during the Civil War, Fenton championed freedom and unity when our country needed it most. His roots here speak volumes about the character and leadership fostered in this community. Robert H. Jackson, who later became a U.S. Supreme Court Justice and the chief U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials, was born in Spring Creek, Pennsylvania, but grew up in Frewsburg, New York, where he graduated from Frewsburg High School in 1909. But it wasn't politics that shaped Carroll--it was people. The town has long been enriched by a strong Scandinavian, especially Swedish, heritage, brought by families who arrived in the 19th century with little more than faith and work ethic. Their legacy lives on in the churches, traditions, and values that continue to define life here today. The blend of cultures and generations has made Carroll more than just a town--it's a home, built on unity and shared purpose. As we celebrate this bicentennial, let's not only reflect on where we've been but commit to where we're going. I will continue to be a voice for towns like Carroll in Washington--fighting for rural investment, family farms, and the future of communities that still believe in the American Dream. I congratulate the Town of Carroll on 200 remarkable years and may the next 200 be just as proud. May God bless the Town of Carroll, and may God continue to bless the United States of America.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I was unable to be present for votes on Monday, June 9, 2025. Had I been present, I would have voted: YEA on Roll Call No. 157; YEA on Roll Call No. 158; and YEA on Roll Call No. 159.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, for over 40 years, Jerry Sanok has been a cornerstone of the Republican Party--a principled leader whose honesty, strategic mind, and dedication have earned him respect across Alden and beyond. It is only fitting that his hometown now honors a lifetime of unwavering service. On June 11th, Jerry will receive the Honorary Lifetime Chairman Award, and I'm proud to stand with the Alden Republican Committee in recognizing this well-earned distinction. As Chairman, Jerry has led winning campaigns, mentored future leaders, and built coalitions that have delivered victory at every level--from Town Hall to Capitol Hill. His political instincts are unmatched, and his advice has shaped the success of candidates and party leaders across New York. What defines Jerry most, however, is his unwavering loyalty and deep patriotism. For over four decades, he has worked tirelessly to make his community, his state, and his country stronger for the generations to come. In every season--in challenge and in triumph--he has stood firm in his convictions and committed to the conservative values that unite us. It is with great pride and deep gratitude that I join the Alden Republican Committee in honoring Gerald J. Sanok--for a lifetime of leadership, patriotism, and service to the Republican cause.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in solemn remembrance of those brave men and women who gave the ultimate sacrifice in defense of the United States of America. On behalf of the United States Congress, and the constituents of the 23rd Congressional District, I am proud to recognize our brave service members' courage, sacrifice, and valor as we come together this Memorial Day. All gave some, and some gave all. Memorial Day is more than a long weekend--it is sacred time for a grateful Nation to reflect on the cost of liberty. We owe our freedom to those who answered the call and never returned. In America--the greatest country on Earth--our founding promise of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is preserved only through the sacrifice of our heroes. The American flag flies in red, white, and blue--each color rich with meaning. Blue stands for vigilance and justice, a call to remain steadfast in our values. White reflects our Nation's ideals and purity of purpose. Red honors the valor and the blood shed by those who died defending our rights. This weekend, across Western New York and the Southern Tier, veterans and families will gather at town centers, VFW halls and cemeteries to commemorate the fallen and ensure that their sacrifice will never be forgotten. This is a responsibility that we all must pass on to the next generation, to continue this great tradition in memory of those who made this life of freedom and opportunity possible. Today, we remember those we've lost and give thanks to the veterans still among us. We are the land of the free because we are the home of the brave. The selflessness of our service members inspires deep gratitude every day--not just on Memorial Day. May we never forget their sacrifice.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentlewoman from Indiana for yielding the time. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the rule and the big, beautiful bill because this is not just a budget bill. This is the beginning of a great American comeback. That is what the people demanded when they went to the polls last November. They voted to take our country back from chaos, from open borders, from crushing inflation, and from a government that rewards fraud while punishing hard work. This bill answers that call. It puts working families first with expanded tax relief for families and the hardworking men and women who are paying the bills in this country. This bill tells them: We see you, and we have your backs. At the same time, we go after the rot that has taken hold here in Washington for far too long. Just last year, Medicaid alone paid out $36 billion in improper payments. That is fraud. That is theft. That is a disgrace. That is money that is not taking care of our most vulnerable, which we have to protect at all costs. This bill stops it cold with tough enforcement, eligibility checks, and a full crackdown on waste, fraud, and abuse. We also bring back work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents. It is just common sense. It has worked before--in fact, in the 1990s, under a Democratic President, Bill Clinton. He worked with Congress and passed historic welfare reform that helped millions of people move from dependence to dignity. We have now restored that principle in this bill because a nation that rewards hard work is a nation that thrives. We stop throwing taxpayer dollars at failed green schemes and electric vehicle mandates that working families simply can't afford and don't want. Instead, we double down on American energy--oil, gas, and nuclear--to lower costs and to make this country safer and stronger than ever. Let's be clear: This bill is more than just policy. It is a turning point. It is the beginning of the great American comeback that President Trump is leading and that this House Republican majority was elected to deliver. The American people are tired of excuses. They want results. They want accountability. They want a government that works for them, not for bureaucrats, not for special interests, and not for people gaming the system. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers. It protects taxpayers. It restores work. It ends waste. It gets America back on track. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' on this rule, vote ``yes'' on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, vote to launch the great American comeback, and vote to stand with the people who sent us here. Let's pass this One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Let the great American comeback begin.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 426 and ask for its immediate consideration.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume. During consideration of this resolution, all time yielded is for the purpose of debate only. General Leave

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, House Resolution 426 provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 13 under a closed rule, with 1 hour of debate each, equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services, or their designees, and provides for one motion to recommit. Additionally, the rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 31 under a closed rule, with 1 hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, or their designees. It provides for one motion to commit. Finally, the rule provides for the flexibility to consider a rule related to reconciliation on the same day it is reported from the Rules Committee in order to expeditiously enact President Trump's agenda. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this rule and in support of the underlying legislation. The rule before us presents an important opportunity for Congress to continue its work to reverse the last-minute attempts at regulatory overreach by the former Biden-Harris administration. The rule includes consideration of S.J. 13, to provide for congressional disapproval of a Biden-era Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulation titled ``Business Combinations Under the Bank Merger Act.'' In September of 2024, the OCC and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC, revised their approach to evaluating bank merger applications. The updated rule restricts a bank's ability to scale, manage risk effectively, and broaden product offerings, ultimately discouraging mergers altogether. By dismantling a longstanding standard, and eliminating automatic approval for certain applications, the Biden administration's actions risk stifling competition and innovation in the financial sector. These changes will delay strategic decisionmaking among financial institutions and limit access to innovative financial services for everyday Americans. For small- and mid-sized banks in particular, the rule imposes additional red tape and bureaucratic hurdles that hinder their ability to merge and compete with larger financial institutions. Despite what my colleagues on the other side of the aisle may claim, the Biden administration's rule strengthens the dominance of the largest market players while undermining smaller, community-focused institutions, limiting consumer choice and consumer access. We should strive for a regulatory environment that is streamlined, balanced, and rooted in practical oversight, one that protects consumers without obstructing innovation and competition. What we don't need are more Biden-era regulations that distort the market and smother opportunity with overreach. S.J. Res. 13 will ensure that future bank regulators cannot repeat this ill-conceived rulemaking, and that financial institutions can continue to make strategic, innovative decisions that will ultimately benefit American consumers. Also, the rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 31, providing for congressional disapproval of the rule submitted by the Biden EPA relating to review of final rule classification of major sources as area sources under the Clean Air Act. Section 112 of the Clean Air Act lays out stringent compliance standards for facilities emitting over 10 tons of a single hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons of an aggregate. Facilities below those thresholds are classified as area sources and subject to more flexible requirements. In 2020, under President Trump, the EPA adopted a more rational approach allowing facilities that significantly reduced their emissions to be reclassified as area sources. This commonsense change rewarded emissions improvements and reduced unnecessary regulatory burdens on American manufacturers and energy producers. To no one's surprise, the Biden administration reversed course by reimposing the outdated and rigid ``once in, always in'' policy. This framework permanently locks facilities into strict major-source status, even if they make substantial efforts to reduce harmful emissions. That is not only unfair, it discourages environmental progress. Whom did the Biden administration hurt? They hurt the chemical manufacturing sector, which includes thousands of mid-sized companies representing hundreds of thousands of jobs. These companies have invested millions in cleaner technologies and equipment upgrades. Under this Biden-era EPA rule, their investments will not be rewarded with a lighter regulatory touch. In fact, despite upgrades to reduce emissions, they will continue to face the same higher regulatory costs. Moreover, there is the pulp and paper industry, a critical employer in States like Georgia, Wisconsin, and Maine. Mills that switch to cleaner fuels or have implemented advanced scrubber systems will receive no regulatory relief under the Biden-era EPA's ``once in, always in'' rule. In a sector that already faces stiff foreign competition and very narrow margins, the Biden administration heaped further unnecessary burdens onto this industry, jeopardizing the jobs of thousands of American workers in the process. Additionally, there is the independent and smaller scale refiner that often lack the scale of larger competitors but serve critical regional fuel markets. They may have made substantial environmental progress in reducing hazardous air pollutant emissions, but the Biden-era ``once in, always in'' rule locks them into compliance regimes that do not reflect their improved emissions profile. Finally, let's not forget our small and rural manufacturing facilities in communities across this country, including in my own district in New York's southern tier. These facilities include metal fabricators and food processors, many of whom have taken proactive steps to cut emissions in very good faith. Under the Biden-era EPA ``once in, always in'' rule, these improvements to reduce hazardous emissions do not matter. They will still be treated with the same costly and burdensome regulatory regime. Simply put, the Biden EPA and its ``once in, always in'' rule not only disincentivizes innovation and cleaner operations, but it also threatens plant closures and kills jobs. Mr. Speaker, you would have to be more concerned with appeasing environmental extremists than protecting American workers to support this punitive and counterproductive regulatory framework. Through S.J. Res. 31, House Republicans stand up for the American workers and job creators. The CRA, ensures regulatory fairness and restores real incentives for emissions reduction. Without this CRA, even the most environmentally responsible facilities are punished, trapped under heavyhanded rules that do not reflect their cleaner operation. Upon returning to office, President Trump and House Republicans focused on restoring commonsense governance: prioritizing American jobs, economic strength, and practical solutions. S.J. Res. 31, like other measures undoing ill-advised Biden-era policies, represents a decisive step in the right direction. Let's get back to smart, forward-thinking policies that actually serve the American people, not far left activists and D.C. bureaucrats. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this rule, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, the budget reconciliation bill is the work of 11 committees that have gone through full markup, that went through the full bipartisan process. I sat through 27 hours in the Energy and Commerce Committee. I know full well that I had a front seat to the longest markup, just as my colleague did with his service on the Agriculture Committee. That is not what we are here debating. Despite what some of my colleagues across the aisle are saying, the CRA that we are discussing right now is addressing standards for major and area sources that will actually promote cleaner and more environmentally conscious operations among manufacturers, refiners, and energy producers. The rule implemented by the Biden administration reflects a flawed approach, one that eliminates incentives for voluntary emission reductions and imposes excessive regulatory burdens without delivering clear environmental benefits. Under this policy, facilities that successfully reduce their actual or potential hazardous air pollutant emissions below the major source threshold are still prohibited from reclassifying as area sources. This means that even after substantial improvements, these facilities remain subject to the strictest and costliest regulatory framework forever, indefinitely. This not only increases operational costs but also removes a key incentive for companies to invest in cleaner technologies and practices, something we should all be encouraging. For example, take a chemical plant that emits hazardous air pollutants like benzene or formaldehyde. Under the Biden-era rule, if they invest millions in cutting-edge emissions control systems that reduce their pollution below the regulatory threshold, they get no relief from the major source permitting burdens. The Biden-era rule entangles them in permanent red tape, discouraging innovation and undermining progress. Under the Trump-era rules that S.J. Res. 31 would pave the way for, companies would have a financial incentive to invest in pollution control since doing so would actually reduce their compliance costs and regulatory delays. The result is cleaner air, a cleaner environment. The reality is that most of these companies and the people who run them live in the very communities affected by emissions. They have every reason to care about cleaner air and healthier environments. What they need is smart, flexible policy, not arbitrary and capricious restrictions that stifle growth and reduce competitiveness. S.J. Res. 31 would restore a proven framework that recognizes and rewards emissions reduction. It allows regulatory classifications to reflect a facility's current environmental impact, not a legacy status based on past emissions. This flexibility fosters continuous improvement and aligns environmental goals with economic incentives. This is not about weakening protections. It is the contrary, actually. It is about applying regulation in a way that actually works, delivering clean air, encouraging innovation, and maintaining the strength of America's industry. Mr. Speaker, this is a commonsense path forward to a cleaner, more sustainable future, one that supports jobs, growth, and the environment. This should be a no-brainer for my colleagues who claim to be the champions of effective environmental policy. Let's not be fooled by their rhetoric. The reality is that many on the other side of the aisle are beholden to a vocal and uncompromising wing of the environmental lobby, groups that would rather see American workers laid off, manufacturing plants shut down, and entire communities economically gutted than support balanced, commonsense regulatory reforms. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, we are hearing a lot of dramatic words from my friend and colleague across the aisle about the reconciliation process. Let's take a moment to remind them of what they did when they were in the majority. During the 117th Congress, when a Democratic-led House considered the last reconciliation bill, also known as the Build Back Better Act, the process was a little messy, to say the least. The gentleman talks about CBO scores, and it is certainly something that we are working very hard on. Mr. McGovern, in a meeting on November 4, 2021, was reading the manager's amendment to be self-executed. His response to not having a CBO score was: I know my colleagues on the other side of the aisle will do everything they can to slow this process down. I will also assure the gentleman, as he knows, that this cannot become law and will not move forward in the Senate without a CBO score, and that will have to happen. Regardless if we do have a JTC score or a CBO score or what that score says, I don't think any of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle will vote for this bill at the end of the day. People in glass houses really shouldn't throw stones here. In fact, this process on their side of the aisle was so messy that two separate rules had to be passed out of the Rules Committee, each one self-executing a new manager's amendment as negotiations were ongoing and changes continued to be made. It was constantly a shifting landscape and, frankly, chaos at times. I know that the gentleman from Massachusetts won't let facts get in the way of a good story. He pounds the table over the use of same-day authority. The reality is that the first rule for Build Back Better extended what is essentially a martial law procedural lockdown of the House floor, granting broad, same-day authority that allowed the majority to jam through changes without proper scrutiny. Let's not forget the second rule for that bill was brought to the floor and voted on the very same day. It was reported from the Rules Committee, exactly the kind of tactic our colleagues are now clutching their pearls while opposing. The fact is that governing is hard. The process is rarely a smooth one, but the American people elected President Trump, a Republican majority in the House of Representatives, and a Republican majority in the United States Senate, and gave us unified government with a clear expectation for Congress to deliver on this agenda. The Rules Committee will continue to use the tools at its disposal to facilitate the passage of historic legislation, just as our colleagues did when they were in charge. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, our friends on the other side of the aisle, they love to cherry-pick the facts when it comes to the timing of committee proceedings, especially in reference to the Rules Committee's upcoming meeting. They bemoan the late start and the timing of tonight's meeting. Yet, they actively ensured one committee markup after another for the legislation before us tonight, they ran hours and hours, if not days on end. Why did those markups run as long as they did? They ran that long because Democrats engaged in the legislative process, which is their right. The same principle applies to the Rules Committee. On this committee we have a long tradition of meeting late into the evening to complete our work. This isn't new, and it is not unique to our current majority. It is simply how the legislative process operates when the House has its full agenda. We need only look at the Committee's operations under Democratic control to see a long history of meetings in the dark of night. Under Democratic control of the Rules Committee, we have seen things like House Resolution 587, which the report was filed at 3:46 a.m. House Resolution 481, the report was filed at 2:09 a.m. House Resolution 597, the report was filed at 3:43 a.m. House Resolution 903, the report was filed at 2:25 a.m. For House Resolution 445 in the 116th Congress, the Committee adjourned at 12:20 a.m. Late-night sessions are not partisan anomalies and unique to the Democrats. These are precedents that Democrats themselves have maintained for years. Let's be clear, this is the way the Rules Committee has operated when necessary, regardless of which party holds the gavel. It is about getting the work done. In fact, tonight we may not be reporting in the dark of night at all but rather as the new day has begun. I expect Mr. McGovern to take full advantage of our unlimited debate rules in the Rules Committee to make sure that that happens, and I see my second sunrise in a couple of weeks here. I invite my colleagues to set aside the theatrics and focus on the work at hand, and I encourage my colleagues on the other side to prove me wrong. Once again, my colleagues across the aisle are doing what they do best. They spread misinformation, and they try to sow fear into the hearts of the most vulnerable in this country about Republicans' work through the budget reconciliation process. Let's set the record straight. President Trump and House Republicans are working to strengthen and secure and sustain Medicaid. Democrats, through their reckless spending and unwillingness to enact commonsense guardrails themselves, have worked to undermine this critical program. We are laser-focused on protecting the absolute most vulnerable among us, Americans with disabilities, pregnant women, children, and our beloved seniors, by putting in place commonsense guardrails to ensure that those truly in need always get the care that they deserve. That means making sure that precious Medicaid resources go to the living, breathing Americans who actually need the care, not bureaucratic bloat, fraud, or people that have come into this country illegally and have been put on this system. We are also ensuring Medicaid's long-term sustainability by rolling past costly Biden-era regulations that are driving up the program's price tag by hundreds of billions of dollars. Let's be clear, Medicaid should always serve American citizens first and foremost, and that is why reinforcing citizenship verification, another commonsense step that the American people believe in, not only protects the program but saves the taxpayers tens of billions of dollars. Yes, we are, reintroducing Clinton-era work requirements. One of the most popular things Bill Clinton achieved in his Presidency, and he worked with Congress to get it done, was bringing commonsense work requirements to social welfare programs. It would only apply to able-bodied adults without dependents. It is something that we should all be able to agree on. If you can work, you should work. It is a step that was once broadly bipartisan, but today, our Democratic colleagues would rather let Medicaid spiral into insolvency with no solution in sight than support a basic principle that if you are able to work, you should. Now, Mr. Speaker, we have heard noise from across the aisle, words like ``cruel'' and ``harsh,'' and all the hyperbole you could expect to be thrown around to score political points from their base. Let me be clear. Those labels belong not to those fighting for reform but to those who would refuse commonsense changes today and instead allow this critical safety net program to become fiscally unsustainable, leaving behind the very people that depend on it every single day. If we want Medicaid to be there in its entirety for the next generation, for those that truly need us, who we need to be working for every day, we must act now. House Republicans are committed to doing just that. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I didn't serve then, so I am not sure.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, we had to go and do a little research, but in the 110th Congress on August 1, 2007, when considering House Resolution 3162, the Democrats did indeed convene a Rules Committee meeting at 1 a.m., and they gaveled out at 3:07 a.m. They have done exactly the same thing that we have all heard about, the ranting and raving and the waving of arms here today. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. However, rules for thee and not for me is typically the way this works. We will do the work of the Rules Committee. We will continue to pass this legislation and deliver real relief for working families in this country. We have listened to a lot of rhetoric about millionaires and billionaires. It sounds like Bernie Sanders is in the Chamber, but really this is about the working people of this country. If we do nothing and the tax cuts expire in this country, it will be a $4.5 trillion tax increase on the American people. It will cut the child tax credit in half. It will cut the standard deduction in half that puts real money into the pockets of working families. In my district, it is about $1,700 a month that the current Tax Cuts and Jobs Act delivers. We deliver even more in this reconciliation package. That might not sound like a lot to some of the people on the other side of the aisle. For my constituents, that is a couple of mortgage payments. That means real relief for working families in western New York. Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, we are here once again to protect Americans from the heavy hand of Biden-era regulations. The slew of midnight rules forced on the American people by the last administration pose a direct harm to our Nation's economy, and it has threatened jobs. The pieces of legislation before us today under this rule are not filler. They are quite the opposite. The resolutions passed by the Senate and here before the House are lawmaking exercises. Democrats' dismissal of these CRAs speak volumes as to their lack of care and compassion for the serious ramifications that the regulatory agenda has had on the economy, on consumer choice, and on the environment. My Democratic colleagues certainly wouldn't want to focus our time today on these CRAs because they are part and parcel to dismantling the regulatory agenda that they wed themselves to for 4 long years under President Biden. What was the result of their commitment in the Biden-era regulatory agenda: $450 billion in new regulatory costs on the economy. That may just be numbers on paper for a D.C. bureaucrat, but the amounts of jobs lost, manufacturing shuttered, and communities decimated for folks outside the beltway is what it is really all about. The CRAs before us will allow Congress and the Trump administration to continue its important work of reversing harmful regulations and unleashing the promise of the American economy. I strongly support the rule before us today.

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I move the previous question on the resolution.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the extraordinary efforts of the William G. Houston Civics Club in Angola, New York, and to commend the entire Lakeshore Central School District for fostering a culture of gratitude, patriotism and civic responsibility in the next generation of Americans. Behind the school now stands a veterans memorial--conceived, designed, and brought to life by eighth-grade students as a permanent tribute to those who served. This project is more than just a monument--it is a testament to the values of patriotism and reflection, cultivated in the classroom and carried forward into the community. The newly established Veterans Memorial at William G. Houston Middle School stands as a permanent and growing tribute to over 120 local veterans--men and women who either attended Lake Shore (Evans-Brant) schools or now reside within the district. These heroes served across all five branches of the United States military, representing a broad spectrum of service, sacrifice, and commitment to this country. This memorial is not dedicated to a single war or era. Rather, it honors the full sweep of service--veterans whose lives have intersected with this community and who answered the call of duty. Their names are now etched into history through this tribute, with space intentionally left to recognize even more veterans in the years to come. It is a living monument--one that will grow alongside the students and community it inspires. This initiative did not happen by accident--it was made possible by a school community that believes in teaching not only the facts of history, but the weight of its meaning. I thank the teachers, administrators, and advisors who guided this effort, and I applaud Lakeshore Central School for its enduring commitment to shaping thoughtful and engaged citizens. Let this memorial stand not just as a symbol of remembrance, but as a proud reminder that patriotism begins at home--and sometimes, behind a school, where students dared to imagine something worthy of the heroes who came before them.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to commemorate the life, service, and sacrifice of the brave men and women who served our great Nation. Memorial Day is a holiday of reverence: a date set for us to come together as a Nation and ensure that we remember our debt of gratitude to those brave soldiers who gave their lives defending our country and freedoms. On May 26, 2025--this Memorial Day--eighteen names will be added to the Clarence Veterans Memorial Honor Walls. I am honored to include their names in the Record to be remembered and honored forever. Army Leroy W. Bender Eric W. Gibson Michael W. Gibson George W. Bluhman Joseph N. Currie Eric J. Draves Robert ``Jim'' J. Gustafson Walter P. Leising Justin J. Lex Chad R. Stockwell Air Force Gary A. Bugenhagen R. Kenneth Miller Marine Corps Kenneth H. Bugenhagen Joseph A. Morgante Navy Arnold D. Castren Robert H. Schurr Charles R. Fiegl Coast Guard John D. O'Neil It is now our duty to remember their sacrifice, courage, and valor as we go forward and continue to grow and build the greatest Nation the world has ever seen.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize and honor the service of our brave men and women for Armed Forces Day, May 17, 2025. Armed Forces Day is a 75-year tradition to thank all of those who are currently serving, as well as those who have served and sacrificed to defend our freedom. It is because of their duty, honor, and courage that the United States of America remains free today. This Saturday, the Western New York Armed Forces Committee will honor eleven service men and women to be honored at its 62nd Military Ball, and it is my honor to include in the Record their names as a tribute to their service, and the service of their brothers and sisters in arms: RP2 Amber N. Cardillo--United States Navy. LS1 Anthony Taylor--United States Navy Reserve. SSG Jacob Hinds--United States Army. SSG Andrew Sulski--United States Army Reserve. SSG Kaleb Acosta--New York Army National Guard. SSG Bradley A. Bray--New York Guard Honoree. BMI Brett Lawrence--United States Coast Guard. MST2 Krishnan Muthaiah--United States Coast Guard Reserve. SSgt Favan G. Perez--United States Marine Corps. Sgt Codey Aboff--United States Marine Corps Reserve Honoree. SrA Tess E. Barone--United States Air Force. Western New York and the Southern Tier are home to many proud service members and veterans, and our community has a long and proud tradition of military service. It is my honor to recognize their bravery. On behalf of the United States Congress and the constituents of New York's 23rd Congressional District, I thank these men and women for their service and all those who continue to serve with them.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, today I rise to honor the remarkable life and service of Richard ``Dick'' Young, a lifelong member of the Lancaster, New York community, who recently passed away at the age of 94. Dick was a proud graduate of Lancaster High School, Class of 1948, where he served as class president and remained dedicated to keeping his classmates connected for decades. In fact, those remaining from his class gathered in 2023 to celebrate their 75th reunion--an extraordinary milestone. Following graduation, Dick answered the call to serve his country by joining the United States Navy. From 1948 to 1949, he served aboard the USS Buck 761 Destroyer, supporting efforts during the Chinese Revolution. After his initial service, he enrolled at Marietta College, but when the Korean War broke out, he was called back to duty--this time serving as a ship-fitter on the USS Marsh DE699 from 1950 to 1952. In recognition of his dedicated service, Dick was honored in 2019 through the Honor Flight to Washington. Dick returned home to join the family business. His father, Lester Young, had founded the Young Fire Equipment Corporation in 1944, and by the time Dick completed his military service, he was destined to lead the company. As President, he relocated it to 204 Cemetery Road in Lancaster, where his Navy-honed skills and forward-thinking mindset revolutionized the fire apparatus industry. He designed firetrucks that were decades ahead of their time--earning a reputation for building the ``Cadillac of Firetrucks.'' Though Young Fire closed in 1991, Dick's passion for innovation never waned. In 1993, he launched the Performance Advantage Company in Lancaster, which continues to design and distribute tool and equipment mounting solutions for the fire service, military, and other industries in over 38 countries. In 2007, Dick established the Greater Lancaster Museum of Firefighting, located next to his business. The museum showcases historic firefighting artifacts, including those from local departments and even pieces from the 9/11 Towers. It stands as a tribute to volunteerism, which Dick regarded as the backbone of strong communities. He often said, ``Communities cannot function without the selfless sacrifices that volunteers contribute. We've got to encourage more volunteers.'' Dick also served his community as an elected member of the Lancaster Village Board, where he played a key role in uniting the Village and Town to address critical infrastructure needs, including improvements to the sewer system. Mr. Speaker, Dick Young leaves behind a legacy of service, innovation, and unwavering dedication to his community and country. His accomplishments, generosity, and leadership set a gold standard that will continue to inspire generations to come. May he rest in peace.

Mr. LANGWORTHY

Mr. LANGWORTHY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the 100th anniversary of the Jamestown High School Band and Chorus, we honor a century of musical excellence and dedication that has profoundly enriched both the school and broader community. Established in 1924 by siblings Arthur and Ebba Goranson, these ensembles have become pillars of artistic achievement. Under Arthur's leadership, the band gained national recognition, performing in prestigious events such as the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade and the Tournament of Roses Parade. Ebba's pioneering efforts led the formation of the A Cappella Choir, renowned for its annual Vespers services and international performances, earning the moniker ``Choir of the Cathedrals.'' Over the decades, these programs have fostered generations of talented musicians, instilling values of discipline, collaboration and cultural appreciation. As we celebrate this milestone, we commend and express deep gratitude to the past, present and future directors, instructors and students whose passion and dedication continue to inspire the Jamestown community and uphold this remarkable legacy for generations to come.