Bob Smith

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to International Paper's Madison Lumber Mill of Madison, NH, which was named this year's Manufacturing Business of the Year by the New Hampshire Chamber of Commerce and Business NH Magazine. As the ranking Republican member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, I applaud Madison Lumber Mill on its outstanding environmental efforts. As the neighbor to 1,800 acres of conservation land owned by the Nature Conservancy, the mill makes extraordinary efforts to create a minimum impact on the environment. Through courtesy and a shared commitment to land conservation, the two neighbors have developed a solid relationship. Along with a dedication to conservation, the mill is constantly looking to reduce any environmental impact, and their environmental compliance goes above and beyond the requirements of the law. One of the mill's main goals is to operate under the principles of the Sustainable Forestry initiative program, which ensures the perpetual growth and harvesting of trees while protecting wildlife, plants, soil, air and water quality. I commend the dedication Madison Mill exemplifies within the community and surrounding areas. Not only does the mill purchase 90 percent of its log supply from predominantly private land owners within a 60 mile radius of the plant, but they also require their loggers to complete safety training courses. Continuing a tradition of community service, Madison Mill annually grants $10,000 to local libraries, schools and civic organizations. Along with donations, the mill has developed a Community Advisory Council partnership to keep the lines of communication between the mill and local community open. One of the council's main goals is to facilitate community economic development and awareness. The 13 member council meets quarterly to discuss regional issues, raise concerns with the mill and discuss plans for the future. I applaud Madison Lumber Mill and their dedication to surrounding communities and the environment. Their environmental efforts and positive additions to the community exemplify why Madison Mill was this year's award recipient. It is an honor to represent you in the United States Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to the Riverwoods at Exeter healthcare facility. Riverwoods was named this year's Health Care Business of the Year by the New Hampshire Chamber of Commerce and Business NH Magazine. I applaud the Riverwoods community on their positive impact in their surrounding community. By consistently giving back to their community, the 350 residents set a superb example for all Granite Staters to follow. Before the facility had even been built, Riverwoods set the tone of their philanthropic efforts by donating land to the Town of Exeter for baseball and soccer fields for the town youth programs. The tradition of giving has continued over the years as Riverwoods has been named by the Exeter Area Chamber of Commerce as one of the Top 10 Corporate Citizens for 1999, 2000 and 2001. Alongside the acclaim Riverwoods has received, one of their biggest rewards is being actively involved in their community. More than 50 percent of the residents and staff contribute to the United Way of the Greater Seacoast. Their contributions have grown from $2,381 to an astounding $28,544 in the past six years. The children of Exeter are enjoying their new ``Planet Playground'' thanks in part to the Road Race which the Riverwoods organized and sponsored to benefit the playground. The road race profits exceeded $35,000 and helped build Exeter's newest playground. The children of Exeter were not the only residents to benefit from Riverwood's generosity, the local teen center was bought and refurbished with the gala dinner which Riverwoods organized and co-chaired. The benefit dinner raised $63,000 for the teens, and gave the center its first real ``home.'' I commend the residents, staff and philosophy of the Riverwoods community, and thank them on behalf of Exeter and the Seacoast communities. It is with continued dedication to the community that Riverwoods has been named this year's award recipient. It is an honor to represent you in the United States Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to Jack B. Middleton, recently named Business Leader of the Year 2002, by the NH Chamber of Commerce and Business NH Magazine. Jack's efforts both in his profession and in his community are unsurpassed, and set an impressive standard for his peers to follow. Jack currently serves as President of the New Hampshire based law firm McLane, Graf, Raulerson & Middleton. Joining the firm in 1956, he entered a tradition of community service and dedicated practice. He became a partner in 1962 and later became President. His countless accomplishments both in his professional career and philanthropic efforts have led him to a position of mentor, friend and leader. I applaud Jack's continued service to the legal profession and willingness to accept leadership roles in numerous organizations. His service extends to state and regional bar associations, legal foundations, the Interest on Lawyer's Trust Account, IOLTA, program, and his own firm. He is the longest serving Chair of the NH Bar Foundation and Secretary of the Board of Governors of the American Bar Association. His position on the American Bar Association is one of great pride to the New Hampshire legal community, as he is only the second person from New Hampshire to hold a position at the national level of the ABA. He is the former President of the New Hampshire Bar Association, the New England Bar Association, the National Conference of Bar Foundations, the National Conference of Bar Presidents and a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers. Along with these positions of service, Jack has also received numerous awards such as Citizen of the Year 1994 by the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce, New Hampshire's Distinguished Citizen of the Year 2000 by the Daniel Webster Council and has twice been awarded the President's Award for Special Service to the Profession by the New Hampshire Bar Association. Jack's community service sets a positive example for all Granite Staters and his dedication to improving his community is beyond compare. His role in developing the IOLTA program, which offers legal assistance for the needy as well as public education about the law, was critical to helping the people of New Hampshire. This program allows lawyers to place money that they are holding for short periods of time into a pooled interest-bearing account. The proceeds of which fund the program. Since the start of the program in 1982, the account has raised more than $13 million dollars. Jack's efforts to develop this already existing program in New Hampshire as well as his many contributions in other fund-raising efforts and community service have led the Bar Foundation to name Jack an ``Honorary Fellow.'' Jack Middleton is an extraordinary example of someone who serves his community as he would serve his career. By continuing the long-standing tradition of philanthropy that his firm has set forth, Jack has shown once and again why he is such a deserving candidate of this year's award. I congratulate him and wish him continued success in future years. It is an honor to represent Jack Middleton in the United States Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to Manchester Neighborhood Housing Services, MNHS, of New Hampshire. MNHS is this year's recipient of the Real Estate/Construction Business of the Year Award by the New Hampshire Chamber of Commerce and Business NH Magazine. I commend the efforts of MNHS to improve the City of Manchester and provide affordable housing to low-income residents. Founded in 1992, MNHS began as a revitalization project for Manchester's inner city neighborhoods. One of the largest and most visible projects thus far has been the $11 Million Elm Street Restoration Project, which created 68 affordable apartments in two of the historic downtown brownstones. This project is one of the largest nonprofit affordable housing projects in New Hampshire's history. I would also like to recognize the Renaissance, a 24 unit family rental project and the first Low Income Housing Tax Credit project, created for first-time home buyers. Among these many accomplishments, MNHS has also loaned or granted more than $6.5 million dollars for home purchase and rehabilitation. The outstanding performance by this organization is not only making positive changes to the community but more importantly to peoples lives. There is nothing more important to me than to make sure that people are taken care of. It is an honor and privilege to represent the fine people that make these advancements possible.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to Unitil Corporation of Hampton, which has been named the Business Services Business of the Year 2002 by the New Hampshire Chamber of Commerce and Business NH Magazine. I applaud Unitil's unique and innovative approach to business and their customers. By taking a fresh approach to the utility industry, Unitil has proven that quantity does not necessarily reflect quality. Unitil was established after a union between Concord Electric Company and Exeter & Hampton Electric Company in 1984. The company now employs 333 people as well as servicing 110,000 customers. Unitil was among the frontrunners of the industry with the creation of their program, USource, which matches buyers on the Internet with pre-qualified energy suppliers. Unitil's approach to business has resulted in the lowest electric rates available in New England as well as excellent performance ratings from the majority of their clients. Aside from Unitil's low rates and high quality of service, the real treasure of the company lies within its employees and their dedication to community service. By operating with an emphasis on giving and volunteering in their local communities, Unitil has encouraged employees to volunteer their time and make a positive impact. Led by example, Unitil's CEO Bob Schoenberger is President of the Board of the United Way of the Greater Seacoast. Employees are each granted eight hours of paid leave for volunteering. Last year, Unitil's employees volunteered 1,000 hours of community service and raised more than $8,000 in a matched contribution program. Unitil also donated $90,000 to 200 local non-profit organizations in 2001. Unitil serves as a positive example for all Granite Staters, and I applaud their dedication to improving their community, both in the personal and the business arena. I commend their leadership as well as their employees and wish them continued success in the coming years. It is an honor to represent you in the United States Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to Village Bank & Trust Company of Gilford. Named this year's Financial Services Business of the Year by the New Hampshire Chamber of Commerce and Business NH Magazine, Village Trust has established a unique niche in New Hampshire. Disguised as a typical bank, Village Trust couldn't be further from traditional financial institutions. Their unique relationship with the community has made them an extremely deserving candidate for this award. From the Bank's beginning in 1982, Founder and President Gregory Dickinson has focused on giving to the community. As Gregory said, ``We are committed to the community and the community is loyal to us.'' Village Bank's track record with their community includes sponsoring the first affordable housing project for the Laconia Area Community Land Trust, being among the first contributors to the Belknap County Economic Development Council, financing the bond for the Main Street Project in Laconia as well as numerous other housing authority projects. Along with these projects, Village Bank is known for its commitment to economic initiatives and its consistent support for local businesses. I applaud the dedicated efforts in improving the community which Village Bank continually demonstrates. They are a positive example to the Granite State not only in their business practice, but also their philanthropic efforts. I wish them continued success in the coming years, and thank them for their contributions to New Hampshire. It is an honor to represent you in the United States Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to the Court Appointed Special Advocates, CASA, of New Hampshire. Named this year's Education/Non-Profit Business of the Year by the New Hampshire Chamber of Commerce and Business NH Magazine. The CASA program is crucial to New Hampshire's abused and neglected children, offering support, guidance, and a sound outlook on the children for New Hampshire's Family and District Court judges. Started in New Hampshire in 1988 by Marcia Sink, CASA has advocated for 3,045 young victims in 2,276 cases within district and family court during the past 14 years. A national program, CASA trains volunteers to advocate for abused and neglected children in the court system. Typically taking just one case at a time, CASA volunteers gain an intimate knowledge of the children, family situation and current arrangements which proves invaluable to judges upon their rulings. Aside from the Business of the year award, CASA has been the recipient of the Citadel Broadcasting Company's 2001 Year of Service Award, Brown and Company's Pro Bono Award, the Walter J. Dunley Award for Excellence in Non-Profit Management and WMUR Channel Nine's Community Champion award. Along with these distinguished awards for their service and contributions, CASA has made an impact in the lives of numerous children which is the greatest award of all. New Hampshire thanks you for your continued service to the children of the Granite State. I applaud the dedication to New Hampshire's youth that CASA has shown over the years. Currently representing more than 75 percent of New Hampshire's abused and neglected children, these volunteers have spent countless hours defending the best interest of these children. They offer a unique and innovative approach to placing children in the best possible situation and their efforts are crucial during these trying times. I commend the CASA program of New Hampshire and wish them continued success in the coming years. It is an honor to represent you in the United States Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, I am please to join my distinguished colleague and ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee to discuss the merits of the Freedom Consolidation Act. Like Senator Warner, I have been deeply troubled by aspects of NATO expansion and by what NATO expansion means in the post-cold-war era. NATO's original mission was clearly understood--we were standing up to the Soviet threat. Today, NATO's mission is very unclear, and the organization itself has become a bloated bureaucracy where politics often dictate military decisions. NATO's involvement in the Balkans and the manner in which military operations were conducted during the Kosovo air campaign are prime examples of a NATO without a clear mission and with a broken decisionmaking structure. Let me make one thing clear--I believe every nation deserves the right to self-determination. I am proud to state that I was an early advocate of Baltic independence from the Soviet Union even when some in the U.S. Government were opposed to the breakup of the Soviet Union. I have great admiration for the Baltic people--the Latvians, the Lithuanians, and the Estonians--they all suffered greatly and they deserve to be free nations as do all nations. I can understand their desire to join NATO and to integrate more fully into Western institutions. However, I believe that before we even consider expanding NATO, we must have a clear understanding of the mission of NATO. For example, just the other day, NATO accepted Russia as a junior partner of sorts. Russia will now participate as an equal partner in many of the discussions and decisions of NATO. How do we reconcile the expansion of NATO to countries that Russia is opposed to admitting to NATO? We also have to consider Russia's own problems, such as the conflict in Chechnya--could NATO and the United States be pulled into the Chechnya conflict? We must also consider, frankly, whether NATO is relevant in today's world. Hopefully, we are finding that coalitions for the sake of coalitions are not necessary. As European countries continue to downsize their militaries, the burden on the United States becomes greater and greater. Increasing its membership without significant reforms and a better understanding of its mission, does not make sense. NATO is becoming a mini-U.N., an unwieldy and overgrown organization which will demand much of us, our commitment, our military, our national wealth, but which will return little to us for our investment. Although I understand a country's desire to join NATO, we must first address the many problems in NATO before we even consider expanding its membership. Therefore, I will vote against this legislation, not because I do not support the security needs of the countries of the Baltic and Eastern Europe, but because the mission of NATO and the organization itself need serious work.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise here today to honor the achievements of the Salem High School Band and Color Guard on their exemplary show in the competition leading to their selection to play in the nationally televised Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade. Congratulations are in order for Salem High, as they have also played in the 2001 Tournament of Roses parade, which is attributed with some of the success this time around in the granting of the New York parade. There were only 12 bands chosen nationwide between nearly 300 high schools or colleges competing for the honor. The country was dazzled by the Salem High band at the Macy's Day parade in 1977 and once again has the opportunity to please onlookers this year. Salem is the only high school in the state of New Hampshire that has marched in this, one of the largest parades in America. The band will have to march for 2\1/2\ miles with an estimated live gathering of almost 2 million. Best wishes to them in a successful march and once again congratulations.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today I pay tribute to the outstanding successes of the recipients of the New Hampshire Excellence in Education Awards. This annual event, which began in 1994, recognizes the hard work of teachers from throughout the state. This serves as one of the largest ceremonies acknowledging the positive difference these professionals are making in the lives of students. Praiseworthy public schools, programs, and educators are used as incentives for others. These individuals demonstrate their worthiness in six areas: curriculum, teaching/learning process, student achievement, community/ parental involvement, leadership/ decisionmaking, and climate. Teachers with these qualities are exactly what is needed to guide our youth today. With the attitude and hard work brought to the table by these individuals I am confident that they will provide the best education possible lending to a spectacular future for our children. It is an honor and privilege to serve these individuals in the U.S. Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to the outstanding growth of the Manchester Airport. Recently it has completed the changes and additions that have been underway for the last 8 years helping pave its path as one of the premier airports in the state. These changes include a 158,000-square-foot passenger terminal with a 70,000-square-foot terminal addition, and a six level parking garage and connecting pedestrian walkway. These drastic improvements have taken this once small, and seldom used airport and turned it into a legitimate point of travel. With all this advancement it has been a point of destination for more than 3.2 million passengers in 2001. In addition, cargo shipping has become a growing factor at the Manchester airport as it is now ranked the third largest cargo airport in New England. A recent impact report has shown that the business related to the airport added 500 million in 1998 and is estimated at more than 1 billion annually by 2010. Factors such as convenience, ample parking, and greater customer service has created an airport that the citizens of Manchester can be proud of. I commend Kevin Dillion, airport director of Manchester for being named the Travel Person of the Year in 2001. The outstanding services available at Manchester will surely be a factor in the growth of the airport. This project has truly added to the appeal Manchester holds for all travelers. It is an honor and privilege representing the good people of Manchester.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to a pillar in the entrepreneurial community of New Hampshire. Mrs. Annalee Davis Thorndike, the creator and manufacturer of the collectible Annalee Dolls, passed away Sunday April 7, 2002, at the age of 87. The Annalee Mobilitee Dolls are considered some of the most famous manufactured items to come from New Hampshire in the 20th century. Beginning in 1930, Annalee and her husband took the first step in turning her dollmaking hobby into a business. Flourishing, the business reached a total of 250 to 300 employees in the Lakes Region. Displaying her dolls in the White House at times, Thorndike was awarded the ``Collectibles and Gift Industry Pioneer Award'' in 1997. Epitomizing the American spirit and following through with her dreams, Annalee's dolls will always be a proud part of the communities as the greatest collectible dolls to ever come from New Hampshire. Five years ago Thorndike stepped down from head of operations and turned the business over to her sons. New Hampshire is excited to see the Annalee Mobilitee Dolls continue to be manufactured in the same location they have been since 1955 when Annalee founded the company. Today a museum of dolls can be visited at the manufacturing site. A true spirit and friend of New Hampshire, Annalee David Thorndike will be sorely missed by all citizens of the great state. It is an honor and privilege to have represented Mrs. Annalee Davis Thorndike in the U.S. Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, today is a sad, sad day in America. It is a said day for the U.S. taxpayer and a sad day for the family farmers of our country. I believe the Wall Street Journal said it best when they editorialized, ``that great rooting, snooting noise you hear in the distance, is the sound of election-year, farm-state politics rolling out of the U.S. Congress.'' My colleagues know I stand for fiscal conservatism, so I don't imagine that many are surprised by my opposition to the farm bill 2002 conference report. But a ``no'' vote does not adequately describe my disappointment, my disgust, or my dismay at this, the largest non- military expansion of the Federal Government since the Great Society. House and Senate conferees approved a farm bill that expands payments to farmers by nearly $50 billion over the next decade. More than 90 percent of this increase will go to farmers producing just five crops: wheat, corn, rice, cotton and soybean. Two-thirds of this money will benefit a mere 10 percent of farmers. If the goal of the so-called Freedom to Farm Act of 1996 was to wean farmers off the trough of government assistance, this bill represents a bloating of agriculture's dependency on the taxpayer's dime. In these times of war and deficit spending, should we really be directing precious taxpayer dollars in such an irresponsible manner? I read an estimate that this legislation will cost the average American household $4,377 over the next 10 years, $1,805 in taxes and $2,572 in inflated food prices because of price supports. And for what, I ask? To prop up wealthy corporate farmers? To encourage farmers to continue overproducing unprofitable crops for which there is more supply than demand? To reinstate subsidies for honey, wool, and mohair? Even the one provision in the Senate-passed version of the bill that made it somewhat palatable, payment limitations, was gutted to the extent that it is no longer meaningful: the cap was raised and loopholes, the prized toy of our top legislators, included to make the one attempt at payment control utterly ineffective. What good is a payment limitation that can be completely circumvented? In response to some of the criticism that has been ladled on this pork-barrel monstrosity, Senators Harkin and Daschle point to the $17.1 billion included for conservation programs. I find it ironic that they continue to do so when environmentalists are critical and have pledged opposition to the bill. As the ranking Republican member of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, I have to say, at what price conservation? It is worth the total price tag? I think not. What the conservation title represents is a transparent attempt to buy votes from those States that do not benefit from the commodities title. I am supportive of the conservation programs this bill funds. My State of New Hampshire relies on these programs. But I will not fall for it. Why should New Hampshire taxpayers, or any taxpayers, be asked to foot the bill for encouraging farmers to get on the Federal dole when our goal should be to do just the opposite? This bill is a step backwards, as far as I am concerned, in agricultural policy. Our Chamber's two working farmers, Senators Lugar and Grassley, oppose its passage. I only hope that fiscal sanity will take hold of my colleagues and prevent this fat-laden conference report from ever reaching the President's desk.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, I rise today to pay tribute to my personal friend, former judge and United States Congressman, Louis Wyman, who passed away Sunday, May 6. Louis, who was 85, was involved in one of the closets races in United States Senate history. Louis left a lasting legacy. His legacy of country, state and family, will not soon be forgotten by those of us whose lives he touched so deeply. He was a loving husband, father and grandfather to his wife Virginia, his children Jo Ann and Louis II, and two grandchildren. Louis Wyman was elected to serve in the United States Congress from New Hampshire's 1st Congressional District in 1962. Louis served five terms in the House of Representatives before deciding to run for the Senate in 1974. In the closest race in Senate history, Louis won the seat by only 2 votes. He served briefly in the Senate, after which a special election was held and John Durkin was awarded the seat. In 1938 Louis graduated from the University of New Hampshire with honors and from Harvard University Law School, in 1941, cum laude. Louis was named attorney general of New Hampshire in 1953, and in 1957 was elected president of the National Association of Attorneys General. He returned to the State over the course of many years to practice law. Louis' impact on the State of New Hampshire will not be forgotten. He touched many lives over the years through his many judicial and political pursuits. Louis was instrumental in preventing the closure of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. Citizens of the Granite State were fortunate to have such invaluable aid. While serving on the sub-committee of defense, Louis was an effectual supporter in the development of the F-18 fighter jet and the AEGIS Missile. During this time, Louis was a leader in the early funding for the moon landing project. From the hallways of Capitol Hill to the law offices of New Hampshire, Louis Wyman touched many lives, and left his mark in U.S. Senate history. He will not be forgotten.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, I rise today to pay tribute to Mary Catherine Morin of Bedford. Mary was crowned this year's Miss New Hampshire and will compete for the Miss America title in September. I applaud the dedication that Mary has shown in her platform as Miss New Hampshire. Her focus on the elderly and dedication to their needs and concerns serves as a positive example for all Granite Staters. Starting in her days of Girl Scouting, Mary has been a advocate for Seniors. By volunteering at Harborside Healthcare in Bedford and serving on the public relations committee for the Manchester Area Committee on Aging, Mary has been a positive example to the community, adding to her already deep devotion to our senior citizens. Mary received her bachelors degree in Communications from the University of New Hampshire and now plans to pursue a Master's Degree in mass communication, with the ultimate goal of becoming a reporter for a major television network. Her experience at WMUR Channel 9 as well as working for Marie Claire magazine will certainly be an asset as she spends her year as Miss New Hampshire. I commend Mary on her achievement and wish her continued success in the coming year. New Hampshire will be represented at the Miss America pageant and her message will reach even more people. Her dedication to our Nation's seniors is exemplary and should serve as the benchmark for today's youth. It is an honor to represent you in the U.S. Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, I rise today to pay tribute to Joan Reische, this year's Families in Transition Volunteer of the Year. Joan has been a dedicated volunteer in the Manchester Community since the 1970's, proving time and again why she is so deserving of this year's award. Joan has spent countless hours volunteering and enriching the lives of those less fortunate. She has been extremely active in the Manchester Area League of Women Voters, serving as President of the Chapter. She has also been a member of the Board of the Manchester Historical District Commission, a member of the Board of the Palace Theater for Performing Arts, a member and President of the Manchester Area Family Planning Council and current chair of Families in Transition. Joan also serves as a guest reader for the Manchester Elementary Schools, working with children learning English as their second language. I applaud Joan's commitment to serving and improving her community. Her time spent volunteering is above and beyond any standards set forth by her fellow philanthropists. Joan serves as a positive example for all in the Granite State. I commend her dedication and wish her continued success in her endeavors. It is an honor to represent you in the U.S. Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, I rise today to pay tribute to Mr. David Haney of Bow. David was named New Hampshire's Business Financial Services Advocate of the Year by the Small Business Administration of the United States. David currently serves as the Regional Director of Community Development for Fleet Bank in Manchester, overseeing all community development activities in Maine and New Hampshire. I commend David on his commitment to improving New Hampshire's small businesses. His business expertise and consistent efforts to increase the availability, as well as the amount and quality of technical and financial assistance to the SBA of New Hampshire have earned him respect and gratitude among the businesses within the Granite State. David's efforts have been instrumental in securing a Business Information Center for the SBA in New Hampshire which allows businesses even greater access to credit and business information. David is credited with allowing the Granite State's small businesses continued access to information vital to the success of their organizations. I applaud David's commitment and wish him continued success in the future. It is an honor to represent you in the U.S. Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, I rise today to offer a long-overdue bill for the purpose of defunding terrorism by Yasser Arafat and his supporters, by shutting off their flow of dollars from the U.S. Treasury. It was the belief of the previous administration that Yasser Arafat and his Palestine Liberation Organization would live up to their renunciation of terrorism, and the newly-formed Palestinian Authority headed by Arafat and his PLO cronies could operate as a responsible governing body to further peace. Instead, Arafat, the PLO and the PA have used the guise of their new- found political legitimacy, and agreement to the Tenet peace plan, to mask their real desires. The reality of the situation is that the Palestinian Authority is joined at the hip with the PLO and other terrorist groups, such as Tanzim, the armed wing of Fatah, the largest faction of the PLO. Tanzim is headed by a member of the PA's legislature, and is believed to have developed an alliance with Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Our aid frees up other money the PA uses to pay for the bombs that are killing innocent men, women and children in Israel. The chart was compiled by my staff from a published list of each such attack last year. That list is 25 pages long. We dare not forget the level of terror visited upon Israel by Palestinian terrorists. The terror attacks in Israel in the year 2001 alone, from the first one on New Year's day, to the last one on December 12 are sobering: 79 separate incidents; 1220 injured; an additional 160 killed. It has been reported that on March 2, 1973, Yasser Arafat ordered the execution of Cleo Noel, the American Ambassador to the Sudan. Arafat and his supporters have since been tied to countless acts of terror and murder. Therefore, it is beyond belief that our country to this day provides the Palestinian Authority and related entities more than $75 million dollars every year. There have been foreign intelligence reports that Arafat has perhaps $10 billion stowed away, a small fortune. He doesn't ``need'' U.S. humanitarian aid. It is flat out wrong to ask American taxpayers to support and subsidize the PA when Yasser Arafat and the PLO have made no attempt to use the resources at their disposal to provide the most basic of humanitarian aid and services to their people. The interest alone from Arafat's bank account could lift countless Palestinians out of squalid conditions. Of course the opponents of my bill will argue that this is just ``humanitarian aid'' for Arafat-friendly NGO's, which begs the reality that those dollars free up Arafat's other money for him to then use to pay to manufacture bombs. We now have the proof, in Arafat's own handwriting, that the Palestinian Authority is still paying the terrorist's bills. Consider the proof, on the official letterhead of the Presidential Bureau of the Palestinian Authority, slash, Palestine Liberation Organization, bearing the signature of Yasser Arafat just 8 days after our country was attacked on 9-11, ordering $600 be paid from the treasury of the Palestinian Authority to each of three terrorists. Two of them are senior activists of the Fatah terrorist group, one of these, Ziad Da'as, is the head of the group behind a recent deadly terrorist attack on a Bat-mitzvah party in Israel. The Israeli Defense Ministry says they recently captured this document at Arafat's office in Ramallah. There is still more proof: an order for Yasser Arafat to the Finance Ministry of the Palestinian Authority from January 7 of this year. It was faxed from Fatah on January 20. Here, Arafat orders the disbursement of $350 to each of the 12 named Fatah activists. According to the Israeli Defense Ministry, who captured this document at Arafat's headquarters in Ramallah, each of these 12 individuals are known terrorists, belonging to Fatah and or Tanzim. Arafat's approval is given in response to a request of Ra'ed Karmi, then the head of the Fatah and Tanzim terror groups, which perpetrated numerous murderous attacks on innocent Israeli civilians since September 2000. As recently as April 7 of this year, Tim Russert on ``Meet the Press'' asked the Secretary of State to deny that Arafat is funding terrorism. Here is what Russert said: ``Israel says documents link Arafat and terrorism. They seized documents and made them public, which liked the office of Yasser Arafat with terrorist attacks carried out against Israeli civilians and other targets. One of the documents, said to be an invoice submitted by a leading Palestinian militant group to a Palestinian official.... Among other items, the invoice requested 20,000 Israeli Shekels, ($4,200 American), to buy electrical and chemical components for the production of a month's supply of 30 bombs. It's an invoice of terrorism, said Dori Gold, an advisor to Prime Minister Sharon. Mr. Secretary, do you believe the Palestinian Authority harbors or supports terrorism? Do you know what our Secretary of State replied? Did he deny the authenticity of this document? He did not. Did he deny that Arafat paid the bill? He did not. Did he deny that our taxpayer dollars are thus funding the killing of innocent men, women and children? He did not. What he said was, ``It is a complex situation''. There's nothing complex about it! Our tax dollars should never be used for terrorism. Period. End of discussion! I don't care if Arafat has agreed to negotiate. I don't care if Arafat has agreed to the Tenet plan. I don't care that we need to keep contacts with the Palestinians, we can do that anyway without subsidizing, and therefore legitimating, their activity. We should not be funding terrorism, and that is all there is to it The United States should not continue a policy which has utterly failed to curb the violence on the part of these radical Islamic terrorist groups that Arafat and the PLO have sway over. Furthermore, American taxpayers should not be fooled into footing a bill for ``humanitarian aid'' when Arafat and his regime have no desire in their hearts to co-exist peacefully with the State of Israel. When our land was so brutally attacked last fall, the President set a new agenda. He said, ``From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.'' Well, my colleagues, that is what Mr. Arafat and his minions are: a hostile regime. Even Secretary Powell, in that ``Meet the Press'' interview conceded as much. He said that the United States has never shrunk from the accusation that the Palestinian Authority supports and harbors terrorism. So why then, why are we taking tens of millions of dollars every year out of our taxpayer's pockets and sending it to the P.A. where it can be used to free up other money to build bombs that suicidal maniacs strap on themselves to blow up a cafe, or a schoolbus? The bill I am offering today will put an end to that. I say no more money should be sent to anyone that will use it in a way that frees up Arafat to pay his bomb-building bills. I say no more money that goes to de-stabilizing the powderkeg in the Middle East. I say no more money for Arafat's new intifada against Israel. My colleagues, I strongly urge you to stand with me on the side of Israel and against terrorism and to support this bill. I ask unanimous consent that the text of bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, I rise today to offer a long-overdue bill for the purpose of defunding terrorism by Yasser Arafat and his supporters, by shutting off their flow of dollars from the U.S. Treasury. It was the belief of the previous administration that Yasser Arafat and his Palestine Liberation Organization would live up to their renunciation of terrorism, and the newly-formed Palestinian Authority headed by Arafat and his PLO cronies could operate as a responsible governing body to further peace. Instead, Arafat, the PLO and the PA have used the guise of their new- found political legitimacy, and agreement to the Tenet peace plan, to mask their real desires. The reality of the situation is that the Palestinian Authority is joined at the hip with the PLO and other terrorist groups, such as Tanzim, the armed wing of Fatah, the largest faction of the PLO. Tanzim is headed by a member of the PA's legislature, and is believed to have developed an alliance with Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Our aid frees up other money the PA uses to pay for the bombs that are killing innocent men, women and children in Israel. The chart was compiled by my staff from a published list of each such attack last year. That list is 25 pages long. We dare not forget the level of terror visited upon Israel by Palestinian terrorists. The terror attacks in Israel in the year 2001 alone, from the first one on New Year's day, to the last one on December 12 are sobering: 79 separate incidents; 1220 injured; an additional 160 killed. It has been reported that on March 2, 1973, Yasser Arafat ordered the execution of Cleo Noel, the American Ambassador to the Sudan. Arafat and his supporters have since been tied to countless acts of terror and murder. Therefore, it is beyond belief that our country to this day provides the Palestinian Authority and related entities more than $75 million dollars every year. There have been foreign intelligence reports that Arafat has perhaps $10 billion stowed away, a small fortune. He doesn't ``need'' U.S. humanitarian aid. It is flat out wrong to ask American taxpayers to support and subsidize the PA when Yasser Arafat and the PLO have made no attempt to use the resources at their disposal to provide the most basic of humanitarian aid and services to their people. The interest alone from Arafat's bank account could lift countless Palestinians out of squalid conditions. Of course the opponents of my bill will argue that this is just ``humanitarian aid'' for Arafat-friendly NGO's, which begs the reality that those dollars free up Arafat's other money for him to then use to pay to manufacture bombs. We now have the proof, in Arafat's own handwriting, that the Palestinian Authority is still paying the terrorist's bills. Consider the proof, on the official letterhead of the Presidential Bureau of the Palestinian Authority, slash, Palestine Liberation Organization, bearing the signature of Yasser Arafat just 8 days after our country was attacked on 9-11, ordering $600 be paid from the treasury of the Palestinian Authority to each of three terrorists. Two of them are senior activists of the Fatah terrorist group, one of these, Ziad Da'as, is the head of the group behind a recent deadly terrorist attack on a Bat-mitzvah party in Israel. The Israeli Defense Ministry says they recently captured this document at Arafat's office in Ramallah. There is still more proof: an order for Yasser Arafat to the Finance Ministry of the Palestinian Authority from January 7 of this year. It was faxed from Fatah on January 20. Here, Arafat orders the disbursement of $350 to each of the 12 named Fatah activists. According to the Israeli Defense Ministry, who captured this document at Arafat's headquarters in Ramallah, each of these 12 individuals are known terrorists, belonging to Fatah and or Tanzim. Arafat's approval is given in response to a request of Ra'ed Karmi, then the head of the Fatah and Tanzim terror groups, which perpetrated numerous murderous attacks on innocent Israeli civilians since September 2000. As recently as April 7 of this year, Tim Russert on ``Meet the Press'' asked the Secretary of State to deny that Arafat is funding terrorism. Here is what Russert said: ``Israel says documents link Arafat and terrorism. They seized documents and made them public, which liked the office of Yasser Arafat with terrorist attacks carried out against Israeli civilians and other targets. One of the documents, said to be an invoice submitted by a leading Palestinian militant group to a Palestinian official.... Among other items, the invoice requested 20,000 Israeli Shekels, ($4,200 American), to buy electrical and chemical components for the production of a month's supply of 30 bombs. It's an invoice of terrorism, said Dori Gold, an advisor to Prime Minister Sharon. Mr. Secretary, do you believe the Palestinian Authority harbors or supports terrorism? Do you know what our Secretary of State replied? Did he deny the authenticity of this document? He did not. Did he deny that Arafat paid the bill? He did not. Did he deny that our taxpayer dollars are thus funding the killing of innocent men, women and children? He did not. What he said was, ``It is a complex situation''. There's nothing complex about it! Our tax dollars should never be used for terrorism. Period. End of discussion! I don't care if Arafat has agreed to negotiate. I don't care if Arafat has agreed to the Tenet plan. I don't care that we need to keep contacts with the Palestinians, we can do that anyway without subsidizing, and therefore legitimating, their activity. We should not be funding terrorism, and that is all there is to it The United States should not continue a policy which has utterly failed to curb the violence on the part of these radical Islamic terrorist groups that Arafat and the PLO have sway over. Furthermore, American taxpayers should not be fooled into footing a bill for ``humanitarian aid'' when Arafat and his regime have no desire in their hearts to co-exist peacefully with the State of Israel. When our land was so brutally attacked last fall, the President set a new agenda. He said, ``From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.'' Well, my colleagues, that is what Mr. Arafat and his minions are: a hostile regime. Even Secretary Powell, in that ``Meet the Press'' interview conceded as much. He said that the United States has never shrunk from the accusation that the Palestinian Authority supports and harbors terrorism. So why then, why are we taking tens of millions of dollars every year out of our taxpayer's pockets and sending it to the P.A. where it can be used to free up other money to build bombs that suicidal maniacs strap on themselves to blow up a cafe, or a schoolbus? The bill I am offering today will put an end to that. I say no more money should be sent to anyone that will use it in a way that frees up Arafat to pay his bomb-building bills. I say no more money that goes to de-stabilizing the powderkeg in the Middle East. I say no more money for Arafat's new intifada against Israel. My colleagues, I strongly urge you to stand with me on the side of Israel and against terrorism and to support this bill. I ask unanimous consent that the text of bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Madam President, the legislation I am introducing today addresses an important and serious subject in the ongoing war on terrorism. The attention of the world has been focused on the conflict in the Middle East between Israelis and Palestinians, and on the devastation wrought by suicide bombers. We are not focusing enough attention, however, on external factors which have significantly contributed to the escalated violence in the Middle East, and on how we can use our vast economic and diplomatic powers to effect changes, to end subsidies to terrorists, and to bring about peace in the Middle East. A good first step would be to cut off U.S. indirect aid to Yassir Arafat and the Palestinian Authority as a sign of our displeasure with their jihad, and with their wanton destruction on innocent Israeli civilians. Our aid legitimizes their terrorist activity and has not contributed to a lessening of the violence, but rather, the opposite. It sends very conflicted signals when we are fighting a global war on terrorism in the wake of 9/11, yet subsidizing Arafat, a known terrorist. We must also cut off aid because our limited taxdollars for foreign aid should only be directed towards the desperately needy. Arafat is known to have stashed away billions of dollars he earns from taxing Palestinians working in other Arab countries, and none of that vast personal wealth is being used to benefit his Palestinian constituency. I believe Arafat prefers that they live in deplorable conditions because misery contributes to strife, if Palestinians are deprived and impoverished, it is easier to entice then to throw stones, or to sacrifice themselves by becoming human bombs. Another important step we could take, which is the subject of my bill today, is to ask our allies in the Middle East to take meaningful measures to show that they are in solidarity with us in the war against terrorism. Specifically, I am asking the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to dissolve its martyrs fund. As President Bush said, after the terrorist attacks of last September 11, ``either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.'' Saudi Arabia needs to demonstrate that it is with us. Just a little over a decade ago, we deployed thousands of U.S. soldiers in the Gulf, to liberate Kuwait from Saddam Hussein's army, and to prevent Saddam Hussein from next invading the Saudi Kingdom, or any of our other allies in the region. The conflict was not protracted, but it was costly, and we lost nearly three hundred American soldiers in that war. We stood side by side with the Saudis in our determination to stop Iraqi aggression, to preserve the independence of Kuwait, and to protect ours and our allies' critical energy interests. Today, our aircraft transit the No Fly Zone from bases in Saudi Arabia, again in the mutual interest of keeping the Iraqi military in check and in preserving sovereign governments in the region. Newspaper reports claim that the Saudi ``martyrs'' fund is $50 million, other news sources claim it may be as high as $400 million. Writer Stephen Schwartz, April 8 Weekly Standard, asserts that the $400 million pledge last year for support of ``martyrs'' families was posted on the Saudi Embassy website. Schwartz figures that at $5300 per ``martyr,'' that works out to roughly 75,000 martyrs. The stated purpose of the fund is said to be for helping the widows and orphans of the martyrs, the martyrs whom we define as fanatical suicide bombers who have been wreaking havoc on Israeli citizens. This may sound innocent and humanitarian on the surface based on the Saudi concept of a martyr, but it is deceptive. In the April 1st issue of the Weekly Standard, an article by AEI fellow Reuel Marc Gerecht, a consistently excellent analyst, reports that: ``In near perfect harmony, the Arab world's rulers blamed Israel for the Palestinian suicide bombers, who are universally referred to in the Arab press as `shuhada', martyrs who die in battle against infidels.'' The reality is that this fund for ``shuhadas'' will entice and solicit more suicide bombers, giving them the assurance that their families will be provided for in their absence. Would we set up a fund to reward the families of domestic terrorists in this country who commit unlawful acts? Of course not! Yet the Saudis are pooling resources to reward, and indeed, to instigate these killings. There is a well-known expression in conservative circles, if you want more of something, subsidize it. Is there any doubt in anyone's mind that the martyrs' fund won't lead to the creation of more martyrs, and to the deaths of many more innocent civilians, not just in Israel, but in this country? Does the martyrs' fund exclude perpetrators of acts by these fanatics against Americans, or French or British, or is it only reserved for those who kill Israelis? These funds are seed money for terrorism, and it will reap a harvest of destruction, aimed at both Israel and at the United States. An Associated Press story from Cairo, Egypt, mentions that the Saudi Ambassador to Britain, a renowned poet, praised Palestinian suicide bombers in a London-based pan-Arab daily publication: May God be the witness that you are martyrs, You died to honor God's word. You committed suicide? We committed suicide by living like the dead.'' The Saudi Ambassador to London, apparently referring to Arab leaders who looked to the United States for help in ending the conflict, said, ``We complained to the idols of a White House whose heart is filled with darkness.'' This Saudi Ambassador and poet refers to the 18 year old female suicide bomber, Ayat Akhras, who detonated explosives she had fastened to her body at a Jerusalem supermarket, killing 2 Israelis and wounding another 25, ``Tell Ayat, the bride of loftiness . . . She embraced death with a smile while the leaders are running away from death. Doors of heaven are opened for her,'' he writes. In addition, the Saudis have been running a telethon to raise additional funds, but the Saudi Embassy in Washington is stating that the money will only be used for Palestinians ``victimized by Israeli terror and violence.'' The Saudis must also share in the blame for the catastrophic events of September 11th. Fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were Saudis. Bin Laden himself was a Saudi national, and contrary to the belief of some that violence is born of poverty or despair, bin Laden's family is notoriously wealthy. The Saudis eventually made bin Laden persona non grata, but they must acknowledge that these hijackers sprang from their society. The Saudis have been funding radical schools which are the breeding grounds for the fanaticism of bin Laden and his ilk, and for anti-American, and anti-Iraeli foment. In the international press, Saudi leaders were claiming that we had no proof that any of the hijackers were Saudi nationals! The Saudi Crown Prince recently presented a peace plan for the Middle East. Some suggested that it was a public relations diversion, intended to distract attention from the Saudi Government's responsibility for the events of 9/11. I would like to believe that that is not true--and that the Saudis also hope that Israelis and Palestinians can learn to live in peace, but the Saudi Government would have more credibility if, in conjunction with devising and offering a peace plan, it would also reconsider its generous funding of radical religious schools and charities, and would dissolve immediately its martyrs' fund. Those acts would do far more to assure Americans that the Saudis are truly on our side in the war on terrorism, and promoting ways to reduce violence, rather than straddling the fence and talking out of both sides of their mouth. We need solid allies in the war on terrorism. We do not need friends who say one thing and do another. We need deeds, not words. I urge the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to demonstrate its stated public commitment to fighting terrorism, and to stop subsidizing terrorists and would-be terrorists through its martyrs' fund. This is not an act of humanitarianism on the part of the Saudis, and it is not charity; it is aiding and abetting terror and should be recognized as such.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to Tarin Lafrance and her Nashua Senior High School AP government class. The class was chosen to represent the State of New Hampshire in the ``We the People . . .'' national competition. Nashua will compete against other States in analyzing and interpreting the Constitution of the United States as it applies in everyday life. As a former schoolteacher, I commend Tarin Lafrance and the entire class for their hard work in this competition. The students' dedication is evident as shown through their strong commitment to excellence in education. I applaud their efforts and innovative interpretations of the Constitution. In working to gain a better understanding of our democratic Republic, the class studied the historical background of the Constitution, the three branches of government, judicial review, the Bill of Rights, and the Constitution as it applies in today's society. So much of our Nation's history revolves around the Constitution, and more importantly, this document serves as the foundation of all our Government's decisions. Nashua's commitment to education is a positive example for the Granite State. I commend all members of the class and wish them continued success as they travel to Washington, DC, to showcase their presentation. Good luck to Julie dePointbriand, Beth Drolet, Jennifer Dube, Brendan Farrell, Kyle Gilbertson, Laurie Gorham, Ariella Green, Kelly Hogan, Jerry Hopkins, Sarah Janowitz, Zach Janowski, Michael Kiser, Candice LeCourt, Fariha Mahmud, Holly Masek, Jennifer McDonald, Lisa Minich, Linnea Sanderson, Lauren Schneider, Stephen Schuler, Katie Staab, and Heather Zimmerman. Go Panthers! It is an honor to represent you in the Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to Laurie L. Chandler, senior vice president of Fleet's Private Clients Group. Laurie has been named New Hampshire's Women in Business Advocate of the Year by the Small Business Administration of the United States. Laurie's 20 years of experience in the financial services industry have been indispensable to the women in New Hampshire's small business community. Along with serving her current position at Fleet, Laurie developed and administered the Women Building Wealth Program of Fleet. The program, which consists of monthly informal seminars for business women, has been crucial to those within New Hampshire. Laurie's time mentoring women has been above and beyond any call of duty. She has been credited with consistently going the extra mile for businesswomen to succeed and always extending herself within the business community. I commend Laurie for her continued dedication to the women in New Hampshire's business community. Her actions set a positive example for the Granite State. Her commitment and business savvy are well respected and admired amongst her peers and are exemplified by her position within the Fleet organization. I look forward to seeing more of Laurie Chandler within our business community and wish her continued success. It is an honor to represent you in the Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to Jerry Miller of Hampton. Jerry has been chosen as the New Hampshire Business Journalist of the Year by the Small Business Administration of the United States. Jerry serves as a correspondent for the Union Leader and New Hampshire Sunday News for the Portsmouth and Seacoast regions of the State. Jerry has worked tirelessly to report on New Hampshire's small businesses for the past 12 years, covering issues including Pease Air Force Base and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. His career has been long and distinguished in both print and broadcast journalism, reporting on hundreds of issues each year. His dedication to the readers of New Hampshire is evident in the stories he writes; I commend him on success. As Jerry so humbly stated, ``I have never tired of covering business in the Granite State, where the entrepreneurial spirit is alive and well. It's a spirit I've seen every day in the men and women who take the risks associated with businesses and job creation, so that they and others may enjoy their perceptions of the American dream.'' This further exemplifies why he was such a deserving candidate for this award. I applaud Jerry on receiving this award and wish him continued success in keeping New Hampshire well informed. His commitment to small business is a positive example for the State and I look forward to reading Jerry's next article. It is an honor to represent you in the Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to GT Equipment Technologies, Inc of Nashua, which has been chosen as New Hampshire's Small Business Exporter of the Year by the Small Business Administration of the United States. GTi began in 1994 as a two person home-based operation and has grown into an 80 employee firm with this year's projected annual sales of $30 million. As one of New Hampshire's great export success stories, GTi has gained national recognition and numerous business awards. In 1997 GTi was designated one of Entrepreneur Magazine's top 100 fastest growing companies, as well as the president and CEO Kedar P. Gupta being named Entrepreneur of the Year. Along with numerous entrepreneurial awards for both Kedar and the executive vice-president Jonathan A. Talbott, GTi received NASA's Commitment to Excellence award of 1998 and Deloitte & Touche's 2000 list of the top 50 fastest growing technology companies. I applaud the dedication and hard work that Jonathan and Kedar have shown in the rise of their company. They have set a positive example of the risk and reward associated with starting and owning a small business for the Granite State. As a former small business owner, I can appreciate the efforts required to have a successful business, and I wish GTi continued success in the coming years. As Jonathan so humbly stated, ``As a company we strive to meet and exceed the expectations of our customers, and that's the key to our success. This award is really our employees, for their hard work, dedication, and long hours.'' It is an honor to represent you in the Senate.

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire. Mr. President, I rise today to pay tribute to Laura L. Monica, New Hampshire's Small Business Person of the Year by the U.S. Small Business Administration. Laura is currently president and owner of the Bow based company, High Point Communications Group. I applaud Laura's determination and hard work in making High Point one of New Hampshire's successful small businesses. As a former small business owner, I understand the amount of energy that starting and running your own business requires. Laura started as a one woman team and has taken her company to a nine-person staff, with revenues exceeding $2.2 million. Laura followed her dream of changing and evolving the typical ``public relations'' model into a new strategic communications model designed specifically for businesses. By reaching out and taking risks, Laura was able to make her dream of innovative and creative strategic communications a reality. I commend her business savvy and exceptional work ethic in the field of public relations. She has brought High Point to a higher level of work productivity and created a company which is able to compete with corporations. I will continue to work hard to protect New Hampshire's small businesses as I am assured that Laura Monica will continue to work hard in putting High Point on the map. With High Point being named as one of the ``Top Ten Best Companies To Work for in New Hampshire'' by NH Business Magazine, we can be sure to see even more great things from Laura Monica and her team at High Point Communications. I wish her continued success in years to come, it is an honor to represent you in the Senate.