Member of Congress
Mike Pence
- Role
- Former Vice President
- Party
- Republican
Speeches
TRIBUTE TO WIBC-AM INDIANAPOLIS2005-12-07
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, each year at the National Association of Broadcasters Annual Marconi Awards dinner, the evening ends with the awarding of the Legendary Station of the Year. The fraternity of radio stations that can call themselves ``legendary'' is an exclusive club. And this year, WIBC-AM Indianapolis joins that group. For 67 years WIBC has been the 50,000-watt News and Talk of Indiana. The WIBC News Team is the largest in the state, offering 24-hour Local News. It has won a record number of AP and Sigma Delta Chi awards and has received the Murrow Award for three consecutive years. Further, WIBC has been named a Marconi recipient for Station of the Year for the second straight year. The National Weather Service called WIBC's weather coverage ``life- saving.'' WIBC is the flagship station of the Indiana Pacers and home of the Indianapolis 500 for 51 years. In the community, WIBC is known for its charitable acts, having raised almost $1 million for the Salvation Army and collected thousands of teddy bears for police to give to traumatized kids. WIBC's Race for Riley with John Andretti has raised over $500,000 for the Children's Hospital and the station runs thousands of PSAs each year for many more deserving organizations. WIBC is home to news and personalities that reflect the lifestyle of mid-America. It is the most popular news/talk station in Indiana. Mr. Speaker, when you talk radio legends, one voice is clear. WIBC.
GALVANIZING A NATION2005-12-07
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, it was a Sunday morning on December 7, 1941, and the planes came down and Pearl Harbor entered the history of infamy in the United States of America. Days later, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt would use that term from this very podium in describing the holocaust of that day. But from the tragedy of Pearl Harbor came a galvanized Nation that rose as one man to confront imperial Japan and Nazi and Fascist Europe. I was here on another morning such as that, another clear day when the planes came down and the holocaust of September 11, as December 7, galvanized a Nation. Let us learn from the Greatest Generation that saw the horror of our enemies at Pearl Harbor. Let us allow September 11 to galvanize our resolve in the war on terror. Complete the mission as our President has challenged our Nation to do.
PRESIDENT SETS TONE ON WAR IN IRAQ2005-12-06
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, some say the U.S. will not win in Iraq, but in the American political debate, we can do better than that. Last week at the Naval Academy in Annapolis, the President of the United States did just that. President Bush delivered a forceful and effective defense of our strategy and the stakes facing our Nation in Iraq. Along with thousands of other midshipmen, I had the privilege of joining the President that day, and I have to tell you, from inside the arena, it appeared that the President was both at ease and determined. He pounded the facts about enemy, their aims and our progress in Iraq into the American debate. From the outset, the President set the tone defining the first war of the 21st Century with the declaration that the enemy must be defeated. He cited their war against humanity, while he released a recently declassified national strategy for victory, which Americans can read at WhiteHouse.gov. For me, the central message came when the President said, ``We will stay as long as necessary to complete the mission.'' This clarion call and the continued determination of the American people was timely and meaningful, and an important challenge to a Nation that believes in freedom and has always demonstrated throughout our history that when the mission is just and the mission is clear, Americans complete the mission.
House of Representatives2005-11-17
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, back in Indiana when a tree falls on your house, first you tend to the wounded; then you start to clean up; then you sit down and figure out how you are going to pay for it. Well, tonight, thanks to the leadership of Speaker Hastert, in the aftermath of having spent over $60 billion in 6 days to meet the real needs of the families and communities affected by Hurricane Katrina, tonight Congress is going to figure out how to pay for it. In the Deficit Reduction Act, Congress will achieve more than $50 billion in savings over the next 5 years to offset the extraordinary cost of Hurricane Katrina. While this is an important first step in restoring fiscal discipline, there is still work to be done. As has been said by my colleagues in the Democratic Party tonight, with an $8 trillion national debt, with more spending on hurricane relief just around the corner, it is imperative that we not only pass the Deficit Reduction Act but that we move immediately on to the other serious work, to look for an across-the-board cut in this year's budget, ensuring that the cost of Hurricane Katrina will be borne by the entirety of our Federal priorities. We must do more, but we dare not do less. Tonight we will do that which is of first importance: we will begin the process of putting our fiscal house in order. President John F. Kennedy said it best when he said: ``To lead is to choose.'' And this is such a moment. Tonight, whatever the outcome of this vote, this is a moment of truth, where we will set aside the rhetoric on this blue and gold carpet, and the American people will see for themselves who in this Congress is willing to make the tough choices in tough times to put our fiscal house in order. Bring the vote, and I urge my colleagues of goodwill on both sides of the aisle to adopt the Deficit Reduction Act.
DEPARTMENTS OF LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AND EDUCATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 20062005-11-17
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I rise simply to express profound gratitude for the leadership that Chairman Ralph Regula has provided in bringing this extraordinary measure to the floor. I also commend the Chairman of the Appropriations Committee, the gentleman from California, for his leadership. The challenge of being in the spending branch of government is to fund the Nation's priorities and to live within our means. And this legislation for fiscal year 2006, with Labor, Health and Human Services and Education, does just that. The story goes that Chairman Ralph Regula was at the White House, saw Ronald Reagan and they talked about the fence at the Reagan ranch. And a day later, Ralph Regula received a handwritten set of instructions about how to build a fence that is on the wall of his office today. What is clear today to House conservatives is that Ralph Regula learned more than just how to build a fence from Ronald Reagan. He learned how to fund the Nation's priorities with the fiscal discipline that characterizes this governing party. And for that, I am grateful.
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT2005-11-16
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, in the aftermath of the worst natural disaster in American history, Congress responded with generosity and more than $60 billion in 6 days. But this week, thanks to the leadership of President George W. Bush and Speaker Dennis Hastert, Congress is going to figure out how to pay for it. In the Deficit Reduction Act, this Congress will achieve more than $50 billion in savings in the next 5 year to offset the extraordinary cost of Hurricane Katrina. But there is still work to be done. This legislation is an important first step toward restoring fiscal discipline, but it is just that: it is a first step. With an $8 trillion national debt and with more spending on Hurricane Katrina awaiting around the corner, it is imperative that we pass the Deficit Reduction Act, move on to an across-the-board cut in this year's budget, and reopen the highway bill and rescind earmarks that are anathema to the American people. It is written that if the trumpet does not sound a clear call, who will get ready for battle? The Deficit Reduction Act is a clear call to begin the process of putting our fiscal house in order, and I urge all of my colleagues, Republican and Democrat, to support it.
TRIBUTE TO LANCE CORPORAL SCOTT ZUBOWSKI2005-11-15
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, Marines arrived at Barbara Weitzel's doorstep this Saturday at 5:30 p.m. in New Castle, Indiana. She said, my first question was, ``Which one?'' Two of her sons are Marines. Both are in Iraq. She learned in that moment that her brave son, Lance Corporal Scott Zubowski, died in Iraq on 12 November 2005. While fighting to defend America and secure Iraq, he was a rear passenger traveling with four other soldiers near Fallujah when a roadside bomb exploded beneath his vehicle. Scott and his family moved to New Castle in 1991 where he attended Greenstreet Elementary School for first and second grade. His teachers quickly recognized his gifts. They placed him in the gifted and talented program, an accelerated academic program at Sunnyside Elementary. Scott did not grow up dreaming of a life in the military but, as is the case with younger brothers, he respected his older brother David. Sergeant David Zubowski enlisted in the Marines. Scott noticed the growing confidence in his brother, and he wanted to enlist as well, which he did after graduating from North Manchester High School in 2003. Mr. Speaker, Lance Corporal Scott Zubowski is a hero. I offer my deepest condolences to his parents, Barbara Weitzel and Richard Zubowski; his lovely new wife, Klancey Zubowski; his two brothers, Brian and Sergeant David Zubowski; and all the family and friends who loved and admired this courageous young man. Scott's mother recently told the hometown newspaper, ``He gave himself for us, and we can't forget.'' He did give himself, Mrs. Weitzel. No greater love has a man than this, that he should lay down his life for his friends. We will never forget your brave son.
FEDERAL YOUTH COORDINATION ACT2005-11-15
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
HONORING OUR VETERANS2005-11-10
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, the Good Book tells us if you owe debts, pay debts. If honor, then honor. If respect, then respect. As Washington, D.C., begins today to embark on a healthy debate over the future course of the Federal budget, I rise in the quiet of this morning to pay a debt of gratitude to those that will be remembered in ceremonies and parades wearing moth-balled uniforms and gray hair across the land as Veterans Day is remembered and celebrated. Memorial Day in the spring is that day we remember those who did not come home; Veterans Day is the day that we remember those who did. I will never forget a close friend of my late father, who said years after he returned from having served in combat in Korea, ``I don't think your dad ever got over the guilt of coming home.'' My dad said good-bye forever to many close friends who served alongside of him in Korea, but he carried a special weight, having fired shots in anger for the United States in uniform. Let us remember our veterans and celebrate them across the land tomorrow.
PERSONAL EXPLANATION2005-11-10
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I was detained the afternoon of November 9, 2005. Had I been present, I would have voted in the following manner: Rollcall 581 (On Passage--H.R. 2862)--``aye''; rollcall 582 (On Passage--S. 1894)--``aye''; rollcall 583 (On Agreeing to the Scott #9 Amendment)--``nay''; rollcall 584 (On Motion to Recommit with Instructions--H.R. 1751)--``nay''; and rollcall 585 (On Passage--H.R. 1751)--``aye.''
PERSONAL EXPLANATION2005-11-09
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I was detained this afternoon. Had I been present, I would have voted in the following manner: Rollcall 581 (On passage--H.R. 2862)--``aye''; rollcall 582 (On passage--S. 1894)-- ``aye''; rollcall 583 (On Agreeing to the Scott #9 Amendment)--``nay''; rollcall 584 (On Motion to Recommit with Instructions--H.R. 1751)-- ``nay''; and rollcall 585 (On Passage--H.R. 1751)--``aye.''
DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT A GOOD FIRST STEP FOR AMERICA2005-11-09
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Madam Speaker, earlier today, my good friend Rahm Emanuel, a Democrat from Illinois, said, ``Tomorrow the House will vote on America's future, with an $8 trillion national debt and with a Congress that spent $60 billion in 6 days without a thought as to how we were going to pay for it.'' I could not agree more. The gentleman from Illinois went on to say, ``Where else could we cut food stamps and Medicaid?'' and he answered, ``With a Republican Congress'' and a lament. And I would ask, where else but in Washington, DC could a deficit reduction act that actually increases entitlements by 6.3 percent, instead of the planned 6.4 percent, be called a cut? The budget cuts we will pass tomorrow, let me say again, will still increase spending in Medicaid student loans and aid to dependent families. As a conservative, as some of my Blue Dog colleagues have said, I do not think this deficit reduction act goes nearly far enough to do right by those children and grandchildren that we raise. But it is a good first step. It is a modest start in the direction of putting our fiscal house in order. I urge my Republican and Democrat colleagues of goodwill to support it.
THE DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 20052005-11-08
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. I thank the gentleman, having not brought my reading glasses. What we are doing here is adjusting the arc from 6.4 growth to 6.3 percent. And as the gentleman from Georgia just said moments ago, in Washington that is what passes for a cut. And that is just false advertising in America today, and the American people are on to it. They know under this bill Medicaid will grow by 7 percent. They know that student financial aid will continue to increase. And they also know that there is a billion, a 50 percent increase, in low-income home energy assistance, over $1 billion in additional resources available. This is modest, but meaningful pruning of the Federal budget. It is not, even though it may warm this conservative's heart, it does not represent the hard choices and deep cuts that, candidly, future Congresses and future generations will have to make to meet the unfunded obligations that this government faces in the next 50 years. So I rise today to say, this is a good start. It is time to put our fiscal house in order. It is time to take that first step toward fiscal restraint. I urge my colleagues to see this in context. For conservatives for whom it is not enough, accept it as an important first step. And for those less conservative in the Congress than me, which is most, see this as a modest first step in the direction of fiscal restraint that is so much needed in the wake of catastrophes of nature.
Mr. PENCE. Let me say I am deeply humbled by the gentleman's characterization of our efforts. There is not a day goes by in this Congress that I am not grateful to the people of Texas for sending Congressman Jeb Hensarling to Washington, DC. His work, Mr. Speaker, on the Budget Committee, his work as the leading voice of fiscal restraint in the largest caucus in the House of Representatives has been seminal to the debate that we are engaged in, both in the House and, as we have motivated it, in the Senate; and I congratulate my colleague from the heart. Mr. Speaker, I rise, along with my other colleagues today, in strong support of the Deficit Reduction Act. The numbers speak for themselves. And as I have listened to the opposition to this legislation speak, as I have listened to even the advocates of this legislation speak, we are spending a great deal of time in, specifically, distinguishing the trees from the forest. I would like to talk about the forest from the trees for a moment. The forest is $8 trillion in national debt, a national debt that has swelled by 25 percent, $2 trillion in the last few years alone, a post- World War II high of per-family share of the national debt, I believe the number, the gentleman will correct me, in excess of $24,000 in obligations for every American family. It is a second mortgage on every American family, that $8 trillion in national debt. We come into this well, this week, as our colleagues in the Senate did last week, and in the face of a hurricane of national debt, we are going to throw a pebble of $50 billion in savings. And in the context, Mr. Speaker, of a $2.5 trillion Federal budget, this is a modest effort, but a meaningful effort. And I rise to applaud it. $8 trillion in national debt. And then as the gentleman from Texas observed, in 6 days, in the wake of the worst natural catastrophe in our country's history, the worst hurricane to strike the coast of this country in some three centuries, this Congress spent over $60 billion in 6 days. And the American people, and many Members of Congress simply stood astride that freight train of spending and yelled ``Stop.'' And it is in a very real sense, that, in part, which brings us to this impasse today, whether or not we, as a Republican majority, as a governing majority in America, are going to be able to make tough choices during tough times. I believe that we will. I believe, as our colleagues in the Senate bravely did last week, I believe this Congress this week, will rise to this challenge because I believe it is precisely what the American people meant this majority to do, to be able to practice both generosity and fiscal discipline at the same time. In a very real sense, I must say that as we saw $60 billion flow out of this institution in less than a week, in the aftermath of Katrina, I bristled at the posturing of some in the House and the Senate who went before the American people who were still grieving in our hearts at the extraordinary cost to families and communities along the gulf coast. And some in Congress stood up and said that we have done the hard work. Well, getting out my grandchildren's credit card and borrowing $60 billion for the families and communities along the gulf coast is not hard. What we are doing this week with the leadership of Speaker Dennis Hastert and the leadership of this Republican majority, what the Senate did last week, is the hard work that the American people expect us to do. That being said, we will take a modest but meaningful step in the direction of ensuring that a catastrophe of nature does not become a catastrophe of death. But let us not overstate it. And with this, I close. As we look at some $50 billion in savings over the next 5 years, we are hearing the remonstrations of the opposition that we are cutting Medicaid, we are cutting student loans, we are even cutting Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Programs. And it is simply not true. As much as it might warm the heart of this conservative for Congress to get out the sharp scalpel and truly go after that $8 trillion in national death, as the gentleman graciously assists me with the chart, that the baseline of changes in mandatory spending between this bill and the last mandatory spending was projected to grow, without my glasses on, at 6.4.
Mr. PENCE. I will be glad to yield.
PRAYERS FOR TORNADO VICTIMS2005-11-07
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Two a.m. Sunday morning in Newburgh, Indiana, the rains came down, the winds blew and beat against the homes of that community, and it fell with a great crash. It was the worst loss of life for a tornado in the State of Indiana since April 1974. Nancy Grimes said to me today in an e-mail of the experience, ``It had to be the scariest thing I have ever been through. The noise and the debris hitting our house was incredible. I think I screamed for 5 to 10 minutes during the duration, and then there was total calm. And the next morning I cried when I walked out onto our front porch and saw the destruction.'' She spoke of finding a needlepoint Christmas ornament with the word ``Hope'' stitched into it. She wrote, ``It will certainly find a place on our Christmas tree this year.'' I urge my fellow Hoosiers and all Americans who have watched the grim reports from southern Indiana and northern Kentucky to be generous in prayer, to take every opportunity to come to the material aid of the families and communities affected by this horrendous tornado.
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. 3057, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, EXPORT FINANCING, AND RELATED PROGRAMS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 20062005-11-04
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the rule supporting the conference report for Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs. It is an example of Congress demonstrating the ability to fund our national and international priorities in a fiscally responsible way, and I come to this floor to extol its virtues and urge all of my colleagues to support the rule and the underlying bill. This legislation will fund the Nation's priorities in a meaningful way, addressing the AIDS pandemic, bringing innovative reforms to our foreign assistance programs and, of ultimate significance, supporting the global war on terror. But specifically with regard to the internal mechanics of this legislation, I am particularly moved by the leadership of Chairman Jerry Lewis of the Appropriations Committee and subcommittee chairman Jim Kolbe who, in an effort to ensure that this legislation was brought to this floor not only on time but on budget, are in the midst of an extraordinary effort to amend the Budget Act to embrace a new road map that will bring not only this bill but all of the appropriations to the $843 billion level embraced by this Congress this spring. Many of us have expressed concerns in recent days that three of the four preceding conference reports that came to the floor did not conform precisely with the details of that spring-adopted budget. In response to that, the chairman of the Appropriations Committee shared with us and with other Members the road map to help us to achieve what will be, in a historic manner, a real cut to nonsecurity discretionary spending before Congress adjourns this year. But in an effort to go one step further, the Appropriations Committee began the process this week of amending that road map into the Budget Act itself. It is my understanding that the Budget Committee as well as many fiscal hawks in the Republican majority have been moved by that leadership and see it as an example of the energetic, principled, executive renewed leadership in the Appropriations Committee under Chairman Jerry Lewis. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the rule. I urge all of my colleagues to support the rule and the underlying bill. I rise to give credit where credit is due, to Chairman Jerry Lewis and Subcommittee Chairman Jim Kolbe, for a job well done, proving once again it is possible to fund the Nation's priorities on time, on budget, in a generous, but fiscally responsible, way.
PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION ACT OF 20052005-11-03
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this time. Mr. Chairman, this is a rare moment of bipartisanship in Congress, and it bears some reflection as I rise in strong support of the Private Property Rights Protection Act. I think that agreement springs from our oath of office, which we take at the beginning of every Congress. It provides: ``I do solemnly swear/affirm that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic and that I will bear true faith and allegiance to same.'' And I believe that is what Republicans and Democrats are doing today is bearing true faith to the Constitution, which in its fifth amendment provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation. The Private Property Rights Protection Act by virtue of its outstanding authorship, Chairman Sensenbrenner, Chairman Goodlatte, Chairman Bonilla, fulfills this oath of office in a profound way. In the wake of the June 2005 Kelo decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that economic development could be a ``public use'' under the fifth amendment's takings clause, Congress and every Member of Congress, in my judgment, has a duty under that oath to support and uphold and defend the Constitution. Indeed, John Adams remarked: ``The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.'' As a Member of the House Agriculture Committee, I can say that the fear of development and the unbridled appetite of urban areas against rural areas makes this an especially important initiative of the Agriculture Committee and its distinguished chairman. In the discharge of our duty to support and defend the fifth amendment to the Constitution, I urge my colleagues very humbly, say no to Kelo, say yes to the Private Property Rights Protection Act.
THE WAR IN IRAQ IS JUST2005-11-03
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Madam Speaker, it has been an extraordinary series of days: closed door sessions in the United States Senate, accusations and recriminations by a former President of the United States. President Jimmy Carter said in the last 24 hours that intelligence was ``manipulated'' in the runup to the war in Iraq. And yet, as the Wall Street Journal reports today, Madam Speaker, four separate independent investigations found otherwise. Let me say from my heart, I was here the night we voted to give the President the authority to go to war, and it was a combination: Saddam Hussein's rejection of over a dozen United Nations resolutions, an appalling record on human rights, and the complete agreement of every intelligence service in the western world that he possessed weapons of mass destruction, a confidence that was derived from the fact that he not only had possessed them before, but Saddam Hussein had used weapons of mass destruction against his own people, killing thousands in the early 1990s. There was no manipulation. The war in Iraq was just, is just, and the freedom of the teeming millions who established a constitutional republic 1 week ago supports that conclusion.
CONDEMNING IRANIAN PRESIDENT MAHMOUD AHMADINEJAD'S THREATS AGAINST ISRAEL2005-10-28
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for yielding and am deeply humbled to rise during the chairman's time and prior to the ranking member's time. I thank the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos) for the courtesy in recognizing a markup schedule on the Hill. I am deeply humbled to stand between Tom Lantos and Henry Hyde, who are the two leading voices for human rights and for the relationship between the people of the United States of America and the people of Israel. I rise in support of House Resolution 523 that recognizes an extraordinary and, as Chairman Hyde just said, shocking and venomous moment in world debate. On October 26, 2005, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, declared that Israel must be ``wiped off the map.'' He described Israel as, quote, a disgraceful blot on the face of the Islamic world. Such rhetoric is, as this resolution states, outrageous and despicable. It is, in my judgment, in the heart of the American people to rise in this Congress, in these extraordinary times and speak this truth to that power, and that is that the people of the United States cherish the dream that became the reality of Israel in 1948, and we categorically condemn rhetoric of this nature. This resolution calls bravely on the United Nations Security Council and all civilized nations to condemn and reject these statements. Let the world know, the American people pray for the peace of Jerusalem, for all the people of all the faiths in Jerusalem. We long for justice in the region. And only if the world will come together and condemn this venomous and despicable and shocking statement by the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran will that peace and justice ever be achieved. Mr. Speaker, I yield back to the chairman with gratitude and appreciation for his and the gentleman from California's leadership in bringing this important resolution before the Congress.
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. 2744, AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 20062005-10-28
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Florida for yielding me this time. Today, the House is set to consider the fiscal year 2006 agriculture appropriations conference report, a bill of some $17 billion in scope. But according to the Congressional Budget Office, Mr. Speaker, the bill violates the budget resolution by $199 million over the budget. The rule we are debating at this very moment is asking us to waive a budget point of order to enforce the budget. Mr. Speaker, I cannot do that. These are difficult times in which we live. The American people are looking to this Congress to make the hard choices, to put our fiscal house in order. Today, as we consider this conference report, for my part I will neither be able to vote yes for this rule, but neither am I willing to vote no. The only reason why I will vote ``present'' and urge other conservative colleagues, Republicans and Democrats, to do likewise is simply out of a sense of confidence in the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee. I have met in recent days and recent hours with Chairman Jerry Lewis of the House Appropriations Committee. The only reason I am not prepared to vote no on this rule is because I believe that almost solely by virtue of the integrity and commitment of Chairman Jerry Lewis, I believe that before we adjourn this year, we will eventually be back to the $843 billion number that this Congress labored to adopt as our budget for discretionary spending, back when the budget of the House was adopted last March. So I believe that at the end of the day, Chairman Jerry Lewis will bring these numbers in line. But as was the case with the legislative branch conference report that was $85 million over the House budget, the Interior conference report which was $52 million over the budget, this Agriculture appropriations conference report is over the budget by $199 million. And I believe it is imperative that while we recognize this chairman's effort at the end of the day, at the end of this year to square this budget up, that largely due to our colleagues in the Senate, this bill exceeds the House budget. It also, as I said in a letter to Chairman Dreier last night, it violates the House rules in one other regard. Under rule XXI, paragraph 6, legislation is not to be considered in order where there is a designation or redesignation of a public work in honor of an individual, and this legislation does that, naming a public structure after a sitting Member of the Senate in direct violation of the House rules. This bill violates the House budget that we adopted in March, this bill violates the House rules, and for that reason I will vote ``present'' on this rule and urge my colleagues to do likewise.
PRESIDENT ADDRESSES ECONOMIC CLUB OF WASHINGTON, DC2005-10-27
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. When it comes to making tough choices in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, Madam Speaker, Presidential leadership will make the difference. Yesterday in remarks before the Economic Club of Washington, DC, the President of the United States called on Congress to ``redouble our efforts to be wise about how we spend your money.'' The President went on to say, ``We can help the people of the gulf coast region recover and rebuild and we can be good stewards of the taxpayers' dollars at the same time.'' He called on Congress to reduce unnecessary spending, to identify offsets, and pledged again to offer spending rescissions to provide the emergency relief, in his words, in a fiscally responsible way. President George W. Bush yesterday encouraged Congress to push the envelope when it comes to cutting spending, and his strong leadership will make the difference. Congress should heed the call of President Bush to rebuild with generosity and fiscal responsibility in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
FREEDOM IS WINNING, TERRORISM IS LOSING IN IRAQ2005-10-26
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, it has been asked in some shrill tones this morning on the floor of this Congress, 2,000 American casualties in Iraq, and what do we have to show for it? Well, I would offer very humbly, what we have to show for it is a dictator behind bars, a terrorist haven vanquished, 100,000 Iraqis in uniform with another 100,000 yet being trained in the next year, millions freed from tyranny, national elections in January, and, as the headlines today attest, a constitution ratified in a new, free, and democratic Iraq. That is what we have to show for it. Because of the ongoing sacrifices of the American soldier, those at their post and those in glory, and their families, freedom is winning, terrorism is losing in Iraq.
PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS ACT2005-10-20
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for yielding me this time and I thank him and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Stearns) for their visionary leadership on this bipartisan legislation. The right to keep and bear arms is enshrined in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act today will reaffirm our Nation's ability to keep, bear, and manufacture lawful firearms in the United States of America. By passing this bill, Congress will prevent one or a few State courts from bankrupting the national firearms industry with baseless lawsuits. Mr. Speaker, a gun, by its very nature, is dangerous. But throughout the history of tort law in this Nation, we have built on the principle of individual responsibility in which a product may not be defined as defective unless there is something wrong with the product, not with the way that it is used. The progeny of cases that have emerged in recent years against gun manufacturers flies in the face of both our Constitution as well as the history of common law and its tradition. It is time for Congress to fulfill its congressional duty, exercise its authority under the commerce clause, and prevent a few State courts from bankrupting our national firearms industry that has as its foundation our constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
TRIBUTE TO DR. JULIUS PERR2005-10-20
Mr. PENCE
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, the State of Indiana lost a giant of the engineering community last month. On Sunday, September 25, Dr. Julius Perr passed away in his home country of Hungary where he revolted against a Soviet-led communist regime before coming to the United States as a refugee of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution. Julius Perr and his wife Elizabeth, made Columbus, Indiana their home and found peace from the unrest in Eastern Europe. It was also in Columbus where Julius began a 41-year career as a mechanical engineer for Cummins Engine Company. In this time, he distinguished himself by submitting more than 300 patents on engine technology improvements, 80 of which are still in use today. Cummins recognized Julius's extraordinary accomplishments by establishing an award in his honor. Each year, Cummins presents the Dr. Julius P. Perr Innovation Award to acknowledge innovative contributions of Cummins personnel. Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the State of Indiana, I extend heartfelt sympathies to the family of Dr. Julius Perr, specifically his wife Elizabeth; his sons Andrew and Victor Perr; his daughters Maria Garrison, Elisabeth Perr-McColm and Karolina Perr; and his eight beloved grandchildren. Julius Perr was commended by the U.S. Patent Office for setting an example for future generations of inventors. But it is his love of culture and allegiance to his community that will be most missed by those who know him the best. The State of Indiana was fortunate to call him one of its own.