Robert Wexler

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, to get our economy growing again, we need policies that encourage investment and job creation, especially in high-technology industries like telecommunications. Just this past month, FCC Chairman Powell tried to encourage more facilities-based competition in the local exchange markets. That balanced approach, however, was abandoned in favor of keeping most of the old rules and regulations, despite predictions that it would discourage plant upgrades, new network installation, and new jobs. Surprisingly, the White House was silent when the plans of its own FCC chairman were sidelined. Mr. Speaker, the Clinton administration took a strong pro-growth, pro-jobs approach in the technology and telecom sector. The Bush administration, in contrast, seems wedded to an almost unchanging policy of benign neglect. I have over 50 facilities and 900 workers in my district that cannot tolerate this benign neglect. Under the present administration, America has lost $2 trillion in the telecommunication industry, computer investment has been erased, and 300,000 American technology workers have lost their jobs.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, for the past several years, Dr. Lyushun Shen has served as Deputy Representative of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (``TECRO'') here in Washington. TECRO is Taiwan's unofficial embassy in the United States and works to strengthen the already strong ties between the United States and Taiwan. Dr. Shen has been an important diplomat in TECRO's ongoing mission, and he has been a prominent participant in the ongoing dialogue between the United States Congress and the Taiwanese government. This is Dr. Shen's third posting in Washington, and, although he has developed a strong network of friends in Washington, the Taiwanese government has decided to name him as Director General of TECRO's office in Geneva, Switzerland. In his new position, Dr. Shen will work to enhance Taiwan's position with the many international organizations based there including the World Health Organization, which still does not count this vibrant democracy as a member, despite the strong endorsement of Congress. Mr. Speaker, those of us who have come to know Dr. Shen will miss our discussions with him and his passion commitment to U.S.-Taiwan relations. While we regret he will be leaving Washington shortly, we know that he will do an excellent job in Geneva, and we wish him continued success in the years ahead.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I share the hopes of Mr. Bereuter for a peaceful, just and lasting settlement to the long-standing Cyprus issue. Like many of my colleagues, I was disappointed that a comprehensive agreement to support the United Nation's proposal was not reached in March. We must not allow the recent setback to get in the way of future negotiations and a lasting settlement of this issue. I hope that both Greek and Turkish Cypriot leaders will renew their commitment to bridge the divide that separates their people. In this vein, I was very pleased to hear that Turkish Cypriot leader Mr. Denktas has taken positive steps to initiate a new process of dialogue and consultation. Last week, in a detailed letter to Greek Cypriot Leader Papadopoulos, Mr. Dentkas proposed lifting all overseas trade, transport, travel and cultural activities from or to both parts of Cyprus. He also expressed his willingness to meet with Mr. Papadopoulos to discuss the core issues of a comprehensive settlement. It is my understanding that Mr. Denktas' proposal was not accepted by the Greek Cypriots. I agree with the Greek Cypriot sentiment that talks should be concluded under the U.N. framework. However, I am hopeful that Mr. Denktas' letter can be a catalyst to restart dialogue and to achieve a comprehensive settlement. As for Turkey's role, which I know has been criticized by some in Washington and Europe, I am optimistic that Prime Minister Erdogan and his government are truly committed to a fair settlement on the issue. Mr. Erdogan has offered to bring Turkish and Greek Cypriots together ``with the three guarantor countries, Turkey, Greece and Britain.'' Furthermore, Mr. Erdogan and Foreign Minister Gul will be attending a Balkans summit in Belgrade this week, where they will meet with Greek leaders to discuss steps to resolve the Cyprus issue. Mr. Speaker, it is going to take an even greater commitment from the United States and the international community to a achieve lasting settlement of the Cyprus issue. I believe the debate we are engaged in today is a clear signal that Congress will remain firmly engaged on this issue, and that we are serious about achieving a comprehensive settlement that benefits both Greek and Turkish Cypriots as well as the entire region.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong opposition to this amendment which cuts the President's $1 billion request for wartime aid to Turkey. I too join in the commendation to the sponsor of the amendment for his patriotism and to the goodwill for those Members that support it. But with all due respect, and I was with the gentleman from Michigan in Turkey 2 weeks ago, the suggestion that Turkey, in the exercise of her democracy, is somehow responsible for putting American soldiers in harm's way I believe is a misplaced and inaccurate argument. We are not at war with Turkey. We are at war with Iraq. Do not transfer the atrocities of Iraq to the decisions of a longtime democratic ally. What is being discussed in the essence of this amendment, I would respectfully suggest, is a very short-term American memory; and if we really want to calculate what advantage the American men and women, the brave American men and women who are on the battlefield now have gotten or not gotten from Turkey, why are we not calculating the last 12 years where Turkey has provided the authority for American and British pilots to control northern Iraq and contain Saddam Hussein? One of the principal reasons why the disparity of power is so great and so much in our favor in the fight right now is because Turkey allowed the United States for the past 12 years to diminish the capacity of Saddam Hussein and diminish his atrocities; but there is no mention of that with respect to this amendment. Following September 11, Turkey demonstrated a steadfast commitment to aiding the United States by leading the international security assistance force in Afghanistan. Let us not underestimate that. When we were attacked in New York, in Washington, in Pennsylvania, when it was our blood that was being spilled and when our forces left Afghanistan, whom did we hand it over to? We handed it over to a willing Turkey, a country that is almost 100 percent made up of Muslim citizens; and they took our battle and they took it willingly. And to suggest that because they exercised their democracy, even though we may be disappointed by the decision, that they are somehow responsible for the letting of American blood I do not believe is the message that the United States should ever suggest to an ally like Turkey. We are fighting in Iraq to destroy Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, but I also thought we were fighting to liberate the Iraqi people, to help them install a democracy. So what is the message? That the United States is their friend if they are a democracy only when they decide in agreement with what we believe? Is there no room for allies in the midst of a hot debate, in the midst of competing interests to have honest discussions, and do there have to be catastrophic consequences if a country disagrees? If I were an ally of the United States today, the message that I would get from this amendment is they are only as good as long as they agree 100 percent, but if they spill their blood with the United States for 6 decades like Turkish soldiers have done shoulder to shoulder with American soldiers, if they spill their blood for 6 decades, but they exercise their democracy and come up with a differing result, then the United States says all bets are off. We are better than that. We are better as a people, and we owe it to our soldiers that are fighting now to defeat this amendment.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, as the ranking Democrat on the Europe Subcommittee, I believe my colleagues in Congress will be interested in the following letter sent by the Turkish Cypriot Leader Rauf Denktas to the Greek Cypriot Leader Tassas Papadopoulos on April 2, 2003. I am hopeful that Mr. Denktas's letter and its content will be a catalyst for renewed dialogue between Greek and Turkish Cypriots and a positive step toward a comprehensive resolution to their long-standing issues. In this letter, Mr. Denktas provides a detailed proposal to lift all overseas trade, transport, travel and cultural activities from both parts of Cyprus. He calls for freedom of movement to be facilitated between the two sides and restrictions on the movement of tourists to be lifted as well. His measures also include allowing Greek Cypriot refugees to return to the Greek Cypriot sector of Famagusta. Finally, Mr. Denktas expressed his willingness to meet with Mr. Papadopoulos to discuss the core issues of a comprehensive settlement with the objective of reaching an agreement between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. While I understand that the long-standing Cyprus issue cannot be solved without great sacrifice by both sides, it is incredibly important that the United States and the international community work together to resolve this issue. Please know, I remain firmly committed to helping both Greek and Turkish Cypriots overcome obstacles and bring about a lasting peace for future generations. April 2, 2003. Dear Mr. Papadopoulos: Since our return from the Netherlands on 11 March 2003, I have been trying to reassess in depth the negotiating process resulting in the stalemate at The Hague. Based on our re-evaluation and the responses given to the UN Secretary-General's proposals by both sides, I am now convinced more than ever that we have for too long overlooked the significance of the socio-psychological dimension of the problem, and especially the deep crisis of confidence between the two sides. The Turkish Cypriot side sincerely wishes a lasting settlement to the forty year-old question of Cyprus. In achieving a sustainable and viable settlement that would be acceptable to both sides, the first meaningful step should, without doubt, be the improvement of the political environment within which we could allow for the evolution of a working relationship between the two sides through the building up of trust and confidence. This would enable us to resolve pending issues, thus preparing the ground for a comprehensive settlement. The island is, no doubt, the common home of the two co-owner peoples in Cyprus. In this context, I wish to share with you the following ideas and suggestions which I believe could initiate a process of dialogue and consultation leading to a working relationship between us. This would greatly enhance the prospects for and paved the way to a mutually acceptable comprehensive settlement based on the political equality of the two sides and bring tangible benefits to both parties. (i) As a first step, the fenced area of Varosha south of Dhimoktrathias street, including the area extending to the UN Buffer Zone, will be transferred to the Greek Cypriot control to be opened for resettlement. (ii) Parallel to this, all restrictions on overseas trade, transport, travel and cultural and sportive activities from or to both parts of Cyprus will be lifted. I am convinced that Turkey and Greece will also positively respond to this by removing the restrictions which they apply to the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot sides respectively. We shall invite the UN and EU to acknowledge and give effect to these arrangements. (iii) The freedom of movement will be facilitated between the two sides, subject only to minimal procedures. The restrictions on the movement of tourists will also be lifted. (iv) Steps will be taken gradually for the normalization of the flow of goods between the two parties on the island. Cooperation shall be also encouraged between the institutions of both sides to identify and develop joint projects. (v) The Turkish Cypriot side will lift the measures regarding the movement of UNFICYP of July 2000. (vi) A bilateral Reconciliation Committee will be established with the objective of promoting understanding, tolerance and mutual respect between the two parties. This Committee will make specific recommendations for promoting bilateral contacts and projects. These ideas and suggestions constitute a package and should be regarded as an integrated whole. The acceptance and implementation of this package will neither prejudice our respective positions, nor will it be a substitute to a final settlement. I am prepared to discuss with you the above points and their modalities with the aim of initiating a cooperative relationship. In doing this, we could benefit from the assistance of the UN and the EU. These measures, I believe, would bring about a positive climate to the island and to our region. On the understanding of the above, I am also ready to talk with you the core issues of the comprehensive settlement and matters related to EU membership with the objective of reaching a mutually satisfactory conclusion. As we both supported the good- offices mission, I am taking the liberty of sending a copy of this letter to the UN Secretary-General. Sincerely, Rauf R. Denktas.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume, and I rise in strong support of this resolution. Mr. Speaker, I want to commend our colleague, the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Smith) for bringing this bill to the floor today and for his effort in drafting this legislation. He has been a champion of human rights issues, and this bill today is just the most recent example of his leadership. In 1986, the Congress adopted the Northern Ireland Peace and Reconciliation Support Act, legislation establishing the International Fund for Ireland. This legislation today seeks to revitalize this critically important program, and it is most appropriate that we do so. When the original International Fund for Ireland was established, Northern Ireland suffered from serious unemployment and economic stagnation. The purpose of the fund was to encourage economic development and cooperation between the Catholic and the Protestant communities in economically deprived areas of Northern Ireland. I am delighted that it has contributed to the economic success and growth in that area. The economic stimulus that the fund sought is less necessary today than it was when this program was created. The Good Friday Agreement of 1998, in which then-U.S. President Bill Clinton played a key role, marked an important step forward in reconciliation in Northern Ireland. We have seen progress in reducing violence, although we have not achieved the full peace that all of us seek. The changes to this legislation we are considering today will permit this program to continue to expend resources for projects and conflict resolution for the critical support of human rights training for police and for programs to foster peaceful mediation in neighborhoods where conflict still exists. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Chairman, I find it deeply troubling that as this country prepares for war and unites in support for our troops, the House Republicans would push forward a deeply partisan, environmentally destructive budget, hoping that a nation focused on war abroad will not notice this domestic attack. This outrageous budget cuts more from crucial environmental programs than even the President's proposals. Without bothering to explain where these cuts will come from, House Republicans slashed more than 10 percent for the 2004 environmental funding, over 3 billion dollars. Incredibly, these cuts continue through the next ten years, providing for less than minimally required to maintain the existing levels of enforcement and environmental protections Americans rely on to protect our health and natural world. Perhaps most deplorably, this proposed budget dictates our nation's environmental policy for the near future. It is a back-door way to open one of America's most precious wilderness areas to oil drilling. My Republican colleagues claim that this budget is `silent' about oil drilling in the Arctic. If this budget is silent, it is certainly not neutral. The $1.1 billion cut over 10 years will all but force the federal government to use income from oil drilling in ANWR to reconcile deep funding cuts to balance their budget. While Secretary Norton may think that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is ``an area of flat, white nothingness,'' my constituents understand that the Refuge is an unique, irreplaceable coastal plain and home to more than 100 specifes of wildlife and birds whose habitat would be undeniably devastated by this reckless drilling. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is a gem of the national wildlife system, created over one hundred years ago by Teddy Roosevelt, and the area of proposed drilling, Area 1002, is the ecological heart of the refuge. Slipping ANWR `silently' into this budget is dishonorable procedure and dangerous environmental policy. I urge my colleagues to oppose this handout to big oil companies and to support the Spratt substitute, which will protect an invaluable American treasure.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 5. I do so because the proponents of this bill would have the country believe that the issue before this Congress is whether or not there is a medical malpractice crisis in America. There is a medical malpractice crisis, but the issue before this Congress is how do we resolve that crisis? How do we minimize the premiums that doctors have to pay in order to participate in our medical society? The reason we are in this position, according to a recently released report, particularly as it relates to my State, the State of Florida, by the group Public Citizen, is that a small number of negligent doctors and the cyclical nature of the insurance industry are largely to blame. The Public Citizen report found that 6 percent of all doctors are responsible for one-half, 50 percent, of all medical malpractice cases. Six percent of doctors are responsible for 50 percent of malpractice cases. Yet the bill before this Congress does not at all address peer review of physicians, nor does it address the insurance aspect of the medical malpractice crisis, nor, most importantly, does it require insurance companies to pass on the savings from the alleged cap that would occur, pass that money on to doctors in the form of lower premiums. In the State of Florida, which amounts to about 16 million people, in the last reported year there were 230 cases of awards in excess of $250,000, yet the proponents of this bill would argue that we will resolve this problem by limiting the excessive number of lawsuits that amount to excessive damages. They do not exist, these lawsuits, in the excessive number that they claim.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding to me. It is with a heavy heart that I rise today to honor an outstanding visionary leader, former Member of Congress, and dear friend, Wayne Owens. Today is a sad day in the Middle East and here in our own country, not only because violence and terror continue unabated, but also because one of the greatest believers and promoters of peace in the Middle East has passed. That man was Wayne Owens. It is with profound respect, admiration, and sadness that I wish to pay tribute to him today. In my tenure as a Member of Congress I have traveled with Wayne to the Middle East on numerous occasions, witnessing firsthand his remarkable ability to bridge the gap between international leaders and promote dialogue, understanding and accord. Wayne was the quintessential peacemaker because he never wavered in his steadfast dedication and commitment to the future of the Middle East. His expertise on this issue was the focus of his professional life, from his years in the House of Representatives, to his time as the President and driving force behind the Center for Middle East peace. Wayne's unique efforts promoted understanding and communication in a time of great uncertainty and despair in the Middle East. At a time when hostility, hatred and terror permeated current events, Wayne would travel to the epicenter of the conflict to encourage diplomacy and peace. At a time when no one could envision a resolution to the most contentious issues in the Middle East, Wayne consistently offered creative answers and an optimistic spin. At a time when doors began to close in the region, Wayne dedicated the end of his life to opening the channels of peace, bringing American ideals to the region, and offering a glimmer of hope to leaders and people in the Middle East. Wayne Owens was a truly remarkable man who leaves behind a legacy of compassion, leadership and hope. Wayne was a beautiful soul, an extremely kind man who loved his family and cherished life dearly. I wish to convey my deepest condolences to his wife Marlene and the rest of Wayne's family and offer my wholehearted sympathy at this most difficult time. Wayne's contributions to history will be forever remembered as will his unyielding dream of harmony and peace. Wayne, you will be missed by those who care for you, and I consider myself one that thinks of you like a brother, an older brother, a very dear person and we will all miss you very, very much.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California for yielding me this time. Mr. Speaker, now is the moment which Congress must act to defend freedom, confront a brutal dictator and rid the world of his increasingly devastating threat. Our decision will not be easy or without consequence. It will pose severe implications for the stability of the world, the security of the Middle East and, ultimately, the future of the United States. It will alter the course of history, change the lives of millions, and resonate in the collective memory of America for generations to come. It is in this regard that I have contemplated this issue with great deliberation, taking into account the concerns of my constituents in South Florida, many of whom fought in World War II and Korea, who have, time and again, expressed their profound reservation concerning the President's rush to engage in military action in Iraq. I will vote for this resolution because it has become painstakingly clear that Saddam Hussein represents the epicenter of hostility and conflict throughout the entire Middle East. His very presence threatens to undermine America's war against terror and compromise all prospects for regional security, stability, and peace. There is no doubt in my mind it is long past time for Saddam to go. I will vote for this resolution, not because I support the irresponsible manner and timing in which President Bush has proceeded with his plans for war, not because I support the President's attempt to handcuff Congress into granting a blank check for unilateral military action, and not because I accept the President's shameful neglect of our spiraling economic crisis and other domestic issues of imminent concern. Homeland security and foreign policy threats must be addressed in conjunction with, not instead of, America's economic and social needs. I will vote for this resolution because I believe, without a doubt, that the threats posed by the current Iraqi regime supersede politics and that America and our allies would be undeniably safer without Saddam Hussein. Since the Gulf War, the threats posed by Saddam Hussein have not dissipated. They have only increased, making it all the more clear that former President Bush should have ousted him when we had the chance in 1991. Since then, Saddam has cultivated his contempt for the international community, his hostility towards the United States, his intent to develop weapons of mass destruction, and his unbridled willingness to use them. While I agree that we must disarm Iraq and oust Saddam Hussein, I share the deep misgivings of the American people that President Bush appears all too ready to accept the military, financial, and diplomatic burden of going it alone. Unilateralism is a grave mistake, and President Bush must make every attempt to build support in the international community for regime change in Iraq. We must give the U.N. and the international community a credible chance to fulfill the demands laid out by President Bush. This would place America and the world in the strongest possible position to disarm Iraq, oust Saddam Hussein, and liberate the Iraqi people from tyranny and oppression. Ultimately, we will best achieve our goals in Iraq not through alienation and unilateral aggression but, rather, through determined diplomacy and partnership with nations that share our vision of stability and peace. This has been America's legacy, and we owe it to future generations to proceed along this path. Mr. President, you will get your resolution and with my support, but I implore you to exhaust all options and reserve war as the very last resort. Mr. President, my constituents are terrified that you are leading America into war with unnecessary impulse and haste. I trust you will prove them wrong. Announcement by the Speaker Pro Tempore

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, last week we witnessed an historic event in the long-standing relationship between the United States and our ally Taiwan. On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, the First Lady of Taiwan Chen Wu-Sue-jen addressed a bipartisan gathering of Members of Congress to express her heartfelt support for U.S.-Taiwan relations and a common commitment to freedom, democracy and human rights. I have included a copy of the First Lady's speech to be entered into the Congressional Record. As a strong proponent our nations' unbreakable bond with Taiwan, I want to thank Madame Chen Wu for her statement in support of the American people and our war against international terror. All Americans greatly appreciate President and Mrs. Chen's heartfelt message of unity and solidarity with our nation in our greatest time of need. Additionally, I want to express my admiration for Mrs. Chen Wu, whose undeniable courage in the face of adversity has helped create a future filled with prosperity and hope for her people. As Co-chairman of the Congressional Taiwan Caucus, I am hopeful that we can build on Madame Chen Wu's visit, which will only serve to enhance and strengthen U.S.-Taiwan relations and cooperation. Friends indeed (By Madam Chen Wu, Sue-jen) Honorable Members of Congress, the best friends of Taiwan: It is a most honorable and warm moment for me to be able to come to the Capitol Hill, in the capacity as the First Lady of Taiwan, to meet so many good friends in the U.S. Congress. Standing here, I feel a strong sense of affinity and goodwill. Although my husband cannot come with me on this trip, you should know that after 27 years of marriage, what I say here today should not be objectionable to him! What I mean is my husband cherishes my opinions. If he were coming here to give a speech in person, he would certainly consult me beforehand and put my ideas into his remarks. You might think that I am joking, but don't forget, when I was elected a Legislator in 1986, President was my legislative assistant, and I was his boss! The first thing I would like to say is that the friendship between Taiwan and U.S. is very strong and everlasting. The fact that I am here to see you in the Congress is a sure sign of this. Indeed, in Taiwan there are countless government officials, university professors, and high-tech professionals who received higher education in the U.S. They brought home not only advanced knowledge and skills, but also the American values of democracy, freedom and human rights. Thus these values stimulated not only our economic advancement, but also our democratization. In 1979 this great democratic institution passed the Taiwan Relations Act, which explicitly affirms that the U.S. will help Taiwan defend itself and expresses the American concern for Taiwan's commercial development and human rights. The Act even states that “the preservation and enhancement of the human rights of all the people on Taiwan are hereby reaffirmed as objectives of the United States.” Thanks to such support, we are able to enjoy such remarkable political and economic achievements today, and it is easy to understand why the Taiwan people deeply appreciate the U.S. standing here in the Congress, which represents all the American people and their democratic system, I would like to say thank you to all of you from the bottom of my heart. Through our political reforms over the past years, Taiwan has become a democratic country that fully embraces the values of freedom and human rights. As a result of the 2000 presidential election, Taiwan undertook the unprecedented challenge of the first democratic transition of power in its history. Now we are proud to say that Taiwan is a genuine, consolidated democracy. This undeniable fact will enable Taiwan to sail stably into the future on the sea of democracy. Today you can hear all kinds of opinions in Taiwan, and sometimes the controversies seem quite serious. However, if you ask the Taiwan people whether they would like to go back to the old days when the freedoms of speech and ideas were deprived of, I don't think you will get a single positive answer. Simply put, the concept of democracy and freedom upheld by the Taiwan government today is: “Even though I don't agree you, I swear to protect your freedom of speech.” Out of that spirit, political leaders such as President Chen and Vice President Lu, even though they previously suffered as political prisoners, hold no grudges or hatred. Likewise, some people might think that a person like me confined to a wheelchair should be angry about the past. But, on the contrary, we are all filled with joy at Taiwan's democratic achievements. In fact, because of our opportunity to help bring about Taiwan's democracy, the little sacrifice we made became a reward in itself. Many political scientists wonder why Taiwan was able to experience the democratic process more peacefully and smoothly than many other countries in the “third wave” democratization. I think the main reason is that the current political leaders have the magnanimity to sow the seeds of love in the place of hatred. People in Taiwan believe in the universal values of freedom, democracy, and human rights. Taiwan's security is more enhanced than before as a result of its progress in democratization. It is also for the same reason that we have so many good friends in the United States of America. And not only here, but also in other democracies; for example, the European Parliament recently passed a resolution expressing strong support for Taiwan. The beautiful smile of democracy is indeed the best protector of Taiwan's security. A basic mission of Taiwan's democratic government is to handle cross- Strait issues with a responsible attitude as well as to participate in international affairs in ever more positives ways. A year ago, the American people suffered the terrible attacks of September 11. The Taiwan people felt the same shock and sadness. Since this tragedy, Taiwan has tried hard to cooperate with the United States and the International community to play an active role, for example through exchanges of anti-terrorism intelligence and efforts to counter money laundering. Taiwan's government has also cooperated intensively with nongovernmental organizations to provide humanitarian assistance to the innocent people of Afghanistan, to cultivate love and hope in the devastated Afghan mountains. We will continue to work with the international community to help Afghanistan and enable the Afghan people to put disaster behind them and rebuild their sense of hope. On the anniversary of September 11, the Taiwanese people continued to feel sorrow for the attacks. Two weeks ago, President Chen called together all our top government officials to review Taiwan's actions in combating terrorism. He also delivered an anti-terrorism declaration reaffirming his support to the American-led global coalition against terrorism. Taiwan is a true friend of America. We stand with America now and we will stand with America forever! Although my husband is not able to visit you this time, I bring his greetings to you. It will be my pleasure to bring your goodwill back to President Chen, to the government and to the people of Taiwan. Thank you, my dear friends. Thank you!

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, we are here at this somber occasion to recognize September 11 as a moment in history when American heroism and patriotism prevailed over terror, adversity, and hate. This resolution pays tribute to those families personally affected by the tragic events of September 11 and honors the innocent victims of these horrific attacks. Today America is united, drawn together by overwhelming grief, a shared commitment to freedom and unwavering resolve. Our unity as a Nation sends an unequivocal message that despite the tragic events of September 11, the American spirit remains strong, that in the face of destruction and hate, democracy, justice, and hope will prevail. September 11 demonstrated that in a moment of unparalleled adversity and devastation, there exists an innate desire of Americans to help others that is unimaginably selfless and good. Never was this more clear than 1 year ago today in New York and Washington where hundreds of the world's bravest and finest, including firemen, policemen, and first responders rushed to assist the victims of these tragic attacks; or above Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where passengers on Flight 93 actually took a vote, a vote, to sacrifice their own lives to preserve those of others and prevent a potential assault on the very Chamber in which we now stand. The vote on Flight 93 to overtake the hijackers epitomizes American values, courage, and heroism at their very best. For in a moment of unprecedented darkness and despair these brave souls refused to sit idly by and bear witness to evil. They chose to take action after evoking the most basic American right and fundamental symbol of democracy that all of us hold dear. As we commemorate the tragic events of September 11 and honor the victims lost in New York, Washington, and aboard Flight 93, we must remember the extraordinary acts of heroism that took place one year ago today. From Washington to every community across the United States, may we derive strength and courage from the bravery demonstrated on September 11 and commit ourselves to a future free from terror, intolerance and hate to one of understanding, freedom and, above all, peace.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Chairman, will the gentleman yield?

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Chairman, I rise to thank the chairman of the subcommittee, the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Istook), and especially the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer), my friend and ranking member, for their work on this issue, as well as the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw), for his leadership as we continue this debate. Let me reiterate how important it is for the Federal Government to take an active role in finding a solution to the cleanup of the anthrax contamination at the American Media, Inc. building and what it means to the people of South Florida and the rest of the Nation. I want to make clear that this is not our first attempt at requesting Federal assistance for this cleanup. Shortly after the October 1, 2001 anthrax attack on the AMI building in Boca Raton, Florida's governor, Jeb Bush, wrote to the Federal Emergency Management Agency asking for disaster assistance to help the State deal with the biological attack and the cleanup effort. The members of the Florida congressional delegation followed with a letter to FEMA, but the request was turned down. We must not forget that this incident in Florida was the first biological attack in the United States. Although the anthrax attack on the AMI building occurred before the anthrax attacks here in the U.S. Capitol, the AMI building is yet to be decontaminated. Now, 9 months later, a potentially treacherous health hazard continues to threaten the people of South Florida. We are now in the middle of hurricane season, and one can only imagine the potential for harm that exists each and every day that the AMI building remains contaminated. Let us not forget that this attack killed Mr. Bob Stevens and severely sickened another person. Every American that is victimized by a terrorist attack should have confidence that the Federal Government will come to their aid. Right now, the people of South Florida do not have that assurance. Again, I would like to thank the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Istook), the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Hoyer), and the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Shaw), and I hope that we will be able to reach a positive resolution to this public health problem.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, this week I will travel to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to meet with Crown Prince Abdullah and other Saudi officials for the third time since the horrific terrorist attacks of September 11. As a result of my previous visits, I have become convinced that it is in the best interest of the United States to remain actively engaged in a constructive dialogue and working partnership with Saudi officials and their leader Crown Prince Abdullah. My initial reaction to traveling thousands of miles to the Saudi Kingdom, in early October 2001, where 15 out of 19 hijackers as well as Osama bin Laden hailed from, was negative. I saw little value in traveling to a region where even in the wake of over 3,000 American deaths, there remained an undeniable hatred of America, continued financial support for fervent extremism, and ties to terrorist organizations that threaten our nation's interest and security. However, I have changed my initial reluctance to engage Saudi Arabia, though not my objection to many of its policies, because Saudi Arabia lies not only at the heart of the problem facing the United States in the Middle East and the Islamic world, but they are also our best hope for resolving these same problems. My meetings with Crown Prince Abdullah in Riyadh and Jeddah have been candid and frank discussions regarding many aspects of U.S.-Saudi bilateral relations. No subject has been taboo. The Crown Prince and I both voiced criticism of each others country's policies, but we also reiterated the longstanding friendship and alliance between America and Saudi Arabia and our many common interests and goals. The Crown Prince impresses me as a man with a vision of peace and coexistence between Israelis and Arabs; moreover, he is willing to risk his personal prestige for a quest for peace. The Crown Prince is a practical and logical man. He is tested and knows the value of leadership. I am convinced that the Crown Prince senses an historic opportunity to build confidence and seek peace from the extraordinary tragedies of the last 20 months and appreciates this opportunity to lead the Arab world away from extreme radicalism and toward normalizing relations with Israel. My optimism is checked, however, by a recurrent fundamental failure by Saudi Arabia to appreciate the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from an Israeli perspective and to recognize the sense of vulnerability of the Israeli people. In fact, the Crown Prince often suggests that American policy in the Middle East is unbalanced and too favorable to Israel. Ironically, it is the Saudi policy toward Israel that too often lacks objectivity. Since September 11, there has been much criticism of the Saudi government in our country and internationally. Much of the criticism is justified, and I have joined my colleagues in Congress in voicing my concerns and objections when I deemed it necessary and in the best interest of the nation. I have been a vocal critic of harmful policies carried out by the Saudi government or Saudi nationals, including their lack of democracy, freedom of the press and abominable treatment of women. I have also strongly condemned Saudi connections to the financing and support of international terrorist organizations, unwillingness to unequivocally condemn suicide bombings perpetrated by Palestinian terrorists, financial payoffs to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers, and their financial backing of extremist schools in Pakistan and around the world that preach intolerance and hate. Like many Americans, I am also angered and disturbed by the virulent anti-American and anti-Semitic rhetoric that is published in the government-run press and echoed repeatedly by Saudis throughout the kingdom. The Saudi government cannot have it both ways; if they are truly committed to peaceful coexistence with Israel, they cannot feed the fires of those who hate and are bent on the destruction of the peace process and the State of Israel itself. Faced with growing American and international criticism, Crown Prince Abdullah has reevaluated the effect of Saudi policies and is seeking to make fundamental changes in the Saudi Kingdom. Since assuming leadership in 1995, Crown Prince Abdullah has taken initial steps to reform Saudi Arabia's economic and political structure and is making serious attempts to root out corruption. The Crown Prince is also the leading advocate for Saudi Arabia's obtaining membership in the World Trade Organization, WTO. I strongly support this effort and believe that WTO membership would lead to greater accountability and transparency in the Saudi Kingdom and, more importantly, would connect Saudis to the global economy. Most important of all, Crown Prince Abdullah brought Saudi Arabia into the international spotlight last February by initiating a proposal that offers Arab normalization of relations with the State of Israel, if Israel returns to the pre-1967 borders. While the Saudi plan maybe viewed by some as a non-starter, an initial position for negotiations, or even worse a public relations ploy, it should not be altogether ignored or minimized. This initiative is a significant signal that Crown Prince Abdullah will be an active participant in the elusive peace process and may be the most progressive step toward Arab-Israeli reconciliation taken by any Arab leader since Egyptian President Anwar al-Sadat traveled to Jerusalem and King Hussein of Jordan signed a peace treaty with Israel in 1994. Unfortunately, during Camp David II in 2000, too many Arab leaders remained on the sidelines while a comprehensive peace proposal was being circulated. Crown Prince Abdullah seems to recognize the lost opportunity that occurred during Camp David II, and in a promising sign he clearly stated to me his intention to be actively involved in any new effort for a comprehensive peace agreement. The United States would be ill-advised to disengage from Saudi Arabia or its leader. As the heart and soul of the Muslim world, Saudi Arabia is home to Islam's two holiest places, Mecca and Medina. It is the Muslim world and, in particular, Arab states that the United States must actively engage in dialogue to promote educational reform, greater religious freedom, democracy, freedom of the press and expanded rights for women. We need to press the Saudi government, especially Crown Prince Abdullah who has significant weight in the Arab and Islamic world, to address religious freedom and human rights. At the same time, we must seek the advice and assistance of prominent Saudis to help America strengthen and improve our standing in the Muslim world. It would be short-sighted to ignore the perceptions and beliefs of more than one billion people. Saudi Arabia is also integral to our policy of containing and eventually removing Saddam Hussein from power. Saudi cooperation with the U.S. and other allies in enforcing Operation Southern Watch over Southern Iraq has been considerable. During my visit to Saudi Arabia this week, I will reiterate that Iraq repeatedly fails to comply with United Nations (UN) resolutions, continues to block unfettered UN weapons inspections, is stockpiling weapons of mass destruction, harbors and supports terrorists, and poses a grave threat to the security of the United States and every nation in the region. It is critical to the United States that Crown Prince Abdullah and Saudi Arabia assist the Bush Administration in building a coalition of support to remove the threat of Saddam Hussein to the region. My visit to Saudi Arabia is also another opportunity to send a message from the American people to the Saudi government and its citizens that the United States intends on continuing our engagement and partnership with their country; however, I would be remiss if I ignored the continued presence and activity of dangerous extremists in the Saudi Kingdom and the danger they pose to America and our allies. Ultimately, the future of U.S.-Saudi relations hinge on the efforts of Saudi leaders to root out extremist elements within the kingdom and choke off all financial support emanating from the kingdom to terrorist organizations around the world. As for Saudi Arabia's leading role in the Middle East, it is incumbent on Crown Prince Abdullah and other Arab leaders to help reform the Palestinian leadership, as outlined by President Bush on June 24, 2002, from one based on corruption, incitement, terror and suicide bombings to one based on democracy, peace and constructive dialogue. This will be the major thrust of my conversations with the Crown Prince this Sunday in Jeddah. It is important to note that Crown Prince Abdullah and other Saudi officials have already played a constructive role in the reform effort by assisting the Palestinians in writing a new constitution. Without concerted international pressure, there will be no genuine reform of the Palestinian leadership and, I fear, no end to suicide bombings. These terrorist acts must end if we are to reach a comprehensive and lasting regional peace based on security, recognition for Israel, and statehood for the Palestinians. Indeed, the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people to have a nation of their own will be destroyed unless there is a change of attitude among those in the Arab and Muslim worlds who encourage and provide moral, financial and material support to so-called martyrs who commit these heinous, inhuman and immoral terrorist acts. As a strong supporter of an unbreakable bond between the United States and Israel, I care deeply about the future security and prosperity of the Jewish homeland. In meetings with Saudi leaders, I will remind them of the unprecedented terrorism the Israeli people have faced over the past 20 months and the tragic toll that suicide bombers have inflicted on innocent Israelis. It is also imperative they understand that like America, Israel has the right to defend herself against these barbaric attacks and that the United States will stand in solidarity with Israel during this difficult time. Mr. Speaker, if we are to avert another tragedy like September 11 and defeat the scourge of terrorism, America needs allies--we cannot do it alone. I am going to Saudi Arabia because more effective cooperation and understanding between our two countries is fundamental to winning the international war on terrorism, and members of Congress must play more than just a consenting role in that effort.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, prescription drug coverage has long been a top priority for a majority of Americans, and as a result, both George Bush and Al Gore pledged during the 2000 Presidential campaign to provide seniors with a comprehensive prescription drug plan and finally put an end to the prescription drug crisis in America. The House Republican leadership avoided this issue for as long as they could, but the day of reckoning arrived, and when it was time for both sides to ante up, the Republicans offered nothing but a sham. Now here we are, preparing to vote on what the Republicans say is a plan that will help seniors pay for prescription drugs. But before we do, I want all my colleagues to know what is really on the table. Quite simply, the Republican prescription drug plan is a disgrace; it is nothing more than a half-hearted attempt to deliver on an empty promise and provide themselves with election year cover. This will not bring the rising costs of prescription drugs down, it has significant gaps in coverage, and where it does provide coverage, it relies completely on unreliable HMOs and insurance companies to provide it. The Republican plan will get us nowhere and will leave too many seniors with nothing at all. As we look at the Republican proposal, it is clear that while the needs of so many are being neglected, the wants of an influential few are being met. The Democratic prescription drug bill we have offered will provide real, meaningful, affordable, prescription drug coverage under Medicare. It will allocate $800 billion to ensure that all seniors can afford coverage. There will be no gaps in coverage, and nobody will be force to join an HMO. But regrettably, we can't even debate this bill today. While that is a shame in and of itself, the real tragedy is that we must choose between a horrible bill or no bill at all. But maybe that is what Republicans--who have been raking in campaign contributions from the insurance industry and the pharmaceutical companies who are the only true beneficiaries of the Republican bill-- wanted all along. The bill that I am sponsoring will be affordable for all seniors, will cover any prescription regardless of the brand, and not just cover those on the insurance companies' formularies. Our prescription drug plan will provide seniors substantial savings by using the government's bargaining power to obtain the best prices for Medicare, as currently done for Medicaid and the Veterans Administration. The Republican plan, in contrast, relies on the insurance industry and HMOs to provide the already scant coverage that it offers. The Republicans have disguised their shallow attempt to pay back the pharmaceutical companies and insurance industry for millions in campaign contributions under the title of Medicare Modernization. The real name for this bill should be the Insurance and Pharmaceutical Industry Payback Act. The criticism that has been offered by Republicans regarding the Democratic bill is that it is unrealistic. That is their argument, simply because they know that the Democratic bill interferes with their $1.3 trillion tax cut. And to add insult to injury, Republicans continue to push for additional billions in tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, which is more than enough to pay for the more generous Democratic plan. It is shameful that while Republicans pander to the narrow interests they serve, seniors continue to wait for a real solution to the prescription drug crisis.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, since September 11, our newspapers and airwaves have been filled with stories about heroes and ordinary men and women who have performed courageously in times of great peril. We are night to celebrate them and to acknowledge their heroism. On Monday, May 20, 2002, an extraordinary film was shown in the U.S. Capitol to Members of Congress and their staffers that celebrates heroes of the past. The film, ``Desperate Hours,'' chronicles the heroic efforts of World War II Turkish diplomats who saved hundreds of Jewish people from almost certain death by providing them with the documentation and support necessary to leave Nazi-occupied Europe and enter Turkey safely. This dramatic hour-long documentary included interviews with Turkish officials who intervened on behalf of the threatened Turkish Jewish community in Europe and those individuals that received the help of these brave diplomats. In their own words, these incredible individuals who survived Nazi persecution continue to tell a moving and uplifting tale of their struggle for freedom and the selfless acts of assistance they received from Turkish diplomats. Mr. Speaker, it is extremely important that we acknowledge the heroes of today, However, it is equally important that we acknowledge and remember individuals like those Turkish diplomats who had the greatest respect for human life and dignity and acted as heroes during a period of great darkness. The movie ``Desperate Hours'' justly recognizes the heroism of these brave individuals who saved the lives of thousand of Turkish Jews.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I would like to pay tribute to the Foundation Fighting Blindness for their incessant efforts toward finding a cure for macular degeneration and all retinal degenerative diseases. The Foundation provides funding for over 155 research studies at 55 prominent institutions, and since its inception in 1971, the Foundation has raised over $160 million. Macular degeneration causes progressive loss of central vision and is the leading cause of blindness in people older than 55 years. Approximately 6 million Americans, including one million Floridians, of every age and race suffer vision loss from retinal degenerative diseases. An additional 15 million Americans have pre-symptomatic signs of macular degeneration. By recognizing the symptoms and problems associated with macular degeneration, individuals can be tested early and receive treatment for this disabling disease. Macular degeneration, which is believed to be caused by a combination of genetic or environmental factors, can be devastating for those diagnosed late. The loss of vision cannot be reversed, leaving its victims handicapped. These individuals usually suffer from depression at the thought of losing their independence. Because of the toll this takes on the lives of so many seniors, I call on Congress to provide additional research funding to the National Eye Institute to help cure this disabling disease. Many local communities and some state governments have passed proclamations calling for May 1, 2002 to be designated ``Cure Macular Degeneration Day.'' Therefore, I find this day fitting to bring attention to this important issue and to urge prompt action to find a cure.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, the United States must stand in solidarity with Israel during this devastating time. Hundreds of Israelis have been murdered by Palestinian terrorists; and make no mistake, Yasir Arafat is directly responsible. The stark reality is that Arafat is no longer even remotely a partner in peace. Just the opposite. Arafat has eviscerated the promise he made at Oslo to renounce the use of violence against Israel. Just as we as Americans defend ourselves against terror, Israelis have the right, the obligation, to defend themselves against terror. It is unacceptable to condemn both Israel and Arafat simultaneously, as if there was any moral equivalency in their actions. This Congress must never rationalize or explain away acts of terror. What should be the message from Washington to Israel is, Mr. Sharon, defend your people, destroy the infrastructure of terror, and know that America stands with you.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 1542. H.R. 1542 presents an opportunity to take a major step toward bringing affordable high-speed Internet service to all Americans, toward reviving the high- tech industry, and toward constructing multiple broadband networks to assure communications in times of national crisis. I support Tauzin-Dingell because it represents the kind of economic stimulus package that America's workers truly need. A recent report issued by Robert Crandall and Charles Jackson indicates that accelerated deployment of broadband Internet service would infuse $500 billion a year into the American economy. The New Millennium Research Council finds that building a nationwide broadband network will contribute to the creation of 1.2 million new and permanent jobs in America. Mr. Chairman, it is time for Congress to seize this opportunity to revive our Nation's economy through business investment without cost to the government.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate the people of the Republic of Kazakstan who celebrated their tenth year of independence as a nation on October 25, 2001. This important occasion highlights Kazakstan's economic, political, and cultural growth over the past decade. In light of the many difficulties facing the people of Kazakstan following the collapse of the Soviet Union, this resourceful nation of over fourteen million people has persevered by overcoming numerous obstacles to emerge as one of Central Asia's most dynamic nations. As the people of Kazakstan continue the process of building their nation on the foundation of democracy and economic liberalization, they should know that the United States will be there to assist them in their efforts. Following the barbaric attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the government of Kazakstan immediately offered its unconditional assistance to the United States in our fight against the international scourge of terrorism. Their heartfelt support for the American people in our greatest time of need has only served to strengthen United States-Kazakstan relations. The future success of a democratic and free Republic of Kazakstan will directly benefit the United States by helping to create stability and increased prosperity in the Central Asian region. Many of the nefarious international terrorist organizations, like al Qaeda, that seek to inflict harm on the United States and our allies are also trying to destabilize Central Asian nations like Kazakstan. The United States and the international community must not miss this opportunity to assist Kazakstan as she takes courageous steps to build a democratic society with an open market economy in a region of the world that is rife with terrorism and discord. Fortunately, Kazakstan has brought much needed stability to the region. As a moderate and tolerant Muslim nation, Kazakstan, has already joined like-minded nations in Central Asia and the Middle East in opposing the use of Islam for terrorist purposes. As Kazakstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev said on October 24th before the eighth session of the Assembly of the Peoples of Kazakstan, ``In the current situation, it is more important to separate Islam from terrorism. The terrorists whatever slogans they use have nothing in common with Islam, its basic commandments, including non-violence, justice, tolerance and equity.'' Mr. Speaker, I wish the people and government of the Republic of Kazakstan the best success as they build on their impressive accomplishments of the past decade. As a Member of the House International Relations Committee, I join many Americans in celebrating the tenth year of Kazakstan's independence and look forward to increased cooperation and relations with this emerging Central Asian nation.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I would like to extend my sincere congratulation to the people and Government of the Republic of Turkey as they celebrate the seventy-eighth anniversary of the founding of their nation by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk on October 29th. This celebration is an important opportunity to highlight the incredible accomplishments of one of the world's most dynamic nations. I know I speak for many Members of Congress and the American people in extending our wishes for the continued strength and success of the Republic of Turkey. Over the past seventy-eight years, Turkey has emerged as the secular and modern democracy that Kemal Ataturk envisioned in 1923. Turkey has proven that democracy and Islam are compatible concepts and that freedom and tolerance are universal ideals that should be embraced by all peace-loving nations. As Turkish President Sezer said in a speech commemorating the foundation of the Republic of Turkey on Sunday, ``The Republic which was founded as a result of Great Leader Mustafa Kemal Ataturk's foresight after our nation won its War of Independence is an idea of enlightenment and modernization.'' As America faces her toughest test both domestically and internationally since World War II, it is reassuring to know that we have the unconditional and unequivocal support of the Republic of Turkey in our counter-terrorism efforts. Turkey's support and sympathy for the American people following the September 11th attacks are testament to the strength of our nations relations and our common commitment to democracy and freedom. As Turkey celebrates her national day, it is important for the United States to recommit to strengthening our strategic partnership with our NATO ally. As Co-Chairman of the Caucus on U.S. Turkish Relations and Turkish Americans, I believe that we would be remiss if we did not mention the significant contributions of the Turkish American community to our nation. This growing and increasingly important American community has enjoyed unparallel success at every level of American society and in every profession. As American ambassadors of Turkish culture and history, they are without a doubt the Republic of Turkey's greatest asset in the United States and have enriched America. Mr. Speaker, as the people of the Republic of Turkey celebrate their nation's seventy-eighth anniversity, I know that they will continue to build on the political, economic, and cultural success envisioned by one of the twentieth century's greatest leaders, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. Again, I congratulate the government and people of the Republic of Turkey as they celebrate the founding of their nation.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased that a provision earlier included in money laundering legislation, which would have inhibited RICO liability for foreign excise taxes for tobacco companies, has been dropped from the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, the final version of comprehensive anti-terrorism legislation. The sections of the final version of this bill which expand the definition of Specified Unlawful Activities for Money Laundering are a crucial component of the USA PATRIOT Act. We all know that in order to crush terrorism in all its forms, it will be necessary for us to put an end to the money laundering which is essential to the financing of terrorists' networks. In order for our legislation to be effective, our laws against money laundering must have the widest possible scope. Just as criminals continually are finding new and creative ways to subvert and circumvent our laws, our laws must be broad enough and flexible enough to allow our courts to fight against money laundering in any form we find it. In response to United States requests, many of our allies, including the European Community and its Member States have strengthened their money laundering laws in a cooperative effort to battle money laundering and terrorism. It is our intent to recognize and assist the efforts of our allies in our joint effort to fight fraud and money laundering wherever and in whatever form we find it. If our allies are victimized by fraud, smuggling or money laundering emanating from U.S. soil, they should have the benefit of U.S. laws and U.S. courts to combat those offenses. The expanded definition of Specified Unlawful Activities will ensure that money laundering associated with crimes or fraud committed against our allies shall constitute violations of U.S. law thereby giving the United States and our allies the maximum capability to utilize U.S. laws to combat the money laundering. Just as the United States has always recognized the fundamental right of friendly nations to have access to our courts to enforce their rights, we shall continue to give our full cooperation to our allies in their efforts to combat smuggling and money laundering, including access to our courts and the unimpeded benefit of our criminal and civil laws.

Mr. WEXLER

Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, it is an honor and privilege for me to join President Chen Shui-bian and the people of the Republic of China in celebrating National Day on October 10, 2001. This important occasion highlights the growth and emergence of Taiwan's democracy as well as its dynamic economy. Over the past fifty years, Taiwan has undergone tremendous political, economic and social changes. As the first democracy in thousands of years of Chinese history, Taiwan has become a model for other emerging democracies around the world to emulate. Taiwan has also emerged as an economic powerhouse. Despite Taiwan's small size and lack of physical resources it has become the world's 17th largest economy, 15th largest trading nation, 8th largest investor and 3rd largest holder of foreign exchange. Taiwan plays an essential role in the global economy and is a major economic partner of the United States. Over the past decade, a robust bilateral trade relationship between Taiwan and the United States has mutually benefitted both nations. Last year, bilateral trade between our two nations topped $64.8 billion and it continues to grow. I would like to congratulate President Chen Shui-bian who has passionately advocated Taiwan's strong commitment to democracy, human rights, and increased global economic cooperation. Please know that I join many of my colleagues in the United States Congress in supporting your government effort to seek readmission to the United Nations and other international organizations. I strongly believe that Taiwan deserves a seat in all international fora and a prominent place on the world stage. I also want to thank President Chen and the people of Taiwan who have heeded President Bush's call to join the international community in a counter-terrorism coalition following the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. President Chen's government has graciously pledged all of Taiwan's resources in helping the United States fight the terrible scourge of terrorism. President Chen's pledge of unequivocal support for our nation during these difficult times is a testament to the historically close relationship between the United States and Taiwan. Again, I want to wish the people and government of Taiwan the very best as they celebrate Taiwan's National Day.