Jerrold Nadler

Mr. NADLER

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Utah (Mr. McAdams).

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Stanton), who is a distinguished member of the Judiciary Committee.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Pelosi), the distinguished Speaker of the House.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentlewoman from Texas.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Garcia), a distinguished member of the Judiciary Committee.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Raskin), a distinguished member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, anybody who says that this bill would dictate to the churches what they may preach or practice doesn't know what he is talking about. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Jeffries), the chair of the Democratic Caucus and a senior member of the Judiciary Committee.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentlewoman from Texas.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee), a senior member of the Committee on the Judiciary.

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney).

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Pocan), the cochair of the Equality Caucus.

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott), the chair of the Education and Labor Committee.

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I yield the gentleman from Rhode Island an additional 1 minute.

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Rhode Island (Mr. Cicilline), the sponsor of this legislation.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, how much time do I have left?

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and insert extraneous material on H.R. 5.

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 377, I call up the bill (H.R. 5) to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation, and for other purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New Mexico (Mr. Lujan).

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Lewis), the conscience of the House.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer), the distinguished majority leader of the House.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I was going to ask the gentleman the same thing. I have no further speakers. I am prepared to close.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, this morning, we have heard phantom fears about the allegedly harmful effects of the Equality Act on religious freedom and women's rights. If these fears had any basis in reality, the Equality Act would not have been endorsed by more than 500 civil rights, women's rights, religious, medical, and other national and State organizations, including the American Medical Association, the Central Conference of American Rabbis, the Episcopal Church, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the NAACP, the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, the National Women's Law Center, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, the Rabbinical Assembly, and the United Methodist Church's General Board of Church and Society. It has also been endorsed by dozens of business associations, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, and the Sports and Fitness Industry Association. Mr. Speaker, the time has come to proclaim liberty and equality throughout the land. Mr. Speaker, I now commend the bill to the judgment of the House, and I commend the House to the judgment of history. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. NADLER. Madam Speaker, I yield myself 3 minutes. Madam Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 5, the Equality Act, which amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other core civil rights statutes to explicitly prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The bill would also strengthen nondiscrimination protections for women and others. Today is a historic day: the first time a comprehensive LGBTQ civil rights bill has come to the floor of the House. This long overdue legislation will provide millions of LGBTQ Americans protections from being denied medical care, fired from their jobs, or thrown out of their homes simply because of who they are. Much of the history of the United States has been about expanding the definition of who is understood to be included when the Declaration of Independence says, ``all men are created equal.'' When these words were first written, that phrase did not include Black and Latino men; it did not include Native Americans; it did not include women; and it certainly did not include LGBTQ individuals. At this moment, we have an opportunity to continue our march towards justice, to enshrine in our Nation's laws protections for marginalized communities to ensure that everyone can fully participate in key areas of life and to provide them recourse in the face of discrimination. Despite what opponents to the bill may say, we know these protections can work. We know that our existing Federal nondiscrimination laws have helped millions of Americans. We know that protections for sexual orientation and gender identity have worked in more than 20 States and that, in these places, women still have rights, religious freedom is still protected, parents are still involved in their children's healthcare, and doctors are still free to exercise their professional medical judgment. Transgender individuals play sports, and sometimes they win and sometimes they lose, just like everyone else. But the ability to have a job, to receive medical care, or to rent a home should not depend on who someone is or where they happen to live. We cannot accept the situation where anyone in this country can get married on Sunday and legally be fired on Monday because of who they love. For decades, the LGBTQ community has been coming to Congress to tell us their stories. We have heard of transgender women being fired from their jobs, lesbian couples being kicked out of their homes, and gay men being denied medical care. It is time we stop asking them to come to the Capitol just to defend their existence. The question before us is not whether the LGBTQ community faces outrageous and immoral discrimination, for the record shows that it clearly does. The question is whether we, as Congress, are willing to take action to do something about it. The answer goes straight to the heart of who we want to be as a country, and today, that answer must be a resounding and unequivocal ``yes.'' To the thousands of LGBTQ people who have shared their stories, I say: Thank you for your bravery. Thank you for reliving your trauma to help build the case for this legislation--to build the case for expanding freedom in this country. We hear you; we see you; we believe you. And we will continue fighting for you. I thank the gentleman from Rhode Island (Representative Cicilline) for his tireless leadership in introducing this bill and helping to shepherd it through the legislative process. I urge my colleagues to support this landmark legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Pennsylvania (Ms. Dean), a distinguished member of the Judiciary Committee.

Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Neguse), a distinguished member of the Judiciary Committee.